PDA

View Full Version : Jambos Legal Challenge



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 11:59 AM
Ruling at 2.00pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lU4ke34dKWo

Andy74
03-07-2020, 12:01 PM
Can you not dial in for it still?

Yes you should be able to.

Since452
03-07-2020, 12:05 PM
Wonder where the meltdown will be. Here or Kickback.

FilipinoHibs
03-07-2020, 12:06 PM
Jambo's closing argument was "We are here now lets just get on with this"

Sounded like Boris let's get Brexit done.

Judge to give oral ruling 2:00 pm did not expect that !

Don't want to pre-empt anything but would indicate pretty clear cut. Back to SFA. Game over.

Heisenberg
03-07-2020, 12:08 PM
Wonder where the meltdown will be. Here or Kickback.

I’m not sure it’d really warrant a meltdown on here if it goes to a full trial. Doesn’t mean it won’t happen right enough 😂

Sammy7nil
03-07-2020, 12:08 PM
Wonder where the meltdown will be. Here or Kickback.

Whatever way it goes the celebrations will be too much. The loser will declare a long way still to go ect :greengrin

KeithTheHibby
03-07-2020, 12:09 PM
Don't want to pre-empt anything but would indicate pretty clear cut. Back to SFA. Game over.

If that is the case what happens next?

matty_f
03-07-2020, 12:09 PM
I’m not sure it’d really warrant a meltdown on here if it goes to a full trial. Doesn’t mean it won’t happen right enough 😂

Yeah nothing really changes if it goes to a full hearing.

Certainly nothing you have a meltdown about.

Sammy7nil
03-07-2020, 12:10 PM
Don't want to pre-empt anything but would indicate pretty clear cut. Back to SFA. Game over.

Ha they will be saying exact opposite on KB

Sammy7nil
03-07-2020, 12:11 PM
If that is the case what happens next?

Moves to SFA arbitration in around 10 days time

matty_f
03-07-2020, 12:12 PM
If that is the case what happens next?

A panel will decide on what should have happened, I guess.

Stuart93
03-07-2020, 12:12 PM
Ha they will be saying exact opposite on KB

Aye but whatever way this goes they’ll claim it as a victory. That’s what they’ve done from the start of this.

Whether a decision has went for or against them they’ve weirdly claimed it as a victory. Some were glad recon didn’t happen so they could go to court.

Joe6-2
03-07-2020, 12:12 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lU4ke34dKWo

Ha ha
Great song too!

WhileTheChief..
03-07-2020, 12:13 PM
If Hearts lose I can laugh, if not it’s just a shrug of the shoulders and meh. No meltdown here at all.

If you’re a Hearts fan on the other hand, there is no win today. You’re just delaying losing. Again.

PatHead
03-07-2020, 12:13 PM
Ha they will be saying exact opposite on KB

Right enough. That will be why hearts are desperate for it to go to court.

Sure they will tell us it is what they wanted all along. Wee bit Trump spin.

It's the hope that kills them.

KeithTheHibby
03-07-2020, 12:14 PM
Moves to SFA arbitration in around 10 days time

Which by then the fixtures will be out and we will be around 2 weeks from the start of the season. What a shambles.

Keith_M
03-07-2020, 12:15 PM
So, some Old Duffer is going to deliberate over lunch and a few Sherries, get the waiter to toss a coin, and tell us the result at 2PM?

Exciting stuff.

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 12:15 PM
What are the possible outcomes?

1) Judge throws it out completely

2) Judge says it should go to arbitration

3) Judge says it should proceed to court

4) Judge tells Steve Fulton he's still ugly?

FilipinoHibs
03-07-2020, 12:16 PM
Aye but whatever way this goes they’ll claim it as a victory. That’s what they’ve done from the start of this.

Whether a decision has went for or against them they’ve weirdly claimed it as a victory. Some were glad recon didn’t happen so they could go to court.

They will win the SFA hearing if not the CAS. Lose that then European Court of Human Rights. Then on to the United Nations. By that time next season will be over and they will be promoted and claim victory.

Pete
03-07-2020, 12:17 PM
Is there anyone else out there who doesn't have the faintest clue about what's going on?

Are we going to have a screaming man in handcuffs being taken away after this or what?

Billy Whizz
03-07-2020, 12:17 PM
Is there anyone else out there who doesn't have the faintest clue about what's going on?

Are we going to have a screaming man in handcuffs being taken away after this or what?

Or a woman

Stuart93
03-07-2020, 12:20 PM
Anyone who’s been listening got any idea what way it could go?

seanshow
03-07-2020, 12:21 PM
So, some Old Duffer is going to deliberate over lunch and a few Sherries, get the waiter to toss a coin, and tell us the result at 2PM?

Exciting stuff.



Perhaps spin the bottle...... of Chateau Lafite

scoopyboy
03-07-2020, 12:22 PM
What's the best possible news Hearts could get?

Could the judge reinstate them to the top division?

Could the judge award them compensation?

If the answer to those two questions is no then they have nothing to celebrate, or is that an over simplification?

04Sauzee
03-07-2020, 12:22 PM
What are the possible outcomes?

1) Judge throws it out completely

2) Judge says it should go to arbitration

3) Judge says it should proceed to court

4) Judge tells Steve Fulton he's still ugly?

Is 1 an option keep hearing 2 or 3 are the only possibilities?

Sammy7nil
03-07-2020, 12:22 PM
Aye but whatever way this goes they’ll claim it as a victory. That’s what they’ve done from the start of this.

Whether a decision has went for or against them they’ve weirdly claimed it as a victory. Some were glad recon didn’t happen so they could go to court.

Over on KB they are doing this for all of Scottish football and they are Fiercely proud of their club :tee hee::tee hee::tee hee::spammy:

Since452
03-07-2020, 12:23 PM
Hearts fans seem to think they're winning this

ancient hibee
03-07-2020, 12:24 PM
No court has the authority to order the SPFL which clubs should play a n which league.

Sammy7nil
03-07-2020, 12:25 PM
Anyone who’s been listening got any idea what way it could go?

I would say no one knows however the speed of the decision may suggest he would not want to be setting a president and well refer this to arbitration. However that is just a guess.

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 12:26 PM
Is 1 an option keep hearing 2 or 3 are the only possibilities?

That's why I was asking - has he the authority just to dismiss the whole thing?

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 12:27 PM
What's the best possible news Hearts could get?

Could the judge reinstate them to the top division?

Could the judge award them compensation?

If the answer to those two questions is no then they have nothing to celebrate, or is that an over simplification?

That isn't being decided today.

The judge can either refer it back to the SFA for arbitration. Or he can chuck it out completely. Or he can decide its best to deal with it in court.

I've listened to most of it and have no idea what way it will go :greengrin

Stuart93
03-07-2020, 12:29 PM
Hearts fans seem to think they're winning this

Of course they do.

They were winning league reconstruction as well mind? And if not it was being pushed through?

They’ve spoke so much nonsense on JKB I can’t fathom why anyone would go on there for info on this.

Also worth pointing out there nothing to be won today

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 12:30 PM
That's why I was asking - has he the authority just to dismiss the whole thing?

I was under the impression thats what the SPFL lawyer was arguing for but having listened to most of it, it seemed more like they were pushing for arbitration.

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 12:30 PM
That isn't being decided today.

The judge can either refer it back to the SFA for arbitration. Or he can chuck it out completely. Or he can decide its best to deal with it in court.

I've listened to most of it and have no idea what way it will go :greengrin

So he can chuck it out completely? Here's hoping - would that means the Jumbos would be liable for costs?

Ozyhibby
03-07-2020, 12:31 PM
What's the best possible news Hearts could get?

Could the judge reinstate them to the top division?

Could the judge award them compensation?

If the answer to those two questions is no then they have nothing to celebrate, or is that an over simplification?

I honestly think that the best they can hope for is the judge sends it back to the SFA and Hearts decide not to pursue it. They can claim to their more mental fans that it’s pointless because they won’t get a fair hearing and they done their best.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Caversham Green
03-07-2020, 12:31 PM
What's the best possible news Hearts could get?

Could the judge reinstate them to the top division?

Could the judge award them compensation?

If the answer to those two questions is no then they have nothing to celebrate, or is that an over simplification?

The answer to the first question is that the judge could say it will be heard in the Court of Session (costing everyone a lot more money).

The answer to the other three questions is 'No'.

weecounty hibby
03-07-2020, 12:32 PM
Hearts fans seem to think they're winning this

They also thought they had won the league in October 2018! They are fuds. No one really has any idea how this will go. Loads of different opinions. Except in the cult of jambos kickedoot if course where there is no dissenting voices

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 12:32 PM
I'm not sure of the process, anyone know if there can be an appeal to the decision today whatever way it goes?

Brightside
03-07-2020, 12:33 PM
Based on the minutes (from JKB) it would be hard for the Judge to rule for anything but Arbitration.

Del Boy
03-07-2020, 12:33 PM
I was under the impression thats what the SPFL lawyer was arguing for but having listened to most of it, it seemed more like they were pushing for arbitration.


I think the Dundee Utd QC was asking for it to be thrown out completely, SPFL say should go to SFA, Hearts want it to go to court

if it goes to court it will be take place in two weeks time, anyone think an out of court settlement will be reached before then? Ie compensation or reconstruction

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 12:34 PM
I think the Dundee Utd QC was asking for it to be thrown out completely, SPFL say should go to SFA, Hearts want it to go to court

if it goes to court it will be take place in two weeks time, anyone think an out of court settlement will be reached before then? Ie compensation or reconstruction

Thanks. I got it the wrong way round :greengrin

Since452
03-07-2020, 12:34 PM
Based on the minutes (from JKB) it would be hard for the Judge to rule for anything but Arbitration.

Would that be a good or bad thing for Hearts?

RoYO!
03-07-2020, 12:34 PM
What are the possible outcomes?

1) Judge throws it out completely

2) Judge says it should go to arbitration

3) Judge says it should proceed to court

4) Judge tells Steve Fulton he's still ugly?

Does the judge have the authority to book Stevie Fulton for said offence?

weecounty hibby
03-07-2020, 12:35 PM
I think the Dundee Utd QC was asking for it to be thrown out completely, SPFL say should go to SFA, Hearts want it to go to court

if it goes to court it will be take place in two weeks time, anyone think an out of court settlement will be reached before then? Ie compensation or reconstruction
Reconstruction won't happen, there is no appetite for it from anyone except those that it will benefit. It would need to go to yet another vote and could drag in for weeks again. Not happening

Stuart93
03-07-2020, 12:35 PM
I honestly think that the best they can hope for is the judge sends it back to the SFA and Hearts decide not to pursue it. They can claim to their more mental fans that it’s pointless because they won’t get a fair hearing and they done their best.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh yes that’ll feed right into their victim mentality

007 Mickey Weir
03-07-2020, 12:36 PM
How will court differ from today?

Brightside
03-07-2020, 12:36 PM
I think the Dundee Utd QC was asking for it to be thrown out completely, SPFL say should go to SFA, Hearts want it to go to court

if it goes to court it will be take place in two weeks time, anyone think an out of court settlement will be reached before then? Ie compensation or reconstruction

If it was to go to court I would hope the SFA would then expel Hearts from Scottish Football. Its only fair.

weecounty hibby
03-07-2020, 12:36 PM
If it was to go to court I would hope the SFA would then expel Hearts from Scottish Football. Its only fair.
Hear hear. I nominate you for SPFL lead council if that happens

Pete
03-07-2020, 12:38 PM
The judge was overheard moaning about how they couldn't go to the Toby carvery for lunch.

That's it, we're screwed.

scoopyboy
03-07-2020, 12:41 PM
The answer to the first question is that the judge could say it will be heard in the Court of Session (costing everyone a lot more money).

The answer to the other three questions is 'No'.

Thanks CG.

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 12:41 PM
The judge was overheard moaning about how they couldn't go to the Toby carvery for lunch.

That's it, we're screwed.

I certainly hope the Judge is gonna carve up some yams

Forza Fred
03-07-2020, 12:41 PM
Decision being handed down at 2pm

Andy74
03-07-2020, 12:42 PM
How will court differ from today?

It would actually get into the detail of the petition itself and whether the clubs have a case. This was just 3 days of arguing about whether it should go to arbitration or court. The merits of the facts were only touched upon to give context as to the practicalities of where it goes next.

The Dundee vote was mentioned a few times. The SPFL this time elaborated on the fact that all the noise didn't matter as a written resolution only required support or not within the 28 days.

This is the sort of thing that would actually get debated at court.

The second aspect of this morning was about documents. Hearts and Partick amongst other things were looking for all sorts of documents to prove that clubs had made investments since knowing they were to be promoted. The respondents are saying that they will be commercially sensitive - Hearts taking the Utd manager was noted as showing there was a direct competitive aspect.

Since452
03-07-2020, 12:42 PM
So I'm guessing anything other than it going to open court is bad for Hearts? Even then they could have their SFA license revoked?

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 12:43 PM
Bugger, it`s a foregone conclusion:


Saughton Jambo
Squad Member
Saughton Jambo
Paid Member_10

1,865 posts
Donor
Report post
Posted 25 minutes ago
Our lucks going to change today. Is it too early to predict my bet. Hearts to finish top 4 in the premiership and qualify for Europe next season Hope you didn’t throw they betting slips away in anger

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 12:44 PM
Bugger, it`s a foregone conclusion:


Saughton Jambo
Squad Member
Saughton Jambo
Paid Member_10

1,865 posts
Donor
Report post
Posted 25 minutes ago
Our lucks going to change today. Is it too early to predict my bet. Hearts to finish top 4 in the premiership and qualify for Europe next season Hope you didn’t throw they betting slips away in anger

Thats gotta be an undercover agent

Andymac85
03-07-2020, 12:45 PM
Maybe I’m just being pessimistic, but I think this is going to go for them. If it does go to court though, what are they actually hoping for at that stage? The court can’t force reconstruction. Perhaps they could declare the vote to end the season void. If so, I’d fully expect the SPFL to just arrange another vote. Therefore is the only realistic outcome if Hearts win today a negotiation around damages?

Pete
03-07-2020, 12:45 PM
I certainly hope the Judge is gonna carve up some yams

Hope so.

FFS hurry up, Judge Rinder deals with stuff like this in a grand total of ten minutes!

Andy74
03-07-2020, 12:46 PM
So I'm guessing anything other than it going to open court is bad for Hearts? Even then they could have their SPFL license revoked?

They will lose in court anyway so no real bad outcome from today either way.

The SPFL lawyer did confirm again that something for the judge to think about was that if they were allowed to go to court then putting the clubs out of business by the disciplinary action that would follow was a possible consequence.

hibeerealist
03-07-2020, 12:46 PM
That's why I was asking - has he the authority just to dismiss the whole thing?

Yes Lord Clark can dismiss if that is what he decides.

Listened to most of the proceedings today and if I was a betting man...................Dismissed!

Andy74
03-07-2020, 12:47 PM
Maybe I’m just being pessimistic, but I think this is going to go for them. If it does go to court though, what are they actually hoping for at that stage? The court can’t force reconstruction. Perhaps they could declare the vote to end the season void. If so, I’d fully expect the SPFL to just arrange another vote. Therefore is the only realistic outcome if Hearts win today a negotiation around damages?

The court is limited to what Hearts asked for - stopping promotion and relegation or otherwise compensating the relegated clubs.

Ronniekirk
03-07-2020, 12:48 PM
Ronnie, it's 'on tenterhooks', not 'on tender hooks'!


:grr:


I would prefer hanging a few I know up on Meat Hooks with there nonsense just now
But I accept my reprimand Ma Laud


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

scoopyboy
03-07-2020, 12:49 PM
Bugger, it`s a foregone conclusion:


Saughton Jambo
Squad Member
Saughton Jambo
Paid Member_10

1,865 posts
Donor
Report post
Posted 25 minutes ago
Our lucks going to change today. Is it too early to predict my bet. Hearts to finish top 4 in the premiership and qualify for Europe next season Hope you didn’t throw they betting slips away in anger

Did he say if we finished third? :greengrin

Andymac85
03-07-2020, 12:50 PM
The court is limited to what Hearts asked for - stopping promotion and relegation or otherwise compensating the relegated clubs.

Stopping promotion and relegation would cause complete uproar and they would be shooting themselves in the foot indefinitely. Not to mention the fact that it would prove their whole ‘nobody should lose out in this’ to be total bluster.

FilipinoHibs
03-07-2020, 12:54 PM
Thats gotta be an undercover agent

No genuine Jambo. Dean's mouth piece on KickBack.

Springbank
03-07-2020, 12:54 PM
Does the judge have the authority to book Stevie Fulton for said offence?

Yes, citing precedent...

Tug Wilson
03-07-2020, 12:55 PM
Bugger, it`s a foregone conclusion:


Saughton Jambo
Squad Member
Saughton Jambo
Paid Member_10

1,865 posts
Donor
Report post
Posted 25 minutes ago
Our lucks going to change today. Is it too early to predict my bet. Hearts to finish top 4 in the premiership and qualify for Europe next season Hope you didn’t throw they betting slips away in anger

What was his prediction for Hearts in season 2019/20 just gone? Bet it wasn't 12th.

Hibs Class
03-07-2020, 12:56 PM
Is this afternoon's Court access code the same as this morning's?

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 12:56 PM
No genuine Jambo. Dean's mouth piece on KickBack.

Says who? Him?

WhileTheChief..
03-07-2020, 12:56 PM
Ronnie, it's 'on tenterhooks', not 'on tender hooks'!


:grr:


Nice one. Learning lots on this thread recently.

Didn’t even know there was such a thing as a tenterhook.

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 12:57 PM
Is this afternoon's Court access code the same as this morning's?

Assuming so. Nothing new on Court website.

Skol
03-07-2020, 12:57 PM
If this goes to arbitration just wait for the accusation of corruption.

The new definition being not a proper hearts outcome.

Pete
03-07-2020, 01:00 PM
Not long now.

Corner at the school end and the big men are in the box.

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 01:00 PM
Back live now

matty_f
03-07-2020, 01:01 PM
Back live now

‘Mon the SPFL!

Aldo
03-07-2020, 01:01 PM
Ssssshhhhh!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Skol
03-07-2020, 01:01 PM
Kickbacks down. Did they lose?

The 90+2
03-07-2020, 01:02 PM
Kickbacks down. Did they lose?

Judge ruling just now.

MrSmith
03-07-2020, 01:02 PM
Ssssshhhhh!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Iiiiiiiittttt?
😬

Pete
03-07-2020, 01:05 PM
What about this weather, eh?

BS44
03-07-2020, 01:05 PM
What about this weather, eh?

Bloody gas engineer never turned up

Hillsidehibby
03-07-2020, 01:06 PM
I got on KB for a moment before it crashed again. They are bricking it.

Aldo
03-07-2020, 01:06 PM
Iiiiiiiittttt?
[emoji51]

[emoji23] quiet at the back please sssshhhhh


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SouthMoroccoStu
03-07-2020, 01:06 PM
Kickbacks down. Did they lose?

They use the same wifi as their solicitor

I'm_cabbaged
03-07-2020, 01:06 PM
What about this weather, eh?

Let’s hope it’s miserable for a while down Gorgie way

The Spaceman
03-07-2020, 01:07 PM
I got on KB for a moment before it crashed again. They are bricking it.

Same here. They are utterly bricking it.

JeMeSouviens
03-07-2020, 01:07 PM
Think this judge should be self-isolating tbh.

Springbank
03-07-2020, 01:07 PM
Kickbacks down. Did they lose?

Everything about Hearts is down, it seems

Ozyhibby
03-07-2020, 01:08 PM
Going to court would be better for wasting the yams money but it would be funny if it gets chucked out today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MrSmith
03-07-2020, 01:08 PM
[emoji23] quiet at the back please sssshhhhh


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

🙏😆

hibbysam
03-07-2020, 01:08 PM
Think this judge should be self-isolating tbh.

Doing my head in 😂

CapitalGreen
03-07-2020, 01:10 PM
Sounds like it’s going back to court

Dashing Bob S
03-07-2020, 01:11 PM
Send em down! (Part three)

matty_f
03-07-2020, 01:11 PM
Sounds like it’s going back to court

Will be interesting to see how it pans out on a full hearing then.

The 90+2
03-07-2020, 01:11 PM
Sounds like it’s going back to court

Yep.

I'm_cabbaged
03-07-2020, 01:11 PM
Some **** on kick back has put up one of they weird pleasing things?

Andy74
03-07-2020, 01:12 PM
Dismissal of case ruled out.

tamig
03-07-2020, 01:12 PM
Which by then the fixtures will be out and we will be around 2 weeks from the start of the season. What a shambles.

Still not sure folk are getting hung up about the fixtures.

Brightside
03-07-2020, 01:13 PM
Dismissal of case ruled out.

That was expected.

nonshinyfinish
03-07-2020, 01:13 PM
Dismissal of case ruled out.

Is that ruling out dismissing it outright (if that was possible?) or ruling out bouncing it to SFA arbitration?

Springbank
03-07-2020, 01:15 PM
That was expected.

Yeah was it dufc wanted dismissal whereas spfl said "it should go to sfa" and hearts said "it should go to court"

The 90+2
03-07-2020, 01:15 PM
Think their case just got kicked out and it’s for the SFA to deal with it?

hibbysam
03-07-2020, 01:15 PM
Is that ruling out dismissing it outright (if that was possible?) or ruling out bouncing it to SFA arbitration?

Dismissing it outright. Sounds very likely it is going to arbitration.

Aim Here
03-07-2020, 01:21 PM
Is that ruling out dismissing it outright (if that was possible?) or ruling out bouncing it to SFA arbitration?

I'm under the impression it would be the United motion to Punt it to the SFA, but dismiss it from the Court of Session so it never comes back.

The SPFL moved to punt it to the SFA but suspend it from the Court; when the SFA rules, the Court can deal with whatever the SFA did.

Hearts just don't want it punted to the SFA at all.

Ruling for 'no dismissal' means, I expect, knocking back the first option (maybe there was an additional 'bin this case right now' motion, but it doesn't sound like it to me).

Andy74
03-07-2020, 01:22 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.

BroxburnHibee
03-07-2020, 01:22 PM
Arbitration it is.

Question is will Hearts bother :greengrin

Greenworld
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.Does that mean no 8 million

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Del Boy
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
Arbitration it is.

Question is will Hearts bother :greengrin

Confirmed??

Keith_M
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
So, no more legal action and go to the SFA?

The 90+2
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
Confirmed??

Yeah.

Mikey
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.

Cheers Andy. Clear and to the point.

DaveF
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
Saughton Jambo 😂

nonshinyfinish
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.

Boom?

Pete
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
Pleasing.

wallpaperman
03-07-2020, 01:23 PM
Yes, they have played their last chip and lost it. :flag:

Waxy
03-07-2020, 01:24 PM
Chuck em to the lions.

Skol
03-07-2020, 01:24 PM
Interdict. Stop the fixtures.

Kato
03-07-2020, 01:24 PM
Saughton Jambo [emoji23]He's a Getitwrongaholic.

Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

Barney McGrew
03-07-2020, 01:24 PM
Kickback will a hoot today.

I wonder how long it will take them to spin this as a victory for Hertz :greengrin

Since452
03-07-2020, 01:24 PM
Hahaha

FilipinoHibs
03-07-2020, 01:25 PM
Saughton Jambo 😂

Binned to the SFA. Hearts binned again.

lord bunberry
03-07-2020, 01:25 PM
That can’t be right, they had an open and shut case that was going to blow the SPFL to pieces and expose the corruption in Scottish football.

BH Hibs
03-07-2020, 01:25 PM
Another relegation party my liver can't take it.

Kato
03-07-2020, 01:25 PM
Interdict. Stop the fixtures.Their pram is running out of toys.

Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk

Stuart93
03-07-2020, 01:25 PM
Nothing won yet mind you. But it’s better going where it’s going.

Brightside
03-07-2020, 01:25 PM
Poor Hearts. Feel really sorry for them. :greengrin

Joe6-2
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
Boom?

And Boom again!

greenginger
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.

How did that take 3 days. ?

Did he mention the award of costs. :cb

Saint Hibee
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
Kickback won't let me on. That's really taken the fun out of my day.

Prof. Shaggy
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
If Hearts don't like the outcome of arbitration can they bring it back to court?

bingo70
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
Can they still present a case to try and win this £10m or is it now a case of stopping relegation or nothing?

Brightside
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
I'm assuming Hearts have to pay all costs for this too.

Real Emerald
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
Where’s Tom English gone? 🤣

matty_f
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
Saughton Jambo 😂

He’s 100% at the wind up. He’s strung them all along magnificently.

Vault Boy
03-07-2020, 01:26 PM
Hahahaha.

Haha.

Ha.

£8m quid.

gazzag70
03-07-2020, 01:27 PM
What a shame 😂😂😂😂🇳🇬🇳🇬

erin go bragh
03-07-2020, 01:27 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.
So Hearts and Thistle have broke SFA rules and should be rightly punished.

Since452
03-07-2020, 01:27 PM
Kickback in lockdown

RoYO!
03-07-2020, 01:27 PM
So exactly how many times have they been relegated again?!

Its the relegation that just keeps on giving! Haha

JeMeSouviens
03-07-2020, 01:27 PM
Nothing won yet mind you. But it’s better going where it’s going.

The shadow of the dreaded Lord Nimmo Smith looms large ...

:shocked:

Cammy
03-07-2020, 01:27 PM
Round one to SPFL

Pete
03-07-2020, 01:28 PM
A Budge statement please.

Monts
03-07-2020, 01:28 PM
Does this now give the SPFL grounds to place sanctions?

If the judge had allowed it to go to court, it could be argued that they didn't need to go to arbitration as it wasn't a 'footballing' matter. But the judge has upheld the SPFL rules, so SPFL well within rights to hammer them?

Stuart93
03-07-2020, 01:28 PM
What does this mean for their compensation claim? Does anyone know?

lucky
03-07-2020, 01:28 PM
I’m worried what the SFA might do. I’d rather it went to court and cost them thousands and they lost

JeMeSouviens
03-07-2020, 01:29 PM
So Hearts and Thistle have broke SFA rules and should be rightly punished.

Lord Clark did a bit of tut-tutting about this, said these SFA rules might be unlawful. Sounded like a nod and a wink to anyone punished by them to take it to court.

Seveno
03-07-2020, 01:29 PM
Budge is now demanding a reconstruction of the Court System.

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 01:29 PM
He’s 100% at the wind up. He’s strung them all along magnificently.

The whole point is that he is a total bona fide Hearts fan, he just keeps getting it wrong, a common theme amongst the maroon balloons

danhibees1875
03-07-2020, 01:29 PM
Kickback in lockdown

For disease containment purposes?

Not In The Know
03-07-2020, 01:29 PM
So have Hearts been relegated 3 times this season?

scottish_sleepy
03-07-2020, 01:29 PM
He’s 100% at the wind up. He’s strung them all along magnificently.

This needs a special edition of Longbangers :-)

oldbutdim
03-07-2020, 01:30 PM
Well, if that judge ever wants to buy or sell a house, I know one estate agent who will not be helpful.
:nerd:

Don Giovanni
03-07-2020, 01:30 PM
It's my birthday today and this is the present I was hoping for!

:greengrin:

Real Emerald
03-07-2020, 01:30 PM
Does this now give the SPFL grounds to place sanctions?

If the judge had allowed it to go to court, it could be argued that they didn't need to go to arbitration as it wasn't a 'footballing' matter. But the judge has upheld the SPFL rules, so SPFL well within rights to hammer them?

So they should be hammered, look at the grief they’ve brought to Scottish Football with their deluded self interest. Now for the good of the game let the big league begin. 😊

Saint Hibee
03-07-2020, 01:30 PM
Although they're way too arrogant and deluded to see it, this is probably the best result for them long term. They now won't waste hundreds of thousands on a court case they're doomed to lose, and might actually get around to sorting out their football team for October.

tomf
03-07-2020, 01:31 PM
Will Hearts be taking their case for expulsion to the SFA? I hope they win that one; I was happy with them being relegated but if they insist. Cheerio.

One wonders if Partick will continue in this farce.

JeMeSouviens
03-07-2020, 01:31 PM
The whole point is that he is a total bona fide Hearts fan, he just keeps getting it wrong, a common theme amongst the maroon balloons

It's Leslie Deans isn't it? Or one of his younger family members that can work a pc. :wink:

danhibees1875
03-07-2020, 01:32 PM
So have Hearts been relegated 3 times this season?

No, they were expelled, demoted, and linearly dropped.

04Sauzee
03-07-2020, 01:32 PM
They seem to think they go to arbitration then back to court? Can that happen?

A Hi-Bee
03-07-2020, 01:32 PM
Where’s Tom English gone? 🤣

Poor Tam will be busy typing up his spin on a dreadful decision for mankind and such, ****ing prick that he is.

Boom ****in Boom ****in Boom
Is that them finished for ever now.

:flag::flag::flag:

MurrayfieldHibs
03-07-2020, 01:32 PM
It's my birthday today and this is the present I was hoping for!

:greengrin:

Happy birthday buddy:thumbsup: were you planning a few drinks tonight?
:flag:

Jack
03-07-2020, 01:32 PM
Lord Clark did a bit of tut-tutting about this, said these SFA rules might be unlawful. Sounded like a nod and a wink to anyone punished by them to take it to court.

Is that like the bench in a friendly getting the wink from the ref before he sends off the defensive midfielder?

penihibs
03-07-2020, 01:32 PM
This is no fair, we're the famous!!
Our Hearts are broken💔💔

CallumLaidlaw
03-07-2020, 01:33 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.

Right so,
Is arbitration much different than court regarding possible outcomes?
Can Hearts still go for an Interdict?
What happens next?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JeMeSouviens
03-07-2020, 01:33 PM
What's the "recovery of documents" stuff about?

Keith_M
03-07-2020, 01:33 PM
So are they still saying "Boom!" on Oneleagueback?

Tug Wilson
03-07-2020, 01:33 PM
Safest path for the court. Now the SFA are fully involved. The practical way forward is to press on with the Premiership as is on 1 August, but Hearts & PT offered some form of enhanced parachute payment as compensation. Suspect these payments will only reach £1m if you add them together!

Hearts & PT could reject this and look to go back to court. However, traditionally courts take a dim view of this. Chance that even if that side win in court, they only get the same compensation and then that gets wiped out by expenses.

nonshinyfinish
03-07-2020, 01:33 PM
So have Hearts been relegated 3 times this season?

Must be more than that?

1a: Dundee vote to end the lower leagues
1b: Second vote to end the Prem (counting these as one)

2: Sevco dossier vote

3: Zoom call with Leeann et al. torpedoing their first reconstruction plan

4: Indicative vote on the second reconstruction plan

5: Emptied by the Court of Session

Any more?

RoYO!
03-07-2020, 01:33 PM
I’m worried what the SFA might do. I’d rather it went to court and cost them thousands and they lost

The SFA simply can't do anything which calls into question their rules and membership.

Hearts have quite simply attacked this and the members and will be rightly hammered.

A bit of fun for us. But caused no end of undue stress on dozens of people.

They lost any sense of "poor them" weeks ago with their unhinged rants and actions. They have literally served papers on others clubs- simply disgraceful.

They have brought this on themselves from day 1.

You will not be missed. Cheerio.

Lunatic
03-07-2020, 01:33 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.

Hmm, pardon my ignorance, but this seems like really obvious, simple **** my 8yr old nephew could have told us. Am I missing something?

Aldo
03-07-2020, 01:33 PM
Judge - all clubs are agreed on articles and rules that bind them - it is a football dispute and the rules can be relied upon. Arbitration is capable of being performed in this case. Therefore, required to grant that it goes to arbitration.

Hearts days in court ends here.

Andy the voice of reason the last few days. Thanks for the updates. Last few days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rumble de Thump
03-07-2020, 01:34 PM
Did Budge not make it clear to the judge that she hadn't read the rules and, therefore, she didn't agree to them and they don't apply to her?

Don Giovanni
03-07-2020, 01:35 PM
Happy birthday buddy:thumbsup: were you planning a few drinks tonight?
:flag:

Thank you Sir.

Yes, I think I may enjoy a dram or two.

:thumbsup:

Sammy7nil
03-07-2020, 01:35 PM
If Hearts don't like the outcome of arbitration can they bring it back to court?

Yes but if they don't accept arbitration outcome they will return to court with a very weak case :aok:

SPFL one up after the away leg. :greengrin

poolman
03-07-2020, 01:35 PM
He’s 100% at the wind up. He’s strung them all along magnificently.


Any word from SJ's pal, the top conveyancing solicitor

steviehibsleith
03-07-2020, 01:36 PM
Take Your Medicine ........... :flag:

hibbysam
03-07-2020, 01:36 PM
He’s now greeting about expenses, ****ting himself about the costs they may incur 😂

SunshineOnLeith
03-07-2020, 01:37 PM
Hmm, pardon my ignorance, but this seems like really obvious, simple **** my 8yr old nephew could have told us. Am I missing something?

Not at all, it really is that simple.

Keith_M
03-07-2020, 01:38 PM
:nanasplit: :nanafunk:


Boom, boom boom,
...shake the room!

Boom, boom boom,
...dodgy Zoom!


:banana:


:nanawave:

CB_NO3
03-07-2020, 01:38 PM
Cheers for the 50k Jimmy.

WhileTheChief..
03-07-2020, 01:38 PM
He’s 100% at the wind up. He’s strung them all along magnificently.

I thought the same yet there are plenty on there who vouch for him.

More likely he’s just a typically thick Hearts fan.

Since452
03-07-2020, 01:40 PM
And I bet the idiots have already spent the 8 million compensation on something

Brightside
03-07-2020, 01:40 PM
Right so,
Is arbitration much different than court regarding possible outcomes?
Can Hearts still go for an Interdict?
What happens next?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No. They've been told to stop coming to court with something that can be ruled over by the SFA. Judge clearly tells them these are football matters.

Topographic Hibby
03-07-2020, 01:41 PM
What happens next?Yet another game of Budge Statement Bingo. I'm going for...

- "unfair" - at least 17
- "relegation" - nil
- "found in our favour" - 3
- "where is Arbroath?" - nil
- exclamation marks - too many to count....

Booked4Being-Ugly
03-07-2020, 01:41 PM
Ya dancer, will done Tom Jamboish, Sughton Jambo, Lord p!shy breeks, Lesley Deans and all the Sportsound presenters.

You all played a blinder in stringing those idiots along. I salute your indifaticability.

:bye:

:hibees

erin go bragh
03-07-2020, 01:41 PM
So basically Hearts just went 1-0 in injury time but lost 2 late goals and now could be looking at sanctions by the SFA for breaking association rules . Which could include a fine of 1m ,expulsion from the Scottish cup and a signing embargo .

Not In The Know
03-07-2020, 01:41 PM
Must be more than that?

1a: Dundee vote to end the lower leagues
1b: Second vote to end the Prem (counting these as one)

2: Sevco dossier vote

3: Zoom call with Leeann et al. torpedoing their first reconstruction plan

4: Indicative vote on the second reconstruction plan

5: Emptied by the Court of Session

Any more?


So have Hearts been relegated 6 times this season?

Numptie
03-07-2020, 01:41 PM
If you enter into arbitration the sides both agree that the findings of arbitration are binding - that's how arbitration works. You can only challenge an arbitration finding on a point of law.

Kojock
03-07-2020, 01:41 PM
I thought the same yet there are plenty on there who vouch for him.

More likely he’s just a typically thick Hearts fan.

Only a Hear7s fan would admit to being mates with Leslie Deans.

CallumLaidlaw
03-07-2020, 01:42 PM
So basically Hearts just went 1-0 in injury time but lost 2 late goals and now could be looking at sanctions by the SFA for breaking association rules . Which could include a fine of 1m ,expulsion from the Scottish cup and a signing embargo .

The judge hinted that may be unlawful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Scott Allan Key
03-07-2020, 01:42 PM
Safest path for the court. Now the SFA are fully involved. The practical way forward is to press on with the Premiership as is on 1 August, but Hearts & PT offered some form of enhanced parachute payment as compensation. Suspect these payments will only reach £1m if you add them together!

Hearts & PT could reject this and look to go back to court. However, traditionally courts take a dim view of this. Chance that even if that side win in court, they only get the same compensation and then that gets wiped out by expenses.Why on earth should they get anymore money than they already do for finishing 12th? Is it right for them to get more money than clubs finishing above them in the league? No! They're ****, and they deserve relegation. That's it. Like everyone else, they must live with the unfortunate effects of Corona virus, and not exploit the situation for financial gain.

They already have a benefactor and have hired a new manager and ex-Celtic goalie. They deserve no more money.

Sent from my LYA-L09 using Tapatalk

JeMeSouviens
03-07-2020, 01:42 PM
No. They've been told to stop coming to court with something that can be ruled over by the SFA. Judge clearly tells them these are football matters.

Well, not quite. He said it's a matter of company law but both sides are signed up to arbitration and the SFA has plenty of legal expertise among its abitrators.

hibbyfraelibby
03-07-2020, 01:42 PM
No, they were expelled, demoted, and linearly dropped.

...add to that lust Summarilly Dismissed

bingo70
03-07-2020, 01:43 PM
No. They've been told to stop coming to court with something that can be ruled over by the SFA. Judge clearly tells them these are football matters.

Are all the possible outcomes the same in the arbitration as they would be in a normal court?

Since452
03-07-2020, 01:44 PM
Right so,
Is arbitration much different than court regarding possible outcomes?
Can Hearts still go for an Interdict?
What happens next?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's like your five year old going to the police because your Mrs put them on the naughty step. The police have said "actually this is really something your father can sort out". They'll get a slap on the wrist and told to stop acting like a baby.

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 01:44 PM
Oh dear, there's a LOT of seethe on Brokeback - pleasing lol

Bronson
03-07-2020, 01:44 PM
The good guys win again, i’ll drink to that

MurrayfieldHibs
03-07-2020, 01:45 PM
Yet another game of Budge Statement Bingo. I'm going for...

- "unfair" - at least 17
- "relegation" - nil
- "found in our favour" - 3
- "where is Arbroath?" - nil
- exclamation marks - too many to count....

expelled
expunged
sair fecht

Andy74
03-07-2020, 01:45 PM
Hearts and Partick to pay the SPFL expenses at 50% but not the defending clubs.

CapitalGreen
03-07-2020, 01:45 PM
Hearts and Partick having to pay 50% of SPFL expenses

JeMeSouviens
03-07-2020, 01:46 PM
Hearts, PT, DU&co to pay their own costs.

Hearts to pay 50% of SPFL's. :lolyam:

banchoryhibs
03-07-2020, 01:46 PM
Will they now be penalised by the SFA for taking legal action in the first place? A significant fine perhaps?

stoneyburn hibs
03-07-2020, 01:46 PM
I'm on a balcony in Bulgaria.....

Since452
03-07-2020, 01:46 PM
Oh dear, there's a LOT of seethe on Brokeback - pleasing lol

Times like this I was I wasn't banned

nonshinyfinish
03-07-2020, 01:46 PM
Hearts and Partick to pay the SPFL expenses at 50% but not the defending clubs.

Any reasoning given for not having to pay the respondents' expenses? Seems unfair.

007
03-07-2020, 01:47 PM
Slammed by the judge. On one hand Hearts complaining in their petition about sporting integrity and on the other hand saying it isn't a football related matter. 😂😂😂

Mikey
03-07-2020, 01:47 PM
Hearts, PT, DU&co to pay their own costs.

Hearts to pay 50% of SPFL's. :lolyam:

Hopefully that bit is covered by the SPFL.

Stuart93
03-07-2020, 01:47 PM
I'm on a balcony in Bulgaria.....

I’m outside the west stand

Pete
03-07-2020, 01:47 PM
It's apparently not over because Hearts have won the right to have all the documents released.

😂

ronaldo7
03-07-2020, 01:47 PM
Mrs Bodge has presided over the mother of all court battles.

It was said that she was an astute business woman.:rolleyes: In life, you pick the battles you can win, and are not persuaded by those on the side lines, screaming at you to take them to the cleaners.

She's really a pound shop Deborah Meaden, (Sorry Deborah) :greengrin

Since452
03-07-2020, 01:47 PM
I'm on a balcony in Bulgaria.....

I heard some of them are away to socially distanced solo clap outside the Hearts QC's house tonight. Pwoud.

bringbackbenny
03-07-2020, 01:48 PM
Hearts, PT, DU&co to pay their own costs.

Hearts to pay 50% of SPFL's. :lolyam:

Why should DU and co have to pay their own costs, they had no option to defend court proceedings that should never have been started?

zitelli62
03-07-2020, 01:48 PM
My heart was broken my heart was broken sorrow sorrow sorrow sorrow.
Happy day indeed.

JeMeSouviens
03-07-2020, 01:48 PM
Any reasoning given for not having to pay the respondents' expenses? Seems unfair.

SPFL went for suspension & arbitration - succeeded.
DU etc also went for dismissal of case - failed.

Andy74
03-07-2020, 01:48 PM
Any reasoning given for not having to pay the respondents' expenses? Seems unfair.

There were 3 issues at hand in this hearing - Hearts won 2, the clubs won 1.

The SPFL didn't join the dismissal action and so they were 1 -1.

Alfred E Newman
03-07-2020, 01:48 PM
Thank you M'lord. Enjoy your weekend.

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 01:48 PM
Bugger, it`s a foregone conclusion:


Saughton Jambo
Squad Member
Saughton Jambo
Paid Member_10

1,865 posts
Donor
Report post
Posted 25 minutes ago
Our lucks going to change today. Is it too early to predict my bet. Hearts to finish top 4 in the premiership and qualify for Europe next season Hope you didn’t throw they betting slips away in anger



There`s a certain karma in Karma boy posting this:

gashauskis9
The Doyen of drivel
gashauskis9
Paid Member_10

11,778 posts
Donor


Appreciate the positivity, but you’re wrong again SJ.

CapitalGreen
03-07-2020, 01:48 PM
It's apparently not over because Hearts have won the right to have all the documents released.

😂

Yeah but they have to stay confidential and the arbitration hearing is held in private 😂😂😂

greenginger
03-07-2020, 01:49 PM
The judge hinted that may be unlawful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It would only be unlawful if found to be excessive .

The SFA regularly impose fines and sanctions. Are all these illegal ?

They should be hit hard and if they don’t like , let them go back to court.

CapitalGreen
03-07-2020, 01:50 PM
Why should DU and co have to pay their own costs, they had no option to defend court proceedings that should never have been started?

Because they asked for a dismissal which was rejected as being without merit and tried to prevent the release of docs. If they’d just asked for a sist along with the SPFL they would have had the majority of their fees paid.

murray26
03-07-2020, 01:50 PM
A little bit a fairness for a change.. delighted😊

nonshinyfinish
03-07-2020, 01:50 PM
SPFL went for suspension & arbitration - succeeded.
DU etc also went for dismissal of case - failed.

Ah, makes sense.

Greenworld
03-07-2020, 01:51 PM
Budge is now demanding a reconstruction of the Court System.
It would only be unlawful if found to be excessive .

The SFA regularly impose fines and sanctions. Are all these illegal ?

They should be hit hard and if they don’t like , let them go back to court.If i heard correct sfa can fine up to 1 million

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

jacomo
03-07-2020, 01:51 PM
Yet another game of Budge Statement Bingo. I'm going for...

- "unfair" - at least 17
- "relegation" - nil
- "found in our favour" - 3
- "where is Arbroath?" - nil
- exclamation marks - too many to count....


She’s copying the Rangers playbook these days, so throw a ‘beggars belief’ and some awful analogy about trench warfare in there.

Monts
03-07-2020, 01:51 PM
There were 3 issues at hand in this hearing - Hearts won 2, the clubs won 1.

The SPFL didn't join the dismissal action and so they were 1 -1.

What issues did hearts win?

007
03-07-2020, 01:51 PM
It would only be unlawful if found to be excessive .

The SFA regularly impose fines and sanctions. Are all these illegal ?

They should be hit hard and if they don’t like , let them go back to court.

Give them £500k compensation then fine them £1m.

Greenworld
03-07-2020, 01:52 PM
I assume this dismisses the 8 mill claim also ?

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 01:52 PM
What issues did hearts win?

Biggest ********s

Real Emerald
03-07-2020, 01:52 PM
Why on earth should they get anymore money than they already do for finishing 12th? Is it right for them to get more money than clubs finishing above them in the league? No! They're ****, and they deserve relegation. That's it. Like everyone else, they must live with the unfortunate effects of Corona virus, and not exploit the situation for financial gain.

They already have a benefactor and have hired a new manager and ex-Celtic goalie. They deserve no more money.

Sent from my LYA-L09 using Tapatalk

Maybe if they’d been a bit more humble to start with, taking it on the chin and expecting a bit more money for not being able to play the remaining games then other clubs would have sympathised. Instead, they’ve tried to stop well performing teams getting their promotion, tried to get football stopped and tried to sue all the other clubs who are trying to survive during a pandemic.

They’ve sat back hoping their actions would put clubs out of business, the diddy clubs that bring nothing etc. Meanwhile they pay money for the Championship winners manager and singed an international goalkeeper. They now have the audacity to ask the other clubs they’ve tried to sue to club together to give them a bigger parachute payment, aye right! Cut them loose 😡

SteveHFC
03-07-2020, 01:53 PM
https://www.hmfckickback.co.uk/index.php?/topic/188814-spfl-declare-league-due-to-covid-go-to-arbitration/&do=findComment&comment=7971262

:faf:

stoneyburn hibs
03-07-2020, 01:53 PM
Any ballpark figure of their court bill ?

HFC93
03-07-2020, 01:53 PM
Thoughts and prayers are with Leslie Deans at this difficult time.

Andy74
03-07-2020, 01:54 PM
What issues did hearts win?

There were basically 3 things being considered.

A motion to dismiss the case totally.
A motion to refer it to arbitration rather than court.
A motion to release some documents.

Only the arbitration one succeeded. It is the important one but the judge ruled the expenses matter on a simple view of the matters for consideration and success on each of those.

Joe6-2
03-07-2020, 01:54 PM
It would only be unlawful if found to be excessive .

The SFA regularly impose fines and sanctions. Are all these illegal ?

They should be hit hard and if they don’t like , let them go back to court.

They have to be hit hard, no way can they get away with all this

jacomo
03-07-2020, 01:54 PM
I assume this dismisses the 8 mill claim also ?

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk


Arbitration will surely consider compensation for the relegated clubs, but the spurious £8m claim will be dismissed as ridiculous.

Garibaldis
03-07-2020, 01:55 PM
Could have stayed in the Premiership by beating St Mirren- bottled it.

First reconstruction plan taken to a vote- failed.

Second reconstruction plan taken to a vote- failed.

Take the SPFL to Court- failed.

The laughing stock of Scottish football.

007
03-07-2020, 01:55 PM
Hearts'd it. The losing streak continues. It's just one bad decision after another. 😂😂😂

leithsansiro
03-07-2020, 01:55 PM
Currently clapping on the plaza. Just so pwoud of our great club and the fantastic achievement of being relegated a record number of times in one season.

Just felt the need to come down and clap to pay thanks to the great institution that is Heart of Midlothian FC.

Very, very pwoud.

Ann Budge, Craig Levein, Gary Locke, Leslie Deans, Vladimir Romanov, Maluray Martin... I love you all.

So pwoud

SunshineOnLeith
03-07-2020, 01:57 PM
Any reasoning given for not having to pay the respondents' expenses? Seems unfair.

Their motion was for the case to be thrown out entirely, rather than just punted to the SFA.

poolman
03-07-2020, 01:58 PM
Currently clapping on the plaza. Just so pwoud of our great club and the fantastic achievement of being relegated a record number of times in one season.

Just felt the need to come down and clap to pay thanks to the great institution that is Heart of Midlothian FC.

Very, very pwoud.

Ann Budge, Craig Levein, Gary Locke, Leslie Deans, Vladimir Romanov, Maluray Martin... I love you all.

So pwoud

It's what famous big teams do

Del Boy
03-07-2020, 01:58 PM
Any chance Hearts will just accept they’re down now and throw in the towel or are they definitely going to go through the whole arbitration process?

Since452
03-07-2020, 01:58 PM
This documentary is going to be epic

04Sauzee
03-07-2020, 01:59 PM
Libertarian Libertarian

Posted 7 minutes ago
I fully expect the SPFL to push through league reconstruction within the next 48 hours after this afternoon's ruling

Quote

Joe6-2
03-07-2020, 01:59 PM
https://www.hmfckickback.co.uk/index.php?/topic/188814-spfl-declare-league-due-to-covid-go-to-arbitration/&do=findComment&comment=7971262

:faf:

Talk about delusions and straw clutching

Since452
03-07-2020, 01:59 PM
Libertarian Libertarian

Posted 7 minutes ago
I fully expect the SPFL to push through league reconstruction within the next 48 hours after this afternoon's ruling

Quote

I'd love to live in their world. Actually no I wouldn't

mutley
03-07-2020, 02:00 PM
Have you seen the state of some of them on jokeback? They still think that reconstruction is going to happen!!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Coco Bryce
03-07-2020, 02:00 PM
Who will the 3 man panel consist of?

Tynie01011973
03-07-2020, 02:00 PM
For any. Of our neighbours looking in

Judges ruling

https://youtu.be/ffCEr327W44

:flag:

Irish_Steve
03-07-2020, 02:01 PM
They seem convinced on Brokeback that they can take it back to court if they don`t get their way. One poster even said that the Judge would "make time" to hear the case - is that correct?

dchibs
03-07-2020, 02:01 PM
No, they were expelled, demoted, and linearly dropped.

Totally flushed I would say.:na na: