It only means they can apply to start in the 3rd division. As Sevco5088 isn't actually a football club, doesn't have 3 years audited accounts etc etc, even that isn't a foregone conclusion.Originally Posted by KeithTheHibby
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'd put money on the Hunosaurus being extinct pretty soon.
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 13,921 to 13,950 of 45185
-
27-06-2012 10:39 AM #13921
-
27-06-2012 10:40 AM #13922This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 10:41 AM #13923
I very much doubt the clubs would do this as mine and many other peoples boycotts would still apply if this happened. I would expect the SPL to say fine, go into SFL1 but you are banned from the SPL for a minimum of three years
-
27-06-2012 10:41 AM #13924
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Dunfermline
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 24,250
- Blog Entries
- 4
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
A vote is needed to allow a company without these accounts to apply and be granted membership to the SFL.
-
27-06-2012 10:42 AM #13925This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Without them, they don't fulfil the criteria.
-
27-06-2012 10:45 AM #13926
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Dunfermline
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 24,250
- Blog Entries
- 4
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I thought normal application was '****, ****, ****, good-guy, **** **** ****'
-
27-06-2012 10:47 AM #13927
JT has a history, particularly in the Daily Hun of making bold predictions and providing us with 'exclusives' which are demonstrated as complete codswallop fairly quickly.
I remember his triumphalist tone when Bill Miller appeared on the scene. I'm amazed he still has an outlet for his views in the media at all.
-
-
27-06-2012 10:50 AM #13929This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 10:52 AM #13930This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'm surprised thats turned out to be wrong, i'd have thought the reporters would have checked a few facts before misleading the fans on that one?
-
27-06-2012 10:53 AM #13931This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I can understand why the likes of Falkirk, Raith etc. don't want them in the first division however surely for the likes of some of the terrible 3rd division teams they would be happy to see the newco playing them twice a season?
-
27-06-2012 10:53 AM #13932This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 10:55 AM #13933This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
27-06-2012 10:57 AM #13935
Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Either he's a cynical media manipulator who's favoured outlet, the Daily William is profiteering by printing lies to sell papers to Buckie-swilling twits desperate for something positive to cling on to. OR he's got Creamola Foam for brains.
-
27-06-2012 11:00 AM #13936johnbc70Left by mutual consent!
How funny would it be if they never even got the votes to join Div3. They are not even a football club so if there is a space then Spartans and Linlithgow Rose etc. should get the space as they meet the criteria.
-
27-06-2012 11:01 AM #13937This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Once Part 1 of this saga is over and Rangers have been dealt with, Part 2 needs to be addressed. That is the blatant propaganda, corruption and jobs-for-the-boys culture which infests our national media, particularly BBC Scotland.
-
27-06-2012 11:02 AM #13938This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Some of the comments from supporters of oldco on the fans chat sites etc is exactly why we need rid of this vile institution. Scottish football will be a far better place without them.
-
27-06-2012 11:02 AM #13939
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,458
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Shows the page the more daft Rangers fans are on if this is the sort of 'person' that agrees with their views.
-
27-06-2012 11:03 AM #13940
Jim Traynor blowing hot air as per...
i get the impression with him that he thinks his opionion counts and his ONLY.
the boy is a fanny of the highest order
-
27-06-2012 11:05 AM #13941This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 11:07 AM #13942This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 11:07 AM #13943
Seriously, this story gets better every day.
Nick Griffin coming out in support of The Rainjurs?? Magnificent, truly magnificent, and will only strengthen the resolve to finish them for good.
No to Newco in the SFL.
-
27-06-2012 11:08 AM #13944
Oh dear
Oh dear. Imagine that they failed to get voted into SFL1 or SFL3
Anyone handy with a musical instrument? I'm thinking of penning a ditty called "Bye bye Rangers, bye bye"
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 11:08 AM #13945This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 11:08 AM #13946This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Away and shove it up your Ronson you blubberingly corpulent nazi fudknocker
-
27-06-2012 11:09 AM #13947This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 11:09 AM #13948This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 11:10 AM #13949This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-06-2012 11:10 AM #13950
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 9,488
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
- the SFA can only broker a proposal between the different authorities, in no way are they king-maker in this situation
- any SPL proposal requires ratification by the SPL clubs, and would probably require a 11-1 majority due to there being a material change to the SPL financial arrangements
- likewise any SFL proposal can only be ratified its members once it had been formulated and circulated.
Whilst the guys in the comfy seats might have had some informal discussion no proposals from either the SPL or the SFL exist, never mind any votes or discussions scheduled.
I can only conclude that Traynor has been overdosing on X-Files re-runs to come up with that stuff.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks