hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 432 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 3323824224304314324334344424825329321432 ... LastLast
Results 12,931 to 12,960 of 45185
  1. #12931
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,985
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    http://local.stv.tv/glasgow/107524-r...dministrators/


    Duff and Phelps might be getting their collars felt by other Boys in Blue.


    And not before time.
    No suggestion of criminal behaviour in there. Lord Hodge wants to clear up the question of conflict of interest.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #12932
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,232
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    No suggestion of criminal behaviour in there. Lord Hodge wants to clear up the question of conflict of interest.

    Who knows what is going to come crawling out when more stones are overturned. This saga will keep the legal profession handsomely remunerated for years.

  4. #12933
    Testimonial Due Paisley Hibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Shaky Toon
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,769
    Quote Originally Posted by The Story So Far... View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Here is the rule which address the issue of promotion and relegation - the bit I've linked above is a Miscellaneous addition to address the issue of membership being ceased for any reason (including liquidation). Combine the 2, and none of Sevco, Dundee or Dunfermline have any right to be in the SPL.

    "The association football clubs eligible to participate in the League in any Season shall, subject to the Articles of Association and Rules, be those Clubs which participated in the League in the immediately preceding Season, except that, subject to Rules A2.2, A2.3 and A2.4, the Club finishing in last place in the League in the immediately preceding Season shall not be eligible to participate in the League and shall be relegated to the SFL and the Candidate Club shall be promoted from the SFL and admitted entry to the League."

    So correctly, Dunfermline were relegated from the SPL and the Candidate Club (Ross County) have been promoted in their stead.

    Dundee are no more eligible than Dunfermline in claiming right to the SPL as they neither played in the league in the preceeding season nor are they the Candidate Club.

    There really is no precedent in the SPL rules for this situation to be honest!
    Donīt see why SPL canīt simply expunge enough points retrospectively (under rule H5) to make Oldhun the club finishing last. Ross County then get their share and Dunfermline stay up as they were not in last place. Thereīs then no decision for the SPL to make on a Newco. It all becomes the SFLīs problem :-)

  5. #12934
    Coaching Staff joe breezy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Buckhurst Hill, Essex
    Posts
    5,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Paisley Hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Donīt see why SPL canīt simply expunge enough points retrospectively (under rule H5) to make Oldhun the club finishing last. Ross County then get their share and Dunfermline stay up as they were not in last place. Thereīs then no decision for the SPL to make on a Newco. It all becomes the SFLīs problem :-)
    The club formerly knows as Rangers are dead / soon to be liquidised. That's all that matters.

    There is a new club called Sevco, who aren't allowed to use the name Rangers, that own Ibrox apparently (although even that may be up for debate). Sevco are a new football club that may want to use a name that will attract former Rangers fans / Huns.
    So Govan Dodgers / Her Majesties Royals / whatever they want to call themselves are a new club that need to apply to the SFL by the usual procedures...

    That's how I see it anyway

  6. #12935
    Testimonial Due Paisley Hibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Shaky Toon
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,769
    Quote Originally Posted by joe breezy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The club formerly knows as Rangers are dead / soon to be liquidised. That's all that matters.

    There is a new club called Sevco, who aren't allowed to use the name Rangers, that own Ibrox apparently (although even that may be up for debate). Sevco are a new football club that may want to use a name that will attract former Rangers fans / Huns.
    So Govan Dodgers / Her Majesties Royals / whatever they want to call themselves are a new club that need to apply to the SFL by the usual procedures...

    That's how I see it anyway
    I agree - what I was suggesting was that SPL expunge the Old Huns points from last season so that they are recorded as having come last. That lets Dunfermline stay up, Ross County get promoted and they can tell Sevco that their application to take over the Old Huns place in the SPL is invalid.

  7. #12936

    not a bad idea

    Quote Originally Posted by Paisley Hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I agree - what I was suggesting was that SPL expunge the Old Huns points from last season so that they are recorded as having come last. That lets Dunfermline stay up, Ross County get promoted and they can tell Sevco that their application to take over the Old Huns place in the SPL is invalid.
    I was thinking that this not a bad idea saves any voting nonsense as we know how that will turn out a (no) dunfy get saved ross county come up
    currant buns in the wilderness and no option to play next season , then expelled later on when all the *rap comes out
    happy days

  8. #12937
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    50
    Posts
    15,209
    Quote Originally Posted by joe breezy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The club formerly knows as Rangers are dead / soon to be liquidised. That's all that matters.

    There is a new club called Sevco, who aren't allowed to use the name Rangers, that own Ibrox apparently (although even that may be up for debate). Sevco are a new football club that may want to use a name that will attract former Rangers fans / Huns.
    So Govan Dodgers / Her Majesties Royals / whatever they want to call themselves are a new club that need to apply to the SFL by the usual procedures...

    That's how I see it anyway
    Indeed that is why the vote on the 4th is wrong regardless of result. Deciding if a club (new club) can just get 3 straight promotions into SPL as they will atttract cash is wrong on every level.

  9. #12938
    Coaching Staff joe breezy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Buckhurst Hill, Essex
    Posts
    5,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Paisley Hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I agree - what I was suggesting was that SPL expunge the Old Huns points from last season so that they are recorded as having come last. That lets Dunfermline stay up, Ross County get promoted and they can tell Sevco that their application to take over the Old Huns place in the SPL is invalid.
    Ah, with you now, it's like being a lawyer trying to keep up with all of this

  10. #12939
    @hibs.net private member cabbageandribs1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in a house in Bathgate
    Posts
    58,924
    where's donkey doncaster been hiding lately not heard his words of wisdom for a few weeks now :(

  11. #12940
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    50
    Posts
    27,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Carlsberg View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Indeed that is why the vote on the 4th is wrong regardless of result. Deciding if a club (new club) can just get 3 straight promotions into SPL as they will atttract cash is wrong on every level.
    SPL is membership based though so that's not really true in practice.

  12. #12941
    @hibs.net private member StevieC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    8,652
    Quote Originally Posted by cabbageandribs1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    where's donkey doncaster been hiding lately not heard his words of wisdom for a few weeks now :(
    He'll be keeping a low profile dreading the point where it transpires that the SKY deal, the one he was so proud of, isn't worth the paper it is written on!

    There should be a vote of no confidence with this guy and he should be emptied and replaced ASAP!
    But you know it ain't all about wealth,
    as long as you make a note to .. EXPRESS YOURSELF!

  13. #12942

    agree

    Quote Originally Posted by StevieC View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He'll be keeping a low profile dreading the point where it transpires that the SKY deal, the one he was so proud of, isn't worth the paper it is written on!

    There should be a vote of no confidence with this guy and he should be emptied and replaced ASAP!

    totally agree this guy is a waste of space



  14. #12943
    @hibs.net private member cabbageandribs1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in a house in Bathgate
    Posts
    58,924
    Quote Originally Posted by StevieC View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He'll be keeping a low profile dreading the point where it transpires that the SKY deal, the one he was so proud of, isn't worth the paper it is written on!

    There should be a vote of no confidence with this guy and he should be emptied and replaced ASAP!

    oor rod hired him, so it's only fair he should propose to firing him as well i'm sure lots of us all around the country would like a little more of the spotlight put on ogilvie as well, he's probably in the same hideout as doncaster, or maybe he has sought asylum in SFA HQ

  15. #12944
    @hibs.net private member johnrebus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Uncle Mort's North Country
    Posts
    3,040
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: Eh ? Wii Code: What ?
    Quote Originally Posted by Caversham Green View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    No, but the transfer to them can be approved under the articles - they are not specifically ineligible in the way that Dunfermline are. In fact on a strict reading of the rules/Articles Dunfermline are the only football club in Scotland that can't participate in the SPL, because the other requirements can be waived.


    Neither Dunfermline Athletic or their fans want to be in SPL next season.

    With eight derby matches to look forward to, they have already sold more season tickets than last term.



  16. #12945
    Quote Originally Posted by cabbageandribs1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    oor rod hired him, so it's only fair he should propose to firing him as well i'm sure lots of us all around the country would like a little more of the spotlight put on ogilvie as well, he's probably in the same hideout as doncaster, or maybe he has sought asylum in SFA HQ
    It will be interesting to see how many of the establishment apologists will survive once the fan's backlash turns the spotlight on them

  17. #12946
    Testimonial Due Brando7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Costa Del Rosyth
    Age
    46
    Posts
    2,820
    Quote Originally Posted by kenny-55 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I was thinking that this not a bad idea saves any voting nonsense as we know how that will turn out a (no) dunfy get saved ross county come up
    currant buns in the wilderness and no option to play next season , then expelled later on when all the *rap comes out
    happy days
    How about a nice wee game off football as a play-off Dunfermline v Dunee winners go up, big pay day for both clubs at Hampden n bit of excitement back into the game.....no?

  18. #12947
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    3,042
    Quote Originally Posted by Paisley Hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Donīt see why SPL canīt simply expunge enough points retrospectively (under rule H5) to make Oldhun the club finishing last. Ross County then get their share and Dunfermline stay up as they were not in last place. Thereīs then no decision for the SPL to make on a Newco. It all becomes the SFLīs problem :-)
    They cant expunge the points retrospectively because of the split. The split means that even if the 6th placed team finished with lower points than any of the bottom 6 teams they cannot be placed below them. In addition the 5 games post split would all have been wrong as the bottom 6 should have been playing rangers.

  19. #12948
    @hibs.net private member ian cruise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    East Kilbride
    Posts
    4,800
    Quote Originally Posted by Brando7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How about a nice wee game off football as a play-off Dunfermline v Dunee winners go up, big pay day for both clubs at Hampden n bit of excitement back into the game.....no?
    i was going to post the same thing. What a start to the season

  20. #12949
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    50
    Posts
    27,490
    The rules I've seen posted here today don't match the ones posted a few weeks ago.

    It was much clearer in the ones I'd seen before that the next team in the SFL would get an invite of a club went bust after the end of the season.

    No idea where they came from though.

  21. #12950
    Coaching Staff IWasThere2016's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Monifieth & Bolton
    Age
    57
    Posts
    35,341
    Quote Originally Posted by johnrebus View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Neither Dunfermline Athletic or their fans want to be in SPL next season.

    With eight derby matches to look forward to, they have already sold more season tickets than last term.


    There would be NO sporting integrity in reinstating the Pars. They were bottom - they got relegated.

    It has to be Dundee IMHO.

  22. #12951
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy74 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The rules I've seen posted here today don't match the ones posted a few weeks ago.

    It was much clearer in the ones I'd seen before that the next team in the SFL would get an invite of a club went bust after the end of the season.

    No idea where they came from though.
    The SPL changed its articles of association recently, part of which was to allow all clubs to get a vote on the transfer of share. Didn't see the full set of changes made public anywhere.

  23. #12952
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,985
    Quote Originally Posted by Paisley Hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I agree - what I was suggesting was that SPL expunge the Old Huns points from last season so that they are recorded as having come last. That lets Dunfermline stay up, Ross County get promoted and they can tell Sevco that their application to take over the Old Huns place in the SPL is invalid.
    On what grounds would you do that, though? They fulfilled all their fixtures, and haven't been found guilty in the double-contracts thing yet.

  24. #12953
    Day Tripper matty_f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    47
    Posts
    51,445
    Blog Entries
    1
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: franck sauzee
    Falkirk look like objecting to any moves fpr the Huns dropping to the first division. http://www.falkirkfc.co.uk/index.php...medium=twitter

  25. #12954
    @hibs.net private member HH81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    43
    Posts
    15,230
    There is a rumour down here rangers have agreed a fall back deal with a non league club in England. One lower than conf North.

    Doubt its true but was told the club had agreed to been moved to Scotland and a route into the English leagues. I'm told bury rumour was a smoke screen for this.

  26. #12955
    @hibs.net private member Stevie Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Prestonfield
    Age
    47
    Posts
    10,900
    Quote Originally Posted by s.a.m View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Worrying bit of back-pedalling here:

    Keith Downie@STVkeithAberdeen Chariman Stewart Milne says that contracry to reports, Aberdeen have still to make a decision on Rangers newco in SPL.
    That was actually built in to the story that BBC released this morning: -

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18539483

    An Aberdeen spokesman told BBC Scotland: "The consequences of not voting no would be overwhelming from a supporters' perspective.
    "There is now an avalanche in terms of fans' feeling here."
    However, the Pittodrie club has not made an official announcement and chairman Stewart Milne said they had yet to reach a final decision.
    "This is a critical decision which will have major implications for all clubs and the future of Scottish football," said Milne. "The views of our fans and the issue of sporting integrity will clearly be a major influencing factor in our decision-making."

  27. #12956
    Quote Originally Posted by matty_f View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Falkirk look like objecting to any moves fpr the Huns dropping to the first division. http://www.falkirkfc.co.uk/index.php...medium=twitter
    Brilliant statement. Especially the bit about 100p in the pound.

  28. #12957
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevie Reid View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That was actually built in to the story that BBC released this morning: -

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18539483

    An Aberdeen spokesman told BBC Scotland: "The consequences of not voting no would be overwhelming from a supporters' perspective.
    "There is now an avalanche in terms of fans' feeling here."
    However, the Pittodrie club has not made an official announcement and chairman Stewart Milne said they had yet to reach a final decision.
    "This is a critical decision which will have major implications for all clubs and the future of Scottish football," said Milne. "The views of our fans and the issue of sporting integrity will clearly be a major influencing factor in our decision-making."
    Companies usually make decisions on products on MoSCoW ratings. Must have, should have, would have, could have.

    Sporting integrity = must have
    Supportive fan base = must have
    Financial income = must have

    These are the 3 main ones moving forward. 2 of the three would be required as a minimum, usually all 3. It's impossible to get with a newco.

  29. #12958
    @hibs.net private member Sylar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Lanark/Palo Alto
    Age
    39
    Posts
    17,826
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: sjmcg1304
    Quote Originally Posted by TQM View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    There would be NO sporting integrity in reinstating the Pars. They were bottom - they got relegated.

    It has to be Dundee IMHO.
    Dundee finished closer to the bottom of division one than they did to the top of the league (in terms of points differential) and did not meet the necessary requirements to get to the SPL.

    Dunfermline finished bottom of the league by 8 points and were deservingly relegated from the SPL, but then again, they were competing in a league against a team who cheated and have been punished accordingly. The cards were stacked against the Pars (and every other club in the SPL).

    In terms of footballing performance, none of them "deserve" to be in the SPL.

    If Dundee (or Livingston, or Airdrie Utd...) ever make it back to the SPL on merit, having properly rebuilt and worked their way back whilst learning the lessons of their financial misdemeanors of the past, I'll tip my hat to them. However, Dundee cheated many people out of significant amounts of money - not once, but twice - and there are a large number of people up here on Tayside (as well you know) who have been royally screwed over by the previous incumbents at Dens Park. To think that this club will now benefit and be defaulted into the most lucrative league in Scotland because of the financial mismanagement of others is simply galling.

    The ONLY way this would be settled fairly is either having an 11 team SPL next year or forcing a playoff between the 2 clubs. IMHO.
    Madness, as you know, is a lot like gravity. All it takes is a little push.

  30. #12959
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Dųn Éideann, Alba
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,863
    Quote Originally Posted by matty_f View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Falkirk look like objecting to any moves fpr the Huns dropping to the first division. http://www.falkirkfc.co.uk/index.php...medium=twitter

  31. #12960

    Non-Huns SPL Meeting planned

    Beeb Radio reporting that 11 SPL clubs planning a meeting prior to the scheduled 4th July meeting.

    Will the second one then be made redundant??

    Here's more:

    Rangers newco vote implications to be discussed by SPL clubs


    Scottish Premier League clubs will meet at Hampden on Thursday to discuss the implications of their Rangers 'newco' vote on 4 July.
    All clubs, except Rangers, are expected to gather for a pre-vote debate.
    Dundee United and Hearts have already publicly stated they will vote against allowing a new Rangers into the SPL.
    BBC Scotland has learned that Aberdeen will also say no to Charles Green's application for his relaunched Rangers to replace the old club.
    And Hibernian chairman Rod Petrie previously made it clear that commercial concerns were of secondary importance in relation to the integrity of the league.
    Kilmarnock are the latest club to say they will canvas supporter opinion following similar moves by Inverness, Motherwell and St Mirren.
    It is understood the SPL board will make recommendations on various outcomes and scenarios at Thursday's meeting.
    Green's consortium, which bought Rangers' assets last week,needs the support of seven rival clubs when the SPL vote on the issue.
    Should Green's group not get the required 8-4 vote in their favour for top flight football, they would have to apply to fill the vacancy that would be created by a team being promoted from the Scottish Football League.
    Rangers Football Club plc entered administration in February over unpaid tax and Revenue and Customs' vote against a company voluntary arrangement proposal prompted the transfer of assets to Green's group and their attempts to replace the old Rangers in the SPL.
    Last edited by ancienthibby; 22-06-2012 at 04:15 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)