Almost perfect!
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 11,101 to 11,130 of 45185
-
-
12-06-2012 05:44 PM #11102
Meanwhile on Real Radio the intellectual debate rages on with DJ, Roughie "supported" by Michelle Moan - yes a solution for all your man-boob problems
This was the divvy that said about a year ago she would consider investing in either gers or tic - tart ;)
Real radio - oldfirm apologists are us"We know the people who have invested so far are simple fans." Vladimir Romanov - Scotsman 10th December 2012
"Romanov was like a breath of fresh air - laced with cyanide." Me.
-
12-06-2012 05:44 PM #11103
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,458
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Any club trying to get into the SFL will be voted on by the current member clubs, why would the SFL3 and 2 clubs vote Rangers in ahead of them at no benefit to themselves?
SFL3 is the only place for them, assuming the member clubs vote them in of course.
-
12-06-2012 05:46 PM #11104This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
One club will leave the SFL (Dundee) and one will join (Rangers Newco) so no need to add any new teams.
-
12-06-2012 05:46 PM #11105
Now this is getting a bit clearer I have to say this. If the dirty cheating huns get allowed back in the league we'd be aswell just liquidating every club in the land and finishing up.
They have to be hammered for the years of cheating and booted right down to the 3rd Division.
-
12-06-2012 05:47 PM #11106This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
By that time it would be too late to join any league.
-
-
12-06-2012 05:48 PM #11108This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
-
12-06-2012 05:51 PM #11111
BBC just stated the fixtures will still be released on Monday with Rangers in them, that makes total sense eh
-
12-06-2012 05:52 PM #11112
Aside from the SPL vote on Newco where does the SFA reconsideration of their punishment stand. Because if FIFA stand by their guns the SFA may have to suspend Rangers membership but if they are liquidated and form Newco without the history does this case disappear with the history. This would then let the SFA off from actually making a difficult decision.
-
12-06-2012 05:52 PM #11113
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Posts
- 4,429
Kick them out
No room for cheats
Change Scottish football for the better
Don't care about any TV deals.
Less money for every team ... So what .. reduce the wages by expanding the size of the league and give the kids from the academies a proper chance
Rangers - GIRFUY
GGTTH
-
12-06-2012 05:53 PM #11114This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 05:59 PM #11115This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Any Newco would have to seek SFA membership. If this was granted, I would guess that the penalties would come with the membership.
If a completely new club called Rangers (2012) was formed and made no attempt to claim the history of Rangers (1690) they may get away with it. However they probably would struggle to get the paperwork completed in time to compete next season.
-
12-06-2012 06:00 PM #11116
Being a bit lazy by asking... What is the status of Murray Park and Ipox ???
"At the end of the day, we all aspire to bigger things in our lives but one thing I can truly say from my heart is if I never kick a ball for one of these bigger clubs I would be delighted to stay with Hibs for the rest of my career. That's how highly I regard this club." Ivan Sproule
-
12-06-2012 06:00 PM #11117
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Nearby
- Posts
- 1,342
Newco Re-entry to SPL
You MUST tell RP that IF they are admitted to SPL that you will NEVER attend any SPL matches again.
The only thing our board understand or react to is hard cash (or lack of). Demand a refund of season tickets already bought IF they are admitted (with or without sanctions).
Time to stand up Rod. Is sporting integrity or cash more important to you and the board?
If it's cash then grow a pair and vote no to newco..........................
Just arrange a couple of friendlies with glamour opposition to recoup the cash lost by no huns.....you know it makes sense.
-
12-06-2012 06:03 PM #11118This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
12-06-2012 06:08 PM #11120This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 06:08 PM #11121
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dùn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 53
- Posts
- 10,863
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 06:11 PM #11122This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 06:14 PM #11123
PS Well done the HMRC for withstanding the Weedgie press, Rangers apologists and Alex Salmonds overt pressure to turn the other cheek!
-
12-06-2012 06:16 PM #11124This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 06:23 PM #11125
The media , especially the newspapers , will bombard everyone with the idea that the Scottish game cant survive without Rangers .
I don't remember us going out of business when we got relegated in '98 and had no TV money either.
-
12-06-2012 06:24 PM #11126This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-06-2012 06:24 PM #11127
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Age
- 82
- Posts
- 14,430
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They don't wear them(so I'm lead to believe)so weegie press has no minds.
-
12-06-2012 06:24 PM #11128
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 4
They're coming to get you . . . .
Untenable president, repay your loans Rangers, Gratuitous Alienation
Posted on 12 June, 2012 by Paul67
251
HMRC have confirmed their actions today leave open “potential investigation and pursuit of possible claims against those responsible for the company’s financial affairs in recent years”.
Chances are, HMRC will investigate the actions of SFA president, Campbell Ogilvie, more thoroughly than the investigation carried out by the Association which allowed their chief executive, Stewart Regan, to tell the media that:
“We are all aware of businesses being run where you have one owner and operator running the club and a number of directors sitting below. The way this process has been managed, a lot of this correspondence was done much higher up the chain than Campbell Ogilvie.”Stewart (if I can be familiar), you’re better than this. Try reading this story one page ahead, figure out where this one is going and start acting accordingly. Of course, President What-school-did-you-go-to then told Scotland on Sunday:
“I might have signed some documents from time to time”.Mr Regan had better make sure he knows what Mr Ogilvie signed, and I recommend he doesn’t relay exclusively on Mr Ogilvie’s memory.
Untenable
“Those responsible for the company’s financial affairs in recent years” includes Mr Ogilvie throughout his period as a director of Rangers. His position has been untenable for months and his continuing presence at the top of the Scottish FA only further contaminates those who claim otherwise.
The former directors of Rangers will not be the only ones alarmed at this development, recipients of EBTs (including the directors, who will have a second matter to consider) have reason to be concerned.
Not only do Her Majesty’s officers want any potential wrongdoing investigated, they also want their money.
Rangers EBTs were a loan. HMRC will tell recipients of this loan that their side letters (you better believe they’ll all find those side letters now) are not worth the paper they’re written on. If the money was indeed a loan, a demand for repayment will be made. If this is disputed, you can expect to hear the phrase Gratuitous Alienation to enter the lexicon soon. Gratuitous Alienation is the Scots legal term describing when property (or cash) is transferred to another party without any, or adequate, consideration.
I hear HMRC have all their ducks lined up for this one.
Internecine strife doesn’t begin to describe how things will end up.
-
12-06-2012 06:25 PM #11129
Im hearing all the 'im no going back if there voted in' chat and of course agree.
But say hibs vote to punt them and the rest of the clubs vote to keep them, is it justified to stop supporting hibs and stop going to games because of other clubs bottling it?
-
12-06-2012 06:29 PM #11130
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 9,489
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks