Beautifully put.... I suggest you send this to the SFA, SPL and all the SPL chairmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Thecat23
Rangers - GIRFUY
GGTTH
Printable View
Beautifully put.... I suggest you send this to the SFA, SPL and all the SPL chairmanQuote:
Originally Posted by Thecat23
Rangers - GIRFUY
GGTTH
[QUOTE=VickMackie;3260843]VR is trying to punt them. They're more financially attractive with Rangers in the league so it will be a definite yes, irrespective of the LW cash.
So are all the other SPL clubs (bar Celtic), but even if not for sale at least the chairmen will be taking this into account.
But,
Hertz and ICT have grievances with them due to money owed
St Mirren are peeved about the takeover debacle, but are the subject of a fans takeover
Dundee Utd are peeved about the legal challenge, as are ICT
Aberdeen have long-held animosity towards gers, but have to finance a move away from Pittodrie.
Yes, VR is trying to punt them, and that may sway their vote, but hopefully some or all of the above would vote no.
IMHO, all clubs should be voting no. If the rules can be bent for one club, then the whole system is flawed. It would expose Scottish football as an absolute joke if they were let back in. Let them apply to the SFL and see if they can outvote the mighty Spartans.
Almost perfect!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWR7Ib48M8g
Meanwhile on Real Radio the intellectual debate rages on with DJ, Roughie "supported" by Michelle Moan - yes a solution for all your man-boob problems
This was the divvy that said about a year ago she would consider investing in either gers or tic - tart ;)
Real radio - oldfirm apologists are us
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by VickMackie
Any club trying to get into the SFL will be voted on by the current member clubs, why would the SFL3 and 2 clubs vote Rangers in ahead of them at no benefit to themselves?
SFL3 is the only place for them, assuming the member clubs vote them in of course.
They don't need to add any.Quote:
Originally Posted by VickMackie
One club will leave the SFL (Dundee) and one will join (Rangers Newco) so no need to add any new teams.
Now this is getting a bit clearer I have to say this. If the dirty cheating huns get allowed back in the league we'd be aswell just liquidating every club in the land and finishing up.
They have to be hammered for the years of cheating and booted right down to the 3rd Division.
The acquisition of the Huns by Greene gives Greene until 30/7/12 to complete, the SPL surely won't need to come to a decision until the deal is done.Quote:
Originally Posted by VickMackie
By that time it would be too late to join any league.
Jim Traynor says Rangers must go to to SFL3!
Its Michelle Evans , not Mone.Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaPalmeiras
Implications for the TV deal?!
Games at 3 on a Saturday!
What will happen, relegated teams stay up, or 2nd placed go up?
BBC just stated the fixtures will still be released on Monday with Rangers in them, that makes total sense eh
Aside from the SPL vote on Newco where does the SFA reconsideration of their punishment stand. Because if FIFA stand by their guns the SFA may have to suspend Rangers membership but if they are liquidated and form Newco without the history does this case disappear with the history. This would then let the SFA off from actually making a difficult decision.
Kick them out
No room for cheats
Change Scottish football for the better
Don't care about any TV deals.
Less money for every team ... So what .. reduce the wages by expanding the size of the league and give the kids from the academies a proper chance
Rangers - GIRFUY
GGTTH
I would assume that the losers of the SFL playoffs will be promoted/retain their place.Quote:
Originally Posted by frazeHFC
If their SPL share is transferred they would have to carry any penalties.Quote:
Originally Posted by thebakerboy
Any Newco would have to seek SFA membership. If this was granted, I would guess that the penalties would come with the membership.
If a completely new club called Rangers (2012) was formed and made no attempt to claim the history of Rangers (1690) they may get away with it. However they probably would struggle to get the paperwork completed in time to compete next season.
Being a bit lazy by asking... What is the status of Murray Park and Ipox ???
You MUST tell RP that IF they are admitted to SPL that you will NEVER attend any SPL matches again.
The only thing our board understand or react to is hard cash (or lack of). Demand a refund of season tickets already bought IF they are admitted (with or without sanctions).
Time to stand up Rod. Is sporting integrity or cash more important to you and the board?
If it's cash then grow a pair and vote no to newco..........................
Just arrange a couple of friendlies with glamour opposition to recoup the cash lost by no huns.....you know it makes sense.
if they are voted back in it'll be golf on a Saturday afternoon for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by HibbyDave
I love Hibs, but if the Huns get back in I'll find something else to do with my time, would confirm Scottish football is corrupt.Quote:
Originally Posted by I'm_cabbaged
Dinnae ken about golf but if there's huns in any guise in the SPL next season with or without sanctions I'll be finding something else tae dae with my time and money.Quote:
Originally Posted by I'm_cabbaged
He wasn't saying that a couple of weeks ago............... But then most of the weedgie press seem to change their minds more often than a wh@re changing her knickersQuote:
Originally Posted by jgl07
PS Well done the HMRC for withstanding the Weedgie press, Rangers apologists and Alex Salmonds overt pressure to turn the other cheek!
My new season ticket will be going straight back to sender if this is the case too I not watching a rigged game what's the pointQuote:
Originally Posted by I'm_cabbaged
The media , especially the newspapers , will bombard everyone with the idea that the Scottish game cant survive without Rangers .
I don't remember us going out of business when we got relegated in '98 and had no TV money either.
So long as we vote NO I think I'll keep mine. I just won't be going to any away games. IF we vote yes, then forget about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by leither#1
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiskyhibby
They don't wear them(so I'm lead to believe)so weegie press has no minds.
Untenable president, repay your loans Rangers, Gratuitous Alienation
Posted on 12 June, 2012 by Paul67
251
HMRC have confirmed their actions today leave open “potential investigation and pursuit of possible claims against those responsible for the company’s financial affairs in recent years”.
Chances are, HMRC will investigate the actions of SFA president, Campbell Ogilvie, more thoroughly than the investigation carried out by the Association which allowed their chief executive, Stewart Regan, to tell the media that:
“We are all aware of businesses being run where you have one owner and operator running the club and a number of directors sitting below. The way this process has been managed, a lot of this correspondence was done much higher up the chain than Campbell Ogilvie.”Stewart (if I can be familiar), you’re better than this. Try reading this story one page ahead, figure out where this one is going and start acting accordingly. Of course, President What-school-did-you-go-to then told Scotland on Sunday:
“I might have signed some documents from time to time”.Mr Regan had better make sure he knows what Mr Ogilvie signed, and I recommend he doesn’t relay exclusively on Mr Ogilvie’s memory.
Untenable
“Those responsible for the company’s financial affairs in recent years” includes Mr Ogilvie throughout his period as a director of Rangers. His position has been untenable for months and his continuing presence at the top of the Scottish FA only further contaminates those who claim otherwise.
The former directors of Rangers will not be the only ones alarmed at this development, recipients of EBTs (including the directors, who will have a second matter to consider) have reason to be concerned.
Not only do Her Majesty’s officers want any potential wrongdoing investigated, they also want their money.
Rangers EBTs were a loan. HMRC will tell recipients of this loan that their side letters (you better believe they’ll all find those side letters now) are not worth the paper they’re written on. If the money was indeed a loan, a demand for repayment will be made. If this is disputed, you can expect to hear the phrase Gratuitous Alienation to enter the lexicon soon. Gratuitous Alienation is the Scots legal term describing when property (or cash) is transferred to another party without any, or adequate, consideration.
I hear HMRC have all their ducks lined up for this one.
Internecine strife doesn’t begin to describe how things will end up.