Climate change and the impending apocalypse

[Ozyhibby]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Sorry it's the 2 years since the war started and it's England not uk, its devolved and we have done much better than England. Yes offshore is more productive but onshore is better than literally burning fossil fuels like we're doing just now. Everything is far to slow in the uk. The same is said about solar, offshore and nuclear is cheaper yes but we need every weapon.

Also yes it's a specific period the last two years but they are dodging mines, drones, have 1 million men fighting and have regular power outages.

https://www.businessgreen.com/news/4...ore-wind-farms
Campaigners highlighted how as a result of the rules Ukraine has been able to install 12 times more onshore wind energy capacity than England since Russia's invasion, despite being at war.

The great thing for Ukraine is that the windmills are harder for the Russians to take out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Stairway 2 7]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

The great thing for Ukraine is that the windmills are harder for the Russians to take out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A huge backfire of Putins war is getting the west to go full throttle towards energy independence and renewables. 34% of Russias federal budget comes from oil and gas, a world running on renewables must be scary for them