Quote Originally Posted by 007 View Post
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
You've again avoided saying whether or not a 100% guarantee can be given that it won't make it easier for predators. Let's cover that matter off first before moving to another aspect of the debate.

You said it won't but you're not prepared to guarantee it which means you are not 100% confident so you are accepting there is a chance (maybe just a very very small one) that it might.
If your basis for passing any legislation is having a 100% guarantee on its actions then I'm afraid nothing will get done as that's an impossible bar to achieve.

I've said this before on this thread and I'll say it again. There is an awful lot of posters on here who seem heavily invested in women's safety and rights judging by the frequency and type of post on this thread.

I look around the rest of the site though, and that concern doesn't seem to continue. In fact there are very few other threads around this topic. We've just had yet another case of the Met police shielding and failing to deal with a horrifically violent officer preying on women. And yet it's trans people we should be most worried about and who need post after post written about them based on stuff here.

Given the standard seems to be the legislation cannot be be 100% guaranteed to stop an abuser finding a way round it, maybe we should shut the Met police as ultimately we can't be 100% sure there are not serving officers who are a grave threat to women.