hibs.net Messageboard

Page 22 of 42 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast
Results 631 to 660 of 1231
  1. #631
    @hibs.net private member JimBHibees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amityville
    Posts
    51,095
    Quote Originally Posted by RMQ1967 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    People don't like MS because he's honest and he doesn't care if his opinion upsets anyone.

    A couple of months ago, Hibs were having a purple patch & he was saying he still wasn't convinced by Hibs - he was bang on - we went on a horrendous run.
    His view if the red card isn't anti-Hibs - just the way he sees it & no different to some of our own support.

    Some folk need to get off the paranoia tablets and accept there are different views to their own that may be valid and aren't down to an anti-Hibs, pro-Hearts conspiracy.
    I have always liked Stewart however seems to be a change in his analysis think his opinions are very emotionally driven he couldn't stand Levein and clearly likes Robbie which imo factors into his views. Don't think I have heard him say anything remotely critical about Hearts this season and has appeared to fit in well with the BBC Gorgie love in especially around the European games. His analysis after Hibs excellent win v Aberdeen was frankly weird imo with no credit given whatsoever. Neilson has done many things this season to attract a least some criticism but his mate Micky has imo struggled to give any. Still one of my favourite pundits though.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #632
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnM1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Stewart's been like that for a while in my opinion. Makes me think I only liked him when they had Levein charge cause he hates Levein more than anything else.

    Think Stewart is a bit of a walloper now

    Thinks he's the bees' knees when he's a wee wasp that stings at every opportunity and needs swatting away.
    Anyone got an industrial size jam jar that can be smeared in Jam Tart sauce round the rim and filled with cruddy water for him to fall into?

  4. #633
    @hibs.net private member BILLYHIBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Sleepy Hollow
    Posts
    24,130
    I meant to say I just FF to the last game ( Hibs ) and listen to why we never got decisions this week

    Not really interested in the bum cheeks or any other Scottish teams tbh

  5. #634
    Coaching Staff gbhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    outside auld reekie
    Age
    64
    Posts
    5,674
    I watch it on IPlayer and fast forward through the analysis so have to listen to the cr##.

  6. #635
    @hibs.net private member Carheenlea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Age
    55
    Posts
    12,404
    Couldn’t tell you the last time I watched Sportscene in its entirety. I just use the BBC highlights on the app which often do the job for any game in particular I’d like to see. I packed it in after realising there was as much pundit chat (probably more..) than that of the actual football coverage which is ultimately what folk are tuning in to view?

    Would watch Sportscene religiously when hosted and commentated by Archie McPherson, and it was pretty much all football with extended coverage of one game. You’d watch then gather your own opinion of what you’d witnessed rather than be lectured to by a team of ex pros in bad shirts like what is the standard football show model of today.

  7. #636
    Coaching Staff hibsbollah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    54
    Posts
    36,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Carheenlea View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Couldn’t tell you the last time I watched Sportscene in its entirety. I just use the BBC highlights on the app which often do the job for any game in particular I’d like to see. I packed it in after realising there was as much pundit chat (probably more..) than that of the actual football coverage which is ultimately what folk are tuning in to view?

    Would watch Sportscene religiously when hosted and commentated by Archie McPherson, and it was pretty much all football with extended coverage of one game. You’d watch then gather your own opinion of what you’d witnessed rather than be lectured to by a team of ex pros in bad shirts like what is the standard football show model of today.
    Less analysis, more action please. It’s really not that difficult.

  8. #637
    The thing that annoys me about Mikey Stewart in recent years is his ignorance of the laws of the game.

    He still talks about whether handballs are deliberate. His analysis of stuff like the Livvy red card at the weekend focused on whether Jason Holt meant to hurt Nisbet…. None of that really matters now. It’s a bit pointless telling us if he thinks something shouldn’t be a yellow/red if his view completely ignores the current laws.

  9. #638
    @hibs.net private member RyeSloan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    13,070
    Quote Originally Posted by hibsbollah View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Less analysis, more action please. It’s really not that difficult.
    Depends on the quality of analysis I suppose.

    Sportscene tends to be a few random opinions that don’t amount to much and rarely reaches a level that could be described as analysis.

    At least MOTD does some half decent break down of the plays and the tactics on occasion.

  10. #639
    @hibs.net private member blackpoolhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    59,275
    Just listening to the Celtic manager saying he can see what LJ is trying to do, he can see an identity and a philosophy at Easter Road, maybe Michael Stewart should have a chat with him to put him right.

  11. #640
    https://twitter.com/BBCSportScot/status/1612397534802251780?s=20&t=kSVaDAUgvdWKID0dy5_98g

    Another example of the BBC slamming Porteous.

    The fact that the BBC have created a new "VARdict" show solely focusing on VAR decisions just shows how pathetic the hysteria over referring decisions has become in Scotland and the modern game. VAR was meant to end these conversations but now we have a show dedicated to them!

    If pundits spent less time over analysing every single decision would we have VAR now? I highly doubt it. Referees will make mistakes it is impossible for them to get everything right, if VAR helped them get everything right I would almost understand the need for it, but it clearly doesn't.

    The BBC should spend less time doing this and spend more time discussing why Rangers are the only team yet to concede a penalty all season and why the vast majority of Premiership refs come from Glasgow.

    Rant over.



  12. #641
    @hibs.net private member Alfred E Newman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    The back of beyond
    Posts
    8,054
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenGray View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://twitter.com/BBCSportScot/status/1612397534802251780?s=20&t=kSVaDAUgvdWKID0dy5_98g

    Another example of the BBC slamming Porteous.

    The fact that the BBC have created a new "VARdict" show solely focusing on VAR decisions just shows how pathetic the hysteria over referring decisions has become in Scotland and the modern game. VAR was meant to end these conversations but now we have a show dedicated to them!

    If pundits spent less time over analysing every single decision would we have VAR now? I highly doubt it. Referees will make mistakes it is impossible for them to get everything right, if VAR helped them get everything right I would almost understand the need for it, but it clearly doesn't.

    The BBC should spend less time doing this and spend more time discussing why Rangers are the only team yet to concede a penalty all season and why the vast majority of Premiership refs come from Glasgow.

    Rant over.


    I thought they were full of praise for Porteous last night? They were even praising him for his professional foul in the last minute which took the guy out and stopped a possible equaliser.
    It made me wonder if he is heading for Ibrox!

  13. #642
    @hibs.net private member Jim44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    77
    Posts
    23,526
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Alfred E Newman View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I thought they were full of praise for Porteous last night? They were even praising him for his professional foul in the last minute which took the guy out and stopped a possible equaliser.
    It made me wonder if he is heading for Ibrox!
    The Sky commentators and pundits used complimentary terms and language to describe how the game was going, because they had no option. However the tone, enthusiasm and liveliness was just not there and their commentary was flat. When Motherwell were showing progress and scoring their goals, you could easily detect a lift of enthusiasm and expectation in their voices. Call me paranoid but ……. !

  14. #643
    @hibs.net private member HibbyKeith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Craigentinny
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,184
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenGray View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://twitter.com/BBCSportScot/status/1612397534802251780?s=20&t=kSVaDAUgvdWKID0dy5_98g

    Another example of the BBC slamming Porteous.

    The fact that the BBC have created a new "VARdict" show solely focusing on VAR decisions just shows how pathetic the hysteria over referring decisions has become in Scotland and the modern game. VAR was meant to end these conversations but now we have a show dedicated to them!

    If pundits spent less time over analysing every single decision would we have VAR now? I highly doubt it. Referees will make mistakes it is impossible for them to get everything right, if VAR helped them get everything right I would almost understand the need for it, but it clearly doesn't.

    The BBC should spend less time doing this and spend more time discussing why Rangers are the only team yet to concede a penalty all season and why the vast majority of Premiership refs come from Glasgow.

    Rant over.


    Conor Goldson has got to be in with a shout for goalkeeper of the month. Hope they're talking about that on their ***** show.

    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk

  15. #644
    @hibs.net private member greenlex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    29,007
    Quote Originally Posted by RyeSloan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Depends on the quality of analysis I suppose.

    Sportscene tends to be a few random opinions that don’t amount to much and rarely reaches a level that could be described as analysis.

    At least MOTD does some half decent break down of the plays and the tactics on occasion.
    We need pundits with higher football IQs IMO.

  16. #645
    @hibs.net private member Smartie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Age
    47
    Posts
    23,137
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim44 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The Sky commentators and pundits used complimentary terms and language to describe how the game was going, because they had no option. However the tone, enthusiasm and liveliness was just not there and their commentary was flat. When Motherwell were showing progress and scoring their goals, you could easily detect a lift of enthusiasm and expectation in their voices. Call me paranoid but ……. !
    Was James McFadden not the co-commentator?

    As a fan of the national side, and one who was in Paris that time he scored the winner, I'm prepared to cut him a wee bit of slack if he's not exactly neutral when it comes to providing punditry on a game involving his team.

    Funny how it can drive you mad at times but not really bother you at others.

  17. #646
    @hibs.net private member Allant1981's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    44
    Posts
    11,384
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenGray View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://twitter.com/BBCSportScot/status/1612397534802251780?s=20&t=kSVaDAUgvdWKID0dy5_98g

    Another example of the BBC slamming Porteous.

    The fact that the BBC have created a new "VARdict" show solely focusing on VAR decisions just shows how pathetic the hysteria over referring decisions has become in Scotland and the modern game. VAR was meant to end these conversations but now we have a show dedicated to them!

    If pundits spent less time over analysing every single decision would we have VAR now? I highly doubt it. Referees will make mistakes it is impossible for them to get everything right, if VAR helped them get everything right I would almost understand the need for it, but it clearly doesn't.

    The BBC should spend less time doing this and spend more time discussing why Rangers are the only team yet to concede a penalty all season and why the vast majority of Premiership refs come from Glasgow.

    Rant over.


    To be fair, if a player had done that to one of our players we would have been raging that there was no foul given

  18. #647
    Quote Originally Posted by Allant1981 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    To be fair, if a player had done that to one of our players we would have been raging that there was no foul given
    Probably, that wasn’t even the main point of my post tbf, it’s just embarrassing that they have a show dedicated to this imo. And this is the clip that they use to promote it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  19. #648
    @hibs.net private member JimBHibees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amityville
    Posts
    51,095
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenGray View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Probably, that wasn’t even the main point of my post tbf, it’s just embarrassing that they have a show dedicated to this imo. And this is the clip that they use to promote it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Yep bizarre they would highlight that pretty much none incident which happens in every game over a genuinely controversial var check. Tortuous agenda

  20. #649
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    3,937
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenGray View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://twitter.com/BBCSportScot/status/1612397534802251780?s=20&t=kSVaDAUgvdWKID0dy5_98g

    Another example of the BBC slamming Porteous.

    The fact that the BBC have created a new "VARdict" show solely focusing on VAR decisions just shows how pathetic the hysteria over referring decisions has become in Scotland and the modern game. VAR was meant to end these conversations but now we have a show dedicated to them!

    If pundits spent less time over analysing every single decision would we have VAR now? I highly doubt it. Referees will make mistakes it is impossible for them to get everything right, if VAR helped them get everything right I would almost understand the need for it, but it clearly doesn't.

    The BBC should spend less time doing this and spend more time discussing why Rangers are the only team yet to concede a penalty all season and why the vast majority of Premiership refs come from Glasgow.

    Rant over.


    Remember these ‘pundits’ have very little knowledge to convey on sportscene. No impartiality when speaking about clubs. It’s become trending to jump on certain players all the time and at the moment that is Porteous

  21. #650
    Day Tripper matty_f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    47
    Posts
    51,455
    Blog Entries
    1
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: franck sauzee
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenGray View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://twitter.com/BBCSportScot/status/1612397534802251780?s=20&t=kSVaDAUgvdWKID0dy5_98g

    Another example of the BBC slamming Porteous.

    The fact that the BBC have created a new "VARdict" show solely focusing on VAR decisions just shows how pathetic the hysteria over referring decisions has become in Scotland and the modern game. VAR was meant to end these conversations but now we have a show dedicated to them!

    If pundits spent less time over analysing every single decision would we have VAR now? I highly doubt it. Referees will make mistakes it is impossible for them to get everything right, if VAR helped them get everything right I would almost understand the need for it, but it clearly doesn't.

    The BBC should spend less time doing this and spend more time discussing why Rangers are the only team yet to concede a penalty all season and why the vast majority of Premiership refs come from Glasgow.

    Rant over.


    The only valid reason I could see for using that clip is that they wanted to educate folk on why VAR didn't/couldn't intervene and so turn down feelings of injustice about it.

    To that end, it was a good example - folk would definitely question how VAR missed it, so that's it explained.

  22. #651
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Trinity Hibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Remember these ‘pundits’ have very little knowledge to convey on sportscene. No impartiality when speaking about clubs. It’s become trending to jump on certain players all the time and at the moment that is Porteous
    Not sure I agree on Sunday's performance of Porteous, in this one game he could easily have cost us the 3rd goal by falling down holding his face.
    Then OK he trips the Motherwell player on the way in to clear from Van Veen, but it would be melt down on here if it happened against us and nothing given!!!
    He seems to bring it on himself at times, and when he gets caught out, this place thinks he's been hard done too???

  23. #652
    @hibs.net private member JimBHibees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amityville
    Posts
    51,095
    Quote Originally Posted by where'stheslope View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not sure I agree on Sunday's performance of Porteous, in this one game he could easily have cost us the 3rd goal by falling down holding his face.
    Then OK he trips the Motherwell player on the way in to clear from Van Veen, but it would be melt down on here if it happened against us and nothing given!!!
    He seems to bring it on himself at times, and when he gets caught out, this place thinks he's been hard done too???
    Think he had a clear head knock and it was ridiculous the ref never stopped the game

  24. #653
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by JimBHibees View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Think he had a clear head knock and it was ridiculous the ref never stopped the game
    Quick recovery time to celebrate the goal, to my mind means he faked it again I'm afraid!!!

  25. #654
    Quote Originally Posted by where'stheslope View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Quick recovery time to celebrate the goal, to my mind means he faked it again I'm afraid!!!
    Players up and down the country do this to get games stopped. Weird take from yourself when it helped us see out a win


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  26. #655
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenGray View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Players up and down the country do this to get games stopped. Weird take from yourself when it helped us see out a win


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Not weird when it could have also cost us the win if play was stopped!!!

  27. #656
    @hibs.net private member Oscar T Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    In a Trash can
    Posts
    6,004
    Quote Originally Posted by where'stheslope View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Quick recovery time to celebrate the goal, to my mind means he faked it again I'm afraid!!!
    Except it was a clear head knock, got a forearm into the back of the head. So the reaction may have been overstated it was not fake.


    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

  28. #657
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar T Grouch View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Except it was a clear head knock, got a forearm into the back of the head. So the reaction may have been overstated it was not fake.
    Looking at the replays it looks more like a forearm in the back rather than head.
    But, I still feel his feigning a head knock could have cost us the 3rd goal?

  29. #658
    @hibs.net private member Oscar T Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    In a Trash can
    Posts
    6,004
    Quote Originally Posted by where'stheslope View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Looking at the replays it looks more like a forearm in the back rather than head.
    But, I still feel his feigning a head knock could have cost us the 3rd goal?
    Isn't VAR meant to look at the play leading to the goal for anything the ref missed? In which case the imaginary 3rd goal would not stand?


    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

  30. #659
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Livingston
    Posts
    2,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar T Grouch View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Isn't VAR meant to look at the play leading to the goal for anything the ref missed? In which case the imaginary 3rd goal would not stand?
    Just watched the incident again on bbc website, and his head was never hit.
    VAR is only called upon if a goal is scored or ref misses something or gets an incident or player wrong.

  31. #660
    @hibs.net private member JimBHibees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amityville
    Posts
    51,095
    Quote Originally Posted by where'stheslope View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Quick recovery time to celebrate the goal, to my mind means he faked it again I'm afraid!!!
    Not at all definitely got a knock to the head. Referee was pathetic as clearly outlined by McFadden on co commentary

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)