My experience of the days of bigger leagues was that the aim of many clubs was to avoid relegation. Once it became clear,usually due to at least one club becoming detached,that a club would be safe instead of a relaxation with good football being played in an effort to move up that in fact many meaningless games took place. Tom Hart was a driving force in smaller leagues. He reasoned that the more games clubs played against the OF the more used they would become to the pressure of playing them. Although Hibs didn’t get a huge amount of success Aberdeen certainly did as did Dundee United to a lesser extent. The only pity was that lack of ambition by owners along with poor financial decisions meant that eventually the OF re established themselves at the top of the Scottish game.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Results 91 to 120 of 136
Thread: SPFL Strategic Review
-
15-09-2021 12:56 PM #91
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Age
- 81
- Posts
- 13,819
-
15-09-2021 01:40 PM #92This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The population of Norway is 5.4 million
The TV Deal for Scotland brings in 30 million
The TV Deal for Norway brings in 63 million
It's possible to earn significantly more from our TV deal without increasing our population. However it would involve far more live matches being shown, which might have a negative impact on attendances. We currently allow 48 live matches, plus play-offs. Norway currently allow 240 live matches.
Maybe the best way of looking at TV deals is to see how much money they bring in per head of population of the country. If we ignore England, Italy, Spain and Germany as they have a truly global reach rather than a mostly national reach then here are some relevant figures:
TV Money per head of population
Scotland - £5.50
Greece - £5
Portugal - £12.6
Poland - £1.24
Austria - £3
Belgium - £9
Netherlands - £4
Norway - £12
Sweden - £5
As you can see Portugal and Norway are over performing but both allow almost all matches to be broadcast live
Greece, Netherlands, Sweden are in the same ballpark as Scotland
Poland and Austria are under performing
We need to stop judging out TV income by England which brings in £29 per head of population and look at more comparable leagues
-
15-09-2021 02:30 PM #93This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Scotland £625,000
Norway £262,500There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
15-09-2021 02:48 PM #94
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
- Location
- Bellshill
- Posts
- 2,417
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
SPFL TV Would maybe be an option but how that’s set up would need some real thinking, if clubs are handed the income on a stream by stream basis the gap between larger supported clubs and the smaller would grow and a Netflix style monthly sub model would probably have to be pretty steep for supporters to guarentee it covers or goes above the deal already in place, it will also likely hit clubs at the gate when the winter months kick in it’s easier to sit on the couch than attend in horrible conditions.
-
15-09-2021 03:45 PM #95This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But those teams would likely improve over time no? A bigger league might encourage fresh investment into clubs like Dunfermline, Dundee, Kilmarnock etc.
-
15-09-2021 03:56 PM #96
Does anyone actually have a clue about how these things work?
I don't. But I do know that TV companies don't just pick a number out of thin air.
They know exactly who watches what for how long. This is the info the ad agencies use to sell ad space.
They in turn know exactly what every second of screen time is worth.
So, ultimately they come up with a figure based on loads of factors. The SPFL can then try and haggle for a bit more I guess.
But what's the alternative? Sky are the only show in town and they know it. Premier Sports were never about to step up and offer more. Who else is there?
If Scottish Football was as desirable as some make out we'd have broadcasters fighting over themselves to show it. But it's not so there is isn't.
When teams in our top league barely get 5000 of their own fans in their stadium, it's a bit rich to expect a broadcaster to pay them zillions to put it on the telly. The demand simply isn't there.
Maybe in other countries there are several broadcasters meaning competition? Maybe some of them charge £100pm to watch the football?
Just saying that country X gets more than us therefore our deal is crap is pretty much just throwing toys out prams.
-
15-09-2021 04:12 PM #97This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
All of this is a very good argument for change.
One unfortunate consequence of the internet is that money and attention becomes ever more focused on a smaller and smaller elite, with everyone else scrabbling for pennies.
I do wonder if the frequency of league OF games (and the Edinburgh derby) actually diminishes their appeal. Drop them to twice a season and their value would increase.
-
15-09-2021 05:45 PM #98This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I know that a lot of people will watch whatever football is on the screen. Me, I will watch hibs, sometimes Scotland but rarely will I go out of my way to watch another game that has no interest for me.
Let's face it, one week we have some team against rangers and the following week it will be another team against Celtc. Very rarely is there a game on telly that doesn't involve one of Them! I get it, the TV companies want the maximum audience, but they are alienating half the viewing public.. IMHO
-
15-09-2021 05:52 PM #99This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Two games a year (plus their inevitable meeting in cups) might start to return some life to the game.
-
15-09-2021 06:08 PM #100
Basing your future on selling players is not a business model - it's a massive gamble. What happens if you don't produce any decent players?I'd guess that teams want the conclusion of this report to be that each team should be able to sell their own tv rights. The last year showed that attendances don't matter - clubs can survive without crowds - what they want to be able to do is to buy a Japanese player and sell the games to people in Japan. Buy an American player and get people in Texas to buy the games.I was in Cairo when Liverpool were in the CL final - it was massive. Everyone in Egypt wants to watch Liverpool games just now because Salah plays for them - when he's sold to Barcelona, then they'll all change to supporting Barcelona.The model that worked in Scotland in 1950, and which we're still using, is not the way forward.[/QUOTE]
Really, IMO teams selling their own TV rights would only suit the Old Firm.A lot of folk using IPTV and other free ways of streaming games would also cut deep into sales.That is to say nothing of the reduction in attendances and ancilliary sales such as match day food and drink and club shop sales.As for your chat about Salah. That is corporate circus football that has no relevance to Hibs. As for still using the same model as 1950 that is total rubbish.The model then was just to live for the day and spend all their money on players and wages.No thought for the future. No development. Players training in public parks.This amateur model was followed by Hibs until they finally ran the club right into the ground and we almost went out of business. At that point 30 years ago we were debt ridden and our ground was a slum collection of wooden and tin huts and the players trained in public parks. .The Hibs model after that was to live within our means and use monies raised to reduce our debt, rebuild our ground and build our own training centre. After 30 years Hibs and indeed Hearts have repaired the damage caused by the 1950-90 model and are ready to improve the team year on year and make progress in European competition.Last edited by CMurdoch; 15-09-2021 at 06:21 PM.
-
15-09-2021 06:09 PM #101This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The OF drew big figures but even games involving "other Scottish teams" drew decent audiences.
They were way out of kilter with what you might expect, based on the money put into English and Scottish football by Sky.
Obviously there is then the global interest, where the English league will clearly appeal more to a global audience.
-
15-09-2021 07:11 PM #102
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 10,624
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Agree and it is the Dons fault we have that. Seems a bit ironic them putting forward a proposal that won't happen because they have essentially given the New, New Firm the casting vote
-
15-09-2021 10:53 PM #103This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Secvo were great for the lower leagues, really boosted attendance figures and audiences. I think it’s Celtic’s turn next
-
16-09-2021 12:13 AM #104
The problem with Scottish football is the dominance of ‘Rangers’ and Celtic. The last time any other team won the League was in the early 1980s when Aberdeen and Dundee United were still competitive. That is not far off 40 years where two teams have a monopoly on League titles.
Compare that to England where Manchester City, Manchester United, Chelsea, Leicester City and Liverpool have all won League titles in the last ten years. Going back to the mid-1980s, you could add Arsenal, Blackburn Rovers, Leeds United, and Everton to that list. Extend it back a few more years and you could include Nottingham Forest, Derby County, and Aston Villa.
Until a formula is devised that can somehow break the dominance of the bigot brothers in Scotland, I don’t see much changing. I am not sure if or how this can be done.
-
16-09-2021 01:40 PM #105
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 1,283
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
12/12, similar to now
14/12, safer for some ? More attacking football, more younger players play earlier. Even split in tier1
14/14 as above but more so
14/12 as above
16/12 Needs splits through league , can still get 4 OF matches and probably Edinburgh derbies. Even more young players?
16/10 as above just 2 less teams
-
16-09-2021 01:52 PM #106
Hope this review is actually read and considered, unlike the Henry McLeish review which was filed under trash while being laughed at by the ugly sisters....
-
16-09-2021 01:57 PM #107This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The 5 clubs mentioned? Ok, Aberdeen haven’t been relegated, but between Hibs, Hearts, Dundee United and Dundee you’ve got a couple of relegations each. Hearts and Dundee (at least once) have an insolvency event. There’s the odd cup win in there, and we shouldn’t easily dismiss the work these clubs have had to do since Hillsborough to get their grounds in order but the underachievement of Scotland’s biggest clubs out with the OF over the past quarter century or so has been shameful.
I’m glad they’re getting together to discuss it but remain a wee bit cynical about what they might come up with.
-
16-09-2021 03:24 PM #108
Perhaps the proposal should be that Rangers and Celtc only get two points for a win and the other teams still get three.
That would reduce the gap at the top quite a bit... though Rangers would still have won the league last season, ahead of Hibs in second place.
-
16-09-2021 04:13 PM #109This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-09-2021 04:25 PM #110This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
16-09-2021 04:33 PM #111This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
What I said about Kelty Hearts earlier, these 'wee' clubs live to be part of the 'big boys'
these 'wee' teams are admitted to the league on merit, remember, that's how Livingston started, Ferranti Thistle, became Meadowbank Thistle before moving out of town. Inverness Caley Thistle, Ross County? Do you deny them the chance to grow, win cups etc????There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
16-09-2021 04:34 PM #112This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-09-2021 04:35 PM #113This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-09-2021 05:37 PM #114This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If under 1000 people can be assed to turn up regularly, should they really be part of the professional set up?
I'd say no. Sounds harsh, but hey-ho, under a bus they go.
They should have zero say on how the professional game is run.
-
16-09-2021 05:41 PM #115This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThere is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
16-09-2021 05:56 PM #116This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
16-09-2021 06:07 PM #117This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The big clubs should dictate what happens because they are meant to be the elite clubs of Scottish football.
These tiny wee clubs are nothing of the sort. They're community cubs, and more power to them for what they do, but they're a million miles form being elite.
All you ever hear form their chairmen is how they need money from the league or SFA. Well, if that's the case maybe they need to look at how their club are set up / run.
Look at the mess Brechin caused the last couple of years. Somehow their chairmen was a member of the board that decides what happens to the rest of Scottish football? The very definition of amateur hour and self interest.
I want guys like Cormack and Gordon running the show.
-
16-09-2021 06:15 PM #118This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They offer nothing.
It's a well accepted fact within football that clubs are nothing without fans. Well these clubs pretty much don't have any!
There were 230 people could be bothered going to watch Albion Rovers against Cowdenbeath last week. You think their chairmen should make decisions that could effect Hibs? Not on your Nelly.
-
16-09-2021 06:30 PM #119
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 4,115
Two full time leagues of 12 teams
Phase 1 22 qualifying games
Phase 2 split 8/8/8
All points returned to Zero round of 14 games.
Phase 3 top 4 play off for Premiership
38 game season
Bottom 4 seeded play off against top 4 in tier 2 home and away 38 game season.
Middle 8 see above
Bottom 8 same up to play offs then bottom 4 play off to avoid a relegation play off against the pyramid winners
Sound familiar? You can bet your 'tache on it
-
16-09-2021 06:31 PM #120This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I want a football set up that is based on a clubs footballing ability. Very simple!
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks