This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Of course they would have. With indecent haste too, if they were in 10th or 11th and it spared them from relegation.
They are a bunch of self-serving cheats.
Results 8,191 to 8,220 of 16724
Thread: The generic Hearts thread
-
11-04-2020 09:10 PM #8191
-
11-04-2020 09:15 PM #8192
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Posts
- 1,327
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 08:34 AM #8193
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 78
- Posts
- 2,425
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I stand corrected - I was under the impression that Conrad was still on Leicester's books at the time we signed him. I will punish myself by staying in for a month.
-
12-04-2020 08:39 AM #8194
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 1,138
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The no alliance all want different outcomes and it will fall to pieces fairly soon I would think.
-
12-04-2020 09:23 AM #8195This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They have spent a fortune to ensure promotion and there is no way they would accept "the title" without the promotion it deserves.
Clearly the flipside of this argument is that - if you promote the winners, you must relegate the bottom sides.
Its all fairly simple, and points to why so many clubs have voted Yes (regardless of Rangers / Hearts / ICT / Dundee conspiracy theories).
-
12-04-2020 09:54 AM #8196This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Look at this example. The word 'conspiracy' has 10 letters. The word 'conspire' has 8 letters. 10-8=2.
Hitler had 2 eyes.
Coincidence?
I think not.
-
12-04-2020 09:56 AM #8197
EUEFA needs to step in and have a blanket rule to end all leagues with average points etc. No league reconstructions unless already planned. If they don’t then there will infighting and bad blood across all leagues with clubs blaming each other for acting in self interest or doing over bitter rivals. It’s crazy allowing leagues to decide their own fate this way. There may be exceptions of course due to how many games were left in certain leagues but a blanket ruling from EUEFA for those who have played the majority of their seasons is a must
-
12-04-2020 10:05 AM #8198This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 10:12 AM #8199This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Who are EUEFA?
-
12-04-2020 10:19 AM #8200This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 10:27 AM #8201This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Ah, Papists. I knew it!!
-
12-04-2020 10:30 AM #8202
Heres another corruption theory inverness struck a deal with rangers and hearts for a pot of money if they could persuade enough clubs in the championship to vote no . A chat group was formed between dundee ,inverness, partick , to conspire to achieve this goal .
The SPFL got wind of this and spoke to the club with least to gain from this agreement Dundee.
Rangers raging that their plan could come undone through everything at the
SPFL as attempted cover for their plan.
Dundee think **** it let's play the game we could get a lot more if we could get into the premier via reconstruction.
So watch and let's see if this happens it won't be a 14 team league put forward but a 16 team league then we know what really happened
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
-
12-04-2020 10:34 AM #8203This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 10:43 AM #8204
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 4,665
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Personally I think rangers & hearts needed it to succeed (for the money) and the hoo-ha is all about optics for their fan bases
Play the victim card to sustain season book numbers during the championship season (hearts) or the 10 in a row season (rangers)
-
12-04-2020 10:57 AM #8205This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Pathetic isn’t it? Even more so that we are now resigned to this behaviour.
-
12-04-2020 10:59 AM #8206This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
-
12-04-2020 11:06 AM #8207This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 11:24 AM #8208This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 11:27 AM #8209This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 11:59 AM #8210
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 4,665
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If they vote No then that implies their remaining games this season are still to be played (so the income hasn't been lost - yet - just delayed, perhaps meaning no pay out).
If they vote Yes, then the games are definitely off, but the policy still might not pay out as DFC had the chance to play them (later this year) but choose not to, by voting Yes.
If that is close to being accurate then Dundee's only sure & certain income before Autumn will be by voting Yes, ending the season & taking the prize money (utd up, hearts down, prizes handed out & prize monies paid out to all)
It's a theory....Last edited by Springbank; 12-04-2020 at 12:03 PM.
-
12-04-2020 12:00 PM #8211
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 7,479
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 12:16 PM #8212
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
- Posts
- 23,176
I don't blame the SPFL really. Clubs up and down the country including Hibs were releasing statements saying which way they voted. Can't blame the SPFL for that.
-
12-04-2020 12:19 PM #8213
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 7,479
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 12:29 PM #8214
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 11,373
It seems to me a bit hypocritical of Rangers in their statement a couple of days ago to say clubs were being coerced and bullied into voting for the SPFL resolution when their little brother's representative Budge freely admitted calling clubs about it. She said it was to see how they'd be voting but I very much doubt she didn't try to persuade (coerce) them into voting against it.
https://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines...embers-update/
-
12-04-2020 12:33 PM #8215This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Again, why?
Why did you expect this should be a secret ballot? Hibs fans quite reasonably wanted to know how our club voted, so SPFL only released info that would come out anyhow.
-
12-04-2020 12:51 PM #8216
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 7,479
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 01:18 PM #8217This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
And how would you stop it?
Even if clubs resisted pressure to communicate their decision with their fans (which I don’t think is tenable), club chairman would be communicating with each other.
-
12-04-2020 01:20 PM #8218
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 7,479
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 01:52 PM #8219
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Posts
- 17,807
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-04-2020 02:04 PM #8220
- Join Date
- Jun 2014
- Posts
- 7,479
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
No that difficult
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks