Quote Originally Posted by RyeSloan View Post
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Ha ha fair enough...the article was probably written for you then! It even calls her a ‘shameless charlatan’ in the headline so starts off by calling her names right at the start, it then continues to be rather derogatory to her and the members of her party throughout.

As I said such articles are not gonna be taken with any weight by people not already on board with such things, which while probably right up your street, doesn’t to me at least, do much to further the conversation or indeed persuade me that the side calling the other one names is any more likely to be trusted or believed than the target of the article.
Here's one from Mandy Rhodes, the editor of "Holyrood" magazine (which aiui, is a fairly neutral source?)

http://www.holyrood.com/articles/com...-her-own-party

Essentially makes much the same points without the vitriol.