This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I got to speak with someone from the Upper House.
Lord Foooks or something like that.
Couldn't make out a word he was saying. Sounded pi$hed to me and it was 11.00 in the morning![]()
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 36,121 to 36,150 of 45185
-
14-02-2017 02:51 PM #36121
-
14-02-2017 03:06 PM #36122This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-02-2017 03:09 PM #36123This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-02-2017 04:06 PM #36124This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
14-02-2017 04:43 PM #36125
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 3,786
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
1) Even if BDO genuinely 'forgot', isn't there a law/procedure covering these events ?. I'd have thought that all/any of the other creditors who stood to lose of money would've known about how these things are dealt with and would've highlighted BDO's 'error' at the time ?
2) Isn't there a governing-body who monitors these events and makes sure all the i's are dotted and t's crossed ?
I did have a 3rd question but it was going to be 'Why wasn't this highlighted in the media' - but then I remembered this is Scotland.
-
14-02-2017 08:05 PM #36126This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I was joking when I suggested the administrator forgot. BDO were appointed by the court and had the court's support . BDO's man was Bryan Jackson and I think his reputation of being " savior of football clubs " got the better of him so he pulled a fast one.
HMRC who voted against the CVA could have gone to court to challenge the actions of BDO and Jackson , but there was nothing in for the taxman or any other creditor. Ukio Bankas as secured creditor was always going to take the whole creditor pot, so the taxman's costs in starting a court action was just chucking away taxpayer's money.
I got that view from someone quite high up in HMRC , he also said the adminstrator's actions had been fully noted and, in the future when the working of the insolvency industry is under review, don't be surprised if this case is quoted as one of the reasons why the taxman thinks there is too much power given to companies like BDO and other checks and balances are needed.
Of course Bryan Jackson no longer works for BDO, he now works for Heart's auditors.
-
14-02-2017 08:27 PM #36127This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-02-2017 08:32 PM #36128
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Age
- 56
- Posts
- 2,303
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
According to this person the Grant was for Millions. Not sure if true or not, just passing on what I was informed.
GGTTH
-
14-02-2017 08:35 PM #36129
None of this stuff was done by the present board at Rangers or Hearts. Why should Budge or King pay for the crap that was left behind by Romanov etc?
When you are blaming Hearts for stiffing the council etc. who are you actually blaming? As far as i can see it was Romanov and his crew., nothing to do with Budge, Levein or anyone else there now?
-
14-02-2017 08:39 PM #36130This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-02-2017 08:49 PM #36131This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sevco are a new club, which puts them in the clear.
Hearts are still the same club, which makes it fair game to point out that they used the money they stole to buy players they couldn't afford to win trophies which they are still entitled to claim. They can't have the trophies without the shame of the debt however.Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
-
14-02-2017 08:53 PM #36132This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
You are spot on about the unliquidated, and therefore still the original Hearts, they'd like it both ways, there's different bums on the deck chairs but its the same ship. Well old steamer anyway.
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
14-02-2017 08:54 PM #36133This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteMature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
-
14-02-2017 09:00 PM #36134This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
14-02-2017 09:12 PM #36135
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 3,786
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-02-2017 09:17 PM #36136
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Utopia
- Posts
- 4,180
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
"original" Hearts were wound up in 1905 although they are still regarded as the version that rose from those embers but there are those that believe that Rangers are still the same version pre 2012 so not sure what difference being liquidated makes in the long run
Hearts were also the first Scottish club to be suspended from all competitions in October 1884 for making "underhand payments" to players.
It's in their genes.....Last edited by Kaiser1962; 14-02-2017 at 09:25 PM.
-
14-02-2017 09:21 PM #36137This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875
-
14-02-2017 09:26 PM #36138This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Don't forget the new stand and now a new pitch to be paid for too.
-
14-02-2017 09:28 PM #36139This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-02-2017 09:28 PM #36140This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The liquidation happened, we know why, so like any other business that goes down that path I am happy to regard them as gone.
It's a bit like the monty python dead parrot sketch with Johnny Hun playing the Michael Palin role.
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
14-02-2017 11:14 PM #36141
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Age
- 67
- Posts
- 62
Big Eck McLeish doing the Yosser Hughes impression on Sunday was an embarrassment.....Has the ginger prick forgotten he was deemed not good enough back when they were almost as deluded as they are now......Can you imagine the interview?
Sent from my Lenovo YT3-X50F using Tapatalk
-
14-02-2017 11:40 PM #36142
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 344
That 1.7m EBT must be concentrating his mind to be fair to McLeish. Decision gets upheld and he might get away with a £2.5m settlement once the penalties are added, or the jail if he prefers that.
-
15-02-2017 04:52 AM #36143This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-02-2017 05:11 AM #36144This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Up until recently, the employer bore the brunt of any dodgy tax scheme. The employee escaped punishment. However, they have recently started to instigate proceedings against employees or beneficiaries of such schemes.
The regime is very new, so there are bound to be appeals against any assessments....until Court case law is established, it's difficult to know how things might go. My own view is that it's unfair to tax both the payer and payee... IMHO double the tax would be collected that way. That will.be the position of the recipients, I'm sure...but how that plays with the Courts remains to.be seen.
If McLeish is held to be liable, he'll be due tax and NI at the top rates in force when he received the payments. He'll also be due interest..which is set down in statute...and penalties...which will be negotiable. I'd doubt that jail time will be a consideration.
Sent from my SM-A510F using Tapatalk
-
15-02-2017 06:37 AM #36145
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Age
- 56
- Posts
- 2,303
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
GGtTH
-
15-02-2017 07:18 AM #36146This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-02-2017 08:08 AM #36147This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It's a bit like the yam saying what happened to the smaller creditors did them a favour as they'd only have wasted the money on food and paying their way anyway, or lord George saying that it was alright because the Lithuanian government had a pension protection scheme.
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
15-02-2017 08:43 AM #36148This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-02-2017 08:47 AM #36149This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-02-2017 08:57 AM #36150This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
At first I thought you were going to say you had joined their creditor's role of shame.
Taken in by the spin of Self-sufficient Southern and All is Barry@EEN.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks