This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThere's a thread on FF about Sevco being about to put in a third bid for O'Halloran. Seems the muppets know more about their club than Warburton. The first bid was apparently £150k.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 33,661 to 33,690 of 45185
-
15-01-2016 11:14 AM #33661
-
15-01-2016 11:31 AM #33662
Breaking: Glasgow Sheriff rejects bid by WiFi company 802 Works to arrest £300,000 from Rangers FC
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
15-01-2016 11:35 AM #33663This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Aw well, not to worry, hope Chuckie is successful with his claim.
-
15-01-2016 11:35 AM #33664This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
15-01-2016 11:41 AM #33665
Judge ends hearing by ruling both sides should pay their own costs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
15-01-2016 11:45 AM #33666This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2016 11:45 AM #33667
Judge told court he was satisfied that there was 'no immediate risk' of Rangers going put of business.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
15-01-2016 11:46 AM #33668
Rangers provided profit/loss statement for Dec 31, 2015 that showed half-year losses significantly down to just below £500,000.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
15-01-2016 11:46 AM #33669
802 Works Limited failed to satisfy the sheriff that there is a risk of Rangers being on verge of insolvency.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
15-01-2016 11:48 AM #33670This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Now they presuambly take DerHun to court to force them to settle the bill.
-
15-01-2016 12:17 PM #33671This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If the bills in and payment date due / imminent, if its not paid then sue and enforce. Could actually be that the tactic is to pay no one until they do sue them!
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
15-01-2016 12:28 PM #33672This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2016 12:34 PM #33673
If I remember it right, the Wi-Fi company billed The Rangers, they said it wasn't up to spec, Then the Wi-Fi co took them to court.
There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
15-01-2016 12:39 PM #33674This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2016 01:14 PM #33675
https://rangersfraudcase.wordpress.c...restment-case/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
15-01-2016 01:25 PM #33676This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
1. I'm not sure that ring-fencing the debt protects the WiFi company at all. The debt is in dispute, and in that light even a ring-fenced debt would rank with all others in an insolvency. However, had the Sheriff ordered that the money be set aside in a separate account, that would have had serious cash-flow issues for Rangers. That's the big win for them in this case.
2. profit and loss account. Unaudited? No Balance Sheet? They'll be fine, then.
3. each side has to pay their own legal expenses. That's going to sting. Again.Last edited by CropleyWasGod; 15-01-2016 at 01:39 PM.
-
15-01-2016 02:09 PM #33677This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Is that a typo, or genuinely how long it takes to get through the law/court system these days??
-
15-01-2016 03:49 PM #33678This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That £ 500K could have little bearing on their whole year.
Published half-yearly figures last year showed a loss of £ 2.6 million against a full year loss of £ 8.5 million.
http://www.londonstockexchange.com/e.../12299859.html
About 30% of loss occurred/declared in first 6 months .
-
15-01-2016 03:52 PM #33679
So, all in all, are they Donald ducked going forward? Fingers crossed
HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875
-
15-01-2016 03:54 PM #33680
"Sheriff Miller said that he had been assured by Rangers that the figures were accurate"
-
15-01-2016 03:56 PM #33681This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875
-
15-01-2016 04:04 PM #33682
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 1,515
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
15-01-2016 04:49 PM #33683
Has there been any comments anywhere concerning the Green v RIFC for his legal expenses ?
-
15-01-2016 04:57 PM #33684
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 9,485
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteLast edited by grunt; 15-01-2016 at 05:00 PM.
-
15-01-2016 08:51 PM #33685
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Dunfermline
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 24,250
- Blog Entries
- 4
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
19-01-2016 08:56 AM #33687
James Doleman has just tweeted.
At the Royal Courts of Justice for interim hearing in case of Sports Direct International Plc v Rangers International Football Club
Can't even remember what this one is about?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
19-01-2016 09:03 AM #33688This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Any sanctions against Sevco and costs to be announced.
-
19-01-2016 09:25 AM #33689
Hearing today is procedural ahead of main trial. Mr McCormack QC is again representing Rangers, Mr Guest QC for Sports Direct.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
19-01-2016 09:26 AM #33690
SD counsel opens by telling court that they are seeking damages over contempt of court.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks