hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 989 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 489889939979987988989990991999103910891489 ... LastLast
Results 29,641 to 29,670 of 45185
  1. #29641
    @hibs.net private member dangermouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Carrick Knowe
    Age
    65
    Posts
    4,420
    Quote Originally Posted by J-C View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I was up at the council to pay my taxi licence fees and there was a fairly large police presence outside the courthouse and all around the High St area, loads of press waiting outside too, I wonder how much all this is costing the tax payers.
    Nothing if Charles Green gets his way, The Rangers will foot the bill
    55° 57' 42.5'' N 3° 9' 55.1'' W


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #29642
    @hibs.net private member Smartie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Age
    47
    Posts
    23,129
    Quote Originally Posted by dangermouse View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Nothing if Charles Green gets his way, The Rangers will foot the bill
    Although - if The Rangers choose to use employees' PAYE payments as working capital for a few months as they have nobody else prepared to lend them it before finding they can't then make payments to HMRC etc etc………...

    It has happened before.

  4. #29643
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    36,495
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Only 11 voted.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

    Very informative but it didn't actually answer the question.







  5. #29644
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Hibayernian View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Very informative but it didn't actually answer the question.






    Every club in the SPL, as it was, had a share in that league. The share held by the old Rangers was one of the assets transferred to Sevco.

    Accordingly, Sevco had a vote.

    Once they were voted out of the SPL, their share was transferred to Dundee.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

  6. #29645
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Gate 38
    Posts
    7,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Golden Fleece View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Only a month until we find out if Charles Green has screwed the Rangers for his legal fees

    http://news.stv.tv/west-central/1330...y-legal-costs/
    Not far from Christmas...

  7. #29646
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,456
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Every club in the SPL, as it was, had a share in that league. The share held by the old Rangers was one of the assets transferred to Sevco.

    Accordingly, Sevco had a vote.

    Once they were voted out of the SPL, their share was transferred to Dundee.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    It was old Rangers who had a vote.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #29647
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,456
    https://rangersfraudcase.wordpress.c...he-indictment/

    Summary of today in court


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #29648
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Gate 38
    Posts
    7,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://rangersfraudcase.wordpress.c...he-indictment/

    Summary of today in court


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Interesting stuff...

  10. #29649
    @hibs.net private member jacomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    exile
    Posts
    22,301
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://rangersfraudcase.wordpress.c...he-indictment/

    Summary of today in court


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Archive photos there - I wonder if Craigie boy is still rocking his renaissance man look?

    Interesting to see the charges laid out. Did Whyte (allegedly) always plan to collude with Green, or did he (allegedly) put together his plan b once he realised plan a was failing?

  11. #29650
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Gate 38
    Posts
    7,816
    Quote Originally Posted by jacomoseven View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Archive photos there - I wonder if Craigie boy is still rocking his renaissance man look?

    Interesting to see the charges laid out. Did Whyte (allegedly) always plan to collude with Green, or did he (allegedly) put together his plan b once he realised plan a was failing?
    We would probably already know the outcome had the sports journalism community asked the proper questions or even splashed the story.

    There's been rumours about the stitch up for ages.

  12. #29651
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,456
    It looks like they are being charged with exactly what non sevconians said they were doing at the time.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  13. #29652
    If they are found guilty of this it has to put a huge question mark over the legitimacy of the company and why they should even be allowed to continue within Scottish football. They were let into the league without the necessary 3 years accounts which looks like being a massive mistake. IF proved guilty the whole existence and continuation of the company must surely be in doubt. At the very least the SPFL can't allow it to continue it's membership, or am I getting ahead of myself? If a company is fraudulently set up what happens to it? Anyone??

  14. #29653
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,456
    Quote Originally Posted by Real Emerald View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If they are found guilty of this it has to put a huge question mark over the legitimacy of the company and why they should even be allowed to continue within Scottish football. They were let into the league without the necessary 3 years accounts which looks like being a massive mistake. IF proved guilty the whole existence and continuation of the company must surely be in doubt. At the very least the SPFL can't allow it to continue it's membership, or am I getting ahead of myself? If a company is fraudulently set up what happens to it? Anyone??
    I've no idea what happens. Do the assets get returned to BDO? Do the new club have to pay compensation to BDO?
    The licence to re enter the In Div 3 was on condition that Craig Whyte was not being involved. Will it be revoked? (Don't answer that)
    Should it be? Of course it should.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #29654
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in the town
    Age
    61
    Posts
    12,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I've no idea what happens. Do the assets get returned to BDO? Do the new club have to pay compensation to BDO?
    The licence to re enter the In Div 3 was on condition that Craig Whyte was not being involved. Will it be revoked? (Don't answer that)
    Should it be? Of course it should.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    but will the SFA? More chance of Christmas be cancelled

  16. #29655
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,456
    Quote Originally Posted by PatHead View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    but will the SFA? More chance of Christmas be cancelled
    The SFA's part in this is what I'm most interested in. Hopefully the the Sevco 7 don't go down without a fight.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  17. #29656
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It was old Rangers who had a vote.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    You sure?

    At the time of the vote, old Rangers were in liquidation, and all of their assets had been transferred to Sevco. One of those assets was the share in the SPL. Therefore only Sevco could have the vote IMO.

    Thinking it through, why would old Rangers even want a vote? By that time, they were not a football club.
    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by CropleyWasGod; 16-10-2015 at 11:53 PM.

  18. #29657
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I've no idea what happens. Do the assets get returned to BDO? Do the new club have to pay compensation to BDO?
    The licence to re enter the In Div 3 was on condition that Craig Whyte was not being involved. Will it be revoked? (Don't answer that)
    Should it be? Of course it should.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    If the criminal charges are proven, it will them be up to BDO to raise a civil case.

    They have the right to ask to have the transfer cancelled, and the assets returned to old Rangers. However, that's unlikely. It's probably too messy; the assets are at least 2 companies away, for one thing.

    It would be more likely that they would sue the main players for the money.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by CropleyWasGod; 16-10-2015 at 11:51 PM.

  19. #29658
    @hibs.net private member Bostonhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    lincolnshire
    Age
    65
    Posts
    26,231
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It looks like they are being charged with exactly what non sevconians said they were doing at the time.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Agree, and they will emerge relatively unscathed as an institution this time around simply because the same culture exists in the corridors of Scottish football politics and if all else fails, they are the people-that usually does it.

    Got to love what their two previous messiahs almost got away with though.

    "I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"

    Sir Matt Busby

  20. #29659
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,903
    Quote Originally Posted by Real Emerald View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If they are found guilty of this it has to put a huge question mark over the legitimacy of the company and why they should even be allowed to continue within Scottish football. They were let into the league without the necessary 3 years accounts which looks like being a massive mistake. IF proved guilty the whole existence and continuation of the company must surely be in doubt. At the very least the SPFL can't allow it to continue it's membership, or am I getting ahead of myself? If a company is fraudulently set up what happens to it? Anyone??
    Your in a different planet if you think Scottish Football is going to kill off Rangers. The company stuff is irrelevant the SPLF & SFA just won't kill off half the old firm. I doubt that even Hibs would vote them out of existence. Scottish football needs them as it needs all its big clubs

  21. #29660
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    1,515
    Quote Originally Posted by steakbake View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Interesting stuff...
    Key point here is that Whyte (allegedly) refunded £137,500 of the exclusivity fee paid by Green's consortium to Duff & Phelps. That's dynamite, and there's no way way this would be on the indictment if the CPS did not think they could prove it.

  22. #29661
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The SFA's part in this is what I'm most interested in. Hopefully the the Sevco 7 don't go down without a fight.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    One also wonders if SDM will be a witness. That might be interesting :)

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

  23. #29662
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,456
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If the criminal charges are proven, it will them be up to BDO to raise a civil case.

    They have the right to ask to have the transfer cancelled, and the assets returned to old Rangers. However, that's unlikely. It's probably too messy; the assets are at least 2 companies away, for one thing.

    It would be more likely that they would sue the main players for the money.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    So even though both of these companies are accused of aquiring the assets illegally, they would be allowed to keep them?
    And BDO would be left chasing Whyte and Green for some money?
    Duff and Phelps malpractice insurance may cover it but surely they would want the assets recovered?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  24. #29663
    @hibs.net private member Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dont know its too dark in here
    Age
    67
    Posts
    12,527
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    You sure?

    At the time of the vote, old Rangers were in liquidation, and all of their assets had been transferred to Sevco. One of those assets was the share in the SPL. Therefore only Sevco could have the vote IMO.

    Thinking it through, why would old Rangers even want a vote? By that time, they were not a football club.
    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    I was under the impression that the SPL share automatically reverted to the SPL in the event of liquidation. If that's the case then Rangers (old) couldn't transfer it and therefore sevco never had it to vote with.
    Space to let

  25. #29664
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    36,495
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    You sure?

    At the time of the vote, old Rangers were in liquidation, and all of their assets had been transferred to Sevco. One of those assets was the share in the SPL. Therefore only Sevco could have the vote IMO.

    Thinking it through, why would old Rangers even want a vote? By that time, they were not a football club.
    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

    The fact remains, no matter how you dice it, that there were two entities in the room claiming to be Rangers.

    One of them must have been lying.

  26. #29665
    @hibs.net private member Spike Mandela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alloa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    10,986
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by lucky View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Your in a different planet if you think Scottish Football is going to kill off Rangers. The company stuff is irrelevant the SPLF & SFA just won't kill off half the old firm. I doubt that even Hibs would vote them out of existence. Scottish football needs them as it needs all its big clubs
    So no matter the criminality, no matter the illegality and no matter the sheer illogical mess of it all Rangers FC floats about in the ether like an untouchable entity.

    Are they just an omnipresent figment of faith like God?

  27. #29666
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hereford
    Posts
    1,488
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: maxsharktooth
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike Mandela View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So no matter the criminality, no matter the illegality and no matter the sheer illogical mess of it all Rangers FC floats about in the ether like an untouchable entity.

    Are they just an omnipresent figment of faith like God?
    No, they're like a steaming piece of s***e that always floats to the top.

  28. #29667
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    .

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by CropleyWasGod; 17-10-2015 at 09:43 AM.

  29. #29668
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I was under the impression that the SPL share automatically reverted to the SPL in the event of liquidation. If that's the case then Rangers (old) couldn't transfer it and therefore sevco never had it to vote with.
    That's the SFA licence you're thinking about, no?

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

  30. #29669
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So even though both of these companies are accused of aquiring the assets illegally, they would be allowed to keep them?
    And BDO would be left chasing Whyte and Green for some money?
    Duff and Phelps malpractice insurance may cover it but surely they would want the assets recovered?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    The new companies would end up having to sell the assets. I can't see any way that they could do otherwise.

    Not sure that BDO would want anything other than cash.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

  31. #29670
    @hibs.net private member Spike Mandela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alloa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    10,986
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The new companies would end up having to sell the assets. I can't see any way that they could do otherwise.

    Not sure that BDO would want anything other than cash.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    The establishment and judiciary will have the whole outcome choreographed to Rangers advantage just as the pre pack administration made it simple for them in liquidation.

    They will find a way.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)