Everyone is forgetting one important fact. Anne Budge is one of their own so in effect they'll owe their debts to themselves. Can't possibly go wrong!
View Poll Results: What's your preferred outcome from the financial problems over at Yam land?
- Voters
- 1526. You may not vote on this poll
Results 30,901 to 30,930 of 47452
-
26-10-2013 09:50 AM #30901
-
26-10-2013 10:09 AM #30902This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-10-2013 10:13 AM #30903This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
What can possibly go wrong with ambition like that?PM Awards General Poster of The Year 2015, 2016, 2017. Probably robbed in other years
-
26-10-2013 10:20 AM #30904This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
However I cannot see a long term future at Tynecastle for them. Budge or whoever might intend to cash out when they sell the site. And therefore with massive council subsidy, how can they afford to build a stadium of similar capacity anywhere in Edinburgh?
-
26-10-2013 10:50 AM #30905
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 11,184
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That's one scenario. But this is a club that has proven itself to be without morals or shame who in desparation accepted an unknown foreign control freak take over everything. They've gone completely bust with £Millions of unpaid debts yet STILL have their home and top league status - along with all success they've enjoyed over the last few years.
What's REALLY changed that suggests they would not be prepared to do that again in a heartbeat? The Yams should be seen as druggies who sold their souls to the devil for short term fix, have OD'd and now trying to get clean. That might work for a while but a few months/years of utter crap and hardship will have them dreaming of glory and good old days.
My problem with this whole sorry affair is there is NOTHING to deter them from doing this all again ? The benefits completely outweigh the cost. There are plenty of Vlad-types around football who might see an ailing capital club, with a amoral fan-base, as a fun toy.
-
26-10-2013 10:51 AM #30906
you do mean without a council subsidy?
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quoteall true.although I know quite a few that follow them and for the most part, they are decent guys, working and paying their way in society. the trouble I've got ,when we all have a few beers in us is that NONE of them regret anything that has happened. all worth it, in their opinion, and this was all said weeks ago well before any mention of a CVA settlement. for that, I hope it goes pear shaped for them
Last edited by Part/Time Supporter; 26-10-2013 at 11:08 AM. Reason: posts merged
-
26-10-2013 10:53 AM #30907This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
£5 million is a manageable debt for Hearts. Especially if they have a bit of extra income from the diddies.
The problem for them is the cost of a new stand (£5m?) and the upkeep of the other three poorly built stands. There is also the likelyhood of 1st Div football for at least 1 year and putting out a team they can afford (ie. Mince) for the first time in 30 years. This will have an effect on their income.
The debt itself though is serviceable provided they change their behaviour.
Bugger, just wrote all that and realised I'm agreeing with you.
-
26-10-2013 11:06 AM #30908This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-10-2013 11:15 AM #30909
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 4,650
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The spl is better without rangers
Their visiting support is not missed in the stadium or in the surrounding streets
The sport is more competitive and importantly it is finally finally clean and credible
Hearts are just a mini version and that era has passed
Banks will not support that mindset any more and the demise of rangers has been important in allowing financial and sporting institutions to see that there is no significant harm to your bank by shutting down a basket case club of whatever size
-
26-10-2013 11:35 AM #30910This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-10-2013 12:07 PM #30911
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Dunfermline
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 24,250
- Blog Entries
- 4
I keep reading that they need to upgrade their stand 'very soon'. Is there a fixed timescale? Substantial upgrading will be required, no doubt, but never any confirmed dates.
Its always going to be a ****hole and it'll suit the championship/div1 to the ground. The danger is it'll need upgrading before getting back into the SPFL should they ever manage it (although Falkirk managed with 3 stands)
-
26-10-2013 12:16 PM #30912This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sure someone will confirm that
Thanks
-
26-10-2013 12:29 PM #30913
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 297
Considering the spawny scrounging flumps are almost at 8000 monthly Direct Debits I just don't buy the absolute rubbish that these are going to 'dry up' for whatever reason?? Fair enough if there was only 2 or 3 thousand diddies but not 8 thousand! No chance.
I'd prefer to focus on the 'frozen UBIG shares' and whether or not these can derail the CVA prospects.
-
26-10-2013 12:39 PM #30914This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Surely given they will be relegated this season it surely depends greatly on results, continuing agreement with wives/ families to fork out hard earned cash , proof that the new owners can " deliver " on a sustainable basis .
I know of three Jambo's , who are not exactly poor, who have said their DD's will run until December 2014 and then they will reconsider based on " value for money "
Makes sense in the circumstances
Then again nothing is written in tablets of stone re the clubs future
-
26-10-2013 01:01 PM #30915
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 297
Don't get me wrong it's certainly possibly that maybe 1 or 2 thousand diddies will cancel after they're repeatedly pumped and relegated this season. But as someone mentioned earlier in the thread they'll have a 'feel good factor' with new owners next season.
-
26-10-2013 05:01 PM #30916This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
When you add the additional changes to the ground required by UEFA rules (which will kick in when they start building), it's going to be a bill for 10-15M.
Add that to the Loan to buy the club and it's suddenly a long way from debt free, IF they even get the CVA.Last edited by Keith_M; 26-10-2013 at 05:04 PM.
-
-
26-10-2013 06:00 PM #30918This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
26-10-2013 06:26 PM #30919This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Thanks
-
26-10-2013 06:29 PM #30920
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 2,306
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteHow right you are , superb.
-
27-10-2013 05:13 PM #30921
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Father Noel Furlong
- Posts
- 9,934
There's an interesting report in today's Sunday Times entitled "Inside Story" where they focus on the collapse of Bankas Snoras and its owners Vladimir Antonov and Raimondas Baranauskas. Both are currently fighting extradition from the UK back to Lithuania where they face charges of fraud to the tune of €500m.
The interesting part is that the Lithuanian authorities froze Antonov's/Snoras assets when they bankrupted the bank - these assets still remain frozen today, some three years down the line.
The similarities between Snoras and Ukio are uncanny. Both banks owned by a Russian crook - both owned basketball clubs - both owned football clubs that entered administration - both on the run from the Lith authorities.
-
27-10-2013 05:19 PM #30922This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If so maybe a precedent was set so won't be as complicated when it comes to selling hertz.
-
27-10-2013 05:21 PM #30923This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Three years... That's brilliant just brilliant. No shares no takeover (if that's right)
-
27-10-2013 05:29 PM #30924
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 3,327
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteLast edited by Part/Time Supporter; 28-10-2013 at 05:45 AM. Reason: posts merged
-
27-10-2013 05:37 PM #30925This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
27-10-2013 05:39 PM #30926This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
True though, don't give a monkeys how long that boys assetts are frozen for if he's allowed to sell his football club during that time and surely that's the point here?
Fingers crossed Sergey comes back shortly to put my mind at ease.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteLast edited by Part/Time Supporter; 28-10-2013 at 05:46 AM. Reason: posts merged
-
27-10-2013 05:42 PM #30927This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
3 years of admin. ;-)
-
27-10-2013 05:50 PM #30928
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Father Noel Furlong
- Posts
- 9,934
I've just had a look at the Portsmouth time-line.
Portsmouth went into administration on 23rd November 2011 and the reformed club owned by the Pompey Supporters Trust exited administration on 19th April 2013. That's nigh-on 18 months in administration.
Trevor Birch really should be making the Fuds aware of these times. "Out of Admin by Christmas" - aye, pull another cracker.
-
27-10-2013 07:43 PM #30929This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis is how it feels
-
27-10-2013 07:54 PM #30930This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks