Apologies if this has already been mentioned but I've been out of the loop for the last week and a half and only been able to catch snippets of the thread.
Hearts didn't sell the 3000 season tickets in 2 weeks they wanted to but they have raised enough money to survive for the time being my source tells me. Morale is starting to drop again significantly despite this. The staff still haven't got a clue what's going on and all the talk of different consortiums is getting frustrating now, "every few days theres a new interested party and we forget about the old one, this process repeats at least once every 3 days" they said.
Another quote
"Foundation of Hearts have no chance of owning the club, the administrator doesn't think they've got a viable business model so wouldn't sell to them, they are just keeping them sweet because they'd get lynched by fans if they told them to beat it. The only way that shower will have any involvement is if they get tacked on to another, far more credible bid"
Nothing earth shattering but then I'm told nothing exciting is really happening at Tynecastle, it's all very mundane, going through the motions until the season starts
View Poll Results: What's your preferred outcome from the financial problems over at Yam land?
- Voters
- 1526. You may not vote on this poll
Results 24,211 to 24,240 of 47452
-
06-07-2013 04:31 PM #24211
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 2,182
-
06-07-2013 04:32 PM #24212This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They ARE trying to broker a deal; that's part of their job. But, like an estate agent trying to sell your house..... if the bid doesn't actually materialise, no matter how hard they work, its not their fault.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
AFAIK, D&P didn't market the RFC assets in the public domain. The criticism is therefore that they didn't sell for market value.
If the BDO advert in the FT this week is genuine, then they ARE marketing the Hearts' assets. That way, they WILL be sold for market value, even if it is peanuts.Last edited by Part/Time Supporter; 06-07-2013 at 04:41 PM. Reason: posts merged
-
06-07-2013 04:53 PM #24213
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 627
Newco
Big problem for buying assets from Oldco for Newco is that none of the interested parties have sufficient funds to meet the minimum Ukio Bankas/UBIG administrators require. That is why a complete liquidation of Tynie & HMFC is on the cards.
-
06-07-2013 04:58 PM #24214This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:00 PM #24215
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 627
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:08 PM #24216This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:11 PM #24217
What happens during the season if they have to form a Newco?
I'm presuming also, it would require the new league body to transfer the share.
If this had been answered before I apologise.
-
06-07-2013 05:13 PM #24218This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But, yes, the share (and the SFA membership) would have to be transferred.
-
06-07-2013 05:13 PM #24219
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Dont know its too dark in here
- Age
- 67
- Posts
- 12,526
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
More seriously, if indeed this is serious for us, two questions please.
Why is it important to secure the shares?
Given they are now worthless and the BDO have been installed by a court of law, why can't they just write to the shareholders and say that and that we are trying to clear up the mess - and then get on with it. It seems the share problem is holding everything up and devaluing what they are trying to gain. And
The secured creditor status.
Sorry this is an old one that's been bugging me. Certainly in this case it just seems that an ordinary creditor has been given special status cause they're 'mates' while everyone else is left scrambling about for the scraps. In laymen terms, please, why is this apparent con allowed?
Thanks.Last edited by Jack; 06-07-2013 at 05:17 PM.
-
06-07-2013 05:14 PM #24220This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:17 PM #24221This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:21 PM #24222This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:21 PM #24223This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
2. secured creditors are usually banks that have lent a company (or an individual, eg for a mortgage) substantial amounts of money. They have taken more risk than most creditors and, in return for that risk, can take out a security. That security gives them preferential status in a situation like this.
It's nothing to do with being mates or a scam. If a bank couldn't have that security, with its legal privileges, they just wouldn't lend.
-
06-07-2013 05:23 PM #24224
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 627
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:25 PM #24225This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:47 PM #24226This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 05:53 PM #24227This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So... in reality.... take £5m (say) for it through the administration.... or.... take possession of it, and still end up getting the same, less all the marketing costs.
-
06-07-2013 06:03 PM #24228This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 06:07 PM #24229
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 627
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 06:16 PM #24230This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Ach, I'm just a simpleton in these matters.
-
06-07-2013 06:19 PM #24231This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk//compdetails
And seeing how the Company was formed in 1990 the Yams will claim its not a NewCo !Last edited by Part/Time Supporter; 06-07-2013 at 06:34 PM. Reason: quote fixing
-
06-07-2013 06:21 PM #24232This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Last edited by Part/Time Supporter; 06-07-2013 at 06:34 PM. Reason: quote fixing
-
-
06-07-2013 06:29 PM #24234
What would happen if, on the back of the FT advert someone said to the administrators that they would happily bid £5.5M for the stadium alone for development.
Meanwhile the highest bid for the club is £5.25M plus enough to satisfy the creditors with a CVA.
Do BDO have a duty to keep the club a going concern if at all possible or would they simply sell the ground then sell the other assets to the highest bidder through liquidation?
-
06-07-2013 06:52 PM #24235
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Posts
- 143
It would be stunning if a for sale board went up at the PBS And they get evicted, the perfect scenario is liquidation and horsed out of the HWU Due to unpaid rent currently 160k and rising this scenario could happen if the Liths do not play ball.
Best to get the seat belts on as this is gonna be fun.
-
06-07-2013 07:04 PM #24236This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 07:12 PM #24237This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
To my mind the administrators of Ukio Bankas would be better to take possession of the PBS in exchange for writing off their debt, and that way they get the proceeds less marketing fees, which will surely be a higher amount than the proceeds less BDO's fees.Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.
-
06-07-2013 07:16 PM #24238
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Father Noel Furlong
- Posts
- 9,934
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I've mentioned this on the PM forum and I'm happy to say it again - The LT government are under extreme political pressure to call the Ukio bankruptcy right - ie, in the best interests of the LT taxpayer.
This is a fairly new government and they campaigned strongly prior to coming to power on correcting the wrongs of the LT financial markets. Bankas Snoras went belly-up a few years ago and the aftermath was mismanaged from Day 1. The current incumbents in power really focused on this case in their political campaign and are now under the microscope to do what's right for the nation - not what's right for some two-bob, bigoted, SPL club.
I'm confident that the Lith's can't play ball even if they wanted to.
-
06-07-2013 07:33 PM #24239
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 3,312
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-07-2013 07:40 PM #24240
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Posts
- 143
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quoteto them on broke back who mock me and Sergey go and bake a cake
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks