HMRC are just acting like any respectable loan shark. Take anything and everything they can get off their " client " with a warning they will be back for the rest and they had better pay or it's a kneecapping !![]()
View Poll Results: What's your preferred outcome from the financial problems over at Yam land?
- Voters
- 1526. You may not vote on this poll
Results 3,931 to 3,960 of 47452
-
14-11-2012 08:16 AM #3931
-
14-11-2012 08:20 AM #3932
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,483
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If they then run their club into the ground paying ridiculous wages then its entirely up to them. But I think we are in for a very interesting new year as far as Hearts are concerned.
-
14-11-2012 08:37 AM #3933
Has the SPL or the PFA commented on the players' consenting to defer or reduce their wages this month? Presumably they can make this gesture 'for the good of their employers' but are they in breach of the rules and still liable for further sanctions?
-
14-11-2012 08:50 AM #3934This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-11-2012 08:56 AM #3935
Let's think about this logically. They've been given a stay of execution because they've managed to put together HALF of what they owe to the tax man in historic debt. They've done this by the equivelant of handing over all future income up to Christmas (ticket sales for all home matches gone) and begging to the fans to give generously. They have the share of income from one SC game against Hibs, minus the money for the 3,900 tickets they already have, which does not leave an awful lot
Result: No more income due for November/December. Players wages + PAYE + NI still to pay for November and December. HALF of the 450,000 still due to pay on 3rd Dec. All normal running costs of the club and stadium plus costs of hosting the home games for which they've already taken the money
To pay all that with very little due to come in over the next 7 weeks, they'll need yet another Share Issue plus the fans to yet again put their hands in their pockets for donations, auctions etc. Some how, I just can't see how they can possibly bring in anything approaching the outgoings.Last edited by Keith_M; 14-11-2012 at 09:26 AM.
-
14-11-2012 09:02 AM #3936
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Back in the town
- Age
- 61
- Posts
- 12,313
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
6. Vlad's empire is crumbling at a rate of knots with his Banks share price tanking
7. Vlad couldn't be bothered appearing to rally the troops
8 They had a faded Callum Elliot top on display!
Wonder if they had drawn someone like Stenhousemuir away in the cup if HMRC would have allowed them to stay open as one of the major sources of income would not be there.
Seriously though
-
14-11-2012 09:13 AM #3937This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-11-2012 09:13 AM #3938This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
How do the SFA honestly expect Hearts to get through the next several weeks? Unless of course they're giving them some hidden source of funding, which is why they're keeping so quiet about the issue.
It honestly wouldn't surprise me at this point.
-
14-11-2012 09:27 AM #3939
There has been clear political intervention to allow the Jambos to wriggle off the hook. Salmond has made reference to the Scottish Government's involvement and there are reports about MP Ian Murray having talks with David Gauke, the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury and senior officials at HMRC. Foulkes has also loudly publicised this political conivance:
@GeorgeFoulkes: Thanks to Ian Murray MP for speaking with Treasury Ministers and HMRC to get a deal to enable the Hearts debt to be paid in stages
Do UEFA and FIFA not have rules about politics and football? I wonder if they will turn a blind eye on this occasion?
-
14-11-2012 09:43 AM #3940
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,483
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'll reiterate, I hope the politicians and journalists are equally zealous in making sure Heart of Midlothian pay all their other outstanding bills to companies and other public bodies - they are after all owned by a very rich man we're constantly reminded - so face up to your financial responsibilities and pay your dues and pay them on time.
I'm of the understanding they are behind in a great many payments to people - so get them paid - if not they have already gained unfair sporting advantage and that needs highlighted.
-
14-11-2012 09:45 AM #3941
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 181
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteLast edited by alexedwards; 14-11-2012 at 09:48 AM.
-
14-11-2012 09:46 AM #3942
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,458
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
At the least the taxman now has at least £200k out of them, money that he / we would never have gotten had the club been liquidated, it'd have went straight to Vlad's back pocket.
It's HMRC's duty to protect the interests of the taxpayer, Hearts clearly have at least some money there, so they've done the right thing and grabbed it. That's the difference with the Rangers situation, there was no hope of getting any serious percentage of what was owed. I doubt any politicians did anything really, some no mark Labour chump claiming credit for it aside, if Hearts hadn't raised this cash they'd be staring into the abyss, and if they fail to meet the instalment due at the start of December that's where they will end up.
-
14-11-2012 09:48 AM #3943This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/political-interference-scottish-football/1134
-
14-11-2012 09:49 AM #3944
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,483
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-11-2012 09:51 AM #3945This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Doesn't irk me at all.
Contrary to popular opinion, it's exactly what I want. Hearts scrimp and save till January, lose any remaining high earners, finish at or near the bottom of the league (pumped out of the SC by Hibs, and beaten by us twice in league games). Start next season with bargain basement players, saddled with debt and no hope in hell of ever paying for a new Main stand.
What's not to like?
-
14-11-2012 09:55 AM #3946This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Best of both worlds, Hearts alive but crippled. Hibs still get the additional income from derbies (compared to Falkirk, Partick or whoever) but gain the satisfaction of winning them more often.
-
14-11-2012 09:57 AM #3947This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Just a punchbag for Hibs in the future. Licking my lips thinking about it.
-
14-11-2012 10:19 AM #3948This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThere is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
14-11-2012 10:27 AM #3949This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Also, in my opinion it's no more than they or we deserve.
-
14-11-2012 10:38 AM #3950This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If we honestly believe that derbies are just going to be a walk in the park from now on, then we're sadly mistaken.
-
14-11-2012 10:54 AM #3951
From STV site, the interesting part is - A spokesman for the league said: “The wage deferral at Hearts is a contract amendment and therefore does not commit a remuneration default.” - which means no sanctions will be applied this month.
http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/h...ovember-wages/
The majority of Hearts first team stars agreed to defer their November wages to help out the club.
Hearts announced on Tuesday night that wages for the month had been agreed to be deferred as the Edinburgh side battles to pay a tax bill of £450,000.
The club has confirmed that the majority of the top team players at Tynecastle have agreed to this deferral, including the senior players.
However it is not clear when the pay will now arrive, or what the details of the deal struck with the players are.
A spokesman for Hearts said: “The majority of the first team, including senior players, agreed to the wage deferral.
“Details of the deferrals remain confidential.”
The voluntary wait to receive their November money does not invoke the same sanctions from the Scottish Premier League as a late wage payment.
Hearts are under a registration embargo until December after paying their staff late twice this season, but the new deferral announced this week will not constitute a “remuneration default” in the eyes of the SPL.
A spokesman for the league said: “The wage deferral at Hearts is a contract amendment and therefore does not commit a remuneration default.”
-
14-11-2012 10:58 AM #3952This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
14-11-2012 11:01 AM #3953
So lets get this straight?
They are not going to pay players. Again but theyll be allowed to play them.
They will sell said players in january making, albeit a limited amount, from players they havent paid in months.
Thats like me selling my brothers car because i drive it sometimes and keeping the cash!
The whole thing is corrupt as **** and the authorities of our game just let it go.
-
14-11-2012 11:04 AM #3954This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This is all just delaying the inevitable.
-
14-11-2012 11:06 AM #3955This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If the situation was reversed an we were in their position, would we get away with it?
Would we ****!
-
14-11-2012 11:14 AM #3956
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 3,275
This 'contract amendment' business just opens a new loophole for clubs to avoid paying their players on time.
-
14-11-2012 11:17 AM #3957
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 39
- Posts
- 3,372
Seen a preview of front page of Evening News tonight, some daft slag worth 40m has joined the consortium apparently.
-
14-11-2012 11:18 AM #3958
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Age
- 42
- Posts
- 5,146
Simply, they shouldn't be allowed to play any players they can't afford to pay.
-
14-11-2012 11:20 AM #3959
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 3,312
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Starting to think this Establishment outfit are becoming untouchable.....they've even got the Scottish Government on their side.
poor, smaller firms aren't afforded such repayment plans by the Taxman. why is this then?
-
14-11-2012 11:21 AM #3960This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks