Quote Originally Posted by The Story So Far... View Post
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think that the allocation of waiver or free agent is entirely dependent on the perceived value of the player.

Each of us has a position on the waiver list (the same order as the draft I think) and so we can all put a claim in on the waivered players and whoever is nearer position 1 (not necessarily the "worst off", which is the argument which arose in light of me stealing Matthews) gets "dibbs" on the player.

I'm not sure if it's dynamic though. For example, I've already successfully obtained a player on waiver request - do I then drop down to the bottom of the order, or is it always the case that the top 5 or 6 players are always most likely to get first shot at such players?
You've dropped to the bottom of the waiver wire. From looking at the settings it looks like the waiver will be set each week in reverse order of the standings.

Quote Originally Posted by HibsMax View Post
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This is the bit I don't get.


On a different topic.....perhaps a silly question but is there any "honour" in this game? I mean, imagine that there are two players (me and you for example) that have players on our bench that could do a job for each other during a bye week. Let's say you want Peyton Manning and I want one of your players. (1) Is it ethical for us to trade those players for the duration of that single week? and (2) if we made such a trade and then you decided to keep Manning, what would happen then? I get the impression that all deals have to be taken at face value but having never played this game before I really don't know how trades work, in an ethical sense.
The league gets to vote on any trade. If it looks iffy then it can be vetoed