hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 346 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 2462963363443453463473483563964468461346 ... LastLast
Results 10,351 to 10,380 of 45185
  1. #10351
    Testimonial Due Paisley Hibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Shaky Toon
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,769
    Quote Originally Posted by snooky View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    D'ya think?

    I suspect they would (or will) suck up to the next one or two teams down the food chain.

    One has to eat, doesn't one?
    That's right - the Yams will just become the Huns.


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #10352
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hereford
    Posts
    1,488
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: maxsharktooth
    Quote Originally Posted by jgl07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I am afraid that no matter what 'compromise' formula the SFA come up with, if Rangers are in the 2012-13 Scottish Premier League I am out for good. I am sure that many other supporters feel the same.
    Aye I'm with you on that one.

    Any other team in the same situation would have been demoted and dealt with by now.

    Any other limited company who didn't pay tax or NI contributions would have their doors padlocked and the assets sold before you could say king billy.

    There's something fishy about this whole situation, I think duff n duffer didn't realise how much they would be under scrutiny approaching the end-game.

  4. #10353
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,968
    Quote Originally Posted by 1875godsgift View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Aye I'm with you on that one.

    Any other team in the same situation would have been demoted and dealt with by now.

    Any other limited company who didn't pay tax or NI contributions would have their doors padlocked and the assets sold before you could say king billy.

    There's something fishy about this whole situation, I think duff n duffer didn't realise how much they would be under scrutiny approaching the end-game.
    You got to wonder if they thought we would get fed-up and just go away

    It has got to be said that I'm getting a tad sick of the whole thing, but I'm in till the death on this one ..

  5. #10354

  6. #10355
    Quote Originally Posted by jgl07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I am afraid that no matter what 'compromise' formula the SFA come up with, if Rangers are in the 2012-13 Scottish Premier League I am out for good. I am sure that many other supporters feel the same.



    So your not taking the view of most Hibs supporters then .

  7. #10356
    Quote Originally Posted by grunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He's got one thing wrong in that, and it's an important one. He says ST income, transfer fees and SPL money will 'be used to fund the ongoing running costs of the company as it seeks to exit administration.' It won't, the creditors are funding those costs. That income will be put into a solicitor's account for the club's use after it exits administration. And that is despite two of the three categories arising from assets that are with the company now and were indirectly funded by the default of payments to those same creditors.

    That alone should kill any chance of a CVA and any money in that solicitor's account should be treated as an asset of the oldco if a newco is formed.

    Edit: Actually, reading the proposal again it's only the ST money and transfer income that's going to be held back.
    Last edited by Caversham Green; 06-06-2012 at 08:50 AM.

  8. #10357
    @hibs.net private member proud_and_green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Galashiels
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,407
    Quote Originally Posted by Sumner View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Scottish fitbaw is dying in the dirt, and this tawdry affair is burying it. Get them the hell out, re-jig the leagues to 18 top teams, get prices down, or it's over.. kids already watch Match of the Day, and avoid the Crappenfest that is Sportscene. Re-invent it FAST men in suits, or watch the Rangers turn it to dust
    Agree 100%

  9. #10358
    Testimonial Due green glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,021
    https://twitter.com/bbcchrismclaug/s...22290938884096

    Hopefully more bad news for the bigots.

  10. #10359
    @hibs.net private member blackpoolhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    59,261
    Stewart Regan says it's down to #Rangers administrators to make sure the Charles Green is fit and proper person to run club.

    Aye thats a great idea?

  11. #10360
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    3,535
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: pesus-ab
    #SFA recieved fax from FIFA today saying they are not breaching rules re #Rangers @BBCchrismclaug 15 minutes ago

  12. #10361
    Coaching Staff IWasThere2016's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Monifieth & Bolton
    Age
    57
    Posts
    35,341
    Quote Originally Posted by HibbyAndy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If Rangers get away with it ( And Im not buying a 10 point deduction or a fine or a slap on the wrist as justice). IF they get away with CHEATING there way for years and spending MILLIONS that wasn't there's to begin with im 100% out. No over reaction for me, Im finished with Scottish Football altogether if the Huns get away with it.
    I'll attend some cup games but it is SPL no more for me.

  13. #10362
    BBCchrismclaug
    #SFA recieved fax from FIFA today saying they are not breaching rules re #Rangers
    06/06/2012 15:00

  14. #10363
    @hibs.net private member Just Alf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The 'Mains
    Posts
    5,993
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Stewart Regan says it's down to #Rangers administrators to make sure the Charles Green is fit and proper person to run club.

    Aye thats a great idea?
    That was my thought exactly......

    I then read a full quote and I guess it makes some sense...

    Scottish FA chief executive, Stewart Regan, said: “It is important that club owners take more responsibility to ensure that they sell their club to an individual or individuals who act responsibly and within the rules of football.

    “The Scottish FA governs the whole of football and rather than spend millions of pounds on investigations into any number of prospective purchases across the game at all levels - which would be better kept within the game - it is important that the onus is on those involved in the sale of the club.”

  15. #10364
    @hibs.net private member Spike Mandela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alloa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    10,986
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by stokesmessiah View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    #SFA recieved fax from FIFA today saying they are not breaching rules re #Rangers @BBCchrismclaug 15 minutes ago
    What does this actually mean, who isn't breaking rules?

  16. #10365
    @hibs.net private member blackpoolhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    59,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike Mandela View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What does this actually mean, who isn't breaking rules?
    The SFA apparently.

  17. #10366
    @hibs.net private member Spike Mandela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alloa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    10,986
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The SFA apparently.
    Who said they were or is this FIFA challenging the CoS decision. Curious.

  18. #10367
    @hibs.net private member blackpoolhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    59,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike Mandela View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Who said they were or is this FIFA challenging the CoS decision. Curious.
    https://twitter.com/#!/BBCchrismclaug

  19. #10368
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,232
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike Mandela View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What does this actually mean, who isn't breaking rules?
    I think it means bad news. If FIFA is saying the SFA are within their rights to impose the player signing ban on Rangers the appeal panel can re-impose the ban instead of taking the correct decision and suspending the club for a season.

  20. #10369
    @hibs.net private member Mon Dieu4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    8,417
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think it means bad news. If FIFA is saying the SFA are within their rights to impose the player signing ban on Rangers the appeal panel can re-impose the ban instead of taking the correct decision and suspending the club for a season.
    I read it as FIFA saying that SFA were in their rights to give the ban, but they will still want other action for them taking it to court imo

  21. #10370
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    50
    Posts
    27,490
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think it means bad news. If FIFA is saying the SFA are within their rights to impose the player signing ban on Rangers the appeal panel can re-impose the ban instead of taking the correct decision and suspending the club for a season.
    Although the SFA have already stated that they are required to operate within the laws of the land and so I think they will, as they have done, accept the judgement and come up with a new punishment that is within their power.

  22. #10371
    Coaching Staff Cropley10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Side, Edinburgh
    Posts
    6,890
    FIFA have taken the view previously that Associations should ignore any judgement handed out by Courts of Law.

    In this case FIFA appear to be saying that it is OK for them to accept Lord Glennie's view that the matter be referred back to the Independent Appeal Tribunal.

    Which in turn should mean that Rangers get a more severe punishment this time around!

  23. #10372
    Coaching Staff Cropley10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Side, Edinburgh
    Posts
    6,890
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think it means bad news. If FIFA is saying the SFA are within their rights to impose the player signing ban on Rangers the appeal panel can re-impose the ban instead of taking the correct decision and suspending the club for a season.
    Bad news for who?

    Surely you mean good news?

  24. #10373
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,232
    Quote Originally Posted by Cropley10 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Bad news for who?

    Surely you mean good news?

    Not if you think a years player signing ban is insufficient punishment.

  25. #10374
    Coaching Staff Cropley10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Side, Edinburgh
    Posts
    6,890
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not if you think a years player signing ban is insufficient punishment.
    Added to the 3 years they'll not be playing in Europe, plus whatever sanction they get for going to the CoS?

    They're toast anyway and might as well be expelled or suspended as they'll soon be liquidated IMHO

  26. #10375
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think it means bad news. If FIFA is saying the SFA are within their rights to impose the player signing ban on Rangers the appeal panel can re-impose the ban instead of taking the correct decision and suspending the club for a season.

    I'm confused. Is it not good news .

  27. #10376
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    1,473
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: Dave1875
    Regan just on the news saying he's spoke with FIFA and rangers won't be punished for taking them to court

  28. #10377
    Quote Originally Posted by Cropley10 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Added to the 3 years they'll not be playing in Europe, plus whatever sanction they get for going to the CoS?

    They're toast anyway and might as well be expelled or suspended as they'll soon be liquidated IMHO
    Regan has said that they will not be taking action against Rangers for going to the CoS.
    Last edited by gramskiwood; 06-06-2012 at 05:27 PM.

  29. #10378
    @hibs.net private member Barney McGrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    15,032
    Quote Originally Posted by gramskiwood View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Regan has said that they will not be taking action against Rangers for going to the Cos.
    Why would they need to waste their time taking action against a team that's been expelled?

  30. #10379
    @hibs.net private member Mon Dieu4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    45
    Posts
    8,417
    Now that is a can of worms, we should take them to court for every decision we don't like

  31. #10380
    Quote Originally Posted by gramskiwood View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Regan has said that they will not be taking action against Rangers for going to the Cos.
    Now free for every club in Scotland to challenge any punishment handed out to them by SFA in the courts without the fear of further actions against them for doing so
    Last edited by Dalkeith; 06-06-2012 at 05:32 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)