This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But it won't transfer to Cowdenbeath F C AKA New Rangers F C![]()
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 5,431 to 5,460 of 45185
-
23-04-2012 10:31 PM #5431
-
23-04-2012 10:35 PM #5432This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
CW, with his shareholding, can virtually control anything the club does. He can hire and fire, set company policy, put it into administration......even pick the team
That, to me, is participation.
-
23-04-2012 10:37 PM #5433
Can't help but feel that financial penalties are a complete waste of time, especially to a football club already on its knees regarding errr... finance!
Points sanctions, omission from competitions and player sanctions would be more favourable, and because of these sanctions the club would still be hit in the pocket, but other "Less corrupt" clubs would also benefit.
-
23-04-2012 10:40 PM #5434This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So let's fine them an all....
-
23-04-2012 10:40 PM #5435
Celebrate good times, come on
Nice wee bedtime story! Well done the SFA"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.' - Paulo Freire
-
23-04-2012 10:41 PM #5436This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Rangers Tax Case
........and I did throw out some new information about the extent of Rangers’ use of the EBT scheme- How many players in the Rangers squad (1st team and subs) that won the SPL title on the last day of the season on 22 May 2005 had an EBT? That is correct- every single one of them.
After tonights news It looks like it's all over anyway, and won't be required.
-
23-04-2012 10:41 PM #5437
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Kilmarnock
- Age
- 80
- Posts
- 697
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Thanks to all who provided information on this post. I have sent an email to the SPL asking the same question. I will transcribe their response, if any, on this thread.
-
23-04-2012 10:42 PM #5438This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-04-2012 10:43 PM #5439This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If there is evidence of dual-contracts, those individuals responsible must be held to account. It would be inconsistent to hammer CW for his part in the RFC story, without hammering those who made a mess of things in the first place.
-
23-04-2012 10:45 PM #5440This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-04-2012 10:48 PM #5441
Alex Thomson Is all over this already -
Absolutely incredible - RFC administrator seriously blaming CW for "bringing Rangers into disrepute". Thus ignoring the EBT years...
This will play seriously badly with HMRC I'm being told
-
23-04-2012 10:50 PM #5442
Rangers 2012 / 2013
Courtesy of Kerrydale Street - an insight to next season.
-
23-04-2012 10:52 PM #5443This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
-
23-04-2012 10:53 PM #5445
i'm not ashamed to say,... i actually felt some involuntary movements down below whilst reading threads on that rangersmedia site
and now it's crashed like swallow swallow :( damn
-
23-04-2012 10:55 PM #5446
http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/inde...owtopic=217769
March on Cup Final DayLess talk, more gifs.21.05.16
-
23-04-2012 10:55 PM #5447
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dùn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 53
- Posts
- 10,863
-
23-04-2012 10:57 PM #5448This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-04-2012 10:58 PM #5449This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-04-2012 10:59 PM #5450Elephant StoneLeft by mutual consent!
Looks like they're wanting to disrupt the final. They can't die soon enough.
-
23-04-2012 11:00 PM #5451
Re: 25 000 rangers fans march to hamden park on the morning of the cup final
The police already have an absolute nightmare to deal with on the Cup final day. Let's make it even worse for them. Not by causing trouble. Just our presence will be enough to make their ***** start flapping when they have hibs and hearts fans to deal with.
quick solution to that, play at murrayfield insteadLast edited by cabbageandribs1875; 23-04-2012 at 11:03 PM.
-
-
23-04-2012 11:04 PM #5453
Doesn't get any better for Rangers fans. Sun splashing in morning that Kyle Lafferty suspended by club following altercation with McCoist. Lafferty reportedly suspended for 2 weeks and banned from attending games. Also allegation operations on hernia cancelled twice.
-
23-04-2012 11:04 PM #5454
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Dùn Éideann, Alba
- Age
- 53
- Posts
- 10,863
-
-
23-04-2012 11:10 PM #5456This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-04-2012 11:30 PM #5457
Regarding their planned march to Hampden......the hun love is fully intact i see:
"police wont allow it. nor should we ruin hearts day out at the final."
-
23-04-2012 11:40 PM #5458This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-04-2012 11:43 PM #5459
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 6,458
Woah, who at Hampden reached down and found a pair tucked away?
So, let me get this straight, surely this 12 month transfer ban totally torpedoes any newco? As Rangers 2012 would need the current clubs license, complete with ban, but would therefore surely be unable to take on any of the current player contracts of anyone over 18, as all the contract contracts would be voided by the liquidation process?
Given this punishment, one can only wonder what would be handed down for the dual contracts scandal if proven.
It would seem their only options now are a newco starting from the bottom of the pile of buying another club. Assuming they find anyone with the cash to actually back up their claims...
Also an interesting test case for the Mad One next time he goes off on one about the SFA...
-
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks