Fantastic idea! If no Huns are going to turn up at other grounds, makes it even easier to kick them down to Div 3.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote![]()
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 4,861 to 4,890 of 45185
-
13-04-2012 09:54 AM #4861
-
13-04-2012 10:09 AM #4862
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Back in the town
- Age
- 61
- Posts
- 12,313
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That is the biggest turn around I have heard of since St Paul on the road to Damascus! Hope you don't mind if I attach this to the Poll by Cheshire. Maybe the press are at long last remembering there are other clubs!
-
13-04-2012 10:11 AM #4863
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 2,896
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It needs the widest possible circulation!
-
13-04-2012 10:19 AM #4864
Some insightful comments from a Mr. Goram in the Sun today:
"The SPL don’t half know how to kick a man when he’s down.
I’d like to say that their spanner-in-the-works statement shocked me when it was released on Wednesday.Sadly, it didn’t.The fact is NOTHING that self-serving mob ever do surprises me any more.
They've never done Rangers - or Celtic for that matter - any favours, nor are they ever likely to either."
-
-
13-04-2012 10:29 AM #4866This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Obviously currying favour with the OF. Maybe needing a bit of dosh from speaking engagements to pay the rent on his caravan.
I heard Jim Traynor last night on Sportsound and he was saying the same thing as he says in his article in the Record. I hope the SPL 10 and Celtc have the bottle to punt the huns but I doubt it."Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.' - Paulo Freire
-
13-04-2012 10:33 AM #4867This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
AKA grandmaster_suck, runs the swallow swallow site, a big bag o wind
-
13-04-2012 11:40 AM #4868This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
and they are both fat ignorant bigots
#PERSEVERED
-
13-04-2012 11:45 AM #4869
UEFA have noted their confidence that Scottish authorities will deal with Rangers appropriately
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17700729
It's an interesting choice of words. They are "entirely confident" that there will be "compliance with the national club licensing regulations" and in the "spirit of Uefa's club licensing and financial fair play regulations."
It feels like it may be more of a warning shot to the SFA/SPl than an expression of confidence, particularly the reference to the spirit of fair play.#PERSEVERED
-
13-04-2012 11:52 AM #4870
Letter to Board
Didn't want anyone accusing me of not doing my bit....
Dear Sirs/Madam,
As one not normally taken to this kind of communication, I hope you recognise the strength of feeling required to motivate me to write to you.
For the record, I am (despite the last few terrible seasons) proud of our club, the infrastructure developments that you have made and am convinvced of the long-term strategy you seem to be taking, even if this has inevitably reduced the quality of the team on the park (notwithstanding poor managers!).
It is precisely for this reason, however, that I am deeply concerned by the recent proposals by Mr Doncaster which, on the face of it, seem to prepare the ground for re-entry of a 'Rangers Newco' to the league.
My concern is that we (Hibs fans) have sweetened the bitter pill of our recent poor league and cup form with sound financial management and infrastructure development. This sweetner would prove very bitter if Rangers (given their alledged cheating and tax-evasion) were competing against us in the SPL next season (given the largely-held view that they should be expelled from the league).
It is an outrageous affront to the notion of sporting integrity - the ONLY reason fans are interested in sport - that this may come to pass.
Accordingly, should Hibernian F.C. vote for any proposal that allows this to happen (or indeed if it does happen, even if HFC votes against it) then I will cease all suport for the Hibs (while they remain part of the SPL).
This is not an empty gesture and it will be with a heavy heart that I make such a decision. But in life, such decisions are often the hardest to make. In my experience, they tend also to be the right ones.
I am aware that there may be 'real-politik' affecting the thinking those like yourselves who 'run' our clubs and the game in Scotland. This, however, has little or no bearing on what fans like me percieve to be the over-riding concern at this point.
How can I encourage the next generation of Hibs fans to support a system which rewards cheating and tax-evasion at the expense of Hibs and the wider principles of sporting integrity?
Yours Faithfully,
-
13-04-2012 11:55 AM #4871This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-04-2012 12:01 PM #4872
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 242
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-04-2012 12:07 PM #4873This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-04-2012 12:09 PM #4874This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-04-2012 12:14 PM #4875This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Scottish football needs to kick Rangers down to Division 3. If Scottish football doesn't do this, Hibs will suffer. Even if they didn't vote for it themselves.
-
13-04-2012 12:32 PM #4876This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-04-2012 12:42 PM #4877This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Edit: sorry, didn't read the above posts. d'oh! Still think RP should put his cards on the table. How are folk supposed to make up their minds about ST renewals etc if we don't even know the position of our own club, let alone the others.
-
13-04-2012 12:56 PM #4878This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They want Rangers to stay in the SPL but to be crippled by cash withheld and points deductions to leave the field clear for.......... Celtic.
The odds are that Rangers even with financial penalties and points deductions will still finish second.
-
13-04-2012 12:58 PM #4879This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
If that is your idea of sport then your are welcome to it.
Hence my email.
I want Hibs to do the right thing - I said as much. But if Hibs vote against the Newco, yet the Newco still enters the league and beats us every match, then how does that make the problem above go away? It doesn't - hence my point about not supporting a game that is corrupt.
I hope this clarifies my position.
-
13-04-2012 12:58 PM #4880This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Any New-Co will have no previous losses to set against the vast fortunes Traynor believes will be accrued in the lower divisions and every penny profit would be subject to Corporation Tax at 30%.
Unless of course they intend to stiff the Tax - Man again.
-
13-04-2012 01:01 PM #4881
the buns would claw back any -10 points deduction within the first 5/6 games, and any SPL money deducted(i've saw figures of approx 1.7m) would be clawed back with two high profile friendlies, if i was a betting man(which i'm not) i would safely bet on the buns winning the league
next season :(
-
13-04-2012 01:12 PM #4882This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
But of course, we should just keep paying our hard earned cash to support a system rigged against us.
How silly of me - pass the vaseline when you're done....
-
13-04-2012 01:15 PM #4883This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The reason Rangers got into this mess was that they could not compete financially with Celtic who have a 10,000 more seats and usually at least 5,000 higher gates. They fiddled taxes, paid no-one and ran up debts to try and cover this up.
They will not be competing in Europe for three seasons at least so Celtic have a further potential income stream. Celtic will be seeded in two qualifying rounds for the Champions' League in the comparatively tranquil 'champions section of the draw. They can expect to face the likes HJK Helsinki or Molde in the third qualifying round and nothing harder than the Swiss Champions' in the playoff round. So Celtic should have a good chance at the group stages and vast quantities of cash.
That will all leave Celtic with a huge financial advantage over Rangers especially with the claw backs.
So a Newco would suddenly be able to pull 10 points back on Celtic in 5-6 games and win the SPL?
-
13-04-2012 01:24 PM #4884
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 15,810
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Can you imagine those dirty unwashed ****my tramps screaming **** at any Huns fan that dared to oppose the boycott.....that'd be like being called ugly at a Stevie Fulton lookalike contest!
-
13-04-2012 01:43 PM #4885This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
13-04-2012 01:54 PM #4886This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There is little appetite to attend 'glamour friendlies' these days. If it was that easy they would have been doing it in the past.
I don't disagree about catching the rest after 5-6 matches but I can't see them winning the SPL for a year or two.
The Newco will have next to no players as I suspect that a good number will be off as their contracts will revert to the SPL or be nullified. They need to sort things out before they can start signing. It will be a major task to even put a team on the park for next season.
They may not even have a stadium if Craig Whyte contests the ownership issue regarding Ibrox.
-
13-04-2012 02:00 PM #4887This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
but anyway, i do hope you're predictions come true
-
13-04-2012 02:01 PM #4888This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Personally supporting Hibs is ingrained in me, I think we've all been aware over time that the situations at Rangers and latterly Hearts wasn't fair, but we kept going back. I've already bought my season ticket and would have done so even if I knew in advance Rangers were getting away scot free.
Everything in life is corrupt. There is, and will always be, ways to cheat at everything. When we punish one thing another measure will simply be exploited. Corruption in sport will never go away, all we can do is try best deal with it when we can. I think we have to realise that in reality, the punishment given to Rangers will rest inbetween no punishment and the most severe punishment. The SPL resolutions are probably near enough that. Removing support for Hibs isn't going to help punish Rangers in any way at all. Fair enough if you feel you can just switch off your loyalty to Hibs and interest in football over the issue.
-
13-04-2012 02:25 PM #4889This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This time next year a team called Rangers will be second in the SPL, miles in front of the next club.
I don't really think that anyone seriously thinks otherwise.
-
13-04-2012 02:31 PM #4890This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Another sad truth: as the result of the above, attendances at the other ten clubs will decline to the point where most of them are no longer viable.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks