hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 141 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 41911311391401411421431511912416411141 ... LastLast
Results 4,201 to 4,230 of 45185
  1. #4201
    Testimonial Due BarneyK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,149
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How are Rangers allowed to keep loan players, just noticed Kyle Bartley is playing for them today?
    Think it's down to them being "Ra Peepul" or somethin'


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #4202
    Testimonial Due James70's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Caledonia
    Posts
    2,040
    Quote Originally Posted by BarneyK View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Think it's down to them being "Ra Peepul" or somethin'
    Shortly to be "they was the peepul" !

  4. #4203
    @hibs.net private member Hibernia&Alba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ma bit
    Posts
    20,010
    Quote Originally Posted by StevieC View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Is today European Licence deadline day?

    Is that the huns missed the boat on Europe, due to them still in administration?
    Yes. Accounts not signed off, so they aren't eligible for europe next season. More revenue they won't be earning.
    HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875

  5. #4204
    Quote Originally Posted by Hibernia&Alba View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yes. Accounts not signed off, so they aren't eligible for europe next season. More revenue they won't be earning.
    Is that our Yam chums goosed as well then?

  6. #4205
    Quote Originally Posted by grunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Saturday morning musing. Still can't get my head round the sequence of events over the Ticketus deal and Whyte paying off Lloyds Banking Group. Did CW get the money from Ticketus to pay LBG before he owned the club? Did he sell something to Ticketus (the rights to future season ticket sales) before he had ownership of the club, and therefore ownership of the season tickets? If the sale took place after he bought the club, where did the money come from to pay LBG? Sorry if this has been dealt with already, but there just seems to be so much wrong with that transaction.
    A guess at the way it worked is:

    CW approached T saying he was about to buy RFC and wanted to do a future ST deal with them. To seal the deal now they could put the money in a 'neutral' bank account held by those honest upright solicitors Collyer Bristow and if the purchase of RFC fell through they would give the money back to T. CW then showed SDM the statements for this account saying that it was the funds already in place to repay the LBG loan (SDM needed to verify that the LBG loan would be repaid as a condition of the sale). He then handed over his quid to SDM, confirmed with T that he was now the owner of RFC and the ST deal went ahead, after which he paid off LBG.

    Of course SDM was totally 'duped' in all this because Ticketus would almost certainly not have thought to discuss the matter with him in any way .

  7. #4206
    @hibs.net private member Hibernia&Alba's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ma bit
    Posts
    20,010
    Quote Originally Posted by The Falcon View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Is that our Yam chums goosed as well then?
    I don't know acutally. Anyway, they needn't worry about europe
    HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875

  8. #4207
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,985
    Quote Originally Posted by StevieC View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Is today European Licence deadline day?

    Is that the huns missed the boat on Europe, due to them still in administration?
    It's also SFA Licence deadline day, Stevie.

    Technically, Rangers and Hearts are in default on that as well.

    Shame.

  9. #4208
    @hibs.net private member Seveno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by Caversham Green View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    A guess at the way it worked is:

    CW approached T saying he was about to buy RFC and wanted to do a future ST deal with them. To seal the deal now they could put the money in a 'neutral' bank account held by those honest upright solicitors Collyer Bristow and if the purchase of RFC fell through they would give the money back to T. CW then showed SDM the statements for this account saying that it was the funds already in place to repay the LBG loan (SDM needed to verify that the LBG loan would be repaid as a condition of the sale). He then handed over his quid to SDM, confirmed with T that he was now the owner of RFC and the ST deal went ahead, after which he paid off LBG.

    Of course SDM was totally 'duped' in all this because Ticketus would almost certainly not have thought to discuss the matter with him in any way .

    You have to wonder though, why did Ticketus agree to lodge the money in the Solicitors bank account before the purchase. What was in it for them ?

  10. #4209
    Quote Originally Posted by Seveno View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    You have to wonder though, why did Ticketus agree to lodge the money in the Solicitors bank account before the purchase. What was in it for them ?
    Possibly just a guarantee that the deal would be done. It seemed like a lucrative deal, and CW could have stressed that he would need the cash as soon as he bought RFC. Ticketus had nothing to lose by putting it in a neutral account (it might only have been for a few days) and were guaranteed a good deal and future goodwill if they did it.

    Edit: Of course it could have been a three-way stitch-up that would never have been discovered if RFC had qualified for the Champions League, but I'm sure it wasn't.
    Last edited by Caversham Green; 31-03-2012 at 12:49 PM.

  11. #4210
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,985
    Quote Originally Posted by Caversham Green View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Possibly just a guarantee that the deal would be done. It seemed like a lucrative deal, and CW could have stressed that he would need the cash as soon as he bought RFC. Ticketus had nothing to lose by putting it in a neutral account (it might only have been for a few days) and were guaranteed a good deal and future goodwill if they did it.
    That's my take on it.

    T had dealt with RFC for a few years, and were perhaps anxious that the change of ownership would mean a change in the ST arrangements. So it made sense to keep in with CW.

  12. #4211
    @hibs.net private member Northernhibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Age
    39
    Posts
    21,826
    Quote Originally Posted by CallumLaidlaw View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Hosed myself at the ugly f***er shouting "WE ARRA PEOPLE" at the start of that. No for much longer!
    Last edited by Northernhibee; 31-03-2012 at 01:02 PM.

  13. #4212
    @hibs.net private member Seveno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    Quote Originally Posted by Caversham Green View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Possibly just a guarantee that the deal would be done. It seemed like a lucrative deal, and CW could have stressed that he would need the cash as soon as he bought RFC. Ticketus had nothing to lose by putting it in a neutral account (it might only have been for a few days) and were guaranteed a good deal and future goodwill if they did it.

    Edit: Of course it could have been a three-way stitch-up that would never have been discovered if RFC had qualified for the Champions League, but I'm sure it wasn't.
    I never, for a moment, thought it might be some sort to stitch up. I am confident that every party involved in this situation is totally above board and of the highest level of integrity.


  14. #4213
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,985
    Quote Originally Posted by Seveno View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I never, for a moment, thought it might be some sort to stitch up. I am confident that every party involved in this situation is totally above board and of the highest level of integrity.

    ...said Alice.

  15. #4214
    Quote Originally Posted by Hibernia&Alba View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I don't know acutally. Anyway, they needn't worry about europe
    I was just thinking if they managed to scrape in on the grounds that Rangers were in administration/liquidation and how much I would piss myself as I watched the penny drop. I may have to watch a while as their small brains attempted to process and calculate the information but I feel sure it would be worth the wait.

  16. #4215
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,721
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's also SFA Licence deadline day, Stevie.

    Technically, Rangers and Hearts are in default on that as well.

    Shame.
    Is this for sure? I don't want to wake up Monday morning and find that they have come up on the rails and submitted (cooked or otherwise) books over this wekend.

  17. #4216
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,985
    Quote Originally Posted by CentreLine View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Is this for sure? I don't want to wake up Monday morning and find that they have come up on the rails and submitted (cooked or otherwise) books over this wekend.
    31st March is the deadline for both. Which is today. So, they have another 8 and a half hours....

  18. #4217
    Coaching Staff down-the-slope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    East Lothian
    Posts
    10,000
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by grunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    But surely if Ticketus have bought the rights to a future event, then until they exercise those rights the money they paid to RFC will be a debt owed by RFC to T?
    That will be a point for argument...as they still could have right to sell seats at Ibrox whether its Rangers / NewHuns / WWF or whatever
    Last edited by down-the-slope; 31-03-2012 at 04:27 PM.

  19. #4218
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,232
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    31st March is the deadline for both. Which is today. So, they have another 8 and a half hours....

    There nothing to stop them submitting their signed account to the SFA without registering them with Companies House.

    Completely irrational of course as they would be greatly increasing the Penalty they pay for late filing of accounts. Saying that their accounts last year are dated 31st March and they were registered at Companies House until 13th May.

  20. #4219
    Quote Originally Posted by down-the-slope View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That will be a point for argument...as they still could have right to sell seats at Ibrox wether its Rangers / NewHuns / WWF or whatever
    Not being an advocate for Ticketus, but as an ordinary observer, I have no doubt that the rights to the value of forward season ticket sales lies with Ticketus.

    They are due all the forward value from that commercial transaction with Craikie's Newco.

  21. #4220
    Under English Law -yes

    Under Scots Law -no.

    Even though the contract was under English Law it has no standing in the matter of conferring rights.

  22. #4221
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by down-the-slope View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That will be a point for argument...as they still could have right to sell seats at Ibrox whether its Rangers / NewHuns / WWF or whatever
    What if NewHuns ground-shared with fellow Division Three team Queens Park?

  23. #4222
    @hibs.net private member MrSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dunfermline
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ancient hibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Under English Law -yes

    Under Scots Law -no.

    Even though the contract was under English Law it has no standing in the matter of conferring rights.

    I tried that with a credit company and their reply was, come ahead! And on further research/advice found that, if indeed the contract is made in England, it stands!

  24. #4223
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I tried that with a credit company and their reply was, come ahead! And on further research/advice found that, if indeed the contract is made in England, it stands!
    But Ibrox is in Scotland (?) so would this be enforcable?

    Either way it should keep the courts busy for the next five years.

  25. #4224
    @hibs.net private member Seveno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,701
    I think that we are agreed that liquidation is inevitable and I think that the sale to Club 9 Sports has always been the planned endgame. They have already said that liquidation is their preferred option.

    So when are HMRC going to make a move and ensure they get their Receivers appointed to avoid Duff and Duffer continuing to call the shots ?

  26. #4225
    Left by mutual consent! PaulSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,864
    Quick question, would the same admin team also be the receivers if put into liquidation and would it be the current admin team that puts them into liquidation?

  27. #4226
    Coaching Staff down-the-slope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    East Lothian
    Posts
    10,000
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jgl07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What if NewHuns ground-shared with fellow Division Three team Queens Park?
    Then they would have contract to sell seats to the WWF at Ibrox....

  28. #4227
    Testimonial Due AndyM_1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    The People's Republic of Fife
    Posts
    2,605
    Quote Originally Posted by jgl07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What if NewHuns ground-shared with fellow Division Three team Queens Park?
    That is my one fear about a Phoenix Rangers being placed in Division 3. Quite simply the impact they would have on the clubs who are in their natural home in that league like East Stirling , Montrose, Stranraer and so on. The presence of Rangers requires much greater infrastructure than those teams (none of whom are particularly strong financially) can hope to have and will also require far more expensive policing and security. Having an attendance norm of 300- 500 suddenly multiplied by 10 could be catastrophic financially for the would the revenue from a league game with Rangers be enough to cover costs?
    Personally, I just don't know.

  29. #4228
    Left by mutual consent! Peevemor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Saint-Malo, Brittany
    Age
    57
    Posts
    28,678
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyM_1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That is my one fear about a Phoenix Rangers being placed in Division 3. Quite simply the impact they would have on the clubs who are in their natural home in that league like East Stirling , Montrose, Stranraer and so on. The presence of Rangers requires much greater infrastructure than those teams (none of whom are particularly strong financially) can hope to have and will also require far more expensive policing and security. Having an attendance norm of 300- 500 suddenly multiplied by 10 could be catastrophic financially for the would the revenue from a league game with Rangers be enough to cover costs?
    Personally, I just don't know.
    They'll be rubbing their hands (and probably other parts of their bodies) at the thought of a couple of home games against the huns..

  30. #4229
    Testimonial Due green glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,021
    They're their Union Jack boxers over on Hunmedia. The Herald meant to be running a story tomorrow where the admins are now talking about liquidation now being a real possibility. Bottom line, no one but Club 9 can really buy them. Liquidation is their preferred route. This week is going to be a . Get the tissues in boys.

    The ostriches might actually be taking their heads out of the sand now. Shame it's too late eh?
    Last edited by MSK; 01-04-2012 at 01:40 AM. Reason: Please dont bypass the swear filter

  31. #4230
    Testimonial Due SmashinGlass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,959
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Quick question, would the same admin team also be the receivers if put into liquidation and would it be the current admin team that puts them into liquidation?
    Yes to both, although they would be liquidators as opposed to Receivers

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)