This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
No. It's a hospital bed!![]()
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 3,121 to 3,150 of 45185
-
09-03-2012 03:53 PM #3121
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 2,896
-
09-03-2012 04:28 PM #3122
http://rangerstaxcase.com/2012/03/09/its-a-deal/
The Rangers Tax Case blogger seems sure talk of HMRC doing a deal with der Hun as " Utter Bollox "
-
09-03-2012 04:29 PM #3123
From rangerstaxcase.com (who has been a helluva lot more accurate over the last year than any of the papers) on rumours of an HMRC deal:
An actual source close to the facts of this story described the latest wave of claims of about a Treasury sanctioned deal as “utter bollocks”.
-
-
-
09-03-2012 04:40 PM #3126This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Lets hope he's right.
IICR the story about, ' treasury permission', was written by Roddy Forsyth in the Guardian. Dear old Roddy is a dyed in the wool Hun, I'm sure he wanted to believe it.......,
-
09-03-2012 04:40 PM #3127This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2012 04:52 PM #3128This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
HMRC told BBC Sport that they would not discuss individual cases, but said all clubs have a responsibility to pay their taxes on time.
“Any business that regards paying tax as an optional extra after other expenses are met, or that uses tax collected from employees or customers as working capital, is potentially heading for trouble,” said HMRC.
“It is only fair to those clubs and to other taxpayers who do meet their obligations that HMRC enforces payment of tax debts owed – and if need be, issues a winding up petition or seeks to appoint an administrator.
“There is little HMRC can do for a business – be it a football club or not – whose viability is dependent either on not paying the UK taxes to which they are liable, or on special treatment not available to other customers with similar tax affairs.”
-
09-03-2012 04:57 PM #3129This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2012 04:59 PM #3130
http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/inde...owtopic=213508
You could not make those clowns up.
-
09-03-2012 04:59 PM #3131This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2012 05:30 PM #3132
It just gets better for the "Billionaire saviour" of the institution.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...iness-17314070
-
09-03-2012 05:38 PM #3133This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2012 05:42 PM #3134This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
He said he wanted to focus on his role at Ibrox."
Makes a change to "spending more time with the family" I suppose.
However, exactly what is he doing with all this new found free time at Ibrox? Has he uncovered more stuff in the attic and he's now down at Paddy's Market trying to get rid?
-
09-03-2012 05:42 PM #3135
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 180
Just listening to that fat blob Traynor on BBC Scotland saying basically that +we don't want to be too hard" on the Huns, just who does he mean he certainly doesn't speak for me or indeed most non-Huns in Scotland. Its so predictable that all the forces of the Scottish establishment will join forces to ensure they don't get kicked out of the SPL. If they do...
-
09-03-2012 05:55 PM #3136This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think your right, the pressure on the Rangers players to accept a 75% pay cut was huge, basically if they didn't the Rangers were liquidated.
So the administrators have to protect the creditors, they need a short term fix otherwise the current liabilities close the club. But now they have a win/win where they fulfil the SPL fixtures, keep the assets (the players). Therefore the club plods along until the next transfer window but then has a cash injection from the selling of those players which they couldn't do until the window opens.
-
09-03-2012 05:57 PM #3137
For some of you guys that are more clued up than me, talk last night about the Huns centered around the guy riding in on a white horse as Joe MaCall (I think that was his first name), was too busy laughing at there justification of being saved to pay attention.
Anybody heard this?
-
09-03-2012 06:03 PM #3138
It seems from reports over last couple of hours that Ticketus are interested in buying - maybe as part of consortioum - the club....
Darn it...that has a ring of potential...can they not just go bustLast edited by down-the-slope; 09-03-2012 at 06:28 PM.
-
09-03-2012 06:19 PM #3139
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 2,896
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17311003
-
09-03-2012 06:28 PM #3140
The agreed wage cuts mean they will have the money to see the season out, but it will be interesting to learn what clauses the players have insisted upon for their protection. The cuts will only be temporary and many players will have to go in the transfer window, unless the magical new buyer comes forward.
Overall, though it keeps the wolves from the door for now, does this news actually diminish the danger of liquidation at some point, and, if so, by what degree?
-
09-03-2012 06:30 PM #3141This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2012 06:32 PM #3142This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2012 06:33 PM #3143
Will Specsavers up their sponsorship monies to compensate for the 75% wage cut?
-
09-03-2012 06:37 PM #3144This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think this is the guy you are thinking about. Hope he has too much sense to get involved with Bigots 1873.
-
09-03-2012 06:38 PM #3145This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
09-03-2012 06:39 PM #3146This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The agreement with the players only stands as long as the club are in administration, if the club comes out of it, then they get to go back to full wages.
-
09-03-2012 06:41 PM #3147
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Kilmarnock
- Age
- 80
- Posts
- 697
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Tonights Sportsound was even more vomit inducing than usual. Continual references to todays developments as "a good news story" "Rangers are a family club" "some supporters just dont get it that Rangers bring money to their clubs,just look at how much Dunfernline got". They (Traynor,Dodds,Young et al) express their own emotions while conventiently abdicating the journalists role of reporting factually.
-
09-03-2012 06:47 PM #3148This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The 'Brand' must be reduced in value to sponsors - no one with squeaky clean image will want to work with fraudsters
If they have done a deal to release for free / low fees (lets say £2million whitty etc - guess work) then they will easily sell them get cash reduce high earners and replace with decent cheaper players and carry on....which would be dissapointing as they really need to go bust to allow the changes to be forced...otherwise it will be a mere blip....
-
09-03-2012 06:48 PM #3149
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- King of the road
- Posts
- 2,394
Sick to death of hearing about how we need the Huns, doesn't anyone in the Scottish media have any real vision of what the future might/could hold if they were to go into liquidation.
Wouldn't it open the door for another team to compete for CL. Or even the SPL? Surely the crowds would rocket?
-
09-03-2012 06:53 PM #3150This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It would seem that the hold up has been due to a number of senior players wanting a clause giving them a " free transfer" at season end in return for taking a 75% wage cut.
This would allow them as " free agents" to negotiate massive " signing on " fees due to there being no transfer fee involved .
If this is correct it would leave Rankers with fewer assets to sell in next window
Please " don't shoot the piano player etc . " I am only repeating what I was told
P.S. This is the second source I have heard this story from
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks