hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 23 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 13212223242533731235231023 ... LastLast
Results 661 to 690 of 45185
  1. #661
    @hibs.net private member BonnieFitbaTeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Stonehaven
    Age
    58
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs13681 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not to mentioned the 24.4 million from ticketus which has been eaten up somewhere. Personally I think the money has been saved and transferred to another company so that Rangers will immediately have 'investment' when they exit administration or a phoenix company is born. What is interesting is that HMRC did not want to put rangers into administration over the big tax case but for the sum of 9 million in unpaid taxes. I wonder what will happen if Rangers exit administration and then the big tax case hits?

    Might explain Whyte's claim that he'd 'provide' £25m for investment in the team over the next five years ?

    I hope they get precisely what's coming to them.
    At Easter Road They Play.....


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #662
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,445
    Quote Originally Posted by John_the_angus_hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This story will never be played straight in the Scottish media. This story will remain a Scottish football at risk story rather than what it is, a story about a fraudulent and corrupt organisation that is trying to steal public money. Why? Look at the pages and the % of airtime they get in our press. Journalists and pundits jobs are at risk here as 90% of every Scottish football story has an OF slant.

    We will never get the unbiased view from the established media. Thank god for independent bloggers who dig and just tell it like it is.

    The Scottish establishment WILL fight tooth and nail to have Rangers survive in some format. I hope they fail. As the posters on here have wonderfully expressed, it is the future of Scottish Football that is at stake...just not in the way our lapdog media is spinning it.

    Death to RFC as a club , institution and memory.


    Sent from another universe!
    100% agree.

  4. #663
    First Team Breakthrough John_the_angus_hibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Angus
    Age
    58
    Posts
    446
    Won't happen as the organisation would be a 'mare, but it would be cool if a weekend boycott could be organised across the board in the SPL. Would be great if virtually only Rangers fans turned up for the weekend. Empty stadiums up and down the country. Would send a big message but only a dream alas!


    Sent from another universe!

  5. #664
    @hibs.net private member semaj64's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    60
    Posts
    435
    Why should we bother about the old firm, they would not hesitate going down to England now, maybe the huns will reform in the English leagues. Local team may benefit from new supporters.

  6. #665
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,445
    We just need to make clear on forums such as this as the board almost certainly read what the fans think.
    Next time you see Rod walking about behind the goals tell him what you expect of him on this matter.
    This is probably the only chance we will be able to change the Scottish game for the better and for the Hibs board not to take it would be unforgivable.

  7. #666
    First Team Breakthrough MCameron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by SunnyLeith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Hibs wont comment on something that is hypothetical, though looking likely , at the moment.
    Fair enough SO but surely they should be made aware of the strength of Hibs fans feelings on the matter which will help shape their position should it come to pass?

  8. #667
    Testimonial Due Twa Cairpets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,694
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by MCameron View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Fair enough SO but surely they should be made aware of the strength of Hibs fans feelings on the matter which will help shape their position should it come to pass?
    The time to do that is when there is a specific thing upon which Hibs have to decide - when the SPL vote on NewHun coming into the league if they go into liquidation. If they go into and come out of administration unscathed - which seems increasingly unlikely I think - then there is no sanction Hibs/the SPL can legally take other than what they have done so far as far as I am aware. If Hibs have an option to consign them to division three (which would be the right thing to do for RFC2012) THAT's when we have to say "have the cahoonas to do the necessary or be aware of the consequences"

  9. #668
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,445
    Quote Originally Posted by TwoCarpets View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The time to do that is when there is a specific thing upon which Hibs have to decide - when the SPL vote on NewHun coming into the league if they go into liquidation. If they go into and come out of administration unscathed - which seems increasingly unlikely I think - then there is no sanction Hibs/the SPL can legally take other than what they have done so far as far as I am aware. If Hibs have an option to consign them to division three (which would be the right thing to do for RFC2012) THAT's when we have to say "have the cahoonas to do the necessary or be aware of the consequences"
    Spot on.

  10. #669
    Left by mutual consent! PaulSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    5,864
    This is terrifying, the ICF against HMRC. No seriously.

    http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...41791642_n.jpg

  11. #670
    Testimonial Due green glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    2,021
    Someone over on hunmedia saying there are rumours Whyte is on a plane to London en-route to Australia. Might not be true but if it is. The Hibees salute you!!

  12. #671
    Testimonial Due At The Edge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    on the rivet
    Posts
    1,074
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This is terrifying, the ICF against HMRC. No seriously.

    http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...41791642_n.jpg
    I'm sure Danny Dyer will be there to record all events as its going to be pwopper nauwtie.
    Got some big top boys the HMRC mob

  13. #672
    Coaching Staff Cropley10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Side, Edinburgh
    Posts
    6,890
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This is terrifying, the ICF against HMRC. No seriously.

    http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...41791642_n.jpg
    Classic OF spelling problem.

    But is this a threat or a promise? I'm confused are they going to fight the Taxman?

  14. #673
    Coaching Staff Cropley10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Side, Edinburgh
    Posts
    6,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    We just need to make clear on forums such as this as the board almost certainly read what the fans think.
    Next time you see Rod walking about behind the goals tell him what you expect of him on this matter.
    This is probably the only chance we will be able to change the Scottish game for the better and for the Hibs board not to take it would be unforgivable.
    The BBC just meekly doing everything they can to sell the idea that (somehow) Celtic, and 'Scottish Football' need Rangers!

    Says who??

  15. #674
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,232
    Quote Originally Posted by Cropley10 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Classic OF spelling problem.

    But is this a threat or a promise? I'm confused are they going to fight the Taxman?

    No, they are going to refuse to cash their benefit cheques in protest.

  16. #675
    Day Tripper matty_f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    47
    Posts
    51,445
    Blog Entries
    1
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: franck sauzee
    While undoubtedly my heart says that it would be brilliant to have no Rangers in Scottish football, and that 100% they should face the consequences of their mis-management, I think the SPL have a huge dilemma to face up to if they do go into liquidation.

    For one, re-instating them sets a very dangerous precedent because it paves the way for any number of clubs to emerge from financial mis-management almost unscathed.

    Then the risk alienating the fans of all other clubs, most of whom would be keen to see Rangers get their cumuppance.

    The problem is, financially the SPL and it's clubs are much better off with Rangers in the league. TV rights are more valuable and lucrative, as well as easier to sell with the OF derby, and the fact that the title race is generally close between the two of them.

    Rangers bring a huge travelling support that boosts the coffers of the rest of the SPL twice a season, not to mention cup games.

    By not allowing Rangers an SPL place, the SPL risks forcing all clubs to downsize as there is significantly lower income available, therefore everyone would have to cut their cloth accordingly. For us, where we lost almost a million pounds last season and are facing a poor financial year again this year, dropping the income further could be catastrophic and result in a significant change in the way the club is run.

    Would clubs vote for a situation that would potentially put their own existence in jeopardy? I don't think so.

    Ultimately, would we want to see a Hibs side far poorer than the one we've got just now as a result of having to downsize? I'm not sure I would, to be honest.

  17. #676
    @hibs.net private member Viva_Palmeiras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    15,264
    What's wrong with well-implemented reparations?

    Like a student loan - you pay on a sliding scale with transparency to prove no shady dealings.

    And they're not allowed to annex Govan or march in groups of more than 3 at a time.
    "We know the people who have invested so far are simple fans." Vladimir Romanov - Scotsman 10th December 2012
    "Romanov was like a breath of fresh air - laced with cyanide." Me.

  18. #677
    @hibs.net private member Viva_Palmeiras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    15,264
    Quote Originally Posted by matty_f View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    While undoubtedly my heart says that it would be brilliant to have no Rangers in Scottish football, and that 100% they should face the consequences of their mis-management, I think the SPL have a huge dilemma to face up to if they do go into liquidation.

    For one, re-instating them sets a very dangerous precedent because it paves the way for any number of clubs to emerge from financial mis-management almost unscathed.

    Then the risk alienating the fans of all other clubs, most of whom would be keen to see Rangers get their cumuppance.

    The problem is, financially the SPL and it's clubs are much better off with Rangers in the league. TV rights are more valuable and lucrative, as well as easier to sell with the OF derby, and the fact that the title race is generally close between the two of them.

    Rangers bring a huge travelling support that boosts the coffers of the rest of the SPL twice a season, not to mention cup games.

    By not allowing Rangers an SPL place, the SPL risks forcing all clubs to downsize as there is significantly lower income available, therefore everyone would have to cut their cloth accordingly. For us, where we lost almost a million pounds last season and are facing a poor financial year again this year, dropping the income further could be catastrophic and result in a significant change in the way the club is run.

    Would clubs vote for a situation that would potentially put their own existence in jeopardy? I don't think so.

    Ultimately, would we want to see a Hibs side far poorer than the one we've got just now as a result of having to downsize? I'm not sure I would, to be honest.
    Thoughtful analysis as ever Matty rock and a hard place - what would you do?

    Something will need to be done but I suspect behind closed doors to save face.
    Will we get to know about it? I wonder. It's a &£@@ state of affairs as Renton said.
    "We know the people who have invested so far are simple fans." Vladimir Romanov - Scotsman 10th December 2012
    "Romanov was like a breath of fresh air - laced with cyanide." Me.

  19. #678
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Dùn Éideann, Alba
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,863
    Quote Originally Posted by VivaPalmeiras View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Thoughtful analysis as ever Matty rock and a hard place - what would you do?

    Something will need to be done but I suspect behind closed doors to save face.
    Will we get to know about it? I wonder. It's a &£@@ state of affairs as Renton said.
    I'd vote for them tae get tae ****

  20. #679
    Day Tripper matty_f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    47
    Posts
    51,445
    Blog Entries
    1
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: franck sauzee
    Quote Originally Posted by Desperate Dan View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd vote for them tae get tae ****
    Think I would too, on reflection.

  21. #680
    Quote Originally Posted by matty_f View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    While undoubtedly my heart says that it would be brilliant to have no Rangers in Scottish football, and that 100% they should face the consequences of their mis-management, I think the SPL have a huge dilemma to face up to if they do go into liquidation.

    For one, re-instating them sets a very dangerous precedent because it paves the way for any number of clubs to emerge from financial mis-management almost unscathed.

    Then the risk alienating the fans of all other clubs, most of whom would be keen to see Rangers get their cumuppance.

    The problem is, financially the SPL and it's clubs are much better off with Rangers in the league. TV rights are more valuable and lucrative, as well as easier to sell with the OF derby, and the fact that the title race is generally close between the two of them.

    Rangers bring a huge travelling support that boosts the coffers of the rest of the SPL twice a season, not to mention cup games.

    By not allowing Rangers an SPL place, the SPL risks forcing all clubs to downsize as there is significantly lower income available, therefore everyone would have to cut their cloth accordingly. For us, where we lost almost a million pounds last season and are facing a poor financial year again this year, dropping the income further could be catastrophic and result in a significant change in the way the club is run.

    Would clubs vote for a situation that would potentially put their own existence in jeopardy? I don't think so.

    Ultimately, would we want to see a Hibs side far poorer than the one we've got just now as a result of having to downsize? I'm not sure I would, to be honest.
    I don't think Rangers will get to that stage - if they do they have to face the consequences. If the clubs let them away with it -it would be the end for the game in Scotland.

    At Hibs at least we run our club pretty well compared to others so we would maybe come out better than some - yes it may damage SPL short term but long term - Hibs and the SPL would be more competitive.

    Too long teams have been sucking up to the Old Firm and it's time that changed


  22. #682
    @hibs.net private member lapsedhibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    21,597
    Quote Originally Posted by VivaPalmeiras View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Thoughtful analysis as ever Matty rock and a hard place - what would you do?
    Lock the gates at Ibrox for good. Preferably during a home game with a full house, so that at least some of the bigoted hordes are removed from civilised society for a while.

  23. #683
    @hibs.net private member Spike Mandela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alloa
    Age
    59
    Posts
    10,986
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Good to read. Hopefully if Rangers try to not pay their debts and carry on regardless the other 11 teams will collectively refuse tp play in the league. Our chairmen need to grow a set.

  24. #684
    @hibs.net private member blackpoolhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    59,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike Mandela View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Good to read. Hopefully if Rangers try to not pay their debts and carry on regardless the other 11 teams will collectively refuse tp play in the league. Our chairmen need to grow a set.
    They have to be brought to book for their actions, or it really is the end game for Scottish football. If they get away with it, what is the point of carrying on anymore?

  25. #685
    @hibs.net private member greenginger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    LEITH NO MORE
    Posts
    7,232
    Quote Originally Posted by matty_f View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    While undoubtedly my heart says that it would be brilliant to have no Rangers in Scottish football, and that 100% they should face the consequences of their mis-management, I think the SPL have a huge dilemma to face up to if they do go into liquidation.



    Rangers bring a huge travelling support that boosts the coffers of the rest of the SPL twice a season, not to mention cup games.

    By not allowing Rangers an SPL place, the SPL risks forcing all clubs to downsize as there is significantly lower income available, therefore everyone would have to cut their cloth accordingly. For us, where we lost almost a million pounds last season and are facing a poor financial year again this year, dropping the income further could be catastrophic and result in a significant change in the way the club is run.

    Would clubs vote for a situation that would potentially put their own existence in jeopardy? I don't think so.

    Ultimately, would we want to see a Hibs side far poorer than the one we've got just now as a result of having to downsize? I'm not sure I would, to be honest.

    I think your believing what pundits are spouting. We will only play the Huns once at home this season, and the gate that day was 11,380.Thats only 1200 more than Saturdays gate against the Dons which incurred far less costs than hosting the Huns.

    For a Rangers game the police costs are about double and stewarding about 50% more than a run of the mill SPL fixture therefor they are not profitable unless we get 16,000 + supporters through the turnstiles.

    Where it would cost clubs would be in the T V deal but a more even share of a smaller deal might be not that much of a loss to make up for life without the Blue Turds.

  26. #686
    Coaching Staff NAE NOOKIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Galashiels
    Posts
    14,478
    If the huns do go into liquidation theres only one way to stop the other half of the manky mob running away with the league every year.


    The remaining SPL clubs ( excluding celtic of course ) vote for a wage cap of £5,000 and win bonuses capped to £1,000

    This would prevent any club being able to dominate the league ever again, including the new huns when they finally claw their way back out of the 3rd division.

    The clubs could also vote in an even split of any TV deal. Yeh the TV money would be less, but with an even split the only clubs who would really suffer would be the OF coz they get the majority of the money just now anyway.

    Also the rest of the SPL clubs would hopefully benefit from a rise in home crowds due to the more competative league.

    This is a golden chance for Scottish football in my opinion.

    Yes it would reduce our chances of doing well in Europe, but .... A ) we aint exactly doing that well just now anyway and .... B ) whats the point of worrying about the new extension when the rest of your bloody house is burning down ?

  27. #687
    @hibs.net private member London Hibs FC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Madrid
    Age
    53
    Posts
    753
    Quote Originally Posted by greenginger View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think your believing what pundits are spouting. We will only play the Huns once at home this season, and the gate that day was 11,380.Thats only 1200 more than Saturdays gate against the Dons which incurred far less costs than hosting the Huns.

    For a Rangers game the police costs are about double and stewarding about 50% more than a run of the mill SPL fixture therefor they are not profitable unless we get 16,000 + supporters through the turnstiles.

    Where it would cost clubs would be in the T V deal but a more even share of a smaller deal might be not that much of a loss to make up for life without the Blue Turds.
    This.

  28. #688
    Testimonial Due TRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Smedjebacken (Sweden)
    Posts
    1,535
    I don't see how the TV money would change surely it's just like them getting relegated?

  29. #689
    Quote Originally Posted by TRC View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I don't see how the TV money would change surely it's just like them getting relegated?
    If Sky were smart, and you have to assume they are, they would have seen that Rangers hitting the skids was a distinct possibility, and inserted some sort of clause to protect themselves.

  30. #690
    @hibs.net private member SteveHFC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Age
    32
    Posts
    23,928
    Less talk, more gifs. 21.05.16

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)