Originally Posted by
He's here!
Without a doubt. That's not something which can be brushed off. If you're a remotely competent golfer it's now actually hard to hit a truly bad/destructive shot, so forgiving is the equipment. Compare that to to the days of Nicklaus, Player, Watson, Palmer, Trevino etc (my dad used to watch the young Tony Jacklin when he lived near Potter's Bar and says he should have been more regularly in that company but that his short putting destroyed him!) and the phenomenal artistry required to shape a shot when anything slightly off the sweet spot would land you in bother. These guys were also playing more unforgiving courses, particularly links. As such only the very best were regularly competing for the biggest prizes. These days I think it's more a case of never mind the quality feel the width, with so many identikit golfers battling for supremacy. McIlroy is one of the few who has something more to offer, granted, but he really shouldn't have taken 12 years to win another major.
It's easy to let nostalgia colour your views, but when I used to go to watch those guys at the Open back in the 70s you just had to marvel at the way they could control a shot, often off bone dry lies with barely a blade of grass on them. It's a wholly different experience now, which is why you see the likes of Old Course no longer really being a proper test for drivers with the power of a cannon.