Originally Posted by
Stick
There seems to be a lot of confusion about the STV voting system. If you can be bothered reading the full explanation of how it works, not only will your head explode but you will understand that the vote till you boak advice doesn’t mean that you should rate ALL the candidates.
If you are pro indie then you should rank the pro indie leaning candidates then stop, don’t continue to rank the anti indie candidates. So in my area it would be snp 1, snp 2, green 3. If there was an indie leaning independant candidate or an Alba they would get 4, and 5.
If you stop as soon as your preferred candidates are finished then any remaining votes are exhausted (voided). If you rank all the candidates then you risk your unused votes filtering down to a Tory.
This is exactly why the unionist parties are advising to only vote for them and not to continue down the list.
I understand that a good local candidate is important, but party politics do come into it I’m afraid. For instance in Perth and Kinross last week the controling Tory council, backed by the Lib Dem’s, voted to sell the council offices to a hotel chain for £1. Not 1 million just 1. Despite in 2015 spending £10million on refurbishing the offices. They rushed the vote thru despite protests from snp and labour to ensure that if they lost overall control after today it would be to late.
So local councils are affected by party politics.
If it were up to me it wouldn’t be allowed, independant councilors only, but alliances would still be forged.