I'm surprised anyone could work out what he meant by that rambling incoherent speech. Apparently what Europe is doing is "an atrocity". He's a lunatic.
Printable View
Here's what the political editor of the BBC thinks ...
"tantalising". "gift".
Starmer needs to clear the lying Tories out of the BBC and restore some pride in our national broadcaster.
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbn...nricggkje@jpeg
And on the subject of the BBC, on a day when the world's stock markets are in freefall, isn't it a shame that the BBC has removed the page from their business website that displays the market numbers? We're being kept in the dark, the BBC hiding / not reporting / down playing bad news.
Is it not referring to the situation he's placed Starmer in as he goes to Brussels - whilst tariffs are being thrown about left, right and centre, the prospect of the UK maybe avoiding tariffs is "tantalising", placing him in a spot where he may have to think further about our closeness to the US vs Europe?
You're right off course but (millionaire) journalists see themselves as immune from the consequences, don't actually give a monkeys about "ordinary hard working people" and Trump's policies/announcements give them hours of easy gum-bumping on their rolling news shows.
They are thrilled he is back.
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
Labour MP for the Western Isles.
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbn...4dgu7ppke@jpeg
I'd be inviting Trump over to check first hand that his old mum's house and his hotels and golf courses are all adequately fireproofed in the event of tariffs being applied to the UK.
Because you never know what folk might do.
This will effect is whether we get tariffed or not. I expect the dollar to strengthen and the pound to weaken which will increase the likelihood the Reeves and Starmer have to go full austerity. Some rough time ahead for everyone globally with a full blown trade war. Globalisation is about to unwind at speed and it won’t be pretty for anyone.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
as a gael, i cannot put into words how ashamed i am of torcuil crichton - literal nausea reading that. this is utterly, utterly disgusting, especially from a Labour politician. the last thing we want is to be seen as Trump's 'home' - even worse, for him to see us as some sort of home...
This is how the media SHOULD be reporting Trump's actions ...
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsi...wj72z4iiy@jpeg
I don't like Trump, he's a fanny, I find some of the things he comes out with funny, in an ideal world we wouldn't have anything to do with him but it's not an ideal world, his decisions can really affect people's lives going forward, including here, if we have to butter him up a bit then so be it I'm afraid
Pound strengthed in a big way against euro today and grew against the dollar and all other currencies bar the yen (due to tariff news). 10 year gilts down too
It should affect the US economy more than most others and with Germany in recession and having a manufacturing economy it will affect the EU too. We've already destroyed our manufacturing industry and since it's a services economy, its not expected to hurt us that much. Could be a boom time for Scottish whisky if Canadia and Ireland both get priced out the US
It could work out nicely for the UK if we stay on side with Trump, particularly Scotland.
If he ‘punishes’ the rest of the world and offers us a trade deal it could work
Well.
I hate trump the same as most people on here but the UK government have to work with him.
The only problem I can see is Starmer cozying back up to Europe. Can’t imagine Trump being too supportive of that. Although if Starmer can pull it off, he would be onto a winner.
Closer ties with Europe - good for growth
No tariffs from the USA and potential trade deal - good for growth.
Sounds promising until you realise it’s Starmer and Reeves
I've just seen that Canada has a small trade surplus with the US. Does this mean the yanks are trying to butter them up for a fascist takeover too?
it's all to do with their oil. Trump wants it, because a) it's oil and b) because it's the basis of the US's deficit towards Canada.
Scotland also has oil, which gives me the brown trousers feeling. This is what we're walking into by chumming up to him. Not to mention the insane data harvesting that Musk is up to. Imagine the power the pair of them would have if granted access to the kind of personal information they're imbibing from the treasury...it's genuinely very dystopian and scary, and no amount of pragmatism is going to avoid it if said pragmatism amounts to becoming his lapdog (which, lets be real, is the only relationship he'll be satisfied with).
In the long-term, any advantage in being the bully's sidekick is unlikely to help us. This will end at some point, and he won't always be there. In the meantime, he'd be a fickle and untrustworthy pal, very possibly with increasing demands if we're to be allowed to hang on to his coat-tails. He has a long-term pattern of forcing his cohorts to subjugate themselves, then throwing them under the bus.
I'd personally much prefer it if we stood together with the rest of his targets and made clear that bullying countries into submission or attempting to seize control of them is unacceptable. At the risk of sounding melodramatic, we don't need to be Trump's Belarus.
No. He's an evil lunatic. If we want to be proud to be Scottish we should have nothing to do with him.
No. He's an evil lunatic. If we want to be proud to be Scottish we should have nothing to do with him.
This.
Tax on staff costs stays in Scotland.
So, if tariffs affect production, there is a knock-on effect on the tax take in Scotland economy. Both in terms of whisky employees, and the wider community where they have spending power.
The duty and the VAT, which is probably what you meant, goes to London, together with the Corporation Tax.
Here we go, knew someone would come out with something like that
There is a huge difference to holding your nose and swallowing something to try and avoid tarrifs that will majorly affect your already crumbling economy and what Chamberlain tried to do
It's really easy to have an idealised view on what you should do when you don't have the livelyhood of 65m people at stake
Also im speaking specifically about avoiding tarrifs, if he starts invading Canada, Mexico, Greenland and Panama is when you can tell him to go **** himself
Rumours of a one month pause in Mexican tariffs due to Mexico promising to put 10,000 soldiers on the northern border to stop people and drug smuggling
What I said, in no way represented supporting a fascist lunatic.
Trump said the UK could be exempt, which could be good for the UK and Scotland.
If we had to bow down and kiss hiss ring whilst claiming ‘All Hail Trump’. That would be supporting a fascist lunatic, however hearing his words and saying it could be good for the UK is far from it.
I think that's valid up to a point.
Different people will have different tolerance levels for Trump's pish and what it means.
For some, he reached and breached that point long ago.
For others, there may remain room for pragmatism for a bit longer.
I'm not much of a fan to pandering to the likes of Trump. Bullies need confronted early and forcefully, never emboldened.
Is it wise to ruffle his feathers too much too early though? Maybe not. Starmer is probably being reasonably smart in keeping options open for now.
Britain has a history of trying to ride more than one horse at the same time and is occasionally successful with it.
I see he has bottled it with Mexico. Delayed a month.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Might not want anything more than to divide the UK from Europe for as long as possible. Putin, China and Trump all have the break up of the EU as wishes, so it's in all their interests to be setting major European economies against each other. So yeah, let's try and get a few hundred £million ahead of the Irish, that's the main thing.
By the time Hitler walked into Czechoslovakia the writing was already on the wall and Chamberlain's appeasement was already meaningless as the chance to stop Hitler had already past. That should have been done once Hitler started disobeying international treaties, in particular the Treaty of Versailles.
The final straw was when he put 22,000 troops into the demilitarised Rhineland, that could have easily been put down by the Allies and by not doing so they handed Hitler back Germany's industrial heartland and with it the ability to build his war machine. Fascists like Trump need to be resisted from the start, not after they have all their ducks in a row.
Nope, not fascist at all. Not in the least.
Please note I no longer have access to Twitter to check this post.
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbn...5epja4pwq@jpeg
The UK don’t sell that many goods to the US, it’s service dominated. We don’t buy many goods either. I can’t think of anything I would want to buy from the Us. Wouldn’t want their cars or food. Love a JD though.
With Trump it could be anything, we might get Tariffs, we might not.
Hes threatening everyone with tariffs but said the UK are doing ok. What he wants? No one knows but he does like the UK, he put the Winston Churchill bust back in the Oval Office.
Let’s hope he just leaves us alone
In fairness, it's harder than ever before to draw the line between real and fake. Much harder.
There are real things that are plain ridiculous. There's also no shortage of people with reasons to put out fake stuff.
I don't have any issue when someone posts something in good faith that turns out to be fake.
That the likes of Musk thrive and prosper in an environment where such doubt exists is not a coincidence.
Seen a lot of these types of comments but I’m not sure you are representing UK trade with the US overly accurately.
The Department for Industry and Trade says that, on an individual country level, the US is the UK’s largest trading partner accounting for 17% of all U.K. trade.
£60bn in goods (equivalent to 2 whole months of annual total goods exports) and £125bn in services.
We also run a trade surplus on both counts (just on goods and massively on services)
And that’s before you account for any FDI and the like.
So the pretence that somehow the US market is not overly important for the U.K. economy is, I would politely suggest, rather incorrect. Any market making up nearly 20% of your trade is one to pay attention to.
Tariffs for Mexico and Canada on hold for at least 30 days
Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk
Both Mexico and Canada tariffs halted for a provisional 30 days each.
Like most I can’t really tell the reason for the tariffs but Trumps narrative looks to be around strengthening borders and both counties have now made commitments to do so.
In reality nothing might change for the average American and fentanyl will still run rampant, but in terms of American public opinion, has Trump just played an absolute blinder?
I can’t find any reason for the speculated about tariffs on the EU though? What is he demanding there?
There's an argument he's got something from Mexico, but what can Canada do? I'd imagine they have a surplus of drugs and criminals coming from the US and I doubt they can do much about the little immigration from the north.
It's shown, after the tameness of Petro, that you can stand up to the bully so I'd say he's lost there.
Could they just be gaming the markets? Absolute crackpots.
In the real world we have a criminal fascist bully sowing seeds of discontent, not only inside the US but across the world, encouraging racial hatred, abolishing hard fought for equal rights for minorities, cuddling up to other fascist dictators, releasing en mass supporters that attempted to overthrow a democratically elected government on his request, has surrounded himself with fascist megalomaniacs and is threatening to invade sovereign countries. I could go on but what's the point, none of it would convince you that sucking up to a fascist isn't a good idea or even simply utterly spineless.
Apologies for the length of this or if it’s repitiition. Saw it on FB. I have never read such an accurate description of the monster.
Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"
Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:
"A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump's limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.
I don't say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it's a fact. He doesn't even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn't just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It's all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don't. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath.
All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He's not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He's more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy' is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it's impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of ****. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
'My God... what... have.. I... created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...07af89d1f2.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...6b22ca961f.png
Shame. It will get worse for the swasticar.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Trump says " I hope Gazans won't want to return". What a horrible excuse for a human being he is, but let's suck up to him because there might be something in it for us. Anyone who wants to pacify this monster has zero integrity.
Allowing the Israelis to take Gaza is a huge win for his right-wing, medieval Christian supporters. Who see an all Jewish "Holy Land" as another step towards JC's second coming. Foreign policy run along the lines of nonsense superstition. (Not to mention all that beach front real estate.)
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
So... Trump is in a press conference with Netanyahu and has announced that the population of the Gaza Strip is going to be evacuated, the US will take ownership of the land, level it and build. Asked if this is a permanent ownership, he says he sees it being a long-term situation.
Jesus.
Edit: he says he wants to see a middle-eastern riviera, and that's the land they need to do it.
Las Gaza, the place we we all need to put on our bucket list for a holiday destination.
With everything with Trump hopefully his insane comments are just rhetoric and there is some negotiation to be had.
No way Jordon and Egypt are going to take the Palestinians and no way the Palestinian people are going to just leave.
I think the whole world is reeling from it apart from Netanyahu
This was the kind of thing I was referring to, rather than simply saying GTF Donald Trump.
"The first minister has vowed to use Donald Trump's affinity for Scotland in a bid to avoid the prospect of tariffs being applied on imports to the US.
John Swinney said he had expressed the importance of trade between the countries, especially Scotch whisky, during a call he held with the US president-elect last month"
"John Swinney said he had expressed the importance of trade between the countries, especially Scotch whisky, during a call he held with the US president-elect last month."
"I will use that as a basis of proceeding with negotiations in discussions with President Trump.
"What he also said in the call was if I ever needed a further conversation with him, he'd be very welcome to taking that forward."
Well done John Swinney for engaging with Trump and protecting the needs of businesses and jobs in Scotland even although he may have had to do it biting his tongue. It seems if some had their way this conversation would never have taken place and the desire would be for Swinney to basically tell Trump to GTF and if tariffs then followed impacting thousands of jobs in Scotland then so be it.
Some US Palestinian supporters that were saying don't vote for Biden due to him being complicit, really played the wrong hand now Trump is letting Israel take Gaza. Genocide of millions of people. As said Egypt and Jordan won't accept Palestinians I don't see where they go, why doesn't Trump welcome them
Truly hideous time in world history, the Jewish nation complicit in ethnic cleansing on this scale was just inconceivable until the felon in the White House got together with the internationally indicted Netanyahu, who will always do whatever is required for his personal survival.
Reading about the Holocaust has always meant I've had sympathy with the Jewish people's cause but it's at a crossroads now.
American's might be about to become embroiled in a real mess where it's unlikely their leader will get whatever he wants out of it. And at a time where many were under the impression they'd be less involved in conflicts abroad.
Sent from my SM-A750FN using Tapatalk
I think it's interesting that the Saudis have come out quickly and said there will be no normalisation of their relationship with Israel without a Palestinian state. Saudi support had for Palestine had been reported as waning somewhat in recent times and there had been talk a deal with Israel was close not least because of their mutual distrust and proxy conflicts with Iran and their membership of the Arab-Israeli Alliance.
The Saudi reaction to Trump seems to slam the door on that in the short to medium term and that is an ally Trump can't **** off without strategic and economic consequences. The US needs Saudi Arabia onside whether they like to admit it or not.
Swinney was right to stand up for Scottish business and he’s also right to call out ethnic cleansing.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czj3wvyn0pno
Doubt we’ll hear same from Starmer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Netanyahu and Trump really make for a ghastly combo, possibly even worse than Trump and Musk.
I hate people who see simple solutions to incredibly complex, multifaceted problems and there will be enormous consequences if and when they blunder further into this.
As Swinney has rather finely demonstrated you can do both, call out his actions but at the same time engage and if required enter discussions that protect the businesses and jobs in Scotland. Tens of thousands of jobs in Scotland will depend on trade with the US, as FM of Scotland he has to acknowledge and understand that and he is doing a fine job of that at the moment.
I saw an interesting thing the other day where someone was saying that all you really need to do with Trump is to allow him to declare a victory of sorts on TV. The reality of the situation doesn't matter so much. The Canadian and Mexican situations (where Trump paused the tariffs in response to measures the Canadians and Mexicans were bringing in anyway) were an example of this.
So it might be possible for Swinney to do both here, potentially.
I'm one of those who is very uncomfortable with appeasement when a line has clearly been crossed though.