Originally Posted by
Keith_M
It's entirely possible that, in retrospect, some of the rules were a bit over the top, but it was an exceptional set of circumstances.
I think many governments and health organisations erred on the side of caution, mostly because they weren't sure quite what they were dealing with.
In saying that, though, there were occasions when relaxing the rules actually caused massive increases in the number of people catching the disease, for example the 'Eat Out To Help Out' scheme. Events like that made me think that the cautious approach probably was for the best after all.