Really hoping them sacking Neilson will force us to do the same with LJ.Quote:
Originally Posted by Is It On....
Printable View
Really hoping them sacking Neilson will force us to do the same with LJ.Quote:
Originally Posted by Is It On....
NaismithQuote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
[QUOTE=Is It On....;7324024]Goodwin, Neilson and Johnson were / are underperforming with their squads. Inevitable decision from Aberdeen and Hearts, just waiting for us to follow suit.[/QUOTE
Decisive from hearts while we fanny around. Johnson should be out today but we are unfortunately a club with no leaders on and off the park. As long as it is possible to make top six Johnson will remain post.
We went through a bad patch with Ross, sacked him and it's been downhill ever since.Quote:
Originally Posted by J-C
I'm amazed they've sacked Neilson. There must surely be more to it than just a shortish bad run of results.
Not so much fan ownership as mob rule at Tynecastle.
Shows hearts ambition compared to ours. Joke of a club atm.
Lol doubt it!Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnM1875
[QUOTE=WestStandMoaner;7324052]Scrambling for top six is embarrassing for Hibs. The never ending cycle of pish continues.Quote:
Originally Posted by Is It On....
The football they play in general is pretty poor according to some, has been for a long time.Quote:
Originally Posted by He's here!
He’s a wee scroat, but will have them fired up. He always showed up in the games v Hibs when he played for HeartsQuote:
Originally Posted by BoomtownHibeys
Agree with comments that Hearts sacking Neilson and Hibs sticking with LJ when you look at where the clubs are, the squads etc shows the difference in expectations and what is and is not acceptable. LJ is basically unsackable as Hibs stick to this we can’t keep sacking managers policy even if it means sticking with a poor manager taking us nowhere.
What happens when the next guy takes us nowhere. And the next, and the next.......Quote:
Originally Posted by thebausburst
They deal with their problem
We stick with our loser.
What a ****ing chance we’ve had to leapfrog them and we’ve ****ing blown it.
We sack them until we find someone who does take us somewhere. You don’t settle for someone with a dreadful record incase the next guy isn’t any better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silky
It’s not even been a full year since we last sacked a manager.Quote:
Originally Posted by thebausburst
Simple logic, if you appoint the right manager we won't need to keep sacking them. The idea that sticking with a failing manager is better than appointing someone better, or assuming that anyone we appoint will be worse is typical of the loser mentality that envelopes the club! Absolutely baffling.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubbsy90+2
How do we know they are better, or, indeed, the right one? I reckon Klopp couldn't get a tune out of this team and I would suggest he's a better manager.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nakedmanoncrack
Harry Potter back in no doub
We already know this manager is *****, he’s proven that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Silky
We’ll only know how the next guy will do once they take over.
Carry on with ***** or roll the dice and either continue with ***** that we’re getting anyway or potentially improve? No brainer. Get him in the bin.
Not always.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
Remember when we strolled it against them on a Friday night (Allan, MacLaren) and won 2-0.
This was probably the last time we beat them which is a disgrace.
Can still see his wee greetin face that night.
Paul Ince and Alex Rae sacked by Reading FC. Feel sorry in a way that they’ve had a 6 point deduction due to the owners, but will never feel sorry for Rae getting the bullet!
Ince is someone who I've always felt has an overinflated opinion of himself. An unlikeable duo. Guess that means we will see/hear more of Rae on TV and radio again :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
Not a managerial sacking but Ross Wilson leaves Rangers for Nottingham Forest.
Was he not quite ***** for Rangers? Can’t think of many brilliant signings they’ve made recently.
They are broke, he had no chance of accomplishing anything that those half heids would think was acceptable.Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubbsy90+2
We shouldn’t have sacked Jack Ross when we did. It’s been downhill since and the club have spent a lot of money achieving very little.
Can’t disagree with thisQuote:
Originally Posted by jacomo
Chris Wilder is reportedly facing the sack at Watford after 36 days.
By my rough calculation in a circa seven year senior career Porteous has served under seven managers
(including his loan period at Edinburgh City).Looks like it could be eight soon.
They released a statement yesterday saying he’s staying until the end of the season.Quote:
Originally Posted by Highwayman
Hope for his sake he does get time until the end of the season.Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesHFC
But it is Watford we’re dealing with here.
Has it been downhill?Quote:
Originally Posted by jacomo
The difference in league position between where he left us and where we finished with Maloney was negligible (I think it was 7th v 8th?) We’re currently higher than we were when he left and also deeper into the season (that tells its own story considering how pish we’ve been) and also higher than he had us in his first season. We’ve also never been on a run as bad as the one we were on under Jack Ross since he left (4 points out of 27/9 games).
I get people liked him but people have conveniently forgot just how bad we were under him when he left imo. People compare us now to the Jack Ross 3rd place season, but that’s not the Jack Ross that got sacked, it was the woefully underperforming 4 points from 9 games version that got sacked.