But who in their right mind is going to pay multiple millions for a club with no ground to play their ganes and a circa £500k season rent to then find.
Printable View
When BDO have to call it a day and announce homfc have to be liquidated, is that it? Do the doors close immediately?
Some of them really don't get it do they? Kickback-Ugly American, on 30 July 2013 - 02:30 AM, said:A century of tradition
A rabid fan base
Biggest club in the 14th largest metro area in the UK
A dedicated effort by the supporters to buy the club and invest in it
A stadium as atmospheric as any in Britain
It will take some years, but I still see glory days for us again. Provided FoH get a hold of the club, some time in my lifetime, hopefully in the next decade, Hearts will finish top of the table in the top tier.
I really don't have that much doubt about this, actually.
Trying to find the SPFL rules and regulations regarding the pinkies across the road starting a season in administration and then being liquidated. All there is is this http://www.spfl.co.uk/ , a website under construction. What rules are hertz covered by? After the rebranding last week you would think it would be all systems go, but apparently not.
GGTTH
I've probably made a hash of it due to posting from a phone but, forgiving the point of who owns the place, the statement that the two can be separated is correct. No way they'd hold it as an investment or lease it back to the club though. But a property developer might prefer to acquire solely the land as an asset, rather than having to go through the hassle of dealing with winding up the club etc.
The company could then be sold, probably for a remarkably similar amount as BDO's fees, to FoH. Thereby avoiding a Newco scenario.
Essentially: security gets called in, tynecastle is sold, remaining company gets sold to the foundation, livi/SRU/us get a nice payday through a groundshare.
I took a Londoner relative of mine to a derby at Tynecastle.
He thought it was a weird pokey little stadium, like Fratton Park - the kind of grounds that remind you why football had to change. He didn't know whether to be nostalgic or to duck to avoid all the asbestos...and that was from the corner of the Roseburn next to the Wheatfield :)
Agreed that UKIO administrators wouldn't want the ground - getting the biggest return for the creditors is their remit - why would they want to rush getting their hands on cash?
And "keep hold of the ground" was just a clumsy way of saying that the two would be sold separately.
It's feasible, but a couple of points get in the way.
1. UBIG would want their pound of flesh as well, so it wouldn't just be BDO's fees that would be paid through a sale of the company. I don't think FOH (or at least their backers) would be keen on paying that much for just the club's name.
2. there still remains the issue of the frozen assets.
They wouldn't necessarily be rushing, but they have to get it in as quickly as possible. Like BDO, they have to be mindful of their own costs racking up.
It's not such a mind boggling concept for a company to lease premises - sometimes selling the premises to a lease-back company to achieve this.
If anyone buys Hearts they will effectively be buying two things - the club and the ground. All I was saying that the UKIO administrators may get better value by selling separately. I'm not making a big deal over this but I reckon it is a possibility.
Maybe missed it in all the posts but is there a deadline on when revised bids have to be submitted?
The infighting on Brokeback just now over the Foundation of Yams is quality Haha
Any one got any ideas who else i can send letters ? my endless personal pursuit of justice must be continued until the day the PBS Is closed down and the yam fuds are doomed.
Sidney.:hnet:
FOH delay the direct debits until September until they are satisfied they can reach an agreement. - http://ow.ly/i/2Ki3E/original
More like they know the end is nigh!!!
What do FoH really expect to get? As I read it, they've 5500 folks pledging an average of circa £20 a skull - everything going well, that's income of only £110k per month. Given that the season ticket money has been spent, this whole 'movement' hasn't a hope in hell of keeping the club afloat.
Surely BDO and the Lith admins will tell them to bolt.
Have you tried Sindey Crosbie?
For the club and stadium to be seperated wouldn't that need to involve liquidation? And liquidation would result in them losing their SPFL status?
To start selling assets, as a going concern, I would assume that a CVA would need to be agreed? It might well be that BDO could get enough in the pot from splitting assets to satisfy a CVA but would that not mean Hearts without a stadium? If if they dont have a stadium, why pay a couple of million towards a CVA? Just liquidate and start a couple of divisions lower with a clean slate?
The way things are going it would appear the John Collins famous quote about them being a Sunday League Pub Team are about to come to pass :greengrin
To be fair I think they have always said they would do that, wasn't July's payment the same?
The bit I don't get is they could have had extra upfront capital, so why turn it down?
OK there is the admin of returning it, but surely you would prefer the capital.
Maybe they don't see newco as that bad an option?
I think they'd said that any money taken would be returned if they were unsuccesful. I suspect that, as others have suggested, they know that they don't have enough and are postponing rather than the costly route of refunding. Also, the longer that they hang in there the more chance of the league starting and the higher the chance of them being allowed to continue in the SPFL after it all implodes.
I'm still torn between wanting them liquidated before the start of the new season, and having them stagger on in some form, and face the humiliation of implosion en route, followed by liquidation. Decisions, decisions....
The league chairmen would just need to vote to transfer their share to the Newco. That's what they tried to do with Rangers, but the majority voted against (after fan pressure). If a majority voted in favour of a transfer then they may be allowed to complete the season (unless the rules now prevent it).
I'm struggling with that one myself, Bob. Instant fun and fireworks, or a protracted, slow-burn, gift-that-keeps-giving scenario?
On balance, I think I'm going to have to go for the more cautious 'bird in the hand is worth two in the bush' approach, and opt for instant extermination. You just never know. :coffee:
On the pledge part of the FoH site, it says the current date for DDs will be 2nd Aug with the caveat that if they are still in negotiations then "an appropriate date will be decided".
It looks like the timing is down to the minimum 3 working days notification under the DD guarantee scheme.
I don't think there is much to be read into the timing at this point unfortunately, the pledgers agree to pay any refund costs so they are covered that way as well.
It makes the decision not to take the payments strange to me.
I'm not arguing they may know the game's up for the current bid, just I don't see this as an indication of it.
I said weeks ago that FOH are unlikely to start taking Direct Debits. If they had taken the money out of peoples bank accounts on friday as planned and they didn't get control of Hearts or it drags on and on then people would be demanding refunds. That would be a massive pain to refund so many people. My guess is they know nothing is going to come of it but don't want to be the ones that give the game away.
If they implode this week then the league will have to carry on but with HoMFC unable to honour fixtures so every Hearts game would be recorded as a 3-0 victory for the opposition.
Im warming to the idea of seeing the table at the end of the season with Hearts on -15 points and a -114 goal difference :greengrin
That's his job, he has to try his best to get the club sold as a going concern and shouldn't give up until liquidation is unavoidable. It's entirely possible at this stage that Hearts will still be sold. Just because liquidation is the most likelydoesn't mean it will eventually come to pass.
Do you think Rudi knew? The L he kept showing us was for LIQUIDATION http://www.hibs.net/images/icons/icon6.png
ian murray must have seen that it was all going to turn out like this from the start
makes you wonder what was in it for him
the previously unknown 1st term labour mp
He is a politician.
His nature is to keep spouting the same old rubbish over and over again because he believes that the more often he says something, the more true it becomes and the more likely it is that ordinary people will believe it. No evidence to the contrary, certainly not incontrovertible fact, will ever convince him otherwise.
With the yams, he has the ideal "electorate". Gullible and desperate to believe.
The hypocrisy the man shows is quite stunning - his latest tweets include praise for the Church for tackling payday loan companies whilst criticising lack of Government stance/movement on the issue (the BBC link he posts has a go at Wonga in particular).
Who sponsors Hearts again :wink: Quite happy for his football club to take their cash though eh :agree::aok: Not sure I heard him shout from the Tynie rooftops that it was a scandal they were taking Wonga's cash and proudly displaying them on their shirts........or am I mistaken :cb
First and only term mate, trust me. No Labour voter I know wants him representing them for another term (and I am/was one).
But it's all the one league organisation now so what share is it that would be transferred?
Whenever the Yams get liquidated, if the SPFL Chairmen then vote to keep a Yam Newco in the top league there will be riots in Govan. It would be much easier for the SPFL to bin them now and save all those shenanigans in a month or so's time.
This is where I get confused (easily done!)
If the Liquidiser arrives at Tynie the Yams wouldn't have the keys to the place so won't be able to play there.
unless of course a Newco buys the Yams and the ground for the UKIO/UBIG Admins asking price and right now its been shown that the current bidders aren't at the races.
I think! :confused:
Looking at todays article in the EN, Massone still has not provided any proof that he has the capital to proceed with his bid, he has been given another 2 weeks to prove he has the cash or will be discounted from the bidding process.
Surely there was a deadline for this last week but BDO are obviously making it up as they go along.
So if Massone does drop out that leaves FoH with backing from around 5,500 Hearts fans, who have pledged money to run the club via a membership scheme if the FoH gains controls as the only show in town, and their bid is way below what the Lith admins will accept.
Doesn't sound good for them, does it. :greengrin
http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.co...ding-1-3021320
The Lithuanians who have the security over Tyne (i.e. the land) have a sum in mind which they believe that land is worth if it is sold on the open market.
The bidders need to satisfy not only the creditors via a CVA but also the holders of the security over the land. They (the Lithuanians) hold the aces because they hold the security over the land. If that's the only money-realisable asset (it seems to be so) then they are due all the money that comes from realising that asset (assuming it is less than the total they are owed = more than likely). Their debt (£15m) has to be paid first before anyone is paid because they are secured creditors.
So, if you are the secured creditor, you need to get as much from the bidders as you could get from an open market sale of the land.
The Lithuanians think the land is worth £5m (+++++++ depending on whose valuation you believe) on the open market, all of which (minus expenses) would go to them. Leaving SFA for the other creditors with zero.
The current offers are for the club + assets as a going concern with very small amounts for a CVA.
From the secured creditors POV these are rubbish offers because they believe they could realise more through a liquidation even though they might not get all their cash back.
The liquidators of the secured creditors are under a legal obligation to get the best possible price for the secured assets. If FoH and the other party can't meet their requirements in this regards, the secured creditor can force a liquidation in order to sell the secured asset (Tynie/land) and get some of their money back.
I think.
I heard from (almost) the horses mouth today of one Edinburgh based property developer very interested in the Tynecastle site. They are. 'watching with interest' at the moment.
Not going to name them but they aren't one that has been mentioned thus far in the thread eg Cala et al. Have done quite a bit redevelopment work in Edinburgh over the years though as well as abroad. They also redeveloped a site not a million miles away from Tynecastle several years ago.
From the secured creditors point of view, if they accept a cva then they have to share some of the money with the unsecured creditors or they will reject the cva?
But if the proceed to liquidation they will repossess the PBS and get to keep the proceeds themselves?
Is that about right?
My non-financial expert PoV FWIW, why would a secured creditor accept a CVA if it could get more from a liquidation? As was said previously by Ginandtonic (sic) on behalf of the Lithuanians, "the bidders need to up their offers by millions" (or words to that effect).
In other words, as I understand it, the bidders need to come up with substantially more than they have so far to avoid liquidation.
I'd be surprised if he does.
Firstly because the Scotsman seems nothing more than a vehicle for Hearts to tell supporters what they want to hear. Secondly because no formal moves have started yet, I found out somewhat due to a slip of the tongue.
The holding company of the developer in question also has a diverse portfolio of businesses and the main development income now comes from abroad so unlikely they would be overly concerned about upsetting the yams in the short term.
Close but no cigar.
Can anyone (maybe sergey) remind me of what happened to Kaunas FC when Romanov stopped using other people's money to fund them?
They resigned from A-Lyga and turned to amateur status and plied their trade in what's best described as ' Lithuanian Pub League' matches. Still amateur to this day. From what I've been told, they'll fold completely in the coming months.
His other club, MTZ RIPO withdrew from the Belarus league during the 2012 season leaving the league in turmoil and they also went amateur. They re-branded (can't remember new name) and are now resigned to history.
Good things do come in three's, don't they?
If it's the builders I'm thinking about, their website is decked out in nice colours. I worked on one of their developments in Muirston Place around 1987/88.
GGTTH
the Chinese, biggest population in the world as everyone knows, are buying up land ,properties , etc all over the place. Edin. quarter mile for example. alright, it's virtually built but what's to stop them gettin' a finger in the pie buying up disused premises next? someone mentioned a lot of money sloshing around, a few pages back but when it comes to a lot of money sloshing around, there are some very intelligent, business people with a lot of clout in the ever growing Chinese community in the whole of the UK.