Printable View
Imagine the plaudits she'd get if she had the grace to accept whatever the final outcome is given the circumstances. Instead she's scrambling to patch the hole in the boat when it's already sunk in terms of her financial mismanagement and now blaming players.
Also they don’t have investors yet no question asked about this mystery benefactor that tops them up every single year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
It’s been conducted by her pal McGlaughlin.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
Cringeworthy, the poor woman can't realise how she sounds, surely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
However she was setting it all up they just couldn't sustain it immediately the games stopped. Only ever a few games away from her business "model" collapsing.
Sent from my SM-A750FN using Tapatalk
And is the word reward or award?Quote:
Originally Posted by KeithTheHibby
What is this mystery benefactors role? Do they not need to show in their accounts where money’s coming from, & is it taxable? Also, is it a gift or repayable?Quote:
Originally Posted by 90+2
Aberdeen chairman on BBC Scotland website said today "Cormack believes if Scottish football does not resume until late July or early August, there will be no "choice but to call the league" as it stands."
Yaaaas
Let's see. It'll be because that's the contracts they chose to negotiate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
Sent from my SM-A405FN using Tapatalk
I think they have to show it on the accounts as gifts to the club but don’t reveal who it is. Yet they start crying about wage cuts instead of deferrals because they have no investors. They have something much more beneficial than investors.Quote:
Originally Posted by munchar
We dont have a rich owner though just a wealthy majority shareholder. On the other hand they actually do have a rich owner and will soon have thousands of skint ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Not In The Know
It's hard to disagree with any of that since it's 100% correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by hibbyfraelibby
Sent from my SM-A750FN using Tapatalk
Bit harsh there are you not...Quote:
Originally Posted by we are hibs
Just at a couple of years should be fine. They will still be arrogant,blinkered,brainwashed and incapable of discussing football but they are still our nearest rivals. My god they will be moaning that will be not be able to increase the gap in derby wins. Don't laugh you know they will mention it. I'll wait till relegation is confirmed before having a celebration tipple
And yes there are far more important things like making sure the whole shambles of a way this has been handled on all fronts has been learned from and for once making sure all the horrendous hubris and total ineptitude is avoided. Possibly for the holy ground but the more we find out about the govts handling of this the more angrier I get. Be safe.
[QUOTE=mjhibby;6134613]Bit harsh there are you not...
Just at a couple of years should be fine. They will still be arrogant,blinkered,brainwashed and incapable of discussing football but they are still our nearest rivals. My god they will be moaning that will be not be able to increase the gap in derby wins. Don't laugh you know they will mention it. I'll wait till relegation is confirmed before having a celebration tipple[/QUOTE
50 years in the lower divisions wouldn't be enough for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.H.F.C
Part of the problem is that we are all feeling our way here. But my employer’s take on it is that employees need to consent to furlough.
[QUOTE=PatHead;6134619]For me, after the The Rangers having all the rules bent, twisted and totally dicarded to allow them to start again in the bottom league then Hearts waiting a couple of days to declare administration to avoid relegation and bumping all their debts if they are not relegated this season then Scottish football is done !Quote:
Originally Posted by mjhibby
Been a season ticket holder x2 for many years now and to be honest at the point where unless the Scottish game is administered in a fair and proper manner what is the point of it all. Clubs can spend what they want outwith their means gaining an unfair sporting advantage then go t!ts up dumping all their debt and start again awash with cash to do the same thing all over again !!
I have not renewed my season tickets yet....
also my experience. i had to agree at 6pm last night when i received the emailQuote:
Originally Posted by jacomo
[QUOTE=the tornadoe;6134632]Great post, & totally agree. Very frustrating imo how the same 2 teams seem to be doing the same again, & most probably the rule makers will accommodate them. Like yourself. I think it’s very delusional, although we’ll both renew for the love of Hibs, even though you could argue it’s corrupt the way certain clubs do what they want with no repercussions. Hand on heart, if it was Hibs in the same position right now as Hearts & league finished as it stands, I’d have no qualms. They’re there on merit. League table doesn’t lie. Admin 2 perhaps? Start again with no debt, and once again have an unfair advantage over the rest. Down you go Hearts. Enjoy paying the 6-8 grand wages down there.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
[QUOTE=munchar;6134656]Other than Football debts, presume most of Hearts debts are due to who built the new standQuote:
Originally Posted by the tornadoe
They can immorally get rid of all their players in admin
[QUOTE=Billy Whizz;6134660]That's the thing for me though ... the Football Debt means debts to other clubs.. it should mean all debts owed by a football club. If that rule was implemented then none of this administration / liquidation would get them out of jail free.. they would be forced to run their clubs properly as most others do including ourselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by munchar
[QUOTE=the tornadoe;6134667]That’s what’s so frustrating. It’s actually a license to commit fraud. Pay your football debts, but bump everyone else!! Ffs 🤬 Hence while they’re trying to force their players to take a cut. If they go bust, they’ll still be liable for their contracts in full. Naismith (who’s voluntarily took 50% cut) & Boyce are on long term big money contracts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
The football debt rule is the reason HMRC never vote for a CVA with a football club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The impression I get from the Old Trout's latest reincarnation of the truth, is that the players will be on furlough, and obviously getting £2,500 per month. The bold Trout, using the Article 12 suspension clause, now introduces a twist whereby she is now contemplating paying the players a percentage of their salary, over and above the £2,500, because she's a really good person and doing them a favour! All on the basis that hertz are a big famous club. She doesn't need to do this.
If anyone in the media or social media says different, they must be lying.
(She says negotiations with the players regarding that percentage continues, and that is maybe an indication that she is not particularly comfortable with the legality of Clause 12.)
She's got herself into this mess because she jumped in with both feet far too early, within hours, of football being suspended. Her solution was the threat of wage cuts, cancelling contracts, taking legal action against whoever, etc.
The rest of football took time to analyse what it meant to them, and then to act accordingly. Most people do this, even if it is subconsciously.
She's a ******* chancer!
Absolutely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kojock
Don't know what he earns, probably easy £9k+ pw? Not bad for a guy who plays around half a season, every season. And STILL bums himself into the national team. Just W T F?
Sent from my LG-H840 using Tapatalk
Naismith won't on circa 10k a week at Hearts. No chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by EI255
Wonder how many extra million the jambos have had chucked at them over the last 40 years.
The brown envelope will be getting stuffed as we speak.
The tone of the interviewer is pathetic. Whispered voice it’s like someone’s just died. No cross examination or any questions asked by the muppets in the studio afterwardsQuote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/...cript-21813458
Is this the same as the pre-record? Generosity of the club?? Does she mean the lucrative contracts?
I struggle to understand her ramblingsQuote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzywuzzy
1- Your crying about the bigger basic wages Hearts pay. If you knew you couldn’t afford them, why offer them?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzywuzzy
2- If admin comes along a second time, you must pay football debts, is this why you’re trying to reduce the contracts you negotiated by 50%?
3- League rules states they can finish whenever they choose. What could you argue, especially given the circumstances with the worldwide pandemic, that you think they’d bend the rules...again?