This. As much as he carps, getting a hefty MEP salary / pension and keeping himself relevant is very important to Farridge.
J
Printable View
Attachment 22663
This will do for me.
I recall when the SNP won their Holyrood landslide, John Curtice was predicting a hung parliament. Yet he is held up as some sort of polling god or guru.
I think the last few years have seen a seismic change and I wouldn’t be confident of much from polling.
Ever since 2010 when we ended up with a coalition “that could never happen in Britain” they have been flawed.
Chris Law is being much more direct about independence in his leaflets, but being in the "Yes City" of Dundee it's understandable to go balls to the walls with that strategy :greengrin
https://twitter.com/stevelonie/statu...23390067609601
ITV is going to have a Boris vs Jeremy debate on Thursday 19th November with a follow up "multi party" debate at a later date.
I know it's going to be either of them as PM in the end but I'm never comfortable with excluding other parties with the risk it can have of swaying voters.
Bit of backlash now regarding the Greens standing in more than 20 seats (so far).
Pete Wishart (SNP) isn't happy, he has a majority of 21, last election Greens didn't run but took over 1000 votes in the election before that.
I usually like to see as many parties as possible run but they have no chance of winning any seat north of the border in this FPTP system and could in the end save a few seats for the Tories..
SNP MPs (or potential ones) who are at risk of losing out to Tories / Lib Dems by people voting for Greens instead.
I don't think they believe it's skullduggery, more asking what's the point, they don't stand a chance of winning and could open the door to the Tories / Lib Dems.
If they were standing 59 candidates then it’s no problem. All is fair in love and war. That’s democracy. But if they are only standing 20 and in areas that target SNP marginals then that is aggressive towards the SNP and in the spirit of all’s fair in love and war I think SNP voters might think carefully before lending the greens their 2nd vote come the holyrood elections.
I’m sure Tories will thank them by lending them their 2nd votes instead.[emoji849]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s only really a democracy when we get rid of this ridiculous FPTP system.
For example in Chippenham I can’t vote Labour, its a straight shootout between the Tories and Lib Dems.
Crazily the Euro elections are the most representative as my vote is lumped into the South West PR vote.
J
Well, ideally yes :greengrin
I think it's the problem with the FPTP system, it's going to throw up issues like this.
The current Tory MP in the Stirling seat for example is against gay marriage, do the Greens really want to risk having him still in the seat boosting Boris' numbers instead of the SNP's Alyn Smith (very pro European, pro-action on climate change)?
Only two days in to the campaign and already we have had -
SNP supporter complaints that hearsay suggests that Labour and the Tories are going to stand aside and let the LibDems have a clear run at Blackford in Skye. (It's no fair.)
Complaints from SNP supporters because Jo Swinson is apparently open to the idea of talking to Plaid Cymru but not to them. (It's no fair.)
And my personal favourite, a diddy party like the Greens has the audacity to actually consider putting up candidates against the SNP. There's even a claim that Pete Wishart ain't pleased. :greengrin (It's no fair.)
All at a time when the SNP is heading for a landslide win in Scotland, my vote included. You could almost feel sorry for them. :greengrin
To be fair to all those SNP supporters, they're only reflecting what's out there in the MSM, "the times" included, and which hasn't been denied (blackford).
FWIW they can get on with it for me, I'll keep this post in mind when we move forward to 2021, when wings comes along to stand on the list only.
The tables will flip on here.
👍
Who needs the mainstream media? :greengrin
https://newsthump.com/2019/10/31/jo-...o-fridge-door/
In my defence if years of supporting Hibs has taught me anything it's that it's never good to go into match day as favourites :greengrin
Its already looking like Harry Hill is going to have to set up a fight so that some people can resolve their differences.
andrew neil asking jo swinson why she thinks she will be PM, she's one helluva dreamer
https://www.facebook.com/TheDailyPol...g0NjA2NDc5MTc/
she's standing as a candidate to be prime minister lol
The candidate hasn’t been selected yet.
I can see why the SNP might be worried about the Greens taking votes from them, but maybe instead of complaining they should look at the reasons why people would vote Green instead of SNP. The Greens have a far bigger commitment to the environment than the SNP, and that’s a big issue for some people.
Farage now making an appeal to the traditional socialist strongholds of Northern England and encouraging them to come out in numbers and vote for eeeerm..... national socialism.
Sinn Fein and the SDLP in unofficial nod and a wink pact.
The SDLP stand aside for Sinn Fein in North Belfast.
Sinn Fein stand aside for SDLP in South Belfast.
Both stand aside for independent pro-Remain Unionist Lady Sylvia Hermon in North Down.
Both stand aside for Alliance's Naomi Long in East Belfast.
Tories haven’t really got out of the traps yet. Maybe as crap a campaign as under May!
SNP (3rd largest party in the UK) getting white washed from yet another "debate".
https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...e1&oe=5E4D21E5
What are the establishment so fearful of?
If Labour can talk about NHS for 6 weeks and keep letting the Brexit Party attack Johnson then it might tighten up enough for a hung parliament.
SNP need to keep doing what they are doing. Getting shut out a debate probably helps them. It shows that mp’s elected here count for less than mp’s elected in England.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lib Dem’s, PC and Greens doing a 50 seat pact where they stand down candidates to help each other win seats from Tories.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sky only invited Swinson after her attacks on ITV for excluding her. Love her or loathe her she has played this one well and if she performs as well as she has been doing in the Commons recently she will pick up a lot of votes.
I suspect Sturgeon will be secretly pleased to be excluded, it sends out the message that Scotland is already a different country fighting a different campaign from the rest of the UK. It looks like a bonus for the SNP to me.
Tories hiding report on Russian interference in elections.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-po...mpression=true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So let me get this right. Boris Johnson is an unelected PM of a leave government that has been found guilty of manipulating a leave referendum vote and is now postponing the publication of a report into cheating in a national vote until after a national vote?
Just another grievance, nothing to see here, move along now.
I would like to see the Greens rational behind agreeing to a "Remainers pact" with the Lib Dems / Plaid down south while putting up candidates against the SNP in Scottish seats where the Tories could get in.
The ****ing Lib Dems are going to let the Tories in. AGAIN.
There are arguments for both systems. I like the fact that there is one person who represents my area. Also how do you take into account local parties? The SNP, DUP, SDLP, independents would all lose out. A popular independent MP would lose his seat because he is not tied to a party.
And how do you get rid of an unpopular mp who is protected by being high up on the parties list system?
Even with the Holyrood set up which is a hybrid of both, if Ruth Davidson’s constituents wanted to get rid of her as it appears she has switched her focus to lining her own pockets then they can’t because she is number one on the national Tory list system.
FPTP is not perfect but I still prefer it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
just watching sky news from westminster the now, it's pretty empty, thornberry is up talking asking about the russian report, two tories opposite her just sitting with their heads bowed playing away on their mobile phones, what a den of ******** rudeness westminster is
It is quite interesting that this doesn't get spoken about more.
The LibDems shelved quite a lot of principle in an attempt to address this issue (they got this referendum as part of an agreement to make up the coalition government).
Everyone remembers the tuition fees, nobody remember that they got the referendum and that it was effectively kicked into touch.
I wonder where we might be today politically had there been a different result in that referendum?
This poll finding is indicative of labour malaise across England and Wales. Personally speaking I think Labour will struggle everywhere even across their strongholds after a dire year of Brexit fence sitting. A party in chaos unfortunately as I don't want to see the tories gain a majority and hope that the anti Brexit Lib Dems are the main beneficiaries.
I think Labour will do well. Corbyn comes across as more genuine than Johnson or Swinson anyway.
It’s not how he come across that worries people. It’s the return to socialism that scares people. People don’t really want to see industry re-nationalised. They definitely don’t want their property confiscated or their kids school shut down. Fact is, when it comes down to it they would rather risk brexit than risk Corbyn.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The proposal was to give tenants the opportunity to buy out rented property from landlords who own and rent a large number of homes. The proposal for private schools is to integrate them into the public sector, not to sell off the assets. Although it is just a proposal and not commited party policy.
You can see why that might scare people though? What is a large number of properties? 2?
And it can be taken for granted the people who send their kids to private school don’t want them integrated into the public sector. 7% of kids are educated privately. They mostly have two parents and grandparents, aunts uncles etc who would not wish for the kids school to close. And the proposal was for the endowments of the schools to be redistributed.
They have similar respect for private property to communist regimes of the past and that is a hard sell to people who value what property they have.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
7% of parents with kids have them educated privately, which means 93% don't.
20% of UK households are rented privately, which means 80% are not.
Do you honestly expect the Labour Party to pander to the private sector to the detriment of the public sector?
Some people might find their policies scary, but there are certainly plenty of people out there who find tory policies scary. Regardless of which party you are and what you're campaigning for, you're always going to scare some groups of people.
Labour scaring private landlords and owners of schools for the privileged doesn't worry me in the slightest. Neither applies to me.
Exactly this.
It was risibly embarrassing when forced into saying they'd both negotiate another deal with the EU then attempt to persuade people to vote against it in a second referendum. Brexit will have a profound effect on this GE despite Labour desperately trying to shift the debate. Hoping the other progressive parties benefit and not the tories.
:aok:
Besides, what votes are Labour really going to lose out on through such proposals?
Can't say I know too many private landlords with a multitude of properties or too many parents sending their kids to top prep schools who have ever really considered voting for the Labour Party.
And yet the Labour Party is languishing in the low 20’s in the polls against this Tory govt. Clearly there are people out there not keen on these policies.
Obviously you think it doesn’t affect you (erosion of property rights will affect everyone eventually) but that does not make it a good idea.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You think they're in the low 20's because they're scaring people who would never consider voting anything other than conservative anyway?
Erosion of what right? The right to buy up hundreds of properties and charge overinflated rent? Landlords should either be limited to the amount of properties they can own and rent out, or there should be a cap in place to stop them charging extortionate rent rates for people who are desperate for a roof over their heads.
Prices are going up because we are not building enough houses. Demand is rising due to the massive increase in Edinburgh’s population which increases competition for property. Until they free up the planning system and allow more house building then it will continue.
Landlords don’t really set prices, they accept them. The market sets them. There are plenty places in Britain where rents haven’t gone up in years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk