I've never voted in this particular election as it's entirely irrelevant to my life. Coincidentally I happen to be abroad so am not bothering about it.
Enjoy the angst. 😁
Printable View
I've never voted in this particular election as it's entirely irrelevant to my life. Coincidentally I happen to be abroad so am not bothering about it.
Enjoy the angst. 😁
I didn't vote as it's all rather pathetic. We voted to leave, so leave. Naw, wait, we might have to vote again 'cause some people didn't like it and others claim that the public are too stupid to understand anything to do with the real world. Sick to death of politics and may actually never vote again.
I wonder what the electoral Commission will say about all the EU citizens who've been denied their vote.
United Kingdom democracy for you. Not fit for purpose.
Not the criminal investigation into how the Leave campaigns conducted themselves?
You also think that the media have tried to ignore the result of the referendum or Nigel Farage, publically educated and on the MEP “rich list” for external earnings isn’t a part of the elite?
The reason anyone voted is leave is 30 years of anti EU rhetoric.
The polling station at Gylemuir Primary was like a morgue when I went at 9pm.
Had a chuckle when I noticed that some cad had carefully folded down all the a-boards with the exception of the SNP's,,,, childish stuff but made me wonder if any voters rock up with no clue who they're voting for and end up going with the poster that catches their eye?
Did they fill in the correct paperwork though?
"Citizens of European countries must fill in a European Parliament voter registration form to ensure they have the right to cast their vote in the country of their choosing. This must be completed and returned 12 working days before the polls open."
https://www.itv.com/news/2019-05-23/...ling-stations/
Unless you can prove otherwise your making assumptions.
Maybe the Scottish Government should have made people aware.
Sweeping generalisations and assumptions leaves no room for discussion and are made by you to confirm your own bias.
The topic was debated to death prior to the referendum and to say that everyone who voted to leave is only down to ignorance is just deluded arrogance on your part.
Anyway I have gave my reason why I voted for the Brexit Party so to try ensure the democratic result is honoured.
If anything just so that future referendum results are honoured the same way, even if I don't like the result such a vote for Scottish Independence, that's how democracy should work.
Oh how strange it will be if and when Scotland votes for independence and the very same forces spring into action and conspire to reverse the result without it ever being implemented.
I do wonder how you would react to that?
You are aware it was an advisory referendum and non binding? There's no legal requirement for the result to be honoured. It was inherently different to the independence referendum.
If someone believes in Brexit, with a deal or otherwise, and votes accordingly today because of that then whilst I don't agree with them I understand their reasoning. On the other hand the argument about respecting democracy is a fundamentally flawed one imo. The only reason democracy works is because it recognises people can and do change their minds.
Well. At least one couple had tower hamlets council rattled that they checked cctv and allowed them to vote
I'd bet my mortgage they aren't the only ones who done everything right only to be denied
This was raised in UK gov as a potential big issue recently
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk
Bound to he some genuine errors, but let's not pretend it was some underhand tactic to deny people the chance to vote. I am guessing a large majority were denied a vote because they had not filled in the correct paperwork and were probably unaware they even had to.
It was also local councils jobs to process the forms. Now who runs our local council?
Your argument does not stack up when you consider there was a general election and the two main parties had it on their manifesto that they would honor the referendum result.
Furthermore democracy can only work when the initial referendum result is respected and then implemented. Once that decision has been give a chance to run, then yes after a period of time (one in a lifetime or just whenever the loosing side decides) a new vote can take place to rejoin. However if the first referendum result is never respected and never implemented then how can that be considered to be democratic? It's not no matter how much you wish it to be so.
Just be honest, you want the result overturned, you don't care that leave won the referendum, you just want to remain and no matter how that is achieved, even if that means risking the integrity of future democratic votes.
All I'm saying is be careful what you wish for because if this result is overturned without ever being implemented then for sure it will happen again and again and again... then what?
Reap what you sow.
Whilst everyone and their dog nowadays seem to be claiming that x, y and z are "undemocratic", there is something a bit whiffy about those who could possibly have done more to help these people get their paperwork together to vote not being hugely bothered to do so.
Get your point here and agree in general
However the picture that was painted in 2016 of what "leave" actually was is vastly different to what we are being offered now
Certainly a far cry from a no deal brexit
Ploughing on with that, IMHO also represents a betrayal of what was voted for in 2016
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk
You're on Twitter, check out #deniedmyvote hundreds if not thousands of people filled in paperwork correctly, and still denied. This was the UK governments responsibility and they've failed people who've lived here for years.
Stop trying to deflect it away from your party. They failed, accept it.
I'm not assuming anything about the majority
If u want to shut down an argument by asking if you have proof of the official documents and if not then its not a valid point as its an assumption - The very same works in reverse
Some will have probably not filled in that form and lots will have
Lots will have had no problems but even some people missing out due to council errors isn't good enough
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk
"In order to take part in the European elections in the UK, EU citizens needed to have returned a UC1 form by 7 May to their local authority, declaring they would not vote in another EU member state.
Citizens of Ireland, Malta or Cyprus are eligible to vote in the UK for European elections without having to make this written declaration.
Many people took to Twitter to say they were not sent the form by their local authority or had received it just days before the deadline - and that councils then failed to process the forms in time. Some others said they were unaware of the UC1 process that would have allowed them the right to a vote."
Yes, look what people are saying! It is their local authority, who runs our local authority?
It would not be a voting day without another SNP grievance though would it.
I disagree we voted to leave, as said before it was debated to death prior to the referendum and during the general election. We were told all the horror stories before the vote and leave still won.
It's a mess I believe the EU offered us a Canada+ type deal that would have satisfied the Tory party but May refused as she wanted even closer ties to Europe. Hopefully we can get back to being offered that deal instead of no deal.
Your MP raised it in parliament the other day. You should be proud of her. 😂
The failure here is with the UK government in dragging their heels in saying whether we were actually voting in these elections. That's why the local councils couldn't get their paperwork sorted out, hence the people who work and have resided here for years couldn't vote.
This is on Theresa and co, and you know it, and trying to put it on the Scottish government as you have is absolutely trumpist.
Tory run Britain, a banana republic.
Ah so the local councils did have a part to play. Maybe they could have done better. Going by your original post it was WM and central government who were at fault for not sending and processing the forms. Although I suspect you probably never knew what a UC1 form was.
Your condescending style of posting is rather grating.
I've given you the reasons why I think our European neighbors didn't get to vote, and you've tried to deflect it to somehow be the fault of everyone bar the real culprits.
At no time did I ever say the UK Gov failed to send forms. You've just made that up.
This seems to be your MO
I'll leave you to continue deflecting away from your party, and your dear leader, as you sip your G&T in your union Jack under gadgeys.
Says the master of deflection. I've given you reasons why it might just not be the fault of big bad Westminster and maybe, just maybe, the local councils were at fault as well. I know that does not fit with your MO of Westminster being the root of all evil though so you will never accept it.
Tried to avoid posting on this thread as it has been somewhat dispiriting reading.
Nevertheless, the rather serious issue of EU nationals missing their chance to vote is serious, as it the issue of overseas UK nationals being deprived of theirs.
It’s sad if this is to be made a party political issue. For me it more reflects the rending effect of political instability in a way that hasn’t been experienced in a long time on these isles.
UK government, the Electoral Commission and local authorities all had some degree of culpability in allowing this to happen IMO.
Without a doubt, a large factor in this was the uncertainty about whether Euro elections would take place. By the same token, one of the key functions of local government is to manage and support the electoral process. And also plan for civil contingencies, of which this seems like an obvious one.
But local authorities, in England especially, but increasingly in Scotland, have seen their budgets slashed in the last number of years. English councils have seen a 50% cut since 2010/11. What needs to be borne in mind is that there are some things councils have to do, cannot afford not to do, have a statutory duty to do.
Child protection, critical social care for the vulnerable, registering and burying the dead, ensuring public safety through environmental health, refuse collection etc etc.
The knock-on effect is that everything else takes a bigger hit to find the savings. That’s why libraries close down, older peope’s lunch clubs disappear, why the verge at that tricky junction never gets trimmed back, why your bins go to every two weeks instead of one.
And before the services that affected day-to-day life were cut, there were culls within the internal structure of local authorities.
And guaranteed, teams that dealt with all sorts of things including planning applications and electoral registration would have been prime targets for downsizing, in a desperate attempt to balance the books.
The regime of austerity has led to that. The focus local government has had to make on critical services has led to that. The failure to ensure people were able to exercise their democratic rights in this election was abysmal but it has been in the post a long, long time.
It’s partly a consequence of austerity, partly a consequence of local government resources, partly a failing on the part of watchdogs and almost certainly a massive consequence of the ‘make it up as we go along’ approach to Brexit.
For me, it just reflects the sleepwalk of the referendum, where the complexity of what leaving meant was never adequately explained or presented and the idiocy of the arguments to leave were never adequately challenged.
If EU Nationals who had a right to vote in this election were turned away in error, then how can this vote be considered democratic? :confused:
Why is it ok for this to happen? Are we just going to meekly accept it, just as we meekly accept the way the UK treats Scotland?
If the Daily Mail’s poll is correct it reflects a disappointing result.
How about being sidelined and ignored at every turn? Or having our own democratically elected represenatives scoffed at, when they're speaking at Westminster and being told to "go home". Or in some cases, told to "go and kill themselves"?
Our representatives in the EU Parliament never get spoken to or treated this way. Why is it acceptable at Westminster?
Our representatives go down to Westminster and rant like idiots, embarrass the nation and behave just like Farage does in the European Parliament. Perhaps if we elected some representatives that don't carry on like the monster raving loony party they'd be taken a bit more seriously
Scotland voted as part of the UK, unfortunately the UK voted to leave.
Just like London voted to Remain but they also voted as part of the UK and have no special deal or arrangements.
A deal could have been done in Parliament a few months back but if I remember the SNP abstained from a Customs Union. Those 35 votes would have passed that motion.
Scotland and London are not like comparing England and Scotland.
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk
When my sister was living and working on a Greek island she was given ballot papers for local council elections and it's actually staggering to think that a small island can organise people who are foreign resident and we can't. Greece is famous for being somewhat haphazard in it's governmental departments to say the least. When we can point at them and say "that's how it's done", then something is seriously amiss.
Do you think that all those millions of people who bought PPI should not have been given their money back? They made their choice do they should respect the outcome whether they were lied to or not.
The 2016 referendum was even more misleading than the most ruthless PPI peddler.
If people so protective of our "democracy" why aren't you screaming from the rooftops about the lies and the breaking of rules?
Because, frankky, they're not. The only democracy they care about is the one where they win.
I don't think your at the wind up but it's clear to see that the only people saying that the voters were mislead are those that voted remain.
Do you not think the very people you believe to have been mislead (the people who voted to leave), do you not think if they had been mislead or if they only based their vote about what was on the side of a bus, then right now they would be up in arms saying hold on a minute we've been lied too?
They the people who voted leave are not, they are not crying foul play, it's only remainers like you who are and are trying to play this card in a desperate attempt to get your own way and to ignore and reverse the result of the referendum.
If anything the desire for getting Brexit is getting stronger not weaker and all the mind control tactics from the media and their corrupt politicians still cannot change the peoples minds!
Regardless of the lies on the bus, no-one was told the truth about the immediate damaging consequences of a no deal.
The leave campaigns just said that they'd had enough of"so called experts" and that they should be ignored.
You don't care about democracy. You care about the result.
At least admit it.
And if 30% if the nobbled electorate is "the will of the people", then democracy isn't what I thought it was.
PS. The people will be up in arms screaming that they'd been lied to when the economy comes crashing in, jobs go through the floor along with the pound, immigration stays at the same level and the wealthy in this country, like Farage, get even wealthier.
That's not entirely true though, is it?
I listen to Radio 5 Live most mornings on my commute, and they have regular phone-ins about Brexit. They often seem to manage to dig up someone who voted leave and has now changed their mind as they feel they were indeed misled.
So are these people frauds? Liars? Or are Radio 5 deliberately seeking out callers from this seemingly non-existent demographic to further their biased agenda?
To suggest that this group of people don't exist is disingenuous, and laced with more than a little Farage-like rhetoric IMO.
I never said that, I asked if London should get a special deal as they also voted Remain and having more people and creating more wealth and jobs than Scotland then is the case for that not compelling? Feel free to answer.
I think it says more about the chip on your shoulder attitude to be honest though, fits in with your big bad England and Westminster narrative.
I’m a leave voter who would now vote remain. The reason I voted to leave was because we are disconnected from the EU in a democratic sense in that our media does not cover What is happening in Brussels every day, most of our mep’s were unknown to the population and we barely took part in EU elections at all (funnily enough that has changed somewhat these days). I wasn’t really against the EU project as such, just that we weren’t really taking part anyway so what was the point. When I’m in Ireland they are much more engaged in the whole thing. I’m comfortable with my vote and I knew why I was voting. Where I was mislead though was on the fact that we would have a very easily negotiated free trade deal by the time we left and that we would have other free trade deals all lined up for exit day. That has not happened and therefore I feel totally entitled to want another vote.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They are to the type of Unionist who only thinks in terms of Britain as their country, Scotland a region within it. They might have a certain amount of regional pride attached to Scotland but there's no way they would regard it as an entity suitable (or in a lot of cases, capabale) of being an independent state. That covers pretty much all Tories and some Libs and Labs. Of course, as Mibbes Aye, is fond of reminding us, what is a nation if not an artificial construct? So choosing between Scotland or Britain is essentially an arbitrary thing.
The "family of nations" bull**** is just that, bull****. UK Tory and Labour politicians only use that kind of rhetoric if speaking to an exclusively Scottish audience. If they are not being forced to think hard about it then the words "country", "nation", "national" all apply exclusively to Britain/the UK.
Hmmm.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...816019b92a.jpg
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk
Theresa May resigns as of 7th June
She actually broke down at the end.
A lot of hope for me in the Daily Mail's polling.
Firstly, for voting in the Euro elections, 'only' 31% admitting to going for Nige. That's way, way less than the 50% or so who want Brexit, so that means 20% or so are not convinced by his 'message'.
Secondly, for voting intention in a General Election, Tories and Labour - the old politics - get 61% between them and Brexit Party - the new politics - gets 12%. Nige is not getting through to as many people as all that. Like in 2014, a huge surge in a protest vote for his then vehicle may not transform into any sort of lasting change in British politics.
If we want to make sure Brexit doesn't happen then Grayling becoming PM is the best thing that could happen. He ****s up literally everything he touches so Article 50 would be revoked within a week whilst he sat trying to remember his own name and wondering what's going on.
I’ve gone independent for local and green European (West of Ireland)..
Crying for herself. Not a tear for the Grenfell victims, disabled and homeless. Hostile environment to hard working immigrants. Windrush scandal. Bangs on about ending Austerity! Your party used Austerity as a tool to dismantle the welfare state.
Not one tear until she loses her power. Crying out of frustration of her own failed legacy. Crocodile tears.
J
Proportionally equal isn’t equal. Small nations in the EU are equal no matter what their population is. The frustration that Scotland can decide one thing, but the UK can just ignore it is for most people the reason for supporting independence. We’re not a region of the UK we’re a country, and the empty rhetoric from Westminster about us being equal partners and the vow that was made before the independence referendum about a near federal UK has only gone on to reinforce the view of being ignored.
Proportionally equal is being equal though, that's how things work. Unless you think Scotland should have a proportionally 10x stronger say in things in order to be considered equal. Different countries in the EU get a different number of MEPs :confused:
I think "Scots decide one thing and UK just ignore it" isn't necessarily how it works either. It could just as easily work the other way, it's just 10x less likely. It's not an active decision to ignore Scottish votes, there's just not as many of them.
Yes, but they also get direct representation on the Council which is considerably more powerful. They even get a veto on particularly important things.
The configuration of the UK isn't particularly unfair when you consider what it actually is: a unitary state with a certain amount of asymmetric regional devolution. It's the disingenuous bull**** from Unionism to try and pretend it's something else that really grates.
It’s not me that’s saying Scotland should have 10x as much say as we deserve. We are constantly told by unionist politicians that Scotland is an equal member of the UK. We’re not equal we’re as you say proportionally equal, which is utterly meaningless when important decisions need to be taken. We don’t have a veto on anything and we rarely get the government we vote for.