Is the boy on trial no 29 years old and failed at every club he's been at until this season when he's been playing in front of about 200 people at a time?
Reckon they'll make more money from face painting than selling this boy
Printable View
Like I said, risky :greengrin
They're making big noises about his all-time scoring record last season in Lithuania and getting his international caps.
Doesnt explain why he's been without a club since 1st november.
Or that the year before, he scored 9 goals all season.
If this was any other sport, there'd be some drugs tests going on....... :wink:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A98wfO4CAAAis8Z.jpg
Tomorrow's Scotsman apparently...
Poor wee puddle-drinkers will have tae stump up again and again it seems.. Just to be stuck with Agent Vlad :greengrin
Not always true mate. I get paid on the 15th and when it falls on a weekend sometimes it is the Monday after I get paid, sometimes the Friday before. No rhyme nor reason. Having said that, the bank still manages to take the SOs and DDs out on the due date. :greengrin
Sounds like a top job to me :greengrin
http://www.scotsman.com/sport/footba...stle-1-2688734
**** it, i have had enough of this, every penny i earn above £1m this year i'm pledging to this save the hearts appeal.
Speaking for myself and all the financial stresses and strains of Christmas I don't think this emotional blackmail would cut any ice with me. My family, friends and my own financial situation would take priority over a football club, even Hibs, at this time.
Any right minded Hearts fan ( there are some:wink:) will surely feel the same and will be unlikely to fall for this kind of tactic from Fedetovas. When the club is in this position because of him and his boss' mismanagement they would surely be unlikely to give him more money to mismanage at the expense of their own loved ones.
I thought Hearts had to give assurances that future wages would be paid for the embargo to be lifted, surely their recent statements suggest these assurances can't be given.
I can't remember seeing that anywhere. As far as i know the embargo gets lifted on the 23rd (just in time for the transfer window opening) as long as this months wages are paid on time, regardless of any assurances being made.
Can predict how this is going to go... Hearts pay their players this week, embargo gets lifted the following week, hearts sign new striker just in time for the derby at Tynie.. Fast forward to january 16th, hearts fail to pay players, spl impose another embargo which surprise surprise doesn't come in to effect until February the 1st giving them one day to sign Skacel (his contract with utd ends on the 30th of January) which of course they do.
Surely any transfer embargo would only be lifted once all wages have been paid in full, even deferred wages? :confused:
One way round this is just to ban any players from playing who have not been paid, that should be the next rule change in my opinion.
Its anyone's guess what their plan is. I don't think they even know, hence the mixed messages coming from Fudditovas every few days.
According to that article in the Scotsman, the deferred wages have already been paid and they are on target to pay this months wages in full.
I agree with your point about banning unpaid players, its the only fair thing to do.
The PFA would oppose that as it wouldn't be fair on their members.
Whatever we think or hope, they, like the players, have to make the assumption that the salaries will eventually get paid.
So, if players were not allowed to play, they may miss out on bonuses for appearances, goals, points gained etc.
The SPL will take the same view so punishing the club itself is the fairest option.
If they had proof that wages would not be settled, the players could walk away from their contracts and no doubt, most, if not all, would.