SD: There has been a continuous stream of comment. Judge: But not by Mr King? SD: Yes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
SD: There has been a continuous stream of comment. Judge: But not by Mr King? SD: Yes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: The more comment there is, the more speculation there is in the press.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge says that if King had revealed the 7 year notice period "the secure accommodation would have loomed pretty quickly"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: You want me to punish him for being in flagrant breach of the court order? SD: Yes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: This is not a situation where Mr King is being buttonholed as he gets in a car. This is an interview he arranged [with Sky].
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: Mr King liaised with Rangers press team before interview. He said things to Sky which were expressly prohibited by injunction.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Counsel for SD tells court "this was an interview he arranged, the injunction meant he could not comment at all"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: Point we make in Sky interview is journalist has gone to some length in considerable detail.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
King's affadavit says "I cannot recall if all the quotes in the article were made by me"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
King written statement states he cannot fully recall if all quotes were his.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"I cannot remember the exact words attributed to me," King statement reads. Judge asks SD to prove the words were his.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: King denies in witness statement he breached the order.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: King has pointed out correctly words attributed in article don't appear in interview. You have to persuade me journalist is accurate.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: Just because journalists say something, it isn't always true. In football world, it's amazing how much is attributed to people.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: Point I'm making is totally implausible journalist would have made up 15 lines of very detailed reported speech from King.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: It's not 15 lines. It's seven.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge asking if Mr King and the journalist had a nice lunch and if any of the 32,000 bottles of wine... tails off.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Im confused, the interview was on television no? so the journalists are just writing what he said in the interview on sky :confused:
Judge on Sky reporter Jim Whyte "Did Mr King give him a nice lunch and refreshments? A bottle of wine?"
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: This would all be resolved by you putting Mr King in the box, whites of the eyes, and ask if what the journalist said was true.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: King says I can't recall if those words are what I said.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SD: He is not saying they weren't spoken, he says he cannot recall.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: have you contacted the journalist? SD: Not as far as I am aware. Judge: Why not? Perfect piece of evidence.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: You want me to send him to prison on a hearsay statement?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge: He says on oath he didn't think he had his Rangers hat on (during interview).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Judge suggests SD counsel has "fallen into a trap" by not having King give evidence.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sports Direct QC finishes. Judge says he "needn't trouble" Rangers. Application dismissed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All over. Big win for King.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk