Generic Sevco / Rangers meltdown thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brog

Yet another Sevco stooge! I wonder who gave Roddy that info? I think it's possible BDO are appealing on behalf of the many rather than the few, or indeed the one! Perhaps they feel some moral responsibility to represent the minor creditors who will lose out should HMRC prevail. Then again it may be as CWG says they've been dashed a considerable amount of wonga by SDM & who are BDO to turn down more money!!

---

Another possibility is that the creditors committee.....I think it's called....have instructed BDO to appeal. The smaller creditors, in whose interests the appeal is, may outvote HMRC on that committee.

If that's the case, I think BDO's hands are tied.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sergey

Agreed. Bang-on every point.

I fed them some information a few years ago when CW got involved as I had an avenue for info. The blogger(s) are actually based in Hong Kong and working from afar. Not that that's stopped them nailing the info.

The whispers I supplied will undoubtedly come out in the forthcoming trial - but I'm glad that the little snippets that I provided them helped to piece together the bigger jigsaw.

---

Here we go....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kaff

Here we go....

---

[emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod

Another possibility is that the creditors committee.....I think it's called....have instructed BDO to appeal. The smaller creditors, in whose interests the appeal is, may outvote HMRC on that committee.

If that's the case, I think BDO's hands are tied.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

---

Do you not think that BDO will be under pressure from their own clients? Many of whom may well have EBTs or have implemented them on BDO's advice?

If the decision is left to stand that puts BDO's clients in a tricky position and therefore BDO as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Onceinawhile

Do you not think that BDO will be under pressure from their own clients? Many of whom may well have EBTs or have implemented them on BDO's advice?

If the decision is left to stand that puts BDO's clients in a tricky position and therefore BDO as well.

---

The liquidator, which is a sole or joint appointment, has responsibility to the Court first, the creditors second and his employer third . If any client of the firm puts that kind of pressure on, they should be told to bolt.

As D&P have shown, no client is worth that kind of hassle. And if the joint liquidators have succumbed to that kind of pressure, they deserve the same kind of kicking.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2015/12/01...on-could-mak/?

Still seems to be a bit of mileage in the Warby to Fulham story.

Who knows what he has been told about his January transfer business.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2015/12/01...on-could-mak/?

Still seems to be a bit of mileage in the Warby to Fulham story.

Who knows what he has been told about his January transfer business.

---

I see the story has finally emerged in Scottish paper-land ...

http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scot...Warburton.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens

I see the story has finally emerged in Scottish paper-land ...

http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scot...Warburton.html

---

Warburton always sounds like he's speaking from a manual. He says a lot without saying anything of any value.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens

I see the story has finally emerged in Scottish paper-land ...

http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scot...Warburton.html

---

Bound to come to Real Madrids' attention as well now that the Scottish sun are on the case about a week after it appeared on here :greengrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by matty_f

Warburton always sounds like he's speaking from a manual. He says a lot without saying anything of any value.

---

He's the generic email of football management.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Treadstone

He's the generic email of football management.

---

Respectfully though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

For anyone who didn't click the link last night, didn't get time to read it, wonders what this thread is all about, thinks we should just move on etc etc.
Please just read this.
https://rangerstaxcase.wordpress.com...-ending-story/



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozyhibby

For anyone who didn't click the link last night, didn't get time to read it, wonders what this thread is all about, thinks we should just move on etc etc.
Please just read this.
https://rangerstaxcase.wordpress.com...-ending-story/



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

That blog post had 10,000 unique hits last night, apparently. One of them was mine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by grunt

That blog post had 10,000 unique hits last night, apparently. One of them was mine.

---

It deserves and will get a lot more over the next few days. He/she has been sorely missed over the last few years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozyhibby

For anyone who didn't click the link last night, didn't get time to read it, wonders what this thread is all about, thinks we should just move on etc etc.
Please just read this.
https://rangerstaxcase.wordpress.com...-ending-story/



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

excellent piece, very well written!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozyhibby

It deserves and will get a lot more over the next few days. He/she has been sorely missed over the last few years.

---

I would also recommend clicking the Discounted Option link in the piece AKA the wee tax case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod

Another possibility is that the creditors committee.....I think it's called....have instructed BDO to appeal. The smaller creditors, in whose interests the appeal is, may outvote HMRC on that committee.

If that's the case, I think BDO's hands are tied.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

---

James Doleman (@jamesdoleman)
30/11/2015 16:05
Of 49 Scottish submissions to appeal to the Supreme Court in last 6 years, 3 were accepted. twitter.com/ScotlandSky/st…

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spike Mandela

James Doleman (@jamesdoleman)
30/11/2015 16:05
Of 49 Scottish submissions to appeal to the Supreme Court in last 6 years, 3 were accepted. twitter.com/ScotlandSky/st…

---

And none of those three were unanimous decisions like the Rangers tax case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Resolution 10 failed

http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/agm-result-notice/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozyhibby

https://rangerstaxcase.wordpress.com...-ending-story/

Well worth a read from the blogger who first brought this to everyone's attention.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

The argument about tax avoidance vs tax evasion can continue.

What is beyond doubt is that Rangers did not disclose full details of their player contracts to the football authorities - a requirement of every club that wishes to compete in Scotland.

Therefore, their players were not properly registered. Bye bye titles win during that period.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens

I see the story has finally emerged in Scottish paper-land ...

http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scot...Warburton.html

---

Reads like a come-and-get-me plea to me.

As I said a couple of days ago, Warburton comes across as a deeply mediocre individual who seems to think he's some kind of leadership guru. I bet he's watched all Terry Buthcher's seminars.

He'd be mad not to take the money on offer now.

Davie Weir to step up in his place?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozyhibby

Resolution 10 failed

http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/agm-result-notice/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

The % of votes for and against cast for each resolution are almost the same yet resolution 10 was not carried. How come?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jim44

The % of votes for and against cast for each resolution are almost the same yet resolution 10 was not carried How come?

---

That one needed 75% in favour to carry it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jim44

The % of votes for and against cast for each resolution are almost the same yet resolution 10 was not carried. How come?

---

Did it not need 75%?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by grunt

That one needed 75% in favour to carry it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatHead

Did it not need 75%?

---

Gotcha.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jacomoseven

The argument about tax avoidance vs tax evasion can continue.

What is beyond doubt is that Rangers did not disclose full details of their player contracts to the football authorities - a requirement of every club that wishes to compete in Scotland.

Therefore, their players were not properly registered. Bye bye titles win during that period.

---

That's the bottom line.

If they had nothing to hide why did they, errm, hide stuff?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jacomoseven

Reads like a come-and-get-me plea to me.

As I said a couple of days ago, Warburton comes across as a deeply mediocre individual who seems to think he's some kind of leadership guru. I bet he's watched all Terry Buthcher's seminars.

He'd be mad not to take the money on offer now.

Davie Weir to step up in his place?

---

Warby is 13/8 favourite, and you can get 6/1 the field.

After the Allan saga, surely the huns wouldn't stand in the way of a guy trying to better himself?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jacomoseven

The argument about tax avoidance vs tax evasion can continue.

What is beyond doubt is that Rangers did not disclose full details of their player contracts to the football authorities - a requirement of every club that wishes to compete in Scotland.

Therefore, their players were not properly registered. Bye bye titles win during that period.

---

Like it or not, the side letter issue has already been addressed and the huns were fined accordingly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hibs0666

Like it or not, the side letter issue has already been addressed and the huns were fined accordingly.

---

Addressed by HMRC?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bighairyfaeleith

addressed by hmrc?

---

HMRC and SFA.