They should have been well prepared for recording the data on this given it’s importance. It stinks of cover up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
533,000 is the number being quoted for Scotland’s allocation in Jan for the AZ vaccine.
Quite what that means of when in Jan it will be available I’m not sure and that also doesn’t include what might be supplied for the Pfizer vaccine.
Also the AZ roll out does not start in earnest until tomorrow so we’ll need to wait a few days to see what the run rate looks like but basically the number of people vaccinated by the end of the month (incl. the 150k or so to date) will need to be at least half a million I think.
Lockdown should continue for another 3 months.
https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.c...expert-3091057
Are people being vaccinated on a Sunday? Surely ffs
A high shielding friend of my mum got her appointment through from Scot NHS today... 31st March.
Absolutely ridiculous.
The initial phase was always going to be difficult. Care homes are the priority and they have to be visited individually which is extremely time consuming. When we start giving vaccines at dedicated clinics I’m confident we will see a fairly efficient distribution of the vaccine. A lot will have been learned from the much increased take up of the flu vaccine this year. I’m really not that concerned.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-end-year.html
Interesting view now from Dr Ferguson
Does it really matter if we have mass vaccination sites or not? If we have lots of smaller sites earmarked that can do the same collectively as a mass site it really doesn't matter. Infact i'd probably feel safer going to a small site than something visited by thousands.
The important thing is we vaccinate as quickly as we possibly can. The size of the sites are not really important.
You have to factor in coming in and getting checked in, then the medical check, then coming in for the vaccination and then a waiting area after, small sites like gp practices for example aren't equipped for that, plus having to make sure people are socially distanced as well makes thing a lot harder
I think what you say makes sense. :agree:
At this point, at the beginning of the roll out with the absence of any data it's easy just to take things like mass centres as being a step in the right direction. It's not that they aren't, but you can get the same results without them (I'd imagine).
I guess it's logistically harder to transport and store the vaccine in a high number of smaller places but it sounds like that was more of an issue with the Pfizer vaccine, the Oxford one should make it easier to do with smaller regional hubs.
I'm not disputing that, it's fairly obvious that a smaller site like a GP or dentist will do less than a conference centre. My point is if you have enough small sites collectively that do the same as 1 large site it makes no difference.
A larger mass vaccination site also has the potential for having a huge knock on effect if things go wrong. If you had to shut down a mass site due to an outbreak for example, or a major road is blocked then you have thousands of people impacted. If the same was to happen at an individual GP surgery the overall impact is negligible. Another poster has also made the point that these sites would also require some of the population to travel large distances if a small local site wasn't available.