Trump having a private 1-on-1 with Putin after the NATO summit.....
It is clear as day that he is trying to break up the alliances
Printable View
Trump having a private 1-on-1 with Putin after the NATO summit.....
It is clear as day that he is trying to break up the alliances
Three massive US helicopters patrolling low over North London at the moment. Very noisy.
Anyone would think the big orange **** was trying to intimidate us!!
******g willy waver!!
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland...itics-44829539
That's Trump in Scotland.
What's the main reason for the protests? The man makes so many baffling statements and has probably upset every nation in the World, so I'm assuming there's plenty reasons for a protest.
The state of people protesting combined with their "patter" has me 100% behind Trump, I hope he comes out with some more trolling to rile them up further.
The worst of the lot are the weegies, chugging themselves senseless at how hilarious their statements are on their banners, the typical cringe level 10 " What are we like?!?!" pish that comes out of Glasgow.
It's the trendy thing to do these days. The people of America voted for him in a democratic election and let's be honest he has not been a complete disaster as many predicted. Why some Glaswegian feels the need to protest I am not sure. Maybe nothing better to do or positive contributions to make elsewhere.
We don't see the Americans out on the street protesting about Teresa May and her handling of Brexit.
Trump's been getting a lot of flak for supposedly blowing the Chequers Brexit plans out of the water but the guy can change his mind like the wind and a day in the company of the PM and the Queen has seemingly swung him back on side. It's hard to take his view on such matters seriously.
Folk forget though, that Obama made what proved to be a grave error when he stepped into the debate pre-Brexit with his 'back of the queue for trade deals' remarks were Britain to leave the EU. He probably thought his perceived popularity here would cement a No vote, but it backfired badly.
It was good to see Vicky Pollard making an appearance at the anti-Trump rally yesterday - yeah but no but yeah but
https://twitter.com/holbornlolz/stat...550007808?s=21
I oppose Donald Trump because because the media told me to and because I like following a trend
The guys the bellends bellend.
I'm not going to waste my sunny Saturday shouting about him in the street though.
Pretty much spot on imo ! and where were the media reports? :confused:
As some posters have said in regards seperatibng the kids n what not i do disagree DT in that regard.It could be handled alot better.
Though if I am a lil confused in regards him getting called a racist- alot of coloured and different nationalists and people whom have worked for him do say they like him and he s not a rasict, his wife aint american is she? and as for being a misogynist- same as i have just said i remeber seeing an interview with one of his top female employees (think she was a c.o.o or something similar) whom had nothing but nice things to say.
Given the choice of him or hillary i d take trump 6 days out of 7 ( i ll prob need a day off after the 6th day !!:wink:)
What time does the march at the parliament start? I'm out a walk in Holyrood Park at the moment and you're lucky if there are 100 people there currently. More Police than protesters,
I’m ashamed of what this country is becoming. Donald Trump holds office in the White House and the disrespect he has been shown is abhorrent. It’s usually by the same muppets who get on their pedestal when idiots call Nicola Sturgeon Wee Nippy or Jimmy Crankie etc
I assume that everyone who was there yesterday on a weekday protesting have jobs and just happened to be on holiday. Surely they wouldn’t have the audacity to be living off the state and making absolutely no contribution to British society? I think we know the answer for the majority of them....
I can’t recall these level of protests when Robert Mugabe or Mohamed Bin Salman were here, nor Clinton and Obama for that matter. I also don’t recall the media giving anywhere near this level of coverage of any protest when Xi Jinping visited the UK
As for Sadiq Khan, well, this man is an absolute disgrace. He should step down, in fact he should have been sacked when he came out with his terrorism is part and parcel of living in a big city quote, everyday he is in office is a further insult to the people in London. I travel Down to London for work regularly and it’s been declining for the past few years but it has never been as run down as it is now, so scary and so disappointing.
Jesus Christ the right wingers are out in force today.
The irony of complaining about millenials being a bunch of snowflakes whilst at the same time, getting upset about a protest just because these people hold a different viewpoint from themselves, should be obvious to most.
I can't believe I have to say this, but just because someone doesn't act like a racist at every single opportunity doesn't mean they aren't a racist piece of ****. Trump tried to ban people of certain ethnic backgrounds and folk travelling from certain countries from entering the US.
You just have to turn that situation on it's head to see how utterly ridiculous that is:
Asian country that's historically had native brown people ban white Europeans from the UK from entering their country, amid fears that they might convert people to a radical branch of Christianity. The ban inevitably ends up preventing foreign nationals who are actually citizens of said country from returning to their family...
There has been a comparisons made between Obama's 2011 migration restrictions and Trumps policy. If you do any research on it you will also note that Independent assessments have concluded that they were not comparable... the findings were that Trumps is broader, impacted more countries and is not designed to respond to a specific threat....unlike Obama's..
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
No it’s because they were racist idiots who believed a number of the side of a bus was it not?
As for Trump...well he’s hardly my cup of tea to say the least but as PB said I ain’t gonna waste any time joining in some ill defined ‘protest’ against a US President having the temerity to visit the UK
I saw a few protesters getting dropped off in their luxury cars by their Mum and Dad's earlier. Probably the same people who protest against capitalism on their gap year before Oxbridge and joining a hedge fund.
I remember thinking much the same during the "Make Poverty History" march that happened the same time the G8 was held at Gleneagles. Whilst we shouldn't judge someone's political standings on appearances of wealth, it did stick in my craw that there I was, dressed in white playing a VERY small part in trying to raise awareness to the global inequalities many people face and there was a few groups of what appeared to be well to do/middle classes quaffing prosecco in the middle of the heaving Meadows as if it was the Henley Regatta or some other such gathering commonly perceived as being for our society's elite.
What a ludicrous post. It's this type of attitude that perfectly sums up what Trump's regime is normalising. Lazy generalisations, insecurity, inverted snobbery and intolerance.
I'd back anyone to protest against him. It seems healthier to actively have a stance against an appalling creature like Trump that sit and sneer at those who do.
Did you see the clip posted from Sky news, the guy never had a clue what he was protesting against. He was there as he and many others think its the trendy thing to do. Appreciate not all are like that and maybe some people have some genuine reason to protest against him, but as I said earlier can you explain why there was not similar protests when the Saudi leader had a state visit?
I did listen to what he said. Not up there with the most articulate, but what actually he said was in essence "that he didn't think the world should be led by a bully who uses negative methods to put people down". Not an issue with that. The danger with voxpop taken in isolation is that you can pick it to choose whatever you want to portray. One lad with a dubious taste in neck wear and a preponderance for interspersing "like" too much in sentences doesn't make the protest invalid. There'll be a mix of reasons for attending sure, but there's a reason why someone like Trump drives people onto the streets here and in the USA. He is an atrocious human being.
You other point is mostly whitabootery. Trump is arguably the most powerful man in the planet. I follow US politics daily - what he and his administration are doing is dangerous on a global level as well as a US one. He panders to his fundamental religious base. He actively appoints climate change deniers to positions on the EPA. His new secretary of state has appalling positions on human rights. He demonstrably and repeatedly lies publicly. He threatens the the concept of free speech enshrined in the first amendment. His SCOTUS appointments will threaten womens rights for decades to come. His global trade war will impact everyone as it bites. His ties with Russia look to be shown to be impeachable. His frequent outbursts against women, people with disabilities, minorities, the press, the democrats all show the man as a blustering narcissist. And that's off the top off my head.
Trump has a disproportionately massive potential to harm the UK and the world. That is why he draws protest more than any number of appalling regimes and conflicts around the planet.
The trump protests are mostly made up of middle class virtue signalling, communists and trans activists.
At the end of the day it matters not what we think but what the people of America think, that's why I don't get why people seem to pick just on Trump and not other leaders of much worse nations. At the recent Commonwealth summit there was 37 leaders of nations where homosexuality is still illegal, anyone protest at that?
If he is doing a bad job he will get voted out. His approval ratings are not great, but neither are they terrible.
Because, as has been said before, the actions of his country have a greater and deeper effect on a larger number of people than do those of anyone else.
When America sneezes, the world catches a cold. When Trump sneezes, the world reaches for the penicillin. :greengrin
Just want to say to the snowflakes, that was pitiful compared to the miners strike and Paris 68.
Of course the didn't have as good snack stalls, so well done on that count.
As others have said, Trump might be a bellend but the fact he was playing golf on the west coast of Scotland at a course he owns didn't inspire me to take to the streets of Edinburgh to 'protest'. For most who choose to spend their Saturday afternoon that way I say fair enough, but it's the politicians who home in on these events in an attempt to boost their credibility who stick in the craw. I see Richard Leonard and Tommy Sheppard coming out with quotes about how this shows that 'Scotland stands shoulder to shoulder against Trump'. Given that the police estimate of the crowd today was a mere 9,000 (there were considerably more at Easter Road in midweek) such statements are patently nonsense.
I don't see the trans movement as being deserving of the amount of attention it receives for the media or virtue signalling politicians.
Here is the video i watched.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKfkzsgZQWQ
Your know where a man wears make up and unicorn wings with a little mini skirt on and try's to walk like a woman wearing high heels and ripped tights, that kind of trans costume. It is a costume.
Many examples here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKfkzsgZQWQ
OK I'm confused. I asked you what a trans costume was. You replied: "Your know where a man wears make up and unicorn wings with a little mini skirt on and try's to walk like a woman wearing high heels and ripped tights, that kind of trans costume. It is a costume"
So I ask again, what is a trans costume, with you having so effectively argued against your own point in the reply quoted above.
Are you doing a Cathy Newman impression? No I did not say that, i merely pointed out that they make up a fair number of the anti trump protestors, along with communists and middle class virtue signalling protestors.
The way the media paints the picture is that these people represent the views of the nation and they do not and they are far from it IMO.
Id say when it gets to the point where children are having sex changes before they are allowed to grow up and also giving children drugs that stop puberty so they can 'make their mind up' about whether or not they are trans is a sign that the trans movement / agenda is getting too much sway with politician's.
You described an outfit worn by someone of any gender or sexuality taking part in Pride, perhaps clubbing, or on a protest march like this. It's hardly a "trans costume".
The transgender people I know wear the type of clothing that you or I would wear.
Just so you know. :wink:
Can I ask a silly question?
Does the term "trans" refer to transsexual (ie someone who has had a sex change operation) or transvestite (as I understand it a man who dresses as a woman, without having had any form of surgery to change their gender)?
Now commonly taken to refer transgender (either post or pre-op), and specifically concerned with an individuals gender identification. Transvestite isn't really used nowadays - cross dressing or drag more commonly describes wearing clothes associated with the opposite gender.
Thank you both for the clarification.
I wonder if this fairly easily made mistake is to blame for some of what we see higher up this page?
I'm no fan of Donald Trump but if we can welcome the leaders of countries such as China and Saudi Arabia to the UK, who are responsible for some of the worst human rights abuses on the planet, and on a scale that is far worse than anything that Donald Trump has ever done, then I'm sure I'll cope with the President of the USA being in the country for a few days.
Where were all the mass protests when we had the visit from Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman of Saudi Arabia earlier this year or when President Xi Jinping of China came over in 2015? The governments of both of these countries allow atrocities to be committed against their own people on a daily basis and yet I don't remember their presence in the UK causing such controversy.
Some people really need to get a grip.
The extension of that thought is that everything should be protested in equal measure, or not at all. With Trump, who is actively destabilising the US internally and the world as a whole, the visibility of his behaviour and the direct impact it could have is, frankly, more in-your-face than the undoubted atrocities committed by Saudi Arabia and China. However, global politics and pubic opinion vary to a large extent according to who is in the White House. Trump's approach to the world is therefore hugely worthy of protest. The old quote from Edmund Burke of "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" is the reason why protest is necessary.
There were a wide range of protests when Chinese leader came to town...but to get your point straight..because not everyone who deserves a protest, got a protest...people need to get a grip, for protesting against Trump...that is your point?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Why would people have voted for someone who actively planned to destabilise their country? Have you ever questioned why people in the US voted for him, why do you think he has become the most powerful man in the world?
Trump's been in power for a while now and I don't notice any difference to my day to day life, have you?
No, they clearly voted for someone who they thought would improve their lot and that of their country. That doesn't make them right. If you give desperate, disenfranchised people an easy answer, and an easy focus for their woes, then more in depth discussions don't get the light of day. The fact is that despite the rhetoric, Trumps much lauded tax cuts benefited the top 1%, not the masses. Wages have actually fallen under Trump.
Has Trump directed affected me? Yes, almost certainly, and as tariffs hit home absolutely certainly. The almost comes from the raft of legislative and policy changes relating to climate. Withdrawal from the Paris Accord changes the world, as well as many actions domestically. This will increase greenhouse gases, and accelerate climate change. On a much more personal basis, I have a daughter in the USA at University, so yes, his legislation impacts my family.