Right back v sheep

[Garymcl]

Who takes millers place

[B.H.F.C]

Whittaker.

[truehibernian]

Young Whittaker - plays with no fear and has pace.

[Unseen work]

Hopefully Whittikar.

Interesting he moved Fish to right back today and brought on Hanlon though

But I think he’ll show faith in the young man and start him.

[wookie70]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Who takes millers place

Whittaker for me. Fish didn't do well there today and I would play Campbell in front of him rather than Youan who again was a man short in defence when he came on. Whittaker might not be 100% ready to play 90 minutes but he certainly doesn't look phased by being included.

[Tambo]

Whittaker for me, done on vs St Mirren and another chance to show what he can do.

[scoopyboy]

I would have thought Whittaker but why was he nor brought on today?

I'm not so sure it will be but given NM won't budge from 442 I don't see what the alternatives are

[truehibernian]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I would have thought Whittaker but why was he nor brought on today?

I'm not so sure it will be but given NM won't budge from 442 I don't see what the alternatives are

I wouldn’t budge from 4-4-2 either Scoopy, it’s working for me. Defensively it’s 4-4-2, when breaking the press it’s a dynamic 4-2-4 which drags opponents everywhere. It’s just about giving NM time on the training pitch, giving him a couple of windows, and perfecting it. Vente in particular is superb at defending from the top as an example. I think you should always play 2 up top anyway - goals win games and if we can polish up the playing from the back and perhaps get a physical midfielder in during January, I think the system we are playing is working well and will continue to.

[Garymcl]

Personally think in a situation like this like the old days up steps the next natural right back if that’s a youngster so be it rather than shift the whole back line can wait for next Saturday let’s sell the three stands out ggtth🇳🇬🇳🇬🇳🇬

[scoopyboy]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I wouldn’t budge from 4-4-2 either Scoopy, it’s working for me. Defensively it’s 4-4-2, when breaking the press it’s a dynamic 4-2-4 which drags opponents everywhere. It’s just about giving NM time on the training pitch, giving him a couple of windows, and perfecting it. Vente in particular is superb at defending from the top as an example. I think you should always play 2 up top anyway - goals win games and if we can polish up the playing from the back and perhaps get a physical midfielder in during January, I think the system we are playing is working well and will continue to.

I'm not grumping about 442, what I'm saying is that I don't think it is cut and dried it will be Whittaker.

You would have thought he would have been the one to come on today if it was straightforward

[Pickle]

I’ve a feeling we might see Campbell there, big game for a 16yr old so can see some merit in it

[Unseen work]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'm not grumping about 442, what I'm saying is that I don't think it is cut and dried it will be Whittaker.

You would have thought he would have been the one to come on today if it was straightforward

I think down to 10 men, away from home against a big team in Dundee changed that.

Monty has got alot of stick about his subs and has saw some results slip away with at times putting on younger players.

Maybe a case of playing it a bit safer which tbf was wise imo

[greenlex]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'm not grumping about 442, what I'm saying is that I don't think it is cut and dried it will be Whittaker.

You would have thought he would have been the one to come on today if it was straightforward

I think there’s an element of going for experience when we only had 10 men. It would have been a huge shift for the young un and maybe felt a poor 25 mins or so would set him back. Guess there might have been a bit of man management right there today. I think Whittaker will start on Sunday if we are without Miller.

[truehibernian]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'm not grumping about 442, what I'm saying is that I don't think it is cut and dried it will be Whittaker.

You would have thought he would have been the one to come on today if it was straightforward

I think maybe it was ensuring we at least had a fit full back for next Sunday (or not taking any chances). Put RW on there’s always a chance of a wee injury, although of course that can happen in training also. Maybe just not risking things.

[Northernhibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I think maybe it was ensuring we at least had a fit full back for next Sunday (or not taking any chances). Put RW on there’s always a chance of a wee injury, although of course that can happen in training also. Maybe just not risking things.

Also possible that with Rocky also on a yellow, he’d be able to move Fish back into the centre if we went down to nine men.

[truehibernian]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Also possible that with Rocky also on a yellow, he’d be able to move Fish back into the centre if we went down to nine men.

Yep, very true, forgot Rocky was on a yellow - mind he nearly put Beck into the Tay 😂 genuinely thought the ref might issue a red for that challenge.

[Donegal Hibby]

Think it will be Whittaker , know he's young but hasn't looked fazed any time he's played for us yet , other than that maybe Campbell or Rocky possibly ? .

[CapitalGreen]

Could play Jeggo there, we’ve tried everyone else 😂

[LewysGot2]

If its not a swap to a back 3 and Boyler RWB then has to be Whittaker

Fish at RB today didn't look comfortable but he did his best. He's not a RB though.

[ancient hibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I'm not grumping about 442, what I'm saying is that I don't think it is cut and dried it will be Whittaker.

You would have thought he would have been the one to come on today if it was straightforward

Sure he wasn’t brought on to avoid injury but also to try the other formation and see if it was a goer.

[Nicho87]

I’d put Stevenson in there

Done it plenty times under fenlon

[Unseen work]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Could play Jeggo there, we’ve tried everyone else 😂

I’d honestly trust Jeggo to slot in there and play well.

Think his reading of the game, defensive ability and composure on the ball would stand him in good stead.

[B.H.F.C]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I’d honestly trust Jeggo to slot in there and play well.

Think his reading of the game, defensive ability and composure on the ball would stand him in good stead.

Whittaker did fine at St Mirren. I don’t think Montgomery will do anything out of the ordinary. I know he did something a bit different today but I think that was to do with circumstances at the time and wanting some experience to get us through. I’d be surprised if Whittaker didn’t play.

[JimBHibees]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I’d honestly trust Jeggo to slot in there and play well.

Think his reading of the game, defensive ability and composure on the ball would stand him in good stead.

He would struggle pace wise imo.

[Brightside]

Might be the first time we don’t play a 4.

[wookie70]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Might be the first time we don’t play a 4.

Don't think so. Who would play wing backs. I think he will stick with 442 and play Whittaker. Perhaps he will stick Campbell back one and bring Youan in but that would make us very weak defensively down that side.

[O'Rourke3]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Don't think so. Who would play wing backs. I think he will stick with 442 and play Whittaker. Perhaps he will stick Campbell back one and bring Youan in but that would make us very weak defensively down that side.

Campbell has been a nightmare when played at RB. That's the one change we should never make.

Sent from my SM-G990B using Tapatalk

[wookie70]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Campbell has been a nightmare when played at RB. That's the one change we should never make.

Sent from my SM-G990B using Tapatalk

Agreed we shouldn't make it but he is better than Fish at RB. The way we play needs full backs that can get forward and Whittaker looks the only option to me.

[truehibernian]

Why anyone would want Josh, who’s scored 2 and had a hand in todays goal in the last 3 games, at right back !!!! That’s back into LJ selection territory- utter madness !

[JohnM1875]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Why anyone would want Josh, who’s scored 2 and had a hand in todays goal in the last 3 games, at right back !!!! That’s back into LJ selection territory- utter madness !

Correct