Khan has been using a armoured car for 4 years it's provided by police. Boris used the same one. Its nothing to do with would be Robin Hood super assassin groups, that's just Facebook facts
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.lan...d-19927900.amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dai...nge-Rover.html
I don't like that this policy effect overwhelmingly poorer people. I'd like a fairer grant like the 7.5k for heatpumps, so people could replace their cars. I'm all for green policies and would go further with banning cars at certain times in the city
Results 61 to 90 of 609
-
06-09-2023 12:02 PM #61
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 17,049
-
06-09-2023 12:06 PM #62
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 17,049
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12447855/amp/Sadiq-Khan-wont-pay-ULEZ-charge-London-mayors-taxpayer-funded-luxury-2020-Range-Rover-exempt-12-50-day-fee.html
-
06-09-2023 12:12 PM #63This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
According to this researcher here, air pollution went from 2.3 at ground level, to 313.50 at underground level.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/84vXwaNO5qY
Does this mean that Electric vehicles might not be as healthy as we think?Last edited by Edina Street; 06-09-2023 at 12:16 PM.
-
06-09-2023 12:12 PM #64This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 12:23 PM #65
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 17,049
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 12:26 PM #66
Sadiq Khan spent an insane amount of taxpayers money to get his favourite Science institution to file a report on car pollution. The report he received suited his agenda. However another department of the same institution tested this theory, and came to the conclusion that in actual fact the ULEZ scheme would be useless. Sadiq Khan tried to bribe the institution with yet more insane amounts of taxpayers money to change the wording, but the institution refused. So what did Sadiq Khan do? He tore up the report from the Scientists of this institution that said the ULEZ scheme would not save lives, and proceeded with the debunked report from the same institution which said the ULEZ would save lives.
Now whether or not the Scientists of this institution are correct or incorrect is not my point. My point is that the Scientific institution which Sadiq Khan is using as proof of his cause, do not actually share the views Sadiq Khan is citing.Last edited by Edina Street; 06-09-2023 at 12:43 PM.
-
06-09-2023 12:33 PM #67This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 12:33 PM #68
Talk TV, GB news?
This where we are going now?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
06-09-2023 12:40 PM #69This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 12:44 PM #70This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
-
06-09-2023 12:47 PM #71This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2396312.html
-
06-09-2023 12:50 PM #72
Sadiq Khan impersonates Manwell from Fawlty Towers at the London Assembly
"I know nothing"
Last edited by Edina Street; 06-09-2023 at 01:02 PM.
-
06-09-2023 02:09 PM #73This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Is it that (a) cars don't pollute (b) old cars don't pollute more than new cars (c) Khan is corrupt (d) if two scientists disagree one of them is corrupt?
Don't get 'the poorest people suffer the most from ULEZ' argument as the poorest people don't have cars.
Farage and The Daily Telegraph are full of ****.
-
06-09-2023 02:12 PM #74This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://energysavingtrust.org.uk/grants-and-loans/used-electric-vehicle-loan/There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
06-09-2023 02:17 PM #75
Congestion charges and low emission zones
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteLast edited by hibee; 06-09-2023 at 02:24 PM.
-
06-09-2023 02:23 PM #76This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think I might be bordering upon opposing the current ULEZ schemes however, especially the one in London. I am more supportive of the Scottish ones as those are not cash grabs, however I am looking forward to seeing how much consensus changes in Scotland should our councils decide to expand the schemes city wide any time in the next few years.
I doubt citizens in Muirhouse, Niddrie, Wester Hailes, Pilton, Drylaw would be quite so happy to wake up tomorrow to find out it is £60 to turn their ignition key on, as those in the City Centre appear to be.Last edited by Edina Street; 06-09-2023 at 02:34 PM.
-
06-09-2023 02:25 PM #77This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 02:45 PM #78This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://theferret.scot/meet-the-peop...eless-hostels/
Even illegal immigrants are getting put up in four star hotels.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-taxpayer.html
Could you afford to live by the beach in a four or five star hotel?
Also, how much pollution does Essex, Sussex, Surrey, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Hertfordshire, Kent, get compared to Central London? Because all those areas out in the sticks, as Ronnie and Reggie would have referred to them as being, are also effected by the ULEZ expansion.
It takes not much research whatsoever to conclude that the local residents of those areas are arguing "but we don't have pollution out here".Last edited by Edina Street; 06-09-2023 at 02:55 PM.
-
06-09-2023 03:09 PM #79This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
06-09-2023 03:28 PM #80This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 03:30 PM #81
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 17,049
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 03:37 PM #82This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 03:44 PM #83
With the amount of Haulage firms not paying their ULEZ charges in London just now, and instead taking their chances in court, which will mean bankrupcy for them should they lose their court cases, how on earth is London going to get their imports and exports? I assume that Sadiq Khan must have already thought of this? There obviously must be some International Giant Haulage Corporation ready to step in and replace the local Hauliers with fleets of compliant lorries with Green coloured trees sketched on the sides. I just hope this corporation's name is something less cheesy than Deliveroo.
Apparently Eddie Stobart is also up in arms, with many haulage firms threatening strike action.
https://motortransport.co.uk/blog/20...-backs-london/Last edited by Edina Street; 06-09-2023 at 03:56 PM.
-
06-09-2023 04:06 PM #84This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
06-09-2023 04:08 PM #85This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://forms.mbtrucks.co.uk/request-a-callback-eactros?mtm_campaign=eActros%20PPC%20campaign&mtm_ source=PPC&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_me dium=ppc&utm_term=electric%20lorry&hsa_kw=electric %20lorry&hsa_tgt=kwd-343903183165&hsa_ver=3&hsa_grp=149198683631&hsa_mt =p&hsa_ad=657682519602&hsa_acc=8086597668&hsa_cam= 19721794463&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&gclid=Cj0KCQ jwxuCnBhDLARIsAB-cq1qOJoZxYBUbAH5asqQlJAizcuf-1Ld6pv-sLvQe8DUl6WM9K234xlQaAn2HEALw_wcB
https://www-bbc-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-65812980.amp?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUA KwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=1694016510 6254&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com
It's almost like someone has already thought of it 😂There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
06-09-2023 04:15 PM #86
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 17,049
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'd do what other cities that have banned cars are doing. Haulage hubs on outskirts then transported by electric cargo bikes, this could be replicated with electric van if allowing green vehicles though
-
06-09-2023 05:06 PM #87
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 9,654
Let's face it, we're ****ed. If people get their "facts" from Talk TV, GB News and unverified YouTube videos, we might as well all pack up and go home.
-
06-09-2023 05:53 PM #88This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Are you denying that five councils in Greater London took Sadiq Khan to court, and since Sadiq Khan won the court case, the five councils have refused Sadiq Khan permission to erect ULEZ signs up in their areas, leading to a loophole that drivers can exploit?
If citizens of Greater London are happy with the ULEZ expansion, then why are their councils fighting tooth and nail against Sadiq Khan? This is also Main stream news.Last edited by Edina Street; 06-09-2023 at 05:59 PM.
-
06-09-2023 06:49 PM #89
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 9,654
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-09-2023 06:43 AM #90
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Dont know its too dark in here
- Age
- 67
- Posts
- 12,589
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteSpace to let
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks