hibs.net Messageboard

Page 18 of 27 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 ... LastLast
Results 511 to 540 of 807
  1. #511
    @hibs.net private member Kato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    on the moon, howling
    Age
    64
    Posts
    16,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I've read they can't just reverse it without breaking the contract. So companies will invest now as they if the new gov breaks the contract they can take them to court. Could be wrong
    Are there contracts signed? The licences have just been announced?

    Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #512
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Quote Originally Posted by Kato View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Are there contracts signed? The licences have just been announced?

    Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
    No obviously assuming they are in the next 12 months, which they will be

  4. #513
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Harper is an arse and no loss to them, although committed to the environment. Although I do think there has to be a pro union green party. 50% of green GE voters polled in Scotland said the didn't want independence.

    https://archive.ph/9RuN7

    Robin Harper quits Greens over stance on trans rights and independence
    Former co-convener fears coalition partner ‘has lost the plot’ on key issues

  5. #514
    Testimonial Due TrumpIsAPeado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Sir Keir Starmer pledges to repeal any new anti-strike laws in first big speech of the year
    "Any new". As far as I'm aware, the tories aren't planning on introducing any further anti-strike laws. The job has already been done (given royal assent on the 20th of July) and Keir Starmer has no intentions of reversing them.

  6. #515
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Quote Originally Posted by HarpOnHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    "Any new". As far as I'm aware, the tories aren't planning on introducing any further anti-strike laws. The job has already been done (given royal assent on the 20th of July) and Keir Starmer has no intentions of reversing them.
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jan/04/anti-strike-law-could-be-brought-forward-as-government-tries-to-end-disputes

    Keir Starmer has said an incoming Labour government would repeal Rishi Sunak’s anti-strike legislation, setting out clear dividing lines with the Conservatives on workers’ rights before the next general election.

  7. #516
    Testimonial Due TrumpIsAPeado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jan/04/anti-strike-law-could-be-brought-forward-as-government-tries-to-end-disputes

    Keir Starmer has said an incoming Labour government would repeal Rishi Sunak’s anti-strike legislation, setting out clear dividing lines with the Conservatives on workers’ rights before the next general election.
    That article was before the u-turn when Starmer came out and said the bill needed to "settle in". This was at the same time when David Lammy was talking to LBC news and saying that Labour wouldn't reverse the anti-protest bill either as it would in his words "take up too much parliamentary time".

    They are a bunch of charlatans.
    Last edited by TrumpIsAPeado; 03-08-2023 at 05:44 AM.

  8. #517
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Quote Originally Posted by HarpOnHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That article was before the u-turn when Starmer came out and said the bill needed to "settle in". This was at the same time when David Lammy was talking to LBC news and saying that Labour wouldn't reverse the anti-protest bill either as it would in his words "take up too much parliamentary time".

    They are a bunch of charlatans.
    Your getting your bills mixed up. They are two separate bills

  9. #518
    Testimonial Due TrumpIsAPeado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Your getting your bills mixed up. They are two separate bills
    I'm not mixing them up. I realize they are two separate bills. Both every bit as heinous with Labour's approach being to do nothing about either of them.

  10. #519
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Quote Originally Posted by HarpOnHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm not mixing them up. I realize they are two separate bills. Both every bit as heinous with Labour's approach being to do nothing about either of them.
    I was wrong twice yesterday in posts. If you admit you were wrong you'll have a much better experience on here. Away to fill up my car with nuclear energy

  11. #520
    Testimonial Due TrumpIsAPeado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I was wrong twice yesterday in posts. If you admit you were wrong you'll have a much better experience on here. Away to fill up my car with nuclear energy
    Go back and read my posts over. I never claimed them to be the same bill and my point about Labour having no plans to do anything about either of them remains correct regardless.

  12. #521
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Quote Originally Posted by HarpOnHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That article was before the u-turn when Starmer came out and said the bill needed to "settle in". This was at the same time when David Lammy was talking to LBC news and saying that Labour wouldn't reverse the anti-protest bill either as it would in his words "take up too much parliamentary time".

    They are a bunch of charlatans.
    The article is about the strike bill, Starmer saying time to settle in was a completely different bill, David Lammy also talked about a different bill to the strike bill...

  13. #522
    @hibs.net private member Moulin Yarns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Spinning a Yarn
    Posts
    27,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The article is about the strike bill, Starmer saying time to settle in was a completely different bill, David Lammy also talked about a different bill to the strike bill...
    I think Harp is as well.
    There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.

  14. #523
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Quote Originally Posted by Moulin Yarns View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think Harp is as well.
    He said a u turn on strike bill and gave example of lammy who was talking about protest bill. As yet they say are repealing strike bill and repeated that last month.

    It's no big deal regardless

  15. #524
    Testimonial Due TrumpIsAPeado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The article is about the strike bill, Starmer saying time to settle in was a completely different bill, David Lammy also talked about a different bill to the strike bill...
    Fair enough, I made a mistake. I though the video of Starmer was about the Strike Bill for some reason, but it was indeed about the Protest Bill. So my apologies for the hic up. If they really are going to reverse the Strike Bill then that's certainly a start. Although I'm still somewhat dubious considering David Lammy's comments regarding Conservative policy and his belief that it would take too much time to pick through it all. If that's the case when it comes to the Protest Bill, then it's difficult to see how they can reverse the Strike Bill while still using that argument not to reverse the Protest Bill.

  16. #525
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Quote Originally Posted by HarpOnHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Fair enough, I made a mistake. I though the video of Starmer was about the Strike Bill for some reason, but it was indeed about the Protest Bill. So my apologies for the hic up. If they really are going to reverse the Strike Bill then that's certainly a start. Although I'm still somewhat dubious considering David Lammy's comments regarding Conservative policy and his belief that it would take too much time to pick through it all. If that's the case when it comes to the Protest Bill, then it's difficult to see how they can reverse the Strike Bill while still using that argument not to reverse the Protest Bill.
    Fair play and there is no excuse to not veto the protest bill. They are a horrible shower, but not as bad as the gestapo sorry tories imo and I know that's hardly a compliment

  17. #526
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Wild. If Germany had kept its nuclear production at the same level, it could have ended burning coal and gas for electricity completely. Instead they now get 25% of power from burning fossil fuels

    https://twitter.com/ArmandDoma/statu...08826745683968

  18. #527
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,713
    https://www.phenomenalworld.org/anal...lobal-boiling/


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  19. #528
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Wild. If Germany had kept its nuclear production at the same level, it could have ended burning coal and gas for electricity completely. Instead they now get 25% of power from burning fossil fuels

    https://twitter.com/ArmandDoma/statu...08826745683968
    A decision that looked mad at the time and is even worse now. Merkel’s legacy won’t be looked at favourably.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  20. #529
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    A decision that looked mad at the time and is even worse now. Merkel’s legacy won’t be looked at favourably.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    And not just for that.

    Thankfully they are investing heavily in renewables so it will change. But in the meantime a lot of gas and coal needlessly burnt.

  21. #530
    @hibs.net private member lapsedhibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    21,597
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    A decision that looked mad at the time and is even worse now. Merkel’s legacy won’t be looked at favourably.
    Green politics has been a bigger thing in Germany than it has in most of Europe. And greens used to be worried about nucular waste. Luckily there's no problem these days about disposing of nucular waste. Just dump it somewhere.

  22. #531
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,713
    https://www.businessgreen.com/news/4...al-gas-boilers

    Article on heat pumps.
    I’m coming round to the view that this along with solar panels is the way to go for me.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


  23. #533
    Private Members Prediction League Winner Hibrandenburg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Gross Kienitz
    Posts
    17,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://www.businessgreen.com/news/4...al-gas-boilers

    Article on heat pumps.
    I’m coming round to the view that this along with solar panels is the way to go for me.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I listened to an interview with a heat pump expert on BBC Cornwall a few days ago and it's a no brainer. Firstly they guy explained how a fridge worked and then explained the technology is similar just in reverse. Anything that can multiply the energy input to output 3 times has to be a good thing. The inhibiting factor just now is the price of installation but like all new technology that will come down as it becomes more widespread.

  24. #534
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,713
    https://twitter.com/doug_parr/status...dxJXScFNwz8V4A

    Some good news.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  25. #535
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,713
    https://twitter.com/thenewsagents/st...dxJXScFNwz8V4A

    Film by Lewis Goodall. Worth a watch.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  26. #536
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    https://twitter.com/thenewsagents/st...dxJXScFNwz8V4A

    Film by Lewis Goodall. Worth a watch.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Disruption of agriculture is likely to be an increasing problem as warming continues. In the UK we are already net importers of 40% of our food so will be particularly vulnerable as farmers who supply us will come under pressure to divert food to their local populations. The shortage of some salad items earlier this year is a forerunner of the future.

  27. #537
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,649
    Greta Thunberg cancels her attendance at Edinburgh Book Festival

    Quote Originally Posted by Greta Thunberg
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    “I am unfortunately unable to attend the Edinburgh Book Festival. As a climate activist I cannot attend an event which receives sponsorship from Baillie Gifford, who invest heavily in the fossil fuel industry. Greenwashing efforts by the fossil fuel industry, including sponsorship of cultural events, allow them to keep the social license to continue operating. I cannot and do not want to be associated with events that accept this kind of sponsorship.”

  28. #538
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    17,048
    Robert Mcalpine argues for community heating programmes for flats. Heat pumps just aren't viable just now for them. They would all need insulated, double glazed and then a huge price for the heat pump insulation.

    Only problem I see to his plan is the mixed make up of Scotlands flats. Council, housing associations, renters, Airbnb, bought houses and absentee landlords. Would need joined up thinking and government legislation

    http://robinmcalpine.org/whats-the-p...th-heat-pumps/

  29. #539
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,713
    Quote Originally Posted by Stairway 2 7 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Robert Mcalpine argues for community heating programmes for flats. Heat pumps just aren't viable just now for them. They would all need insulated, double glazed and then a huge price for the heat pump insulation.

    Only problem I see to his plan is the mixed make up of Scotlands flats. Council, housing associations, renters, Airbnb, bought houses and absentee landlords. Would need joined up thinking and government legislation

    http://robinmcalpine.org/whats-the-p...th-heat-pumps/
    There are a few things in that article that don’t match up with what I’ve read else where? Everywhere else I have read that heat pumps need less maintenance than a gas boiler (no annual safety checks etc) and also that they last twice as long?

    I would also dearly love the number of the guy who instals his gas boilers for him?

    Suggest he is exaggerating to help make his point which undermines the whole article.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  30. #540
    Testimonial Due TrumpIsAPeado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,953
    10-20k for what is effectively a fridge in reverse.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)