hibs.net Messageboard

Page 13 of 113 FirstFirst ... 311121314152363 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 390 of 3383

Thread: Hibs Women

  1. #361
    Quote Originally Posted by The Harp View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yeah, you've got it spot on. The resources those two clubs have is much greater than the rest of the clubs put together.
    Just as with their male equivalents they have an unfair advantage over the other clubs. The women's game is going to go the same way as the men's - totally dominated (and ruined) by the Glasgow duopoly.
    Perhaps I'm an optimist but, with some investment, the foundation, infrastructure, fan interest (it seems like we have more interest generally than most other clubs, up there with GCFC) is there to make Hibs a success again.

    We have some really good players and it's making sure we retain a good squad and can add to it. The Old Firm have good squads but I don't think they are light years away, I think it's down to a few individuals.

    Not sure how true it is but I heard a story about Lizzie Arnott saying if it wasn't for the FT offer from Rangers then she would have been open to a Hibs move


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #362
    Solipsist Eyrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    PDSBRS
    Posts
    14,130
    Quote Originally Posted by hibby rae View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Perhaps I'm an optimist but, with some investment, the foundation, infrastructure, fan interest (it seems like we have more interest generally than most other clubs, up there with GCFC) is there to make Hibs a success again.

    We have some really good players and it's making sure we retain a good squad and can add to it. The Old Firm have good squads but I don't think they are light years away, I think it's down to a few individuals.

    Not sure how true it is but I heard a story about Lizzie Arnott saying if it wasn't for the FT offer from Rangers then she would have been open to a Hibs move
    The Old Firm can afford to spend £1m per season on their women's teams if they want and it wouldn't affect their men's teams which would still have similar budgets that are massively in excess of everyone else. If we spent a tenth of that, there would be an outcry from the less enlightened elements in our support that the money should have been spent on the men's team.

    I'd be very surprised if we ever again sign someone who scores five goals in a cup final.
    Mature, sensible signature required for responsible position. Good prospects for the right candidate. Apply within.

  4. #363
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyrie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The Old Firm can afford to spend £1m per season on their women's teams if they want and it wouldn't affect their men's teams which would still have similar budgets that are massively in excess of everyone else. If we spent a tenth of that, there would be an outcry from the less enlightened elements in our support that the money should have been spent on the men's team.

    I'd be very surprised if we ever again sign someone who scores five goals in a cup final.
    Yes, but Glasgow City are still up there and also don't have the resources that the Old Firm do.

    I wouldn't consider myself an authority by any means, and I may well be wrong, but I would be surprised if the Old Firm were currently spending that, or were prepared to at the moment.

    I agree some would bump their gums about the men not getting the money instead, but it's Ron's money and you and I understand it's not diverting anything from the men's team, so let them moan all they want.

  5. #364
    @hibs.net private member CapitalGreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    13,350
    Quote Originally Posted by Brightside View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Tbf Glasgow City are still holding their own.
    Glasgow City are being bankrolled by Hearts benefactor, his wife and daughter are on their board.

  6. #365
    Quote Originally Posted by CapitalGreen View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Glasgow City are being bankrolled by Hearts benefactor, his wife and daughter are on their board.
    They're also better coached than Hibs are.

    Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

  7. #366
    @hibs.net private member cabbageandribs1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in a house in Bathgate
    Posts
    58,926
    todays results..

    Glasgow City 6 Hamilton 0
    Aberdeen 1 Spartans 1....good result for Hibs
    Motherwell 3 Partick thistle 3
    Rangers 6 Hearts 0

  8. #367
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by CapitalGreen View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Glasgow City are being bankrolled by Hearts benefactor, his wife and daughter are on their board.
    What do you think is bankrolled? They aren’t a full time team and payments to players are negligible. They do get a lot of sponsorship in and have a huge amount of volunteers. Massively different to Rangers.

  9. #368
    @hibs.net private member green day's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Southside
    Age
    57
    Posts
    11,613
    Quote Originally Posted by CapitalGreen View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Glasgow City are being bankrolled by Hearts benefactor, his wife and daughter are on their board.
    Hearts have just announced that their womens team are to be come "semi professional" in a bid to bridge the gap to the other teams in the league.

    Wonder who is - ultimately - paying for that, and if they are creating a conflict of interest for themselves?

  10. #369
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by green day View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Hearts have just announced that their womens team are to be come "semi professional" in a bid to bridge the gap to the other teams in the league.

    Wonder who is - ultimately - paying for that, and if they are creating a conflict of interest for themselves?
    It’s really all just words. Unless they are dumping half the squad the vast majority are at Uni / School.

  11. #370
    @hibs.net private member green day's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Southside
    Age
    57
    Posts
    11,613
    Quote Originally Posted by Brightside View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It’s really all just words. Unless they are dumping half the squad the vast majority are at Uni / School.
    Thanks, I did wonder if it was just the usual (i.e. Hearts bumming themselves up over nothing).

  12. #371
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by green day View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Thanks, I did wonder if it was just the usual (i.e. Hearts bumming themselves up over nothing).
    They claimed they were putting 100k a year into the womens team in the last few years. Basically thats the rental for Oriam pitches, and some minor staff costs. They are also about to release a huge amount of kids in the next few weeks, despite there being months to go in the season.

  13. #372
    @hibs.net private member blackpoolhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    59,262
    Quote Originally Posted by hibby rae View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Perhaps I'm an optimist but, with some investment, the foundation, infrastructure, fan interest (it seems like we have more interest generally than most other clubs, up there with GCFC) is there to make Hibs a success again.

    We have some really good players and it's making sure we retain a good squad and can add to it. The Old Firm have good squads but I don't think they are light years away, I think it's down to a few individuals.

    Not sure how true it is but I heard a story about Lizzie Arnott saying if it wasn't for the FT offer from Rangers then she would have been open to a Hibs move
    Aye the investment angle again, where is this coming from? The womens team still get one man and his dog along watching, unless the game is at Easter Road and free to get in.

    The womens game needs to grow at its own pace, without affecting the mens game.

    I think i have been here before.

  14. #373
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Aye the investment angle again, where is this coming from? The womens team still get one man and his dog along watching, unless the game is at Easter Road and free to get in.

    The womens game needs to grow at its own pace, without affecting the mens game.

    I think i have been here before.
    Speculate to accumulate. I agree it wont see bigger attendance for a while. We are a long way away from getting say 500 people going every week to womens games in Scotland. But without investment it wont get any better.

  15. #374
    @hibs.net private member linlithgowhibbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Linlithgow
    Age
    70
    Posts
    3,115
    Quote Originally Posted by green day View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Hearts have just announced that their womens team are to be come "semi professional" in a bid to bridge the gap to the other teams in the league.

    Wonder who is - ultimately - paying for that, and if they are creating a conflict of interest for themselves?

    The same person who is pumping millions a year into the mens team!

  16. #375
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Aye the investment angle again, where is this coming from? The womens team still get one man and his dog along watching, unless the game is at Easter Road and free to get in.

    The womens game needs to grow at its own pace, without affecting the mens game.

    I think i have been here before.

    Which it wouldn't do, as I said on a previous post. Nothing is getting taken away from the men's team. You have nothing to fear. If Ron, or someone else, wants to also invest in the women's team, that isn't taking from the men.

    And yes, you have been here several times, we all know you have no interest in the women's team.

  17. #376
    @hibs.net private member blackpoolhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    59,262
    Quote Originally Posted by hibby rae View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Which it wouldn't do, as I said on a previous post. Nothing is getting taken away from the men's team. You have nothing to fear. If Ron, or someone else, wants to also invest in the women's team, that isn't taking from the men.

    And yes, you have been here several times, we all know you have no interest in the women's team.
    Where is this investment coming from, as i dont see many people queuing up in Scotland, yet they are throwing money at it in England?

  18. #377
    @hibs.net private member Billy Whizz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    63
    Posts
    45,593
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Where is this investment coming from, as i dont see many people queuing up in Scotland, yet they are throwing money at it in England?
    Probably TV, as lots of games seem to be on
    Also think the big clubs are funding it, loose change for them

  19. #378
    @hibs.net private member cabbageandribs1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in a house in Bathgate
    Posts
    58,926
    Barcelona women beat Real Madrid women 5-2(agg 8-3) tonight in front of 91,553


    quite astonishing

  20. #379
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpoolhibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Where is this investment coming from, as i dont see many people queuing up in Scotland, yet they are throwing money at it in England?
    I don't sit in on the development meetings for the club so I'm not privy to their funding opportunities.

    But it's not outside the realms of possibility that people will want to invest, as it's a fast growing sport in this country, I wouldn't be surprised if our owner doesn't decide to put some of his money their way at some point.

  21. #380
    @hibs.net private member eastterrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    edinburgh
    Posts
    2,306
    Quote Originally Posted by cabbageandribs1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Barcelona women beat Real Madrid women 5-2(agg 8-3) tonight in front of 91,553


    quite astonishing
    not seen the games but I take it the goalies are still mince in the woman’s game.

  22. #381
    @hibs.net private member cabbageandribs1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    in a house in Bathgate
    Posts
    58,926
    Quote Originally Posted by eastterrace View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    not seen the games but I take it the goalies are still mince in the woman’s game.

    i didn't watch the game but i've saw them play before and i was reasonably impressed with the quality from the outfield players


    keepers i would put under the 'could possibly probably maybe do a little wee bitty better' category :)

  23. #382
    Quote Originally Posted by eastterrace View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    not seen the games but I take it the goalies are still mince in the woman’s game.
    The difference between the elite keepers such as Ellie Roebuck at Man City and the decent keepers is stark in the woman's game. Maybe still more so than the mens game. Although as we're well aware there are some absolute wage thieves in goal in the mens game...

    However the general standard is becoming very technical. It's slower than the mens game but there's some excellent games.

    I watch man utd women regularly and genuinely enjoy it. I watch it for the fact I enjoy it and I don't compare it to the mens game. I judge it for what it is.



    Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

  24. #383
    @hibs.net private member JimBHibees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amityville
    Posts
    51,076
    Quote Originally Posted by cabbageandribs1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    i didn't watch the game but i've saw them play before and i was reasonably impressed with the quality from the outfield players


    keepers i would put under the 'could possibly probably maybe do a little wee bitty better' category :)
    Saw bits of both games last night some really good football and goals but yes some questionable goalkeeping in both games Bayern goalie got lobbed with a cross she should have done better with. Very watchable matches with great atmospheres in both games.

  25. #384
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    47
    Posts
    27,228
    Quote Originally Posted by eastterrace View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    not seen the games but I take it the goalies are still mince in the woman’s game.
    Has there never been a 5-2 or 8-3 aggregate score in mens football?

    Having said that I do wonder if they’d be better playing in slightly smaller goals - women in general are smaller than men so making them play in full size “mens” goals makes it a lot harder for the women.

  26. #385
    @hibs.net private member JimBHibees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Amityville
    Posts
    51,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Danderhall Hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Has there never been a 5-2 or 8-3 aggregate score in mens football?

    Having said that I do wonder if they’d be better playing in slightly smaller goals - women in general are smaller than men so making them play in full size “mens” goals makes it a lot harder for the women.
    Agree the size of goal is definitely a factor. In saying that two brilliant games and atmospheres imo.

  27. #386
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    16,907
    Quote Originally Posted by Just_Jimmy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The difference between the elite keepers such as Ellie Roebuck at Man City and the decent keepers is stark in the woman's game. Maybe still more so than the mens game. Although as we're well aware there are some absolute wage thieves in goal in the mens game...

    However the general standard is becoming very technical. It's slower than the mens game but there's some excellent games.

    I watch man utd women regularly and genuinely enjoy it. I watch it for the fact I enjoy it and I don't compare it to the mens game. I judge it for what it is.



    Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
    Ellie roebuck is 5 foot 8, Gorum was 5,11 and was onecof the few under 6 foot. Maybe a slightly smaller goal would be better, although shots don't have the same speed in general so maybe evens out

  28. #387
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    24,112
    The 92k attendance proves that if you build the product and market it well the people will come. Unfortunately the product in Scotland still isn’t great but that can only improve if there is some investment. That won’t come from Scottish parent teams. The fans won’t allow it. The clubs that have invested have provided a tiny percentage of their full year budget, and only Rangers are paying wages better than you’d get in KFC. So the womens game needs to work harder on getting someone to bankroll the development of the game. Oh and there is no need to make the goals smaller. At least it makes the chances of 0-0 remote.

  29. #388
    Quote Originally Posted by Danderhall Hibs View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Has there never been a 5-2 or 8-3 aggregate score in mens football?

    Having said that I do wonder if they’d be better playing in slightly smaller goals - women in general are smaller than men so making them play in full size “mens” goals makes it a lot harder for the women.
    Goalkeepers were smaller in the men's game 50 years ago and the goals were the same size as they are now e.g. Ronnie Simpson was 5"10

    They'll just work on their 'springs'.

  30. #389
    Quote Originally Posted by Brightside View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The 92k attendance proves that if you build the product and market it well the people will come. Unfortunately the product in Scotland still isn’t great but that can only improve if there is some investment. That won’t come from Scottish parent teams. The fans won’t allow it. The clubs that have invested have provided a tiny percentage of their full year budget, and only Rangers are paying wages better than you’d get in KFC. So the womens game needs to work harder on getting someone to bankroll the development of the game. Oh and there is no need to make the goals smaller. At least it makes the chances of 0-0 remote.
    What's your thoughts on the merger with the SPFL? Do you think it increases the chances of investment?

    Is it a case that the SWPL had taken it as far as they could on the resources available?

  31. #390
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    24,112
    Quote Originally Posted by hibby rae View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    What's your thoughts on the merger with the SPFL? Do you think it increases the chances of investment?

    Is it a case that the SWPL had taken it as far as they could on the resources available?
    The SWPL was a bit of shambles. One man and a dog trying to run it.... the youth part of it is even worse. Hopefully the sharing of resources will help the senior game but the talk of a larger top league is worrying. You dont increase the quality of the product by putting in more teams that arent good enough for that level. Talk of making it a 12 /14 team league would be a disaster. The football in the 2nd div is truly awful stuff and if more of them come up we will see even more double figure score lines.

    They need to bring back Colt (u21) teams into the 2nd Div. That way the best players continue to get coached by the best staff, and arent just pushed into lower league teams for game time. The NPL leagues at youth level are a disaster. Again far too many teams, and not enough players to fill them so you end up with none of the teams being top class.

    In many ways its similar to the Mens game. Far too many football teams. So everything becomes too diluted.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)