hibs.net Messageboard

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 54 of 54

Thread: Nations League

  1. #31
    @hibs.net private member Bristolhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chippenham/Bath
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,586
    Quote Originally Posted by G B Young View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yes I accept it sounds cheerless in the wake of the euphoria around qualification, but the fact remains that the only teams we beat to get to the play-off were Israel and Albania. There also seemed to be much over-egging of what a dynamite side Serbia are when in fact they're only ranked 30th in the world - hardly a monumental scalp when you consider Scotland are 45th.

    As others have pointed out on another thread, this just doesn't stack up as the success it's being billed as. We failed dismally (as usual) in the qualication group proper and were thrown a lifeline by the Nations League which seems to me to be set up in order to allow teams who weren't otherwise good enough the chance to play at a major tournament. I don't really understand its rationale.

    Granted Scotland appear to be developing into a different beast under Clarke, but Covid has given him a lot of unexpected additional time to develop the team and I'll be a lot more impressed when we qualify for a tournament via the group route.

    I may just be getting old and cynical, but as somebody who can recall Scotland at the 1974 World Cup and numerous tournaments when our frustration centred around our inability to reach the latter stages rather than 22 years of failure to even qualify I just feel a bit underwhelmed by the way we've reached this one.
    After 22 years I don’t care. Everyone (eventually) figured out and knew how important the Nations League was (and we nearly messed that up (Israel away and the nervy win at home).

    TBH after getting humped 3-0 by Kazakstan back in 2019 I’d have taken another civil war to qualify (see Denmark in 1992).

    J


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Going by the UEFA website though, it’s the two best ranked Nations League group winners, who haven’t already qualified or reached the playoffs, who get the remaining playoff slots. So unless we won our Nations League group, we wouldn’t get one.
    I think that’s a typo, it’s been reported everywhere that it’s the two highest ranked sides not already qualified.

  4. #33
    Testimonial Due Gordy M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Stirling
    Posts
    1,801
    Quote Originally Posted by G B Young View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yes I accept it sounds cheerless in the wake of the euphoria around qualification, but the fact remains that the only teams we beat to get to the play-off were Israel and Albania. There also seemed to be much over-egging of what a dynamite side Serbia are when in fact they're only ranked 30th in the world - hardly a monumental scalp when you consider Scotland are 45th.

    As others have pointed out on another thread, this just doesn't stack up as the success it's being billed as. We failed dismally (as usual) in the qualication group proper and were thrown a lifeline by the Nations League which seems to me to be set up in order to allow teams who weren't otherwise good enough the chance to play at a major tournament. I don't really understand its rationale.

    Granted Scotland appear to be developing into a different beast under Clarke, but Covid has given him a lot of unexpected additional time to develop the team and I'll be a lot more impressed when we qualify for a tournament via the group route.

    I may just be getting old and cynical, but as somebody who can recall Scotland at the 1974 World Cup and numerous tournaments when our frustration centred around our inability to reach the latter stages rather than 22 years of failure to even qualify I just feel a bit underwhelmed by the way we've reached this one.
    See since you referenced 1974, how many games did Scotland play and win to qualify for that World Cup?

  5. #34
    @hibs.net private member Bristolhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chippenham/Bath
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,586
    Quote Originally Posted by JimBHibees View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Given they seemed to still be in Belgrade this lunchtime assuming they will fly to a Slovakia from Serbia. Probably also then fly to Israel from there for Wednesday.
    Good tournament practice.

    J

  6. #35
    @hibs.net private member Bristolhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chippenham/Bath
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,586
    Quote Originally Posted by hibbysam View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think that’s a typo, it’s been reported everywhere that it’s the two highest ranked sides not already qualified.
    So winning the group is irrelevant. In that case, is it not better to stay in the “weaker” pot for the next Euros so as to keep our parachute?

    J

  7. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by G B Young View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yes I accept it sounds cheerless in the wake of the euphoria around qualification, but the fact remains that the only teams we beat to get to the play-off were Israel and Albania. There also seemed to be much over-egging of what a dynamite side Serbia are when in fact they're only ranked 30th in the world - hardly a monumental scalp when you consider Scotland are 45th.

    As others have pointed out on another thread, this just doesn't stack up as the success it's being billed as. We failed dismally (as usual) in the qualication group proper and were thrown a lifeline by the Nations League which seems to me to be set up in order to allow teams who weren't otherwise good enough the chance to play at a major tournament. I don't really understand its rationale.

    Granted Scotland appear to be developing into a different beast under Clarke, but Covid has given him a lot of unexpected additional time to develop the team and I'll be a lot more impressed when we qualify for a tournament via the group route.

    I may just be getting old and cynical, but as somebody who can recall Scotland at the 1974 World Cup and numerous tournaments when our frustration centred around our inability to reach the latter stages rather than 22 years of failure to even qualify I just feel a bit underwhelmed by the way we've reached this one.
    You keep saying this, but again, we would have got into the playoffs based on our finishing position in qualification. The playoffs have always been there, and the teams that were in the playoffs were essentially those that would’ve been anyway based on the qualifiers, plus a few additions, and none of those additions qualified, so the cream rose to the top anyway.

    Like I said previously, do you think Portugal felt underwhelmed at winning the tournament after qualifying in third place from a group of 4, just because previously the top two qualified? Change happens, thats life. I’ll not care one bit if we qualify for the World Cup through the same (but harder) route.

  8. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by G B Young View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yes I accept it sounds cheerless in the wake of the euphoria around qualification, but the fact remains that the only teams we beat to get to the play-off were Israel and Albania. There also seemed to be much over-egging of what a dynamite side Serbia are when in fact they're only ranked 30th in the world - hardly a monumental scalp when you consider Scotland are 45th.

    As others have pointed out on another thread, this just doesn't stack up as the success it's being billed as. We failed dismally (as usual) in the qualication group proper and were thrown a lifeline by the Nations League which seems to me to be set up in order to allow teams who weren't otherwise good enough the chance to play at a major tournament. I don't really understand its rationale.

    Granted Scotland appear to be developing into a different beast under Clarke, but Covid has given him a lot of unexpected additional time to develop the team and I'll be a lot more impressed when we qualify for a tournament via the group route.

    I may just be getting old and cynical, but as somebody who can recall Scotland at the 1974 World Cup and numerous tournaments when our frustration centred around our inability to reach the latter stages rather than 22 years of failure to even qualify I just feel a bit underwhelmed by the way we've reached this one.
    You make some valid points and I agree that qualifying through the normal group route will be the real achievement for me but I do think qualifying by any means is huge for the country and will hopefully see us go from strength to strength. Hopefully we go there next year and give a good account of ourselves and qualifying becomes the norm like it was 40-50 years ago.

    After 22 years (23 by the team we kick off the tournament) it was just important to actually get there.

  9. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by G B Young View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Yes I accept it sounds cheerless in the wake of the euphoria around qualification, but the fact remains that the only teams we beat to get to the play-off were Israel and Albania. There also seemed to be much over-egging of what a dynamite side Serbia are when in fact they're only ranked 30th in the world - hardly a monumental scalp when you consider Scotland are 45th.

    As others have pointed out on another thread, this just doesn't stack up as the success it's being billed as. We failed dismally (as usual) in the qualication group proper and were thrown a lifeline by the Nations League which seems to me to be set up in order to allow teams who weren't otherwise good enough the chance to play at a major tournament. I don't really understand its rationale.

    Granted Scotland appear to be developing into a different beast under Clarke, but Covid has given him a lot of unexpected additional time to develop the team and I'll be a lot more impressed when we qualify for a tournament via the group route.

    I may just be getting old and cynical, but as somebody who can recall Scotland at the 1974 World Cup and numerous tournaments when our frustration centred around our inability to reach the latter stages rather than 22 years of failure to even qualify I just feel a bit underwhelmed by the way we've reached this one.
    What additional time did COVID give him? He played the same number of games and had the players for the same amount of time? Did COVID help him when he had Tierney, Christie and Armstrong were ruled out of the last three games?

    You seem desperate to be miserable about something positive.

  10. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by Bristolhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So winning the group is irrelevant. In that case, is it not better to stay in the “weaker” pot for the next Euros so as to keep our parachute?

    J
    No, it’s not irrelevant. If we stay in pot 2/B(whatever it is called), the best we could finish would be 17th, if we get into pot 1/A then the worst we can finish is 16th. This would ultimately give us the best chance of getting into the World Cup playoffs.

    Even if we then got relegated, we’d still be in the second pot for the euros campaign, but be ranked/seeded higher for the actual qualifying campaign.

  11. #40
    @hibs.net private member Bristolhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Chippenham/Bath
    Age
    43
    Posts
    8,586
    Quote Originally Posted by hibbysam View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    No, it’s not irrelevant. If we stay in pot 2/B(whatever it is called), the best we could finish would be 17th, if we get into pot 1/A then the worst we can finish is 16th. This would ultimately give us the best chance of getting into the World Cup playoffs.

    Even if we then got relegated, we’d still be in the second pot for the euros campaign, but be ranked/seeded higher for the actual qualifying campaign.
    Oh, in that case, full steam ahead, 6 points please.

    J

  12. #41
    @hibs.net private member Green Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    No longer a city dweller
    Age
    44
    Posts
    4,582
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: TheMightyJag PSN ID: FiveOClockHero
    Away from Scotland, Luxembourg are sitting top of their group in League C, level on points with Montenegro. That’s very impressive for a nation which for so long was right down at the bottom of the rankings.

  13. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Away from Scotland, Luxembourg are sitting top of their group in League C, level on points with Montenegro. That’s very impressive for a nation which for so long was right down at the bottom of the rankings.
    Faroes too, although in league D, well ahead of Latvia and Malta.

  14. #43
    Professional thread starter Diclonius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    West Fife
    Age
    32
    Posts
    23,260
    Quote Originally Posted by hibbysam View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think that’s a typo, it’s been reported everywhere that it’s the two highest ranked sides not already qualified.
    No, it's definitely group winners only. If you finish second in one of the league A groups you get **** all.


  15. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Diclonius View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    No, it's definitely group winners only. If you finish second in one of the league A groups you get **** all.

    So going by that being drawn in A1 gives you a better ranking than A4, even though that’s luck of the draw? Doubt that. That’s been taken from the UEFA website, that may well be right, however I’ll await better judgement on that. I highly doubt league D is getting a route into the World Cup playoffs. It’s also far more beneficial when it comes to the next Euro’s that we get into League A.

  16. #45
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    17,807
    Quote Originally Posted by hibbysam View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So going by that being drawn in A1 gives you a better ranking than A4, even though that’s luck of the draw? Doubt that. That’s been taken from the UEFA website, that may well be right, however I’ll await better judgement on that. I highly doubt league D is getting a route into the World Cup playoffs. It’s also far more beneficial when it comes to the next Euro’s that we get into League A.

    Sounds like paper talk to me.

  17. #46
    Professional thread starter Diclonius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    West Fife
    Age
    32
    Posts
    23,260
    Quote Originally Posted by hibbysam View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So going by that being drawn in A1 gives you a better ranking than A4, even though that’s luck of the draw? Doubt that. That’s been taken from the UEFA website, that may well be right, however I’ll await better judgement on that. I highly doubt league D is getting a route into the World Cup playoffs. It’s also far more beneficial when it comes to the next Euro’s that we get into League A.
    It won't work like that - it'll be whoever has the most points from each of the group winners i.e. if A2 have 10 points and A1 have 9, A2 will be given priority.

    Chances are A1-4 will all qualify directly, as will some of the B winners. It's likely that whoever doesn't directly qualify out of B and maybe 1 from C will get the extra playoff places.

  18. #47
    Testimonial Due SJNB Hibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    SJNB-Saint John, New Brunswick
    Posts
    2,539
    So who do we want relegated from the Pool A groups.
    I feel Scotland are a "I'll have your 2nd cheapest wine" We'' slip up agaisnt the lowest seesd, but we certainly dont want relish Germany Spain France etc.
    As I write, Ukraine are beating Germany -- that pretty much condemns Switzerland to relegation, but Ukraine not a bad option. Let's face it, we'll be hoping to finish a strong 3rd in our group.
    Group 3 relegated team likely to be Sweden, unless they beat Croatia today
    Group 1---complete toss-up, but would certainly not fear Bosnia or Poland, so happy to see Holland relegated
    Group 2---Iceland are done

    The other teams coming up with us?? Likely Austria/Norway, Russia/Hungary, and Wales/Finland---nothing to be quaking about there. Lets get those 2 points

  19. #48
    Testimonial Due SJNB Hibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    SJNB-Saint John, New Brunswick
    Posts
    2,539
    Quote Originally Posted by SJNB Hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So who do we want relegated from the Pool A groups.
    I feel Scotland are a "I'll have your 2nd cheapest wine" We'' slip up agaisnt the lowest seesd, but we certainly dont want relish Germany Spain France etc.
    As I write, Ukraine are beating Germany -- that pretty much condemns Switzerland to relegation, but Ukraine not a bad option. Let's face it, we'll be hoping to finish a strong 3rd in our group.
    Group 3 relegated team likely to be Sweden, unless they beat Croatia today
    Group 1---complete toss-up, but would certainly not fear Bosnia or Poland, so happy to see Holland relegated
    Group 2---Iceland are done

    The other teams coming up with us?? Likely Austria/Norway, Russia/Hungary, and Wales/Finland---nothing to be quaking about there. Lets get those 2 points
    Germany turned that around in a hurry

  20. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Diclonius View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It won't work like that - it'll be whoever has the most points from each of the group winners i.e. if A2 have 10 points and A1 have 9, A2 will be given priority.

    Chances are A1-4 will all qualify directly, as will some of the B winners. It's likely that whoever doesn't directly qualify out of B and maybe 1 from C will get the extra playoff places.
    Want to apologise, it is the league winners, however this is the nations league that it is taken from, the next one isn’t until 2022. Therefore we would be one of the group B winners, and providing majority of those above us reach World Cup automatically or the playoffs through the traditional method, then we would be in the playoffs as well.

    Forgot next year is World Cup qualifying year so no nations league until 2022.

  21. #50
    @hibs.net private member Green Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    No longer a city dweller
    Age
    44
    Posts
    4,582
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: TheMightyJag PSN ID: FiveOClockHero
    Quote Originally Posted by hibbysam View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Want to apologise, it is the league winners, however this is the nations league that it is taken from, the next one isn’t until 2022. Therefore we would be one of the group B winners, and providing majority of those above us reach World Cup automatically or the playoffs through the traditional method, then we would be in the playoffs as well.

    Forgot next year is World Cup qualifying year so no nations league until 2022.
    That’s a point that I’d completely missed - for some reason I was thinking there was another Nations League campaign between now and the World Cup. This means that winning our current group would give us a pretty decent safety net for the playoffs. Although, given the squad we have now, I’m optimistic about our chances of finishing second in whichever group we end up in.

  22. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That’s a point that I’d completely missed - for some reason I was thinking there was another Nations League campaign between now and the World Cup. This means that winning our current group would give us a pretty decent safety net for the playoffs. Although, given the squad we have now, I’m optimistic about our chances of finishing second in whichever group we end up in.
    So had I, no idea why I hadn’t thought of it before. There’s a few decent pot 2 sides, but likewise some that we should definitely be targeting.

  23. #52
    Testimonial Due
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Sunny Capital
    Posts
    1,117
    Gordon
    Tierney
    Cooper
    McKenna
    Considine
    Palmer
    McLean
    Armstrong
    Christie
    McGinn
    McBurnie

  24. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by Bristolhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So winning the group is irrelevant. In that case, is it not better to stay in the “weaker” pot for the next Euros so as to keep our parachute?

    J
    No as the next Nations League is for the euro 2024 playoffs and being in League A we’d be pretty much guaranteed a playoff spot even if we lost every game in our group

  25. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by davhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    No as the next Nations League is for the euro 2024 playoffs and being in League A we’d be pretty much guaranteed a playoff spot even if we lost every game in our group
    That’s what Iceland did, they lost the playoff though. Every team bar them from Group A qualified for the euro’s.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)