Kids can’t go to school in Scotland but this is London yesterday? We are wasting our time now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Results 12,931 to 12,960 of 63517
Thread: Coronavirus
-
04-06-2020 09:13 AM #12931
-
04-06-2020 09:22 AM #12932This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 09:24 AM #12933
https://open.spotify.com/episode/42x...SL2XGZVv9C4rUg
Very good pod here about one Liverpool fans experience of the controversial Athletico Madrid game, Covid and its aftermath.
-
04-06-2020 09:25 AM #12934This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There's a time and a place for a peaceful protest and during a pandemic isn't it.
-
04-06-2020 10:06 AM #12935
The German government have announced a finance package to help the economy recover from Corona. VAT will be reduced on a temporary basis to encourage spending and families with children will receive an extra €300 per child as a one time payment. The document has 57 points all aimed at assisting the economy recover.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/germany-unveils-stimulus-package-to-kickstart-economy/a-53677420
-
04-06-2020 11:38 AM #12936
Daily Scottish update;
49 new cases since yesterday
Decrease of 96 in hospital including a decrease of 21 in the confirmed cases
Decrease of 6 in intensive care
3758 have left hospital since 5th March
9 deaths registered since yesterday
First week day since 27th March that deaths registered are in single figures.
-
04-06-2020 11:44 AM #12937This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 11:45 AM #12938This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Id love to know if the new cases were in a cluster or spread across the country, does anyone know if they share that info?
Hopefully it’s a fairly straightforward process through the phases.
-
04-06-2020 11:45 AM #12939This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 11:48 AM #12940This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 11:51 AM #12941
Might’ve been mentioned but here in NZ we are expecting to return to normal next week (aside from borders) and all bets are off, including social distancing! A quite remarkable effort really. At this point there is ONE active case, and we’ve had 2 weeks of no new cases. COVID eliminated in NZ.
-
04-06-2020 12:04 PM #12942This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
She also said that she considers any deaths from this virus to be unacceptable. Reading between the lines, I feel she wants the number to be zero before anything significant is lifted.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Exactly the same as those who found it acceptable to have parties for VE Day last month and meeting in large numbers last weekend.
Really selfish people.
-
04-06-2020 12:06 PM #12943This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
More short term pain (earlier and stricter lockdown) resulting in hopefully greater long term gain for the country of New Zealand. Enjoy it mate 👍
-
-
04-06-2020 12:41 PM #12945This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-52009463
As you say I’ve no idea how R is being calculated when you have a statistically negligible number of new infections v the size of the population, maybe it’s got nothing to do with that but if so then what use is this often quoted number?
Actually now I think about it I’m sure Nicola promised us last week that the full calculation methodology on R was going to be shared this week...has anyone seen that at all?
-
04-06-2020 12:52 PM #12946
More CV deaths in the UK last 24 hours than all 27 EU member states combined.
End the lockdown back to work though
-
04-06-2020 12:53 PM #12947This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 12:55 PM #12948This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Stable door horse etc
-
04-06-2020 12:57 PM #12949This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
https://www.gov.scot/publications/co...nd-issue-no-3/
-
04-06-2020 12:58 PM #12950This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 12:59 PM #12951
https://unherd.com/2020/06/karl-fris...e-to-covid-19/
Might explain the lack of a 2nd wave anywhere?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
04-06-2020 01:00 PM #12952This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 01:00 PM #12953This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 01:01 PM #12954This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So say Re is 0.5. You start with 1000 infectious people (who haven't infected anyone else yet) and their average time of infectiousness is 10 days and their average time of becoming non-infectious (by recovering or dying) is also 10 days. Then, after 10 days you would expect to have 500 infectious people (500 newly infected, the original 1000 recovered). Then you ease things and Re jumps to 0.9. After another 10 days you'd have 450.
Unfortunately, that's a gross over-simplification because you have to slide the window of infectiousness and the window of recovery over the time period and they will be different sizes. Plus, Re is going to vary place to place by number of people each person is in contact with, what measures they're taking, etc etc etc.
You can see why they struggle to come up with a good number.
-
04-06-2020 01:02 PM #12955This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 01:14 PM #12956This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
WTF
-
04-06-2020 01:15 PM #12957This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 01:20 PM #12958
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Dunfermline
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 24,251
- Blog Entries
- 4
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
absolute ****ing disgrace
-
04-06-2020 01:23 PM #12959This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-06-2020 01:24 PM #12960This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It contends the Imperial College modellers were wrong because we didn't have 80% of the population infected, so we have to explain that by saying 80% of the population weren't susceptible.
But, the IC 80% assumed no interventions and, in case we hadn't noticed, we've had months of lockdown! And, iirc, the IC model did predict around the level of infections we have had with the sort of lockdown interventions we've had.
Like most stuff on unherd, it probably boils down to right-wing propaganda. In this case, anti-lockdown propaganda.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks