hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 1279 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 27977911791229126912771278127912801281128913291379 ... LastLast
Results 38,341 to 38,370 of 45185
  1. #38341
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,457
    Reading through the SPFL statement it appears that so long as a club changes owners then no punishment can be handed out for bringing game into disrepute? There are contradictions everywhere in it as well but it will require better legal minds than mine to decipher it all.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #38342
    @hibs.net private member MrSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dunfermline
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by grunt View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

    Covered their combined ***** from 2010 onwards! Complete whitewash and complicit in nature.

  4. #38343
    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Covered their combined ***** from 2010 onwards! Complete whitewash and complicit in nature.
    The notice talks about no further action due to a "finality in litgation". I am not a lawyer, although surely there is always scope for an appeal. Disgraceful the way the SPFL are abdicating their duty to foster fairness and justice.

  5. #38344
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    3,982
    isn't an "independent review" a good idea or am I missing something

  6. #38345
    Coaching Staff Thecat23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Age
    46
    Posts
    19,713
    Corrupt league, always has been always will be. Every club including ours should be ashamed of themselves for not pursuing this as far as possible.

    Actually disgusted by it all. Maybe we should just cheat like **** as well.

  7. #38346
    @hibs.net private member MrSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dunfermline
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Hibeesforever View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The notice talks about no further action due to a "finality in litgation". I am not a lawyer, although surely there is always scope for an appeal. Disgraceful the way the SPFL are abdicating their duty to foster fairness and justice.
    There must be room for a retrospective appeal/action. This is a scandal that needs those who initiated it to be brought to justice and charged appropriately. I think the only way forward is for fan action now. The SPFL statement goes past title stripping now into the realms of criminality.

    Someone said earlier about abdication of responsibility, it is absolutely shameful! We can now be clear that our club were part of it.
    Last edited by MrSmith; 26-07-2017 at 12:05 PM.

  8. #38347
    Ultimate Slaver Keith_M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In der Hölle
    Posts
    36,495
    The only posibility now of anything being done to strip titles is if Celtc decide to take this further.

  9. #38348
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,457
    Looking forward to hearing what Traceyhibs thinks will be getting discussed at the board meeting on Monday 31st. Looking very like our fans reps on the board are in the loop about as much as any of us.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #38349
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by 660 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    isn't an "independent review" a good idea or am I missing something
    It is, in my book.
    Last edited by CropleyWasGod; 26-07-2017 at 12:24 PM.

  11. #38350
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,786
    Quote Originally Posted by The Falcon View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    From the Whyte trial it would appear that those in the know accepted that an admin event was possible, if not probable, and had been pushing water uphill for quite a while. Rangers were being investigated by HMRC and were "obstructive, unhelpful and evasive" in that investigation into Rangers player payments, of which Ferguson was a major beneficiary, and an admin event could have meant that Rangers would lose control over the flow of information. HMRC have been chaing these payments and others , Celtic being one, complied. Rangers did not or could not. It is not hugely speculative to suggest this would have been the source of discussion amongst those it might affect.

    I know nothing about Eclipse or the timescale of the "investments". Was this the same one Billy Dodds mentioned when confronted with the payment recieved to leave Rangers and did not question?

    That said speculation and assumptions which show Old Rangers and their loyal servants in a less than honest light is something that I, sadly, find quite gratifying. Like reminding Yams that they bumped the Poppy fund.

    Facts???
    Or - if all we're going to get out of this is an 'Independent Review' then the SPFL should rename it 'The Rangers Review' as it was brought about by their cheating - at least we'd forever have a law that would constantly remind them of their cheating !

  12. #38351
    @hibs.net private member Smartie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Age
    47
    Posts
    23,129
    Quote Originally Posted by Keekaboo View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The only posibility now of anything being done to strip titles is if Celtc decide to take this further.
    Can Celtic take it further?

    Where can they take it?

    I'm not sure this slams the door on their face any less than the rest of us.

    If Celtic can take this further, why not Hibs?

  13. #38352
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,457
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartie View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Can Celtic take it further?

    Where can they take it?

    I'm not sure this slams the door on their face any less than the rest of us.

    If Celtic can take this further, why not Hibs?
    If it goes further from here it will be the the fans. The clubs won't move on this now.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  14. #38353
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,457
    Quote Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It is, in my book.
    Only if the scope of the review is wide ranging and it is truly independent. It also needs to have the power to interview any individuals it needs to and proper punishments for those found guilty. People like Murray, Ogilvie, Dickson etc should be banned from football for life.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #38354
    Testimonial Due Geo_1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In my Joy Division Oven Gloves
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If it goes further from here it will be the the fans. The clubs won't move on this now.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Why would the The fans want to take this further?

  16. #38355
    Testimonial Due AndyM_1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    The People's Republic of Fife
    Posts
    2,605
    Quote Originally Posted by Deansy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Or - if all we're going to get out of this is an 'Independent Review' then the SPFL should rename it 'The Rangers Review' as it was brought about by their cheating - at least we'd forever have a law that would constantly remind them of their cheating !
    I'd like to think that an independent review will be somewhat broader than just focusing on the disgraceful behaviour at Rangers.
    When you have had in the space of a decade 4 Premiership clubs undergo Administration, one of them twice plus a liquidation and that absolute freakshow at Gretna it suggests to me that the League needs to paying greater scrutiny of the Accounts of it's member clubs.

    Perhaps a job for CWG

  17. #38356
    @hibs.net private member CropleyWasGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    29,989
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyM_1875 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'd like to think that an independent review will be somewhat broader than just focusing on the disgraceful behaviour at Rangers.
    When you have had in the space of a decade 4 Premiership clubs undergo Administration, one of them twice plus a liquidation and that absolute freakshow at Gretna it suggests to me that the League needs to paying greater scrutiny of the Accounts of it's member clubs.

    Perhaps a job for CWG
    I'm tainted

  18. #38357
    @hibs.net private member Moulin Yarns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Spinning a Yarn
    Posts
    27,335
    All the legalese in that statement is just to confuse us mere mortals.

    I don't think anyone wants sanctions against the club currently plying their trade in the SPFL, but rather, it is a statement of fact that the titles and trophies acquired by the previous incarnation were not won fairly and should be expunged from the records as being null and void as a result of the irregularities in player registration at the time.
    There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.

  19. #38358
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If it goes further from here it will be the the fans. The clubs won't move on this now.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    ... and Celtc have been every bit as keen* on short termist rule bending and rug sweeping as all the other clubs.


    * if not more so.

  20. #38359
    First Team Regular plhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by Golden Fleece View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    All the legalese in that statement is just to confuse us mere mortals.

    I don't think anyone wants sanctions against the club currently plying their trade in the SPFL, but rather, it is a statement of fact that the titles and trophies acquired by the previous incarnation were not won fairly and should be expunged from the records as being null and void as a result of the irregularities in player registration at the time.
    This hits the nail on the head. rules exist to deal with improperly registered players It has been proven that this happened during this time period so apply the rules. It doesn't need lawyers to advise how to go about this.
    Apply the rules as has been done to other clubs, but maybe as all fans can see they just don't want to upset the mob from Ibrox.
    SFA, SPL, SPFL whatever they want to call themselves I call THEM cheats and cowards. all of them.

  21. #38360
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,457



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  22. #38361
    How did Lord Nimmo-Smith manage to keep a straight face when he said Rangers didn't gain any unfair competitive advantage?

  23. #38362
    Quote Originally Posted by 660 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    isn't an "independent review" a good idea or am I missing something
    That will depend on the remit of the review and what assistance the SFA and SPFL are prepared to give it.

    The Nimmo-Smith commission was a good idea, but football officials made sure it got the result they wanted. I'd like to know why the dates it examined were selected to exclude the DOS scheme which preceded EBTs, why the assumption was made that the EBT scheme was valid when the legal process was incomplete and why there was no appeal against the ridiculous leniency of the penalty imposed on Rangers.

    It's probably correct that any appeal against Nimmo-Smith had to be within a given time so the penalty can't be amended within SFA rules. What I'd like to see is an investigation into whether the DOS scheme broke rules in the same way. I also believe there's a rule that payments to players can't be made by a third party. Now that it's established that the EBTs were wages, could a new charge be brought for infringing that?

  24. #38363
    Coaching Staff HoboHarry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    13,498
    Quote Originally Posted by green is good View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How did Lord Nimmo-Smith manage to keep a straight face when he said Rangers didn't gain any unfair competitive advantage?
    All of his focus was on his next scheduled act with the lodge goat.......

  25. #38364
    Quote Originally Posted by HoboHarry View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    All of his focus was on his next scheduled act with the lodge goat.......
    Wonder that the initiation ceremony is like for the goat and do you think they also have to learn the secret handshake?

  26. #38365
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,457
    http://mattleslie74.weebly.com/blog/...t-go-wrong-ann


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  27. #38366
    @hibs.net private member lapsedhibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    21,597
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Possibly the most coherent thing I've ever seen from a yam.

  28. #38367
    First Team Regular OxoHibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    659
    Quote Originally Posted by Is It On.... View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Wonder that the initiation ceremony is like for the goat and do you think they also have to learn the secret handshake?
    No it's easy for them. The handshake is based on hoofs

  29. #38368
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,786
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Of course she's changed her tune - at the time she was still relatively 'fresh' in football, naive even. She probably did intend to be the 'new broom that sweeps through the game' right up until the point where (one of her own crew probably ??) pointed out that if Rangers were to be punished for cheating then her own club would undoubtedly be next as a stripped-Hun would definitely embark on the biggest exercise of 'Whitabootery' ever seen !

  30. #38369
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That is bang on the money..first Milne and now Budgie.. wonder what we will do.

  31. #38370
    @hibs.net private member jacomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    exile
    Posts
    22,301
    Quote Originally Posted by Deansy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Of course she's changed her tune - at the time she was still relatively 'fresh' in football, naive even. She probably did intend to be the 'new broom that sweeps through the game' right up until the point where (one of her own crew probably ??) pointed out that if Rangers were to be punished for cheating then her own club would undoubtedly be next as a stripped-Hun would definitely embark on the biggest exercise of 'Whitabootery' ever seen !

    Quite.

    Jambos will be no allies in this.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)