@STVGrant: CG lawyer: LNS par 33 on articles of definitions from SPL. "club means undertaking of a football club".
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 30,871 to 30,900 of 45185
-
12-11-2015 02:11 PM #30871
-
12-11-2015 02:12 PM #30872
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: LNS par 37. In SPL rules, club is an association football club eligible to participate in league and includes owner/operator
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:13 PM #30873
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: One cannot be the chief executive of a thing which cannot enter into contracts
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:13 PM #30874
@jamesdoleman: Brown Says a club is an "undertaking" of it's owners and as it "has neither capacity of personality" no-one can be CEO of it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:14 PM #30875
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: Difference between Rangers and Woolworths... Any Newco of Woolworths would have bought the undertaking. Not the personality.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:14 PM #30876
@jamesdoleman: Brown "The idea someone can be CEO of an undertaking is just nonsense."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:15 PM #30877
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: What act did this "club" as distinct from Sevco Scotland carry out for Green?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:15 PM #30878
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: How and why was Green appointed to the "club"? On what terms?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:16 PM #30879
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: The business is the preparation of a pro football team. Players employed by Sevco. Using brands owned by Sevco
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:16 PM #30880
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: Manager employed by Sevco. Customers of Sevco buy tickets from Sevco.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:17 PM #30881
@jamesdoleman: "The team are paid by Sevco, play at a ground owned by Sevco trained by a manager who is employed by Sevco, fans buy tickets from Sevco"
1/2
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:18 PM #30882
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: LNS par 46. Of course one has an undertaking and assets which can be bought and sold. This happens all the time.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:18 PM #30883James Doleman @jamesdoleman 4s5 seconds ago
Brown "What is the players went one way and the ground another, where is the "club" then.?
One for the pro-Hun metaphysicists there?
-
12-11-2015 02:19 PM #30884
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: Clearly basket of assets is not single, indivisible thing. What if grounds go one place, players the other? What is a club then?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:20 PM #30885
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: I accept matter of whether it is same club or not is a matter of life or death for some people
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:20 PM #30886
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: It's a leap, in the interest of continuity, that the parties in this contract did not intend to be involved in the act carried on
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:21 PM #30887
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: One is trying to find out what the parties meant by Rangers Football Club
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:21 PM #30888
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: Defies belief parties meant to indemnify against non-existent threat and not against real threat of proceedings.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:22 PM #30889
@jamesdoleman: Brown says that Green "was prepared to depart the scene without fuss," but if he was "dragged back in" agreement was "you pay the lawyers."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:34 PM #30890
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 3,173
Chuckie 2-1 up ?
Whats happening Ozy ? Are sevco bringing on the subs ?
-
12-11-2015 02:36 PM #30891
Can't believe RIFC went down the club/company distinction route. Even if it wasn't all obviously bollocks and amorphous clubs really were floating about in the ether, it's stretching credulity to believe Green and RIFC signed up to a legal indemnity clause relating to a position in something without legal personality.
Their other defence - that a la Andy Coulson, if someone is alleged to have done something illegal that's against the interest of the company, they wouldn't expect indemnity - seems a bit more hopeful for them.
When do we get a judgement?
-
12-11-2015 02:39 PM #30892
@jamesdoleman: Brown says costs decision can not wait until criminal case is over "The rainy day has arrived" he tells the court.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:39 PM #30893
@jamesdoleman: Brown says the wording of the indemnity agreement shows "it was to be as wide as possible."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:40 PM #30894
@STVGrant: CG lawyer: Costs decision can't wait until end of the trial. Can't be based on an outcome which may not come to pass
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:43 PM #30895This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Is the lawyer just trying to bamboozle people into submission?
-
12-11-2015 02:43 PM #30896
@jamesdoleman: Court now discussing timetable for forthcoming criminal case.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:44 PM #30897This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Two very different things.
-
12-11-2015 02:48 PM #30898This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-11-2015 02:50 PM #30899
@STVGrant: Jonathan Brown, lawyer for Charles Green, concludes his argument. Lord Doherty notes a number of typographical errors on his submission.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
12-11-2015 02:51 PM #30900
@STVGrant: James Wolffe, lawyer for Rangers, says there are two matters he wishes to pick up on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks