hibs.net Messageboard

View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?

Voters
1016. You may not vote on this poll
  • Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football

    537 52.85%
  • Opposed - but will continue to support the game.

    454 44.69%
  • In favour.

    25 2.46%
Page 1025 of 1507 FirstFirst ... 25525925975101510231024102510261027103510751125 ... LastLast
Results 30,721 to 30,750 of 45185
  1. #30721
    Testimonial Due Weststandwanab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    1,894
    Quote Originally Posted by southsider View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I heard that idiot Stuart McCall on Monday night's Sportsound say if EBT's were legal why not use them. Well Stuart it is ok for the Postie or the girl in the bank or the bloke in the call centre to pay tax and n/I on their wages of £250 a week in order to keep the schools open, to pay for our NHS, to pay benefits so people don't stave or freeze to death but for the superstars of rangers f.c (IL) it is ok to pay zitch ? The armed forces one is the biggest brass neck ever as they profess an undying love for the troops whilst robbing them of much needed income. These people may have caused death injury to these brave men and women by the theft of funding. Make every player pay back to HMRC what they defrauded them (and us off.
    Spot on


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #30722
    @hibs.net private member CallumLaidlaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Rosyth, Fife
    Age
    43
    Posts
    15,330
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: Cal_hibby
    Quote Originally Posted by southsider View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I heard that idiot Stuart McCall on Monday night's Sportsound say if EBT's were legal why not use them. Well Stuart it is ok for the Postie or the girl in the bank or the bloke in the call centre to pay tax and n/I on their wages of £250 a week in order to keep the schools open, to pay for our NHS, to pay benefits so people don't stave or freeze to death but for the superstars of rangers f.c (IL) it is ok to pay zitch ? The armed forces one is the biggest brass neck ever as they profess an undying love for the troops whilst robbing them of much needed income. These people may have caused death injury to these brave men and women by the theft of funding. Make every player pay back to HMRC what they defrauded them (and us off.
    I totally agreed with Darren O'Dea on the show. Leave the medals with the players as they went onto the field and earned them, but the club should be stripped of the titles as they deliberately gained a advantage on the field through their actions. Graham Spiers said that David Murray even said in a court hearing that had it not been for the EBT's the club would have been unlikelt to attract certain players to the club. Surely that says it all. The attitude from Lambert & McCall was everything I would expect from an Old Firm love in. They almost sneered when they said that fans viewed things differently from players. Yes, these fans that pay a good portion of their wages every week/month to follow a tournament only to find out their opponents cheated. How dare we have an issue!!

  4. #30723
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Father Noel Furlong
    Posts
    9,934
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs0666 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    There is an important point in here that we should not overlook - Scottish football is a basket case and is probably only a couple of rungs up from the Maidstone United's of this world.

    What proportion of effort do we want to spend kicking **** out of one another - and making the situation even worse - versus working together to try and get this shambles of a sport on a decent footing?

    Right now it looks like 100% on the former and 0% on the latter.


    I wish I had come up with this statement

  5. #30724
    @hibs.net private member jacomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    exile
    Posts
    22,301
    Quote Originally Posted by southsider View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Well said Jaco I 100% agree. All titles & cups they "won" using EBT's stripped and made void. This story has legs and may end up back in court. Speaking of courts Dodgy Dave has picked a fight with Big Mike. Now we are not talking about the 3 bear puppets or the saps in Sons of Struth. This is a real self-made billionaire and this guy don't dance.


    If you're gonna pick a fight with Big Mike, best make sure you've got very deep pockets yourself.

    Dave King's hardman posturing with Sports Direct looks more and more ill-advised with each passing day.

  6. #30725
    @hibs.net private member MrSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dunfermline
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jacomoseven View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote


    If you're gonna pick a fight with Big Mike, best make sure you've got very deep pockets yourself.

    Dave King's hardman posturing with Sports Direct looks more and more ill-advised with each passing day.
    Don't you think mr King is deliberately doing this to get out of rangers in order to save money and face? This way he looks like the victim of the nasty tyrant. Bet King can't wait to get out of dodge!

  7. #30726
    Coaching Staff jgl07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Merchiston
    Posts
    7,809
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs0666 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    There is an important point in here that we should not overlook - Scottish football is a basket case and is probably only a couple of runds up from the Maidstone United's of this world.

    What proportion of effort do we want to spend kicking **** out of one another - and making the situation even worse - versus working together to try and get this shambles of a sport on a decent footing?

    Right now it looks like 100% on the former and 0% on the latter.
    I hate to say this but Scittish Football has been a basket case for twenty or thirty years. This is ever since first Rangers (with the arrival of Souness) and later Celtic (Fergus McCann) started to flex their financial muscle and comprehensively outspend everyone else.

    It has been consistent decline since then.

    The League is totally uncompetitive and this has percolated down to all levels.

    Allowing Rangers to 'move on' will not solve that problem.

  8. #30727
    Quote Originally Posted by southsider View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I heard that idiot Stuart McCall on Monday night's Sportsound say if EBT's were legal why not use them. Well Stuart it is ok for the Postie or the girl in the bank or the bloke in the call centre to pay tax and n/I on their wages of £250 a week in order to keep the schools open, to pay for our NHS, to pay benefits so people don't stave or freeze to death but for the superstars of rangers f.c (IL) it is ok to pay zitch ? The armed forces one is the biggest brass neck ever as they profess an undying love for the troops whilst robbing them of much needed income. These people may have caused death injury to these brave men and women by the theft of funding. Make every player pay back to HMRC what they defrauded them (and us off.
    Totally agree.
    If our politicians are too incompetent to draft proper legislation to force payment, there could at least be a crowdfunding type movement encouraging named EBT individuals to donate an amount, say 40% to an HMRC approved charity.

  9. #30728
    Testimonial due Baldy Foghorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    52
    Posts
    18,975
    Sporting integrity?
    "There's class, there's first class and there's Hibs class" - Eddie Turnbull

  10. #30729
    Coaching Staff brog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    11,584
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jgl07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I hate to say this but Scittish Football has been a basket case for twenty or thirty years. This is ever since first Rangers (with the arrival of Souness) and later Celtic (Fergus McCann) started to flex their financial muscle and comprehensively outspend everyone else.

    It has been consistent decline since then.

    The League is totally uncompetitive and this has percolated down to all levels.

    Allowing Rangers to 'move on' will not solve that problem.
    With the exception of the 20 years after WW2 when Hibs, Yams, Dundee, Aberdeen & Killie all won the league & the brief New Firm period in the 80's, Scottish football has always been uncompetitive. The fact that there was full employment & huge crowds after WW2 basically took away much of the OF economic advantage at that time. Celtc only won 1 league in those 20 years & their crowds were tiny until Stein arrived. To put it in perspective, IIRC there was only one year between the wars when the league wasn't won by the OF. I agree it's now a dreadful & totally uncompetitive situation but unfortunately this is not really anything new.

  11. #30730
    First Team Breakthrough
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Age
    63
    Posts
    198
    Just a thought, if UEFA take a dim view on the actions of the SFA with regards to "fit and proper person" and all issues relating to this saga, could they ban all Scottish clubs from European competitions until sporting integrity is achieved?

  12. #30731
    @hibs.net private member CraigHibee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,895
    Im hoping that Mike Ashley wins his case against the sfa so it can highlight just how corrupt they are, there is absolutely no way that dave king could be passed as "fit and proper" given his previous convictions

  13. #30732
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,451
    Quote Originally Posted by wills View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Just a thought, if UEFA take a dim view on the actions of the SFA with regards to "fit and proper person" and all issues relating to this saga, could they ban all Scottish clubs from European competitions until sporting integrity is achieved?
    They can although they have their own problems just now given that their president is banned from all football for allegedly taking bribes.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  14. #30733
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,451
    Quote Originally Posted by CraigHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Im hoping that Mike Ashley wins his case against the sfa so it can highlight just how corrupt they are, there is absolutely no way that dave king could be passed as "fit and proper" given his previous convictions
    Whatever the outcome, the decision will now have to be explained in open court. Transparency is the best disinfectant.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #30734
    If rangers/sevco/govan zombies/glesga shame boys get away with rhis scheme, does it not set a precedent?, will it hypothetically mean we could sign world class players win a league, possibly a treble then not pay them or the income tax and then claim it as our own in our history?. I wish i could buy a ferrari on my credit card. Change my name. Declare myself bankrupt and keep the car!!!!!!
    Happy days eh???!!!! FTSFA

  16. #30735
    He's awful and completely self serving but I think Scottish football ultimately may owe Ashley a great deal. The taking the SFA to court over King FFP is a nightmare and could have massive potential ramifications.

  17. #30736
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    9,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Dashing Bob S View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    He's awful and completely self serving but I think Scottish football ultimately may owe Ashley a great deal. The taking the SFA to court over King FFP is a nightmare and could have massive potential ramifications.
    It's a great move by Ashley and will force the SFA to reveal their process for assessment, who made the decisions and what due diligence was done and in what timescales. I'm sure a journalist on the radio yesterday said there had been an unusual process used by them that whilst not wrong in procedure had rarely been used previously hence he thought there was cause for the SFA to have a genuine concern.

    Could as you say be good for Scottish football and also force moves and change - hopefully see Regan leave too. He's been awful.

  18. #30737
    Testimonial Due Hibee87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Leith
    Posts
    2,789
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: hibee-87
    I know next to nothing on legal things, but did King not get some sort of court approval to become a director of a company again? Would the SFA defense agaisnt Ashley not be based on the court approval for that? Wether this is right or wrong in ours and many other people eyes

  19. #30738
    First Team Regular Glesgahibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Feel good city
    Posts
    690
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozyhibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Whatever the outcome, the decision will now have to be explained in open court. Transparency is the best disinfectant.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I think the decision on ineligible/eligible players will also have to be explained in open court one day.
    If the SFA don't deal with this properly,they could leave themselves exposed to all sorts.

  20. #30739
    @hibs.net private member jacomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    exile
    Posts
    22,301
    Quote Originally Posted by MrSmith View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Don't you think mr King is deliberately doing this to get out of rangers in order to save money and face? This way he looks like the victim of the nasty tyrant. Bet King can't wait to get out of dodge!
    Possibly. Does King know what he's doing? In all honesty, I just think he's a bit thick. Makes it all the more galling that he has scooped up so much wealth - but I suppose if you've got no scruples, that is a lot easier.

  21. #30740
    @hibs.net private member MrSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dunfermline
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by jacomoseven View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Possibly. Does King know what he's doing? In all honesty, I just think he's a bit thick. Makes it all the more galling that he has scooped up so much wealth - but I suppose if you've got no scruples, that is a lot easier.
    He certainly appears to display sociopathic tendencies.

    He does though, know how to appeal to the ignorant within the newco support, almost as though inciting nationalism!

  22. #30741
    Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Gate 38
    Posts
    7,816
    Quote Originally Posted by truehibernian View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's a great move by Ashley and will force the SFA to reveal their process for assessment, who made the decisions and what due diligence was done and in what timescales. I'm sure a journalist on the radio yesterday said there had been an unusual process used by them that whilst not wrong in procedure had rarely been used previously hence he thought there was cause for the SFA to have a genuine concern.

    Could as you say be good for Scottish football and also force moves and change - hopefully see Regan leave too. He's been awful.
    He's a rich man so can afford legal assistance no problems. Equally, he's a busy man so why would Ashley make a move like this if he was not convinced that he had an excellent chance of getting what he wants? And why now? Personally, I think it's because he's got the opportunity to take down King and he's got something on the SFA that is going to come back to haunt them.

  23. #30742
    Testimonial Due AndyM_1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    The People's Republic of Fife
    Posts
    2,605
    Quote Originally Posted by jacomoseven View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Possibly. Does King know what he's doing? In all honesty, I just think he's a bit thick. Makes it all the more galling that he has scooped up so much wealth - but I suppose if you've got no scruples, that is a lot easier.
    King is incredibly arrogant and self assured and expects to get his own way at all times.
    Unluckily for him he's done the worst think possible in angering Mike Ashley, a man who could buy and sell him many times over. It's the equivalent of punching an angry grizzly bear.

    Ashley will put Dave King in his place. Why? Because he can. And because he feels like it..

  24. #30743
    @hibs.net private member jacomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    exile
    Posts
    22,301
    Quote Originally Posted by southsider View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I heard that idiot Stuart McCall on Monday night's Sportsound say if EBT's were legal why not use them. Well Stuart it is ok for the Postie or the girl in the bank or the bloke in the call centre to pay tax and n/I on their wages of £250 a week in order to keep the schools open, to pay for our NHS, to pay benefits so people don't stave or freeze to death but for the superstars of rangers f.c (IL) it is ok to pay zitch ? The armed forces one is the biggest brass neck ever as they profess an undying love for the troops whilst robbing them of much needed income. These people may have caused death injury to these brave men and women by the theft of funding. Make every player pay back to HMRC what they defrauded them (and us off.
    For me the issue is very straightforward.

    For a decade, Rangers failed to register their players properly. This is because they didn't disclose full details of player contracts to the SFA and SPL - a clear breach of regulations.

    The sanction for failing to register a player properly - let alone lots of players over a 10 year period - is clear. All those titles should be expunged.

    However... It seems entirely possible that the infamous 5 way agreement includes some sort of immunity against this sort of retrospective punishment.

    So what does the SFA do now?

  25. #30744
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    9,488
    Quote Originally Posted by jacomoseven View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    For me the issue is very straightforward.

    For a decade, Rangers failed to register their players properly. This is because they didn't disclose full details of player contracts to the SFA and SPL - a clear breach of regulations.

    The sanction for failing to register a player properly - let alone lots of players over a 10 year period - is clear. All those titles should be expunged.

    However... It seems entirely possible that the infamous 5 way agreement includes some sort of immunity against this sort of retrospective punishment.

    So what does the SFA do now?
    The registration question has already been dealt with...

    "Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not in breach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of the disclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed.

    "Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nor did the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligible to play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should be imposed upon Rangers FC."

  26. #30745
    Testimonial Due Geo_1875's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In my Joy Division Oven Gloves
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs0666 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The registration question has already been dealt with...

    "Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not in breach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of the disclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed.

    "Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nor did the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligible to play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should be imposed upon Rangers FC."
    Those other reasons being what?

  27. #30746
    @hibs.net private member Bostonhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    lincolnshire
    Age
    65
    Posts
    26,229
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs0666 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The registration question has already been dealt with...

    "Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not in breach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of the disclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed.

    "Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nor did the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligible to play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should be imposed upon Rangers FC."
    When you look at some of the players they were able to sign in this period, the success that immediately followed and the true cost / financial impact all these years later this statement really does ram home how disdainful the football authorities are of the commonsense of the fans of all the other clubs on Scotland whilst at the same time looking to issue as statement that helps the team who gained from cheating here.

    "I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"

    Sir Matt Busby

  28. #30747
    @hibs.net private member ano hibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    the 'burgh
    Age
    54
    Posts
    2,188
    I wonder where 'all' Kings money is?
    If it's in SA he will have taken a fair hit.
    5 years ago 10 Rand to £1
    Now over 20 Rand to £1
    50% hit to £ wealth on paper at least.
    Guess wealthy businessmen should deploy money managers who would diversify outside SA. No idea whether he's done this.
    "We've also been unsure about what has happened to the receipts of the players who have been sold."
    George Foulkes BBC website 20/3/08

  29. #30748
    First Team Breakthrough
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs0666 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The registration question has already been dealt with...

    "Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not in breach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of the disclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed.

    "Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nor did the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligible to play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should be imposed upon Rangers FC."
    Where are you quoting from?

  30. #30749
    @hibs.net private member MrSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dunfermline
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by hibs0666 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The registration question has already been dealt with...

    "Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not in breach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of the disclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed.

    "Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nor did the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligible to play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should be imposed upon Rangers FC."

    If above correct - no reason to doubt - the recent court ruling (subject to SC appeal) has blown it out the water and is now open to scrutiny and legal process.

    Its out now and every one involved will be running for cover. The severest penalty must be imposed and until then, there is no way I'm moving on and forgetting the antics of Rangers Football Club!

  31. #30750
    @hibs.net private member Ozyhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    38,451
    Quote Originally Posted by ano hibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I wonder where 'all' Kings money is?
    If it's in SA he will have taken a fair hit.
    5 years ago 10 Rand to £1
    Now over 20 Rand to £1
    50% hit to £ wealth on paper at least.
    Guess wealthy businessmen should deploy money managers who would diversify outside SA. No idea whether he's done this.
    He is not allowed to take money out of SA. It was part of his settlement with the revenue that all his money was brought back to SA and it stays there.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)