His lawyers aren't running the country though.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Ashcroft is fabulously wealthy. If Cameron was confident of winning a libel case against him and the paper which serialised his book, the writs would have been issued as soon as the issue hit the shelves.
Actually, most likely it would have happened before publication as he'll have known in advance that it was coming.
I don't believe for a second that the Dailly Mail would risk libelling the Tory PM without checking first.
I think Cameron "refused to dignify the story by giving a response" to give his team time to assess whether or not Ashcroft was in possession of the photo, ready to use it in the face of libel action.
Once they satisfied themselves that this was unlikely, a muted denial was issued, presumably dignifying the story.
Results 91 to 96 of 96
Thread: #Piggate
-
23-10-2015 06:25 AM #91
-
23-10-2015 06:36 AM #92This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
National leaders (in democratic countries) are probably libelled daily and rarely sue for libel, if ever. Just because it's a salacious story doesn't mean that they are more likely to sue than normal. Aside from anything, it would just prolong the agony for Cameron. Why drag a story out for months/years when it's forgotten by most people in a week otherwise?
As I said in my previous post, Isobel Oakeshott has already conceded that the story likely to be rubbish.
-
23-10-2015 12:28 PM #93johnbc70Left by mutual consent!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-10-2015 01:16 PM #94This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-10-2015 03:13 PM #95johnbc70Left by mutual consent!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-10-2015 06:23 PM #96This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks