Whether you think the 'club' is two years old or not ,any finance that The Rangers claim they are due prior to liquidation would surely be paid into the creditors pot of the liquidated entity?
View Poll Results: What is your attitude to a new "Rangers" entering at Div1?
- Voters
- 1016. You may not vote on this poll
-
Opposed - and will walk away from Scottish professional football
537 52.85% -
Opposed - but will continue to support the game.
454 44.69% -
In favour.
25 2.46%
Results 24,601 to 24,630 of 45185
-
11-11-2014 05:57 PM #24601
-
11-11-2014 06:05 PM #24602
As far as I can see people's opinion of the current incarnation of Rangers for or against is irrelevant.
The club called Rangers in a business sense ceased to exist in October 2012. Around that time a new club The Rangers was formed. In view of that fact it flies in the face of logic for The Rangers to demand compensation for development work done on a player by A) a different football club ...... and B) a football club which in a legal business sense no longer exists.
Never mind the fact that Steven Thompson is giving us all a bloody good laugh, in a business sense he is utterly correct.
-
11-11-2014 06:14 PM #24603This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Gretna are now called Gretna 2008. Why aren't Rangers called The Rangers 2012?HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875
-
11-11-2014 06:18 PM #24604This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
11-11-2014 06:27 PM #24605This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
HIBERNIAN FC - ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY SINCE 1875
-
11-11-2014 06:29 PM #24606This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
11-11-2014 06:36 PM #24607This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
11-11-2014 06:41 PM #24608
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,974
http://i62.tinypic.com/2s99mom.png
Coral know the score swell.
Coral bookies to be boycotted too for telling the truth.
-
11-11-2014 06:43 PM #24609This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
............... love it
-
11-11-2014 07:27 PM #24610
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Being an Underhanded Bigot
- Posts
- 3,042
Dundee Utd seem to be Scottish Football's chief wind up merchant of the Zombies - more power to them I say! Really wanted them to draw The Rangers in the league cup semi, just for their Zombie Outbreak Squad banter to get another airing.
-
-
11-11-2014 07:39 PM #24612
They're 2 already? jeez where does the time go, they seem to have been around forever, I hope someone bought them a birthday cake. With a file in it.
"I did not need any persuasion to play for such a great club, the Hibs result is still one of the first I look for"
Sir Matt Busby
-
11-11-2014 08:14 PM #24613This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
11-11-2014 10:07 PM #24614This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Steven Thompson really really hates Rangers. And that dislike goes back a long way.
-
11-11-2014 10:14 PM #24615
I really hope the decision goes Utd's way. Newhun can't have it all ways. They managed to wipe out an enormous debt with their Sevco manoeuvre so I fail to see why they should gain any benefit due to the time a player spent with the now defunct company.
-
11-11-2014 10:26 PM #24616
when they come to easter road will we have the balls to call them THE RANGERS on the scoreboard ??
doubt it...
-
11-11-2014 10:31 PM #24617This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
11-11-2014 10:32 PM #24618This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
11-11-2014 10:49 PM #24619
I don't know why it's seen as so controversial to claim that Sevco and Rangers are two different clubs.
They're the only organisation from any field that I've ever heard of which has gone through liquidation and yet still claims to be the same organisation to the one which existed before liquidation occurred.
The club that exists now has only been in existence since 2012.
Never let them forget.
-
12-11-2014 06:08 AM #24620
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Pride Park, Bulgaria
- Posts
- 8,167
They know themselves they're a new club, hence their "140 years unbroken history" merchandise. It's all a bit cringe if you ask me. New club, deal with it.
"Play for the name on the front of the jersey and the supporters will remember the name on the back"
-
12-11-2014 06:41 AM #24621
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Dont know its too dark in here
- Age
- 67
- Posts
- 12,526
I think sevco will get away with it.
The authorities allow them to be the same club so that they can insist football debt is taken care of.
They'll argue that if football debt is transferable then so should football credit.
Just saying likes, I'm not saying I agree.Space to let
-
12-11-2014 06:56 AM #24622This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-11-2014 08:19 AM #24623This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-11-2014 08:34 AM #24624This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-11-2014 08:53 AM #24625This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
United losing the LC final to Rangers on penalties where Thompson felt his team had been cheated was particularly sore.
A couple of years before Rangers had smashed United 7-1 at Hampden in a semi final, Thompson was angry and unpleasantly offensive in the Hospitality areas at Hampden that night ( I was there with a work party).
The Mike McCurry refereed game at Ibrox that Rangers won 3-2 where Dundee United nearly walked off. It is without doubt the most biased piece of refereeing I have ever seen in an SPL game. It was so bad I felt sorry for Craig Levein the United manager who was having a breakdown at the side of the pitch.
Then there was the general unpleasantness between the clubs over abandoned matches due to weather conditions. After a game was abandoned at half time Thompson refused to issue vouchers to the travelling Rangers fans and basically said "screw the lot of you, you can pay full price in the rearranged game". Rangers howled in protest at this but the SFA said there was nothing they can do.
United were one of the first clubs to vote to boot Rangers out the league in 2012. Their vote was issued with glee rather than the resigned sigh most of the other clubs announced theirs with and the between sobs manner that Celtic issued theirs.
These two clubs (irrespective of what you view Rangers status as) really despise each other. The urban rumour I've heard is that delegates from United and Rangers will not talk to each other at SFA/SPFL meetings. But it has to be said Stephen Thompson is something of a **** stirrer because if he really did actually view Rangers as a new club rather than the old enemy, he wouldn't use the language he does about them because it's all fuelled by the perceived injustices that predate the Rangers meltdown.
-
12-11-2014 09:02 AM #24626
Aside from the legal/paperwork fiddly bits, anyone who insists on calling Rangers "The Rangers 2012" or similar is having a mare of a facepalm moment IMO.
It may be technically correct, but they still play at Ibrox, in blue, still have the same horrid bigoted fans and I imagine still have an Ibrox Trophy Room stuffed to the rafters.
They're Rangers - do we now sing "We hate The Glasgow Rangers................. " etc? Does anyone really say, in the pub, who are "The" Rangers playing this weekend?
Move on and continue to despise them as much as we always have.
-
12-11-2014 09:22 AM #24627This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-11-2014 09:25 AM #24628This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Rangers are no different in that respect.
-
12-11-2014 09:31 AM #24629This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
12-11-2014 09:59 AM #24630This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The visitors
Just the once though
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks