I'm a Hibs supporter in his 40's with a wife, kid, dog, mortgage, job and lawn that grows faster that triffids. 'A tad tetchy' is my default state.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
View Poll Results: Should Scotland be an independent country?
- Voters
- 662. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
458 69.18% -
No
175 26.44% -
Undecided
29 4.38%
Results 3,841 to 3,870 of 26549
Thread: Scottish Independence
-
29-08-2014 07:20 AM #3841
-
29-08-2014 07:40 AM #3842This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-08-2014 07:46 AM #3843This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
He has always been a slimy Labour careerist. He was a couple of years ahead of me at Uni, edging his way up the greasy pole via the NUS, where he eventually became president. Imagine my surprise when he totally sold out his membership by supporting Nu-Lab's introduction of student fees.
-
29-08-2014 07:51 AM #3844This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThere is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
29-08-2014 08:02 AM #3845This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I think it's right that people currently living in Scotland have the right to vote (if they fulfill certain criteria).
I also think it's right that expats like myself do not have the right to vote.
However, I think it's wrong that I don't have the right to vote in France (eg. Presidential elections) even though I've lived, worked and paid taxes here for 10 years.
-
-
29-08-2014 08:13 AM #3847This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I guess it must be a quirk of French democracy when it comes to presidential elections. Sadly I don't see it being a major issue to the majority of French.
Is it something that could be taken up through the EU as to me it seems like discrimination based on Nationality.
J
-
29-08-2014 08:26 AM #3848This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThere is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
29-08-2014 08:29 AM #3849This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-08-2014 08:40 AM #3850This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-08-2014 12:19 PM #3851
I must admit I was quite a bit of the way through the original before I realised it wasn't a spoof.
-
29-08-2014 12:43 PM #3852
I am watching and following this
https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/indyrefThere is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
29-08-2014 02:29 PM #3853
Not that the Scotland International team is high on my list of priorities for an Independent Scotland, but the article at the attached link is interesting nonetheless. http://en.ria.ru/analysis/20140828/1...rnational.html
-
-
29-08-2014 11:06 PM #3855This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I has the "pleasure" of speaking to someone today who wanted the Electoral Commission to resign its role in the referendum because its bus shelter adverts which publicise the voting guide were "too Scottish" which meant they favoured a "Yes" vote. The person asked why the adverts depicted a tourist version of Scotland instead of a quaint, English village which would "make people vote no".
This person was not the first I've encountered who fits the stereotype of an anti-Scottish "No" voter. It seems impossible for them to understand that "No" voters are capable of loving Scotland (in all its beauty) just as much as "Yes" voters, despite the fact they claim to be on the "No" side. Don't get me wrong, I've also experienced this extreme paranoia from those on the "Yes" side, but all it does is exacerbate the elements of "debate" which ordinarily turn so many people away from politics.
I think part of the reason that "Yes" seems to be behind in the polls is that our culture all too often reinforces the negative connotations of where we currently are as a nation and it is very difficult to go against the tide to sell people on where we could be as an independent nation.
-
29-08-2014 11:58 PM #3856
Not very happy tonight, got a text from a mate saying well done on voting yes, I texts back asking WTF, he said my FaceBook profile said I was going to vote yes. This was news to me, turns out some innocuous link I clicked (funny vid) ended up adding a post to my profile stating I was going to an event on the 18th and voting YES. I'd seen this on other people's timeline and just assumed they were. Turns out it's just spam or some very clever cyber Nats. Not very happy as it gives the illusion that everyone on FB is voting yes,,,,
-
30-08-2014 08:25 AM #3857This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-08-2014 11:22 AM #3858This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
You are joking here, right?
-
30-08-2014 12:13 PM #3859This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Not exactly sure how it's happening, my profile has settings on it that prevent others tagging me at check-ins or in pics, would love to think it's something innocent but I still feel it's an underhanded way to behave through this referendum.Last edited by speedy_gonzales; 30-08-2014 at 12:16 PM.
-
30-08-2014 12:32 PM #3860This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-08-2014 01:24 PM #3861
The Better Together stand is doing a roaring trade in Pitlochry, 5 staff and NO interest by the public.
I'm thinking of giving them a visit later, just to get some answers, you understand.
I intend trying this approach
Imagine Scotland was already independent and we were about to have a referendum on whether to join a union with the rest of the UK.
Could the Pro-union side convince us that getting together would be better when we were told what would happen to Scotland after such a union? Some bullet points from the campaign…
-Your main Parliament will move 600 miles away, and your MPs will be in a tiny minority & will therefore have limited ability to effect policy on your behalf
-Scotland will get a government it didn’t vote for.
-All of your oil and gas revenues will be handed over to the treasury in London.
-Even though not 1 inch of track will touch Scottish soil your taxpayers will contribute £4.2bn to the HS2 project.
-Your taxpayers will also subsidise the crossrail project to the tune of £4.2bn
-The biggest nuclear weapons facility in Western Europe will be built on the river Clyde, just 30 miles from your largest city.
-Even though you only have 8.2% of the UK’s population you will contribute 9.9% of the UK’s total tax take yet will only receive 9.3% of that tax take back to spend in Scotland (you will lose £4.4bn per year to the UK treasury)
-You will devolve all of the economic levers you have used to shape your economy directly to London and will now only have control of 7% of your economy
-Even though 79% of Scottish MP's voted against it we will privitise your publicly owned mail service
-Even though 91% of Scottish MPs voted against the bedroom tax in your parliament, we will impose it.
-Even though 82% of Scottish MP's believed that a VAT increase would be detrimental to your economy, we will impose a VAT increase.
-You will join a country whose health and education services are rapidly being privatised.
-Now and again you’ll get dragged into an illegal foreign war.
-An austerity budget will be imposed from London cutting jobs and threatening vital public services even though 81% of your MP's voted against the cuts.
-The financial regulation system will be so weak and so lax that your whole economy will be brought to the brink of collapse.
-The most weak and vulnerable in society, instead of getting the protection and support they deserve will be interrogated and humiliated in an effort to get them off the meagre levels of support to which they are entitled.
Ask yourself, would you vote for such a package?
Would you vote for that Better Together campaign?There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
30-08-2014 01:34 PM #3862
This poll should really read 231 for yes and 87 for no as I changed my mind a while back
-
31-08-2014 12:18 AM #3863This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
What they have in common is that they are so clearly biased that they lose credibility.
-
31-08-2014 12:58 AM #3864
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Posts
- 2,246
Just out of interest, have any former do not knows or anybody changed sides, based on the discussion on this thread?
-
31-08-2014 08:04 AM #3865This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2014 08:46 AM #3866This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2014 09:20 AM #3867This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-08-2014 10:29 AM #3868
Just watched Salmond give Jim Murphy a verbal kicking on Sky News. Love him or hate him he's a smooth operator.
-
31-08-2014 10:45 AM #3869This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
COPY AND PASTE ALERT
I am posting this from a self-declared 'undecided' billionaire businessman. I have posted some of his observations in the past as I think they help people get some unbiased perspective compared to News websites. If that is such a bad thing then I really worry about the future.
Last night I spent the evening in my old home town of New Cumnock at a ‘tattiefest’ – a music and tattie combo; they are still pretty inventive there!
The town, and ultimately my dad Campbell’s grocery store there, was decimated by the pit closures when the notion of a job for life finally ended as the nationalised pits, steel and shipbuilding industries collapsed.
So as the music skirled and the tatties were consumed inevitably the conversation turned to the Referendum and I think this is an important and positive aspect of this Referendum people are engaged, I also think that the debates that happen between friends and family are proving more productive than the claim and counter claim we get from our politicians more later. Unsurprisingly the discussion wasn’t led by Trident, Euro, EU membership or the currency, it was about how a yes or no vote could affect the daily lives there and rightly so.
If we go would the pension be safe, how many more jobs would be created, could there be new investment in New Cumnock and the surrounding areas and would we need a passport to get to the Yorkshire Dales? Will we still be able to afford free prescriptions, education and elderly care? And what if we stay with the UK what changes then; we’ve had three different offers of more powers but which one, or combination do we get and when?
All these points are absolutely bang on and require an answer, an answer I’m saddened to say I expect from neither camp. Business people like me are absolutely concerned with the currency issue as it will have a distinct and material impact on both rUK and Scotland, most people just want to know will I be better off, have more opportunity for my family in or out of the Union? It’s a good question.
Fundamentally sadly that brings us back to the currency question.
What saddens me most about this referendum is the willingness of both sides for brinkmanship, to play with normal people’s lives, the one’s who can’t up sticks if they don’t like the yes or no answer we offer on the 18th of September.
On the one hand we have Alex Salmond and John Swinney declaring that if we don’t negotiate a currency union we are not paying our share of the UK’s debts. There are two crucial points to note in that assertion.
The first is this, if we do agree to a currency union our public finances will in absolute terms be governed by the UK, or more precisely the Bank of England. Is that what Yes voters are signing up for because I am struggling hard to see how with such constraints Alex’s White Paper vision can be delivered on that basis – perhaps he could explain?
Secondly say we take the brinkmanship to the end point, fail to get a currency union and default on our debts. I think we all know when walking into a bank for a loan having just failed to pay off a massive debt elsewhere what the bank manager might say – countries are no different. To be extreme will the headline be ‘Scotland signs deal with Wonga for long-term capital requirements?’
Be assured if we go down that route the cost of capital will inflate markedly and thus we the taxpayer need either to generate more taxes, through building more successful businesses, or cut back on the very services Alex wants to protect.
So there are two positions set out by Alex both of which have very material consequences to the questions posed by the people of New Cumnock I talked to…
The people we democratically elected in the Labour, Conservative and Lib Dem parties have united in saying no to a currency union in the hope of exposing the perils of Plan B.
But here’s the big question that exposes their duplicity in all of this – if they can unite to say no to currency union why is it they can’t unite to say yes to an agreed package of devolved powers: what is it we get if we tick no on the 18th of September. Answers please before the 18th Mr. Cameron, Clegg and Milliband.
On the one hand Alex wants us signing up for a walk in the fog with cliffs nearby, while Alistair and the unionists want us blindfolded knowing only what lies behind us and not in front of us.
Most undecided people I speak to say this – if it’s more of the same that’s not that appealing, the trouble is I don’t know what we will get if I vote no and I’m unclear if independence will make me better or worse off.
Curiously, to the point of playing with people’s lives, when Alex Salmond sat down with David Cameron to define the question we would be asked on the 18th of September, Alex asked for a second question – in essence do you want more devolution for Scotland? Cameron refused and to my mind cast the dice that now has brinkmanship on every side.
There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
-
31-08-2014 11:03 AM #3870
This is just for a laugh, folks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KphfN-Bk7M
There is no such thing as too much yarn, just not enough time.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks